Pediatric capsule endoscopy: review of the small bowel and patency capsules.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Because capsule endoscopy (CE) avoids ionizing radiation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia, CE may be valuable in pediatrics. We report a single pediatric center's experience with the use and safety of CE. METHODS: In a retrospective review of consecutive CE studies, 284 CE studies were performed in 277 patients with a mean age of 15 (±3.7) years during a 5-year period. The youngest to swallow the capsule was 4.6 years old. Twenty capsules were placed. Overall, 245 (86%) patients underwent CE for suspected (184, 65%) or confirmed (61, 21%) Crohn disease (CD); 27 (9.5%) anemia or gastrointestinal bleeding; 6 (2%) polyposis; and 4 (1.4%) celiac disease. RESULTS: Positive findings were observed in 205 (72%) of the studies, with 152 (54%) having small bowel findings. Of these, 72 (47%) were diagnostic. Gastric (95, 33%) and colonic (31, 11%) abnormalities were also identified. Five CE studies (1.8%) resulted in retention of the capsule in nonsurgical patients. A patency capsule before CE in 23 patients allowed 19 CE to proceed with only 1 retained capsule. In 65 (21%) patients, the video capsule did not enter the colon before the video's end. Of these, 36 (65%) had significant findings, including 27 (49%) documenting small bowel (SB) CD. CONCLUSIONS: CE is useful to diagnose SB disease in children. Even in a study population with a high prevalence of confirmed and suspected CD, the risk of retention remains small. The patency capsule may lessen that risk. CE may identify gastric or colonic disease even when SB lesions are not present.

Use of capsule endoscopy in diagnosis and management of pediatric patients, based on meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To further our understanding of capsule endoscopy (CE) in children, we systematically compiled data on indications and outcomes and evaluated the effectiveness of CE on patient management using meta-analyses. METHODS: We searched the Medline and PubMed databases (January 2001-May 2010) for English language citations of use of CE in patients ≤18 years old. Duplicate reports and those that included 5 patients or fewer were removed. We analyzed data from 15 source documents with 740 CE procedures in 723 patients. RESULTS: Suspicion or evaluation of inflammatory bowel diseases was the most common indication for CE (54%: 34% for patients suspected to have Crohn's disease [CD], 16% for patients known to have CD, 1% for patients with ulcerative colitis, and 3% for patients with indeterminate colitis). Completion and retention rates were 86.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.5-90.3) and 2.6% (95% CI, 1.5-4.0), respectively. Retention rates for children that underwent gastric (0.5%) or small bowel (1.9%) CE were similar to those of adults, by indication. For CE, 65.4% of procedures resulted in positive findings (95% CI, 54.8-75.2). Where reported, 69.4% of CE examinations (95% CI, 46.9-87.9) resulted in a new diagnosis and 68.3% (95% CI, 43.6-88.5) led to change in therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The relative frequency of CE indications varies among pediatric and adult patients. In pediatric patients, CE is used primarily to evaluate patients with CD - to aid in diagnosis, monitor disease severity, and assist patient management. Retention rates appear to be related to indication, rather than patient age; capsule retention is relatively infrequent for adults and children.