Is the world ready for gene therapy?

KEY POINTS OF CONSIDERATION: To prepare for the introduction of gene therapies in haemophilia care, healthcare frameworks for evaluation and valuation will need to evolve to address the unique requirements of current and future innovations for treating this rare disease. The papers in this supplement provide an insightful and comprehensive state-of-the-art assessment of these requirements and challenges. In terms of evaluation, the definition of a patient-defined value framework that captures multi-dimensional, patient-centered outcomes is an important first step for determining the full benefit of gene therapy for persons with haemophilia. In terms of valuation and rewards for innovation, health systems will need to develop alternative payment models for risk-sharing that will allow payers and society to address uncertainties about the ultimate clinical and economic value of these innovations. And health technology assessment authorities will need to exercise greater flexibility in evidence requirements given the unique features of data collection for a potentially curative therapy for a rare disease with long-term uncertainties about durability of impact. Collaboration among stakeholders will be essential for developing the critical evidence requirements and providing the incentives needed to achieve sustainable budgets and broad access for persons with haemophilia worldwide.

Can we use existing guidance to support the development of robust real-world evidence for health technology assessment/payer decision-making?

Advances in the digitization of health systems and expedited regulatory approvals of innovative treatments have led to increased potential for the use of real-world data (RWD) to generate real-world evidence (RWE) to complement evidence from clinical trials. However, health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and payers have concerns about the ability to generate RWE of sufficient quality to be pivotal evidence of relative treatment effectiveness. Consequently, there is a growing need for HTA bodies and payers to develop guidance for the industry and other stakeholders about the use of RWD/RWE to support access, reimbursement, and pricing. We therefore sought to (i) understand barriers to the use of RWD/RWE by HTA bodies and payers; (ii) review potential solutions in the form of published guidance; and (iii) review findings with selected HTA/payer bodies. Four themes considered key to shaping the generation of robust RWE for HTA bodies and payers were identified as: (i) data (availability, governance, and quality); (ii) methodology (design and analytics); (iii) trust (transparency and reproducibility); and (iv) policy and partnerships. A range of guidance documents were found from trusted sources that could address these themes. These were discussed with HTA experts. This commentary summarizes the potential guidance solutions available to help resolve issues faced by HTA decision-makers in the adoption of RWD/RWE. It shows that there is alignment among stakeholders about the areas that need improvement in the development of RWE and that the key priority to move forward is better collaboration to make data usable for multiple purposes.

An open-label randomized study of the relative absorption of gastro-resistant risedronate taken fasted or with food versus immediate-release risedronate.

Patients with osteoporosis often take oral bisphosphonates with food, rendering these medications ineffective. This study compared the relative absorption of four formulations of gastro-resistant (GR; formulations 1-4) risedronate 35 mg versus immediate-release (IR) risedronate 35 mg taken fasted. Secondarily, it compared the relative absorption of GR formulations administered fed and fasted, and determined the site of disintegration. Healthy participants (N = 160) were randomized to one of nine treatment groups: IR risedronate taken fasted (group A) or formulations 1-4 taken fasted or fed (groups B-I). Fasted groups fasted for 8 h pre-dose and 4 h post-dose. Fed groups fasted for 7.5 h, then took risedronate with breakfast. Urine was collected until 72 h post-dose and analyzed using liquid chromatography. From each group, up to seven participants underwent scintigraphic monitoring to assess tablet disintegration. The percentage of total dose recovered in urine (A'e ) was ~0.5% for group A. The A'e of formulations 1-4 taken fasted was 0.220% (90% confidence interval 0.124-0.389), 0.298% (0.122-0.730), 0.154% (0.090-0.264), and 0.108% (0.051-0.231), respectively. With food, the A'e of formulation 1 decreased least versus fasted (-27%) compared with the A'e of formulations 2, 3, and 4 (-73%, -80%, and -65%, respectively). Formulations 1-3 disintegrated in the small intestine, formulation 4 closer to the large intestine. All GR formulations were well tolerated and in line with the known safety profile for IR risedronate. Formulation 2 had the highest absorption when taken fasted, whereas the absorption of formulation 1 was least affected by food.

Psychomotor and cognitive effects of piribedil, a dopamine agonist, in young healthy volunteers.

Piribedil is a dopamine agonist acting on D2 and D3 central nervous system dopamine receptors. This drug has been administered to 12 young healthy male volunteers (age 22 +/- 2 years) according to a single center randomized, double-blind, two ways cross-over, placebo controlled trial, including a washout period of one week. Placebo and piribedil were administered by a single intravenous infusion over 2 h (3 mg). Psychomotor performance and cognitive functions were assessed through a standardized and computerized psychometric tests battery and a continuous electroencephalogram (EEG) mapping. Piribedil improved simple reaction time (P=0.02), immediate (P=0.045 and 0.004), and delayed free recall (P=0.05), dual coding test (P=0.02) and increased theta and fast beta waves on the EEG (P < 0.05 and 0.001, respectively). No deleterious effect was observed on the tests exploring attention and concentration via the other procedures. It is concluded that a single intravenous perfusion of piribedil 3 mg improves alertness and the information processing speed within the central nervous system, in healthy volunteers.

Voriconazole potentiates warfarin-induced prothrombin time prolongation.

AIMS: Voriconazole is a novel triazole with broad-spectrum antifungal activity. It is likely that some patients receiving voriconazole may also require treatment with the anticoagulant warfarin. Cytochrome P450 isoenzymes are important in the metabolism of both these drugs. This study investigated the effect of voriconazole on the pharmacodynamics of warfarin by measuring prothrombin time, and also evaluated the safety and tolerability of the coadministered drugs. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study in which healthy male subjects received either 300 mg voriconazole or placebo twice daily on days 1-12, plus a single oral dose of 30 mg warfarin on day 7 of each study period. Volunteers were randomized to one of the following treatment sequences: voriconazole + warfarin followed by placebo + warfarin or placebo + warfarin followed by voriconazole + warfarin. There was a washout of at least of 7 days between treatment periods. RESULTS: The mean Cmax, AUCtau and tmax for voriconazole were 3736 ng ml-1, 25 733 ng.h ml-1, and 1.66 h, respectively. Both the mean maximum change from baseline prothrombin time and the mean area under the effect curve (AUEC) for prothrombin time during coadministration with voriconazole (17 s and 3211 s.h, respectively) were statistically significantly greater than the mean values observed during the placebo period (8 s and 2282 s.h ). Prothrombin times were still increased by a mean value of 5.4 s 144 h post warfarin dose following coadministration with voriconazole compared with a mean value of 0.6 s in the placebo treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of voriconazole and warfarin potentiates warfarin-induced prothrombin time prolongation. Regular monitoring of prothrombin time is recommended if these drugs are coadministered, with appropriate adjustment of the dose of warfarin.

Voriconazole does not affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

AIMS: Voriconazole is a triazole antifungal agent with potent fungicidal activity against Aspergillus species. Digoxin is a commonly prescribed cardiac glycoside with a narrow therapeutic index. This aim of this study was to investigate the effect of multiple-dose voriconazole on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy male volunteers. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. All subjects received daily administration of oral digoxin for a total of 22 days (0.5 mg twice daily on day 1, 0.25 mg twice daily on day 2 and 0.25 mg once daily on days 3-22). In addition, on days 11-22 the subjects were randomized to receive either voriconazole (200 mg twice daily) or matching placebo. RESULTS: Concomitant administration with voriconazole did not significantly alter the Cmax, AUCtau, tmax or CLR of digoxin at steady state. The ratios between groups for Cmax and AUCtau at day 22, corrected for baseline (day 10) were 109.8%[90% confidence interval (CI) 97.1, 124.1] and 100.5% (90% CI 91.4, 110.5), respectively. In addition, group mean Cmin values were similar in both treatment groups throughout the study. There were no significant differences between treatments with respect to the incidence of adverse events, all of which were classified as mild and transient in nature. CONCLUSIONS: The steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin are not affected in a clinically relevant manner by the concomitant administration of voriconazole.

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists have no clinically significant effect on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole.

AIMS: Voriconazole, a new triazole antifungal agent, is metabolized mainly by cytochrome P450s CYP2C19 and CYP2C9, and also by CYP3A4. The aim of this open-label, placebo-controlled, randomized, three-way crossover study was to determine the effects of cimetidine and ranitidine on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole. METHODS: Twelve healthy male subjects received oral voriconazole 200 mg twice daily plus cimetidine 400 mg twice daily, voriconazole 200 mg twice daily plus ranitidine 150 mg twice daily, and voriconazole 200 mg twice daily plus placebo twice daily. Treatment periods were separated by at least 7 days. RESULTS: When cimetidine was administered with voriconazole, the maximum plasma voriconazole concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of voriconazole (AUCtau) was increased by 18.3%[90% confidence interval (CI) 6.0, 32.0] and 22.5% (90% CI 13.3, 32.5), respectively. Concomitant ranitidine had no significant effect on voriconazole Cmax or AUCtau. Time of Cmax (tmax) elimination half-life (t 1/2) or terminal phase rate constant (kel) for voriconazole were similar in all three treatment groups. Most adverse events were mild and transitory; two subjects were withdrawn due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of the histamine H2-receptor antagonists cimetidine or ranitidine does not affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in a clinically relevant manner.

No clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions between voriconazole and indinavir in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: Voriconazole is a new triazole antifungal agent, and is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and to a lesser extent by CYP3A4. Protease inhibitors, such as indinavir, are also metabolized by cytochrome P450 (mainly CYP3A4). As these drugs are likely to be coadministered, these studies were performed to assess the pharmacokinetic interactions, safety and toleration of these drugs when taken together. METHODS: Two randomized placebo-controlled studies were conducted in healthy male volunteers. Study A was an open parallel-group study of the effect of indinavir on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in 18 volunteers (nine subjects in each group). Subjects received voriconazole 200 mg twice daily (days 1-7), then voriconazole 200 mg twice daily + indinavir 800 mg or placebo three times daily (days 8-17). Study B was a double-blind, randomized, two-way crossover study of the effect of voriconazole on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of indinavir in 14 volunteers. They received indinavir 800 mg three times daily + voriconazole 200 mg or placebo twice daily for two 7-day treatment periods separated by a washout period of at least 7 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared within treatment groups at days 7 and 17 in Study A and between treatment groups on day 7 of each period in Study B. All adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Study A: Seventeen subjects were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analysis (eight voriconazole + indinavir, nine voriconazole + placebo). The day 17/day 7 ratios for Cmax and AUCtau were estimated as 102%[90% confidence interval (CI) 91, 114] and 107% (90% CI 98, 118), respectively. Study B: Fourteen subjects were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analysis in each treatment period. The ratios between the geometric means for indinavir + voriconazole vs. indinavir + placebo were: Cmax, 91% (90% CI 83, 101), AUCtau, 87% (90% CI 77, 100), and Cmin, 101% (90% CI 82, 125). Trough plasma concentrations of indinavir were above the concentration required to inhibit HIV replication (IC95) in both treatment periods. Voriconazole coadministered with indinavir was well tolerated in both studies. CONCLUSIONS: The coadministration of voriconazole and indinavir in healthy volunteers had no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of either voriconazole or indinavir.

Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of multiple-dose oral voriconazole.

AIMS: Voriconazole is a new triazole antifungal agent with activity against a range of clinically important and emerging pathogens. This study determined the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was an open, randomized, two-way crossover, multiple-dose study in male volunteers. Twelve subjects received voriconazole 200 mg twice daily for 6.5 days. Each dose was administered either with food or in the fasted state, i.e. not within 2 h of food. Treatment periods were separated by a minimum 7-day washout period. Plasma samples were taken for the estimation of voriconazole plasma concentrations on days 1 and 7. Safety and toleration were assessed by monitoring of both laboratory safety tests and adverse events. RESULTS: Administering voriconazole with food significantly decreased both day 7 AUCtau and Cmax by approximately 35% (9598-7520 ng.h ml-1; P = 0.003) and 22% (2038-1332 ng ml-1; P = 0.008), respectively. Administering voriconazole with food statistically significantly delayed absorption, evident from tmax values; the mean difference for tmax on day 7 was 1.1 h. The terminal phase rate constant was unchanged by administering voriconazole with food. The fasted terminal phase half-life was 7.3 h compared with 6.6 h for the fed state. Visual inspection of Cmin values suggests that steady state was achieved after 5 days in both dietary states. Voriconazole accumulation, as assessed by ratios of Cmax and AUCtau on days 1 and 7, was statistically significantly greater when administered with food (Cmax, P = 0.010, AUCtau, P = 0.006). Mean Cmax accumulation in the fasted state was 2.1-fold compared with 3.5-fold in the fed state. AUCtau accumulation in the fasted state was 3.1-fold compared with 4.2-fold in the fed state. There were no discontinuations due to adverse events or laboratory abnormalities. Treatment-related mild-to-moderate visual disturbances were experienced by six out of 12 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The bioavailability of twice-daily 200 mg voriconazole is reduced by approximately 22% as measured by AUCtau after multiple dosing when taken with food, compared with fasting.

No clinically significant effect of erythromycin or azithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in healthy male volunteers.

AIMS: The antibiotic erythromycin is a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 metabolism. As CYP isozymes, including CYP3A4, are involved in the metabolism of the new triazole voriconazole, this study investigated the effects of multiple-dose erythromycin or azithromycin on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in healthy male subjects. METHODS: In an open, randomized, parallel-group, single-centre study, 30 healthy male subjects aged 20-41 years received oral voriconazole 200 mg twice daily for 14 days plus either erythromycin (1 g twice daily on days 8-14), azithromycin (500 mg once daily on days 12-14) or placebo (twice daily on days 8-14). Only morning doses were administered on day 14. Plasma concentrations of voriconazole were measured up to 12 h postdose on days 7 and 14, and plasma pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Adverse events and standard laboratory test results were recorded before and throughout the study. RESULTS: Comparison of the voriconazole Cmax day 14/day 7 ratio for the voriconazole + erythromycin group with that of the voriconazole + placebo group yielded a ratio of 107.7%[90% confidence interval (CI) 90.6, 128.0]; for the voriconazole + azithromycin group, the ratio was 117.5% (90% CI 98.8, 139.7). Comparison of the voriconazole AUCtau day 14/day 7 ratios of the voriconazole + erythromycin and voriconazole + azithromycin groups with that of the voriconazole + placebo group showed ratios of 101.2% (90% CI 89.1, 114.8) and 107.9% (90% CI 95.1, 122.4), respectively. For voriconazole tmax, the differences between the day 14-day 7 calculations for the voriconazole + erythromycin or the voriconazole + azithromycin groups and that of the voriconazole + placebo group were - 0.2 h (90% CI - 0.8, 0.3) and - 0.1 h (90% CI - 0.7, 0.5), respectively. None of these changes was considered clinically relevant. The study drugs were well tolerated by subjects in all groups; the most common study drug-related adverse events were visual disturbances, reported in all groups, and abdominal pain, present in the voriconazole + erythromycin group. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of erythromycin or azithromycin does not affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in a clinically relevant manner in healthy male subjects.

Effect of omeprazole on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole.

AIMS: Voriconazole, a novel triazole antifungal agent, is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes CYP2C19, CYP2C9, and to a lesser extent by CYP3A4. Omeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor used widely for the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers, is predominantly metabolized by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of omeprazole on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole. A secondary objective was to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of an oral loading dose regimen of 400 mg twice-daily voriconazole on day 1. METHODS: This was an open, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study of 18 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received oral voriconazole (400 mg twice daily on day 1 followed by 200 mg twice daily on days 2-9 and a single 200-mg dose on day 10) with either omeprazole (40 mg once daily) or matched placebo for 10 days. There was a minimum 7-day washout between treatment periods. RESULTS: Mean Cmax and AUCtau of voriconazole were increased by 15%[90% confidence interval (CI) 5, 25] and 41% (90% CI 29, 55), respectively, with no effect on tmax during coadministration of omeprazole. Visual inspection of predose plasma concentrations (Cmin) indicated that steady-state plasma concentrations were achieved following the second loading dose. One subject withdrew from the study during the voriconazole + omeprazole treatment period because of treatment-related abnormal liver function test values. All other treatment-related adverse events resolved without intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole had no clinically relevant effect on voriconazole exposure, suggesting that no voriconazole dosage adjustment is necessary for patients in whom omeprazole therapy is initiated. Administration of a 400-mg twice-daily oral loading dose regimen on day 1 resulted in steady-state plasma levels of voriconazole being achieved following the second loading dose.