Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without stereotactic body radiation therapy for advanced Merkel cell carcinoma: a randomised, open label, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma is among the most aggressive and lethal of primary skin cancers, with a high rate of distant metastasis. Anti-programmed death receptor 1 (anti-PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monotherapy is currently standard of care for unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. We assessed treatment with combined nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma as a first-line therapy or following previous treatment with anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 monotherapy. METHODS: In this randomised, open label, phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned adults from two cancer sites in the USA (one in Florida and one in Ohio) to group A (combined nivolumab and ipilimumab) or group B (combined nivolumab and ipilimumab plus SBRT) in a 1:1 ratio. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years with histologically proven advanced stage (unresectable, recurrent, or stage IV) Merkel cell carcinoma, a minimum of two tumour lesions measureable by CT, MRI or clinical exam, and tumour tissue available for exploratory biomarker analysis. Patients were stratified by previous immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) status to receive nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks (group A) or the same schedule of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with the addition of SBRT to at least one tumour site (24 Gy in three fractions at week 2; group B). Patients had to have at least two measurable sites of disease so one non-irradiated site could be followed for response. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab. ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response or partial response per immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. Response was assessed every 12 weeks. Safety was assessed in all patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03071406. FINDINGS: 50 patients (25 in both group A and group B) were enrolled between March 14, 2017, and Dec 21, 2021, including 24 ICI-naive patients (13 [52%] of 25 group A patients and 11 [44%] of 25 group B patients]) and 26 patients with previous ICI (12 [48%] of 25 group A patients and 14 [56%] of 25 group B patients]). One patient in group B did not receive SBRT due to concerns about excess toxicity. Median follow-up was 14·6 months (IQR 9·1-26·5). Two patients in group B were excluded from the analysis of the primary endpoint because the target lesions were irradiated and so the patients were deemed non-evaluable. Of the ICI-naive patients, 22 (100%) of 22 (95% CI 82-100) had an objective response, including nine (41% [95% CI 21-63]) with complete response. Of the patients who had previously had ICI exposure, eight (31%) of 26 patients (95% CI 15-52) had an objective response and four (15% [5-36]) had a complete response. No significant differences in ORR were observed between groups A (18 [72%] of 25 patients) and B (12 [52%] of 23 patients; p=0·26). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 10 (40%) of 25 patients in group A and 8 (32%) of 25 patients in group B. INTERPRETATION: First-line combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma showed a high ORR with durable responses and an expected safety profile. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab also showed clinical benefit in patients with previous anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 treatment. Addition of SBRT did not improve efficacy of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab represents a new first-line and salvage therapeutic option for advanced Merkel cell carcinoma. FUNDING: Bristol Myers Squibb Rare Population Malignancy Program.

Interpretation of ambiguous TP53 test results: Mosaicism, clonal hematopoiesis, and variants of uncertain significance.

The increased use of next-generation sequencing has led to the detection of pathogenic TP53 variants in the germline setting in patients without a personal or family history consistent with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). These variants can represent low-penetrance LFS, mosaic LFS, or clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Additionally, TP53 variants of uncertain significance can be detected in patients with a history suspicious for LFS. The interpretation of the significance of these variants can be challenging but is crucial for an accurate diagnosis and appropriate medical management. This retrospective case review provides illustrative examples of the interpretation of challenging TP53 results through multidisciplinary expertise and use of a flowchart. The authors describe eight patients with TP53 variants associated with ambiguous diagnoses and, for each case, describe how the results were interpreted and the medical care that was implemented. This report presents illustrative cases to help guide clinicians to reach definitive diagnoses for patients when confronted with TP53 variants that are inconsistent with the clinical picture and to add to the body of literature regarding interpretation and medical management of TP53 variants discovered on germline testing.

Molecular annotation of extramedullary acute myeloid leukemia identifies high prevalence of targetable mutations.

BACKGROUND: Genomic landscape of extramedullary acute myeloid leukemia (EM-AML), including myeloid sarcoma (MS) and leukemia cutis (LC), is not well characterized. The potential utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) using EM tissue is not established. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, clinical and NGS data were collected on patients with EM-AML. All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS Statistics (v 26). RESULTS: Our study included 58 patients with EM-AML. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years; 59% of patients had MS and 33% had LC. EM-AML was isolated (i.e., without blood or marrow involvement) in 31% and was first noted at relapse in 60% of patients. Median overall survival in our cohort was 18.2 months overall, with 19.1 months and 11.6 months in the newly diagnosed and the relapsed/refractory patients, respectively. At least one targetable or potentially targetable alteration was present in 52% of patients with EM-site NGS, with 26% IDH1, 21% NPM1, 11% IDH2, 6% FLT3, and 13% KMT2A-PTD. Mutations in IDH1 were significantly more prevalent on NGS from EM tissue than non-EM (blood or marrow) samples (26% vs. 3%; p = .030). Three of four patients treated with IDH inhibitors based on EM-site NGS experienced a complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Targetable mutations are frequent in EM-AML and EM-site NGS is warranted for selecting potential targeted therapies for patients with EM-AML.

Evaluation of Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing for the Management of Patients Diagnosed with a Cancer of Unknown Primary.

BACKGROUND: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) comprises a heterogeneous collection of malignancies that are typically associated with a poor prognosis and a lack of effective treatment options. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical utility of targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) among CUP patients to assist with diagnosis and identify opportunities for molecularly guided therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a CUP at Moffitt Cancer Center who underwent NGS between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019, were eligible for study inclusion. Next-generation sequencing results were assessed to determine the frequency of clinically actionable molecular alterations, and chart reviews were performed to ascertain the number of patients receiving molecularly guided therapy. RESULTS: Ninety-five CUP patients were identified for analysis. Next-generation sequencing testing identified options for molecularly guided therapy for 55% (n = 52) of patients. Among patients with molecularly guided therapy options, 33% (n = 17) were prescribed a molecularly guided therapy. The median overall survival for those receiving molecularly guided therapy was 23.6 months. Among the evaluable patients, the median duration of treatment for CUP patients (n = 7) receiving molecular-guided therapy as a first-line therapy was 39 weeks. The median duration of treatment for CUP patients (n = 8) treated with molecularly guided therapy in the second- or later-line setting was 13 weeks. Next-generation sequencing results were found to be suggestive of a likely primary tumor type for 15% (n = 14) of patients. CONCLUSION: Next-generation sequencing results enabled the identification of treatment options in a majority of patients and assisted with the identification of a likely primary tumor type in a clinically meaningful subset of patients.

Large granular lymphocytic leukemia - A retrospective study of 319 cases.

Large granular lymphocytic leukemia (LGLL) is a rare hematological malignancy that arises from cytotoxic T lymphocytes (T-LGLL) in 85% of cases and natural killer (NK) cells in the rest. A significant knowledge gap exists regarding the pathogenesis, treatment choices, and prognostic factors of LGLL. We report a cohort of 319 consecutive LGLL patients who presented to our cancer center between 2001 and 2020. A total of 295 patients with T-LGLL and 24 with chronic NK-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (CLPD-NK) were identified. The median age was 65 years (range, 17-90 years). Eighty-three patients (26.0%) had autoimmune diseases. A total of 119 patients (37.3%) had coexisting malignancies, 66 (20.7%) had solid tumors, and 59 (18.5%) had hematological malignancies. Most coexisting malignancies were diagnosed before the diagnosis of LGLL. Treatment was needed for 57% of patients. Methotrexate (MTX), cyclophosphamide (Cy), and cyclosporine A (CSA) were most used and had similar response rates between 61.5%-74.4%. Cy produced more complete responses (32.3%) compared to MTX and CSA (15.7% and 23.1%, respectively). Thrombocytopenia, splenomegaly, and female gender (after controlling for autoimmune diseases) were associated with decreased response rates to MTX, CSA, or Cy. Autoimmune diseases were associated with increased response rates. Thrombocytopenia was an independent risk factor for worse survival.

Key Lessons Learned from Moffitt's Molecular Tumor Board: The Clinical Genomics Action Committee Experience.

BACKGROUND: The increasing practicality of genomic sequencing technology has led to its incorporation into routine clinical practice. Successful identification and targeting of driver genomic alterations that provide proliferative and survival advantages to tumor cells have led to approval and ongoing development of several targeted cancer therapies. Within many major cancer centers, molecular tumor boards are constituted to shepherd precision medicine into clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In July 2014, the Clinical Genomics Action Committee (CGAC) was established as the molecular tumor board companion to the Personalized Medicine Clinical Service (PMCS) at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida. The processes and outcomes of the program were assessed in order to help others move into the practice of precision medicine. RESULTS: Through the establishment and initial 1,400 patients of the PMCS and its associated molecular tumor board at a major cancer center, five practical lessons of broad applicability have been learned: transdisciplinary engagement, the use of the molecular report as an aid to clinical management, clinical actionability, getting therapeutic options to patients, and financial considerations. Value to patients includes access to cutting-edge practice merged with individualized preferences in treatment and care. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic-driven cancer medicine is increasingly becoming a part of routine clinical practice. For successful implementation of precision cancer medicine, strategically organized molecular tumor boards are critical to provide objective evidence-based translation of observed molecular alterations into patient-centered clinical action. Molecular tumor board implementation models along with clinical and economic outcomes will define future treatment standards. The Oncologist 2017;22:144-151Implications for Practice: It is clear that the increasing practicality of genetic tumor sequencing technology has led to its incorporation as part of routine clinical practice. Subsequently, many cancer centers are seeking to develop a personalized medicine services and/or molecular tumor board to shepherd precision medicine into clinical practice. This article discusses the key lessons learned through the establishment and development of a molecular tumor board and personalized medicine clinical service. This article highlights practical issues and can serve as an important guide to other centers as they conceive and develop their own personalized medicine services and molecular tumor boards.

Novel and Expanded Oncology Drug Approvals of 2016-PART 1: New Options in Solid Tumor Management.

The nonradiologic medical management of solid tumors has evolved from the use of traditional cytotoxic agents to modern targeted therapies, monoclonal antibodies, and immunotherapies. Advances in the understanding of cancer biology and therapeutic strategies have resulted in increasing numbers of new drug applications and approvals. Consequently, practicing oncologists need to learn how the newly available agents function and what toxicities to watch for, as well as ways to optimize the use of both new drugs and previously approved drugs with new indications. In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration approved three novel drugs for the treatment of solid malignancies-olaratumab in selected patients with soft-tissue sarcoma, atezolizumab for the treatment of bladder cancer, and rucaparib for the treatment of ovarian cancer; also in 2016, the use of previously approved anticancer agents (including atezolizumab) was expanded into 11 new patient populations. The diversity of options for patients is evident in the broad range of the 2016 approvals, which include immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, monoclonal antibodies, and traditional cytotoxic agents. This article focuses on the new agents and indications that emerged in 2016 for solid tumor treatment. We review the drug indications, mechanisms of action, pivotal trial data, pertinent toxicities, use in special populations, and the appropriate clinical contexts for treatment planning.

Novel and Expanded Oncology Drug Approvals of 2016-PART 2: New Options in the Management of Hematologic Malignancies.

The recent past has brought pharmacotherapeutic advances that benefit patients with hematologic malignancies. In 2016, two novel hematology drugs were approved and four previously approved hematology drugs were granted expanded use for the treatment of appropriate patient populations by the US Food and Drug Administration. These new approvals and indications represent significant steps forward in patient management: they include the first-in-class B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor, venetoclax, the newest targeted therapy available for the treatment of hematologic malignancies; and nivolumab, the first immune checkpoint inhibitor to be approved for treatment of a hematologic malignancy. Other advances include defibrotide as the first drug approved for the treatment of veno-occlusive disease with evidence of multiorgan dysfunction, and the expansion of indications for the two anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies ofatumumab and obinutuzumab, as well as the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab. This article reviews each of these drugs and their indications, mechanisms of action, accompanying pivotal trial data, pertinent toxicities, use in special populations, and appropriate clinical context.

Blood Tumor Mutational Burden Alone Is Not a Good Predictive Biomarker for Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Gastrointestinal Tumors.

There has been a controversy about the predictive value of tissue-TMB-H for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with limited data regarding blood-TMB (bTMB) in GI tumors. We aim to evaluate the predictive value of bTMB compared with MSI-H in GI tumors. Patients with unresectable/metastatic GI cancer, harboring either MSS with bTMB-H (≥10 mut/Mb) or dMMR/MSI-H who received ICI were included. We compared ICIs' efficacy between MSS-bTMB-H (N=45) versus MSI-H (N=50) in GI tumors. Ninety-five patients were identified with the majority having colorectal (49.5%) or esophagogastric (34.7%) cancers. MSS-bTMB-H group had more esophagogastric cancer and later-line ICI recipients, with no significant differences in other known prognostic variables. At a median follow-up of 9.4 months, MSI-H group showed superior ORR (58.0% vs. 26.7%), DCR (84.0% vs. 42.2%), DoR (not-reached vs. 7.6 mo), PFS (22.5 vs. 3.8 mo), and OS (Not-reached vs. 10.1 mo) compared with MSS-bTMB-H. Multivariable analysis showed that MSI-H was an independent favorable factor over MSS-bTMB-H for PFS (HR=0.31, CI 0.15-0.63, P =0.001) and OS (HR=0.33, CI 0.14-0.80, P =0.014). MSI-H group showed favorable outcomes compared with MSS-bTMB-16+ (ORR: 58.0% vs. 26.9%; DCR: 84.0% vs. 42.3%; PFS:22.5 vs. 4.0 mo) and MSS-bTMB-20+ (ORR: 58.0% vs. 31.6%; DCR: 84.0% vs. 42.1%; PFS:22.5 vs. 3.2 mo). There was no difference between MSS-bTMB10-15 compared with MSS-bTMB-16+ in ORR, DCR, and PFS, or between MSS-bTMB10-19 compared with MSS-bTMB20+. Regardless of bTMB cutoff at 10, 16, or 20, bTMB-H did not appear to be a predictive biomarker in MSS GI tumors in this retrospective analysis.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia with Myeloid Mutations Is a High-Risk Disease Associated with Clonal Hematopoiesis.

Myeloid neoplasms arise from preexisting clonal hematopoiesis (CH); however, the role of CH in the pathogenesis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is unknown. We found that 18% of adult ALL cases harbored TP53, and 16% had myeloid CH-associated gene mutations. ALL with myeloid mutations (MyM) had distinct genetic and clinical characteristics, associated with inferior survival. By using single-cell proteogenomic analysis, we demonstrated that myeloid mutations were present years before the diagnosis of ALL, and a subset of these clones expanded over time to manifest as dominant clones in ALL. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed upregulation of genes associated with cell survival and resistance to apoptosis in B-ALL with MyM, which responds better to newer immunotherapeutic approaches. These findings define ALL with MyM as a high-risk disease that can arise from antecedent CH and offer new mechanistic insights to develop better therapeutic and preventative strategies. SIGNIFICANCE: CH is a precursor lesion for lymphoblastic leukemogenesis. ALL with MyM has distinct genetic and clinical characteristics, associated with adverse survival outcomes after chemotherapy. CH can precede ALL years before diagnosis, and ALL with MyM is enriched with activated T cells that respond to immunotherapies such as blinatumomab. See related commentary by Iacobucci, p. 142.

Association of Age With Treatment-Related Adverse Events and Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Importance: While the incidence of early-onset metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been increasing, studies on the age-related disparity in this group of patients are limited. Objective: To evaluate the association of age with treatment-related adverse events and survival in patients with mCRC and explore the potential underlying factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included 1959 individuals. Individual data on 1223 patients with mCRC who received first-line fluorouracil and oxaliplatin therapy in 3 clinical trials, and clinical and genomic data of 736 patients with mCRC from Moffitt Cancer Center were used to assess genomic alterations and serve as an external validation cohort. All statistical analyses were conducted from October 1, 2021, through November 12, 2022. Exposures: Metastatic colorectal cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures: Survival outcomes and treatment-related adverse events were compared among patients in 3 age groups: younger than 50 (early onset), 50 to 65, and older than 65 years. Results: In the total population of 1959 individuals, 1145 (58.4%) were men. Among 1223 patients from previous clinical trials, 179 (14.6%) in the younger than 50 years group, 582 (47.6%) in the 50 to 65 years group, and 462 (37.8%) in the older than 65 years group had similar baseline characteristics except for sex and race. The younger than 50 years group had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.46; 95% CI, 1.22-1.76; P < .001) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.19-1.84; P < .001) compared with the 50 to 65 years group after adjustment for sex, race, and performance status. Significantly shorter OS in the younger than 50 years group was confirmed in the Moffitt cohort. The younger than 50 years group had a significantly higher incidence of nausea and vomiting (69.3% vs 57.6% [50-65 years] vs 60.4% [>65 years]; P = .02), severe abdominal pain (8.4% vs 3.4% vs 3.5%; P = .02), severe anemia (6.1% vs 1.0% vs 1.5%; P < .001), and severe rash (2.8% vs 1.2% vs 0.4% P = .047). The younger than 50 years group also had earlier onset of nausea and vomiting (1.0 vs 2.1 vs 2.6 weeks; P = .01), mucositis (3.6 vs 5.1 vs 5.7 weeks; P = .05), and neutropenia (8.0 vs 9.4 vs 8.4 weeks; P = .04), and shorter duration of mucositis (0.6 vs 0.9 vs 1.0 weeks; P = .006). In the younger than 50 years group, severe abdominal pain and severe liver toxic effects were associated with shorter survival. The Moffitt genomic data showed that the younger than 50 years group had a higher prevalence of CTNNB1 mutation (6.6% vs 3.1% vs 2.3%; P = .047), ERBB2 amplification (5.1% vs 0.6% vs 2.3%; P = .005), and CREBBP mutation (3.1% vs 0.9% vs 0.5%; P = .05), but lower prevalence of BRAF mutation (7.7% vs 8.5% vs 16.7%; P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 1959 patients, those with early-onset mCRC showed worse survival outcomes and unique adverse event patterns, which could be partially attributed to distinct genomic profiles. These findings may inform individualized management approaches in patients with early-onset mCRC.

Prognostic and Predictive Value of PIK3CA Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive genomic profiling is used to guide the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, the role of PIK3CA mutations, present in up to 20% of mCRCs, is unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the association of PIK3CA mutations with other common mutations in mCRC and determine the prognostic and predictive value of PIK3CA mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients in the Moffitt Clinical Genomic Database with mCRC. A meta-analysis was performed to further evaluate the predictive value of PIK3CA mutations to the response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. RESULTS: Among 639 patients, PIK3CA was positively correlated with KRAS mutation (r = 0.11, p = 0.006) and negatively correlated with TP53 mutation (r = - 0.18, p ≤ 0.001) and ERBB2 amplification (r = - 0.08, p = 0.046). The median overall survival (OS) of patients with PIK3CA-mutant mCRC (n = 49) was 35.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.7-48.1) months vs. 55.3 (95% CI 47.5-65.6) months for PIK3CA wild-type mCRC (n = 286) [p = 0.003]. This OS difference remained significant with exon 9 and exon 20 subset analyses. There was no significant difference in response rate between patients with PIK3CA wild-type (n = 97) versus mutant (n = 9) mCRC who received anti-EGFR therapy (43% vs. 56%, p = 0.61) and no significant difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) of 10.3 versus 7.2 months (p = 0.60). However, our meta-analysis of 12 studies, including ours, using a common effect model identified that PIK3CA mutations are associated with reduced response to anti-EGFR therapy, with a relative risk of 0.56 (95% CI 0.38-0.82). CONCLUSION: Our study identified PIK3CA mutations as a poor prognostic factor, and our meta-analysis identified PIK3CA mutations as predictive of decreased response to anti-EGFR therapy in patients with mCRC.

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Targeting Approaches for Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Implications of Novel Treatments and Future Therapeutic Avenues.

The treatment paradigm for colorectal cancer (CRC) has changed significantly over the past decade with targeted therapeutics. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification is seen among 3%-4% of patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). The biological discovery of HER2 amplification in cancer cells has led to practice-changing drug development for several solid tumors, including breast, gastric, and esophageal cancers. HER2 amplification is now highly actionable in CRC with distinct therapeutic combinations, including the combination of monoclonal antibodies and HER2 receptor-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors, as well as antibody-drug conjugates, that delivers targeted cytotoxic agents. However, it is essential to define the therapeutic role and sequence of these different combinations, some of which are already part of standard clinical practice. In this review article, we discuss recent clinical studies demonstrating the clinical benefits of each distinct therapeutic approach and their impacts on the current management of HER2-amplified mCRC. We also review ongoing clinical trials targeting the HER2 pathway in mCRC and elaborate on novel therapeutic opportunities in this space that may further define the changing paradigm of HER2-targeted therapy for CRC.

Copy Number Alterations as Novel Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Colorectal Cancer.

In colorectal cancer, somatic mutations have played an important role as prognostic and predictive biomarkers, with some also functioning as therapeutic targets. Another genetic aberration that has shown significance in colorectal cancer is copy number alterations (CNAs). CNAs occur when a change to the DNA structure propagates gain/amplification or loss/deletion in sections of DNA, which can often lead to changes in protein expression. Multiple techniques have been developed to detect CNAs, including comparative genomic hybridization with microarray, low pass whole genome sequencing, and digital droplet PCR. In this review, we summarize key findings in the literature regarding the role of CNAs in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer, from adenoma to carcinoma to distant metastasis, and discuss the roles of CNAs as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in colorectal cancer.

Developing Drugs for Tissue-Agnostic Indications: A Paradigm Shift in Leveraging Cancer Biology for Precision Medicine.

Targeted therapies have reshaped the landscape of the development of cancer therapeutics. Recent biomarker-driven, tissue-agnostic clinical trials represent a significant paradigm shift in precision cancer medicine. Despite their growth in preclinical and clinical studies, to date only a few biomarker-driven, tissue-agnostic indications have seen approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These approvals include pembrolizumab in microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficient solid tumors, as well as both larotrectinib and entrectinib in NTRK fusion-positive tumors. Complex cancer biology, clinical trial design, and identification of resistance mechanisms represent some of the challenges that future tissue-agnostic therapies have to overcome. In this Review, we present a brief history of the development of tissue-agnostic therapies, comparing the similarities in the approval of pembrolizumab, larotrectinib, and entrectinib for tissue-agnostic indications. We also explore the future of tissue-agnostic cancer therapeutics while identifying important challenges for the future that drugs targeting tissue-agnostic indications will face.

An analysis of the use of targeted therapies in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma and an evaluation of genomic correlates of response.

BACKGROUND: The use of targeted therapy remains a treatment consideration for some patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). However, supportive data on the use of targeted therapy approaches are limited. Thus, we sought to evaluate the responsiveness of targeted agents in patients with advanced MCC. METHODS: An institutional MCC database identified patients who were treated with targeted therapy. For the purpose of this study, targeted therapy was defined as any multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor or inhibitor of the PI3K-pathway. Clinical benefit was defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease (SD) ≥6 months. A subset of patient samples underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS), Merkel cell polyomavirus testing, and PD-L1/PD-1 expression testing. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with MCC treated with targeted therapy were identified, 21 targeted therapy regimens were evaluable for response in 18 patients. Four of twenty-one (19%) of evaluable regimens were associated with clinical benefit with the best overall response of SD. The durations of SD were 13.6 months (59 weeks), 9.7 months (42 weeks), 7.6 months (33 weeks), and 7.2 months (31 weeks). Of the four patients who derived clinical benefit, three were treated with pazopanib alone and one was treated with pazopanib plus everolimus. No difference in the rate of clinical benefit between molecular disease subtypes was detected nor was associated with any specific genomic alteration. CONCLUSION: In our series, targeted agents elicited a disease control rate of 19% in patients with advanced MCC, with a best overall response of SD. Pazopanib alone or in combination exhibited a rate of disease control of 36% (4 of 11 with SD ≥6 months).