RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) has evolved into both diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. Our review discusses the cost-effectiveness of single use flexible ureteroscopes (su-fURS) and the use of these instruments in routine urological practice. RECENT FINDINGS: There are studies which support the use of su-fURS with an argument of both cost and clinical utility over reusable flexible ureteroscopes (ru-fURS). However, the cost may vary across countries, hence is difficult to compare the results based on the current literature. Perhaps therefore there is a role for hybrid strategy incorporating ru- and su-fURS, where su-fURS are employed in complex endourological cases with a high risk of scope damage or fracture to preserve ru-fURS, with the ability to maintain clinical activity in such an event. SUMMARY: While there seems to be some cost advantages with su-fURS with reduced sterilization and maintenance costs, the data supporting it is sparse and limited. This choice of scope would depend on the durability of ru-fURS, procedural volumes, limited availability of sterilization units in some centers and potential risk of infectious complications. It is time that cost-benefit analysis is conducted with defined outcomes for a given healthcare set-up to help with the decision making on the type of scope that best serves their needs.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Ureteroscopios , Humanos , Ureteroscopía/métodos , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Cálculos Renales/terapiaRESUMEN
In concert with carbonyl compounds, Lewis acids have been identified as a versatile class of photocatalysts. Thus far, research has focused on activation of the substrate, either by changing its photophysical properties or by modifying its photochemistry. In this work, we expand the established mode of action by demonstrating that UV photoexcitation of a Lewis acid-base complex can lead to homolytic cleavage of a covalent bond in the Lewis acid. In a study on the complex of benzaldehyde and the Lewis acid BCl3, we found evidence for homolytic B-Cl bond cleavage leading to formation of a borylated ketyl radical and a free chlorine atom only hundreds of femtoseconds after excitation. Both time-dependent density functional theory and transient absorption experiments identify a benzaldehyde-BCl2 cation as the dominant species formed on the nanosecond time scale. The experimentally validated B-Cl bond homolysis was synthetically exploited for a BCl3-mediated hydroalkylation reaction of aromatic aldehydes (19 examples, 42-76% yield). It was found that hydrocarbons undergo addition to the CâO double bond via a radical pathway. The photogenerated chlorine radical abstracts a hydrogen atom from the alkane, and the resulting carbon-centered radical either recombines with the borylated ketyl radical or adds to the ground-state aldehyde-BCl3 complex, releasing a chlorine atom. The existence of a radical chain was corroborated by quantum yield measurements and by theory. The photolytic mechanism described here is based on electron transfer between a bound chlorine and an aromatic π-system on the substrate. Thereby, it avoids the use of redox-active transition metals.
Asunto(s)
Benzaldehídos , Ácidos de Lewis , Cloro , Aldehídos , Cloruros , Carbono/química , Hidrógeno , AlcanosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Comparisons of ureteroscopy (URS), extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for urolithiasis considering long-term health and economic outcomes based on claims data are rare. Our aim was to analyze URS, SWL, and PCNL regarding complications within 30 days, re-intervention, healthcare costs, and sick leave days within 12 months, and to investigate inpatient and outpatient SWL treatment as the latter was introduced in Germany in 2011. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study based on German health insurance claims data included 164,203 urolithiasis cases in 2008-2016. We investigated the number of complications within 30 days, as well as time to re-intervention, number of sick leave days and hospital and ambulatory health care costs within a 12-month follow-up period. We applied negative binomial, Cox proportional hazard, gamma and two-part models and adjusted for patient variables. RESULTS: Compared to URS cases, SWL and PCNL had fewer 30-day complications, time to re-intervention within 12 months was decreased for SWL and PCNL, SWL and PCNL were correlated with a higher number of sick leave days, and SWL and particularly PCNL were associated with higher costs. SWL outpatients had fewer complications, re-interventions and lower costs than inpatients. This study was limited by the available information in claims data. CONCLUSION: URS cases showed benefits in terms of fewer re-interventions, fewer sick leave days, and lower healthcare costs. Only regarding complications, SWL was superior. This emphasizes URS as the most frequent treatment choice. Furthermore, SWL outpatients showed less costs, fewer complications, and re-interventions than inpatients.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Litotricia , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea , Urolitiasis , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Cálculos Renales/terapia , Litotricia/efectos adversos , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ureteroscopía/efectos adversos , Urolitiasis/etiología , Urolitiasis/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Comparisons of ureteroscopy (URS), extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for urolithiasis considering long-term follow-up are rare. We aimed to analyze re-intervention rates, costs and sick leave days of URS, SWL and PCNL patients within 7 years. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was based on German health insurance claims data. We included 54,609 urolithiasis patients incidentally treated in 2008-2010. We investigated time to re-intervention, number of sick leave days and healthcare costs. We applied negative binomial, extended Cox regression and gamma models. RESULTS: 54% were incidentally treated with URS, 40% with SWL and 6% with PCNL. 15% of URS, 26% of SWL and 23% of PCNL patients were re-treated within 7 years. Time to re-intervention was significantly lower for PCNL (955 days) and SWL (937 days) than URS (1078 days) patients. Costs for incident treatment were significantly higher for PCNL (2760) and lower for SWL (1342) than URS (1334) patients. Yet, total costs including re-interventions were significantly higher for PCNL (5783) and SWL (3240) than URS (2979) patients. Total number of sick leave days was increased for PCNL (13.0 days) and SWL (10.1 days) compared to URS (6.8 days) patients. CONCLUSION: This study describes outcomes after use of different intervention options for urolithiasis. URS patients showed longest time free of re-interventions and lowest number of sick leave days. Although SWL patients initially had lower costs, URS patients had lower costs in the long run. PCNL patients showed high costs and sick leave days.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Litotricia , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea , Urolitiasis , Humanos , Ureteroscopía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Urolitiasis/cirugía , Seguro de Salud , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cálculos Renales/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: White light (WL) is the traditional imaging modality for transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). IMAGE1S is a likely addition. We compare 18-mo recurrence rates following TURBT using IMAGE1S versus WL guidance. METHODS: Twelve international centers conducted a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Patients with primary and recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) were randomly assigned 1:1 to TURBT guided by IMAGE1S or WL. Eighteen-month recurrence rates and subanalysis for primary/recurrent and risk groups were planned and compared by chi-square tests and survival analyses. RESULTS: 689 patients were randomized for WL-assisted (n = 354) or IMAGE1S-assisted (n = 335) TURBT. Of these, 64.7% had a primary tumor, 35.3% a recurrent tumor, and 4.8%, 69.2% and 26.0% a low-, intermediate-, and high-risk tumor, respectively. Overall, 60 and 65 patients, respectively, completed 18-mo follow-up, with recurrence rates of 31.0% and 25.4%, respectively (p = 0.199). In patients with primary, low-/intermediate-risk tumors, recurrence rates at 18-mo were significantly higher in the WL group compared with the IMAGE1S group (31.9% and 22.3%, respectively: p 0.035). Frequency and severity of adverse events were comparable in both treatment groups. Immediate and adjuvant intravesical instillation therapy did not differ between the groups. Potential limitations included lack of uniformity of surgical resection, central pathology review, and missing data. CONCLUSION: There was not difference in the overall recurrence rates between IMAGE1S and WL assistance 18-mo after TURBT in patients with NMIBC. However, IMAGE1S-assisted TURBT considerably reduced the likelihood of disease recurrence in primary, low/intermediate risk patients. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02252549 (30-09-2014).
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Cistectomía/métodos , Humanos , Invasividad Neoplásica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The extent of variation in urinary and sexual functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RPE) between prostate cancer (PC) operating sites remains unknown. Therefore, this analysis aims to compare casemix-adjusted functional outcomes (EPIC-26 scores incontinence, irritative/obstructive function and sexual function) between operating sites 12 months after RPE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis of a cohort of 7065 men treated with RPE at 88 operating sites (prostate cancer centers, "PCCs") between 2016 and 2019. Patients completed EPIC-26 and sociodemographic information surveys at baseline and 12 months after RPE. Survey data were linked to clinical data. EPIC-26 domain scores at 12 months after RPE were adjusted for relevant confounders (including baseline domain score, clinical and sociodemographic information) using regression analysis. Differences between sites were described using minimal important differences (MIDs) and interquartile ranges (IQR). The effects of casemix adjustment on the score results were described using Cohen's d and MIDs. RESULTS: Adjusted domain scores at 12 months varied between sites, with IQRs of 66-78 (incontinence), 89-92 (irritative/obstructive function), and 20-29 (sexual function). Changes in domain scores after casemix adjustment for sites ≥ 1 MID were noted for the incontinence domain (six sites). Cohen's d ranged between - 0.07 (incontinence) and - 0.2 (sexual function), indicating a small to medium effect of casemix adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Variation between sites was greatest in the incontinence and sexual function domains for RPE patients. Future research will need to identify the factors contributing to this variation. TRIAL REGISTRY: The study is registered at the German Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.drks.de/drks_web/ ) with the following ID: DRKS00010774.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Incontinencia Urinaria , Sistema Urinario , Humanos , Masculino , Próstata , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Social service counseling (SSC) is an important instrument to support cancer patients, for example, regarding legal support, or rehabilitation. Several countries have established on-site SSC in routine care. Previous analyses have shown that SSC utilization varies across cancer centers. This analysis investigates patient and center-level predictors that explain variations in SSC utilization between centers. METHODS: Logistic multilevel analysis was performed with data from 19,865 prostate cancer patients from 102 prostate cancer centers in Germany and Switzerland. Data was collected within an observational study between July 2016 and June 2020 using survey (online and paper) and tumor documentation. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient for the null model implies that 51% of variance in SSC utilization is attributable to the center a patient is treated in. Patients aged 80 years and older, with higher education, private insurance, without comorbidities, localized intermediate risk, and undergoing androgen deprivation therapy before study inclusion were less likely to utilize SSC. Undergoing primary radiotherapy, active surveillance, or watchful waiting as compared to prostatectomy was associated with a lower likelihood of SSC utilization. Significant negative predictors at the center level were university hospital, center's location in Switzerland, and a short period of certification. CONCLUSION: The results show that patient and center characteristics contribute to explaining the variance in SSC utilization in prostate cancer centers to a large extent. The findings may indicate different organizational processes in the countries included and barriers in the sectoral structure of the healthcare system. In-depth analyses of processes within cancer centers may provide further insights into the reasons for variance in SSC utilization.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Consejo , Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Servicio SocialRESUMEN
PURPOSE: WisQoL (Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire) is a disease specific, health related quality of life measure designed for patients who form kidney stones. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a German version of WisQoL. METHODS: The German version of the WisQoL was developed following a standardized multistep process. Patients were recruited prior to stone treatment, and completed the questionnaire as well as the SF-36v2 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey). This was repeated 1, 3, and 6 months after stone surgery. Scores of the 28 questionnaire items were summarized into sum scores for four domains and a total score. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The German WisQoL demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.90 for all domains at all visits). All inter-domain associations were positive. The test-retest reliability for patients with unchanged self-reported health state was considered satisfactory (Spearman's rho for total score 0.70 [95% CI 0.55 to - 0.80]). The German WisQoL demonstrated good convergent validity with the validated SF-36v2 (correlation between corresponding items 0.44 to 0.64). All domain scores showed significant sensitivity to change induced by stone treatment (p ≤ 0.05). Total WisQoL scores generally improved during the first 3 months following stone treatment, and remained stable thereafter. CONCLUSION: The German WisQoL proved to be a reliable and robust instrument to evaluate health related quality of life measures of kidney stone patients in the clinical setting. It is expected to be of use for further research in patients with kidney stones.
Asunto(s)
Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Cálculos Renales , Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Cálculos Renales/diagnóstico , Lenguaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traducciones , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To systematically assess the quality of videos on the surgical treatment of urinary stones available on YouTube using validated instruments. METHODS: A systematic search for videos on YouTube addressing treatment options of urinary stones was performed in October 2019. Assessed parameters included basic data (e.g. number of views), the grade of misinformation reporting of conflicts of interest. Quality of content was analyzed using the validated DISCERN questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 100 videos with a median of 26,234 views (1020-1,720,521) were included in the analysis. Of these, only 26 videos were rated to contain no misinformation and only nine disclosed potential conflicts of interest. Overall, the median quality of the videos was low (2 out of 5 points for DISCERN question 16). Videos uploaded by healthcare professionals and medical societies/organizations offered significantly higher levels of quality. In particular, the videos provided by the EAU achieved the highest rating with a median score of 3.0. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of videos concerning the surgical treatment of urinary stones have a low quality of content, are potentially subject to commercial bias and do not report on conflicts of interest. Videos provided by medical societies, such as the EAU, provide a higher level of quality. This highlights the importance of active recommendation of evidence-based patient education materials.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Difusión de la Información , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Cálculos Urinarios/cirugía , Grabación en Video , HumanosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the balance between existing evidence and expert opinions on the safety and efficacy of new technological improvements in lithotripsy techniques for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: A scoping review approach was applied to search literature in Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Consensus by key opinion leaders was reached at a 2-day meeting entitled "Consultation on Kidney Stones: Aspects of Intracorporeal Lithotripsy" held in Copenhagen, Denmark, in September 2019. RESULTS: New-generation dual-mode single-probe lithotripsy devices have shown favourable results compared with use of ballistic or ultrasonic lithotripters only. However, ballistic and ultrasonic lithotripters are also highly effective and safe and have been the backbone of PCNL for many years. Compared with standard PCNL, it seems that mini PCNL is associated with fewer bleeding complications and shorter hospital admissions, but also with longer operating room (OR) time and higher intrarenal pressure. Use of laser lithotripsy combined with suction in mini PCNL is a promising alternative that may improve such PCNL by shortening OR times. Furthermore, supine PCNL is a good alternative, especially in cases with complex renal stones and large proximal ureteric stones; in addition, it facilitates endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS). CONCLUSION: Recent technological improvements in PCNL techniques are promising, but there is a lack of high-level evidence on safety and efficacy. Different techniques suit different types of stones and patients. The evolution of diverse methods has given urologists the possibility of a personalized stone approach, in other words, the right approach for the right patient.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales/terapia , Litotricia , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide an answer on which is the most appropriate approach for the management of the lower pole stones with a maximal dimension of 2 cm or less. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on PubMed®, SCOPUS®, Cochrane and EMBASE®. The PRISMA guidelines and the recommendations of the EAU Guidelines office were followed. Retrograde intrarenal surgery, shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy were considered for comparison. The primary end point was the stone-free rate. RESULTS: A total of 15 randomized controlled trials were eligible. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery have higher stone-free rates in comparison to shock wave lithotripsy and require fewer re-treatment sessions. Operative time and complications seem to favor shock wave lithotripsy in comparison to percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, but this takes place at the expense of multiple shock wave lithotripsy sessions. Retrograde intrarenal surgery seems to be the most efficient approach for the management of stones up to 1 cm in the lower pole. CONCLUSIONS: The pooled analysis of the eligible studies showed that the management of lower pole stones should probably be percutaneous nephrolithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery to achieve stone-free status over a short period and minimal number of sessions. For stones smaller than 10 mm, retrograde intrarenal surgery is more efficient in comparison to shock wave lithotripsy. The decision between the 2 approaches (percutaneous nephrolithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery) should be individual, based on the anatomical parameters, the comorbidity and the preferences of each patient.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales/terapia , Litotricia , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea , Nefrostomía Percutánea , HumanosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Fluoroscopy is valuable in modern endourology. We present the results of a survey where compliance to radiation safety measures was tested according to surgical exposure, and level of understanding of the radiation rules and risks associated with it. METHODS: A 52-item, anonymous questionnaire, structured by 6 ESUT/EULIS experts was distributed at 3 different endourological meetings during 2017-2018. Main aim was to evaluate level of knowledge on radiation physics and the protective measures taken against radiation exposure by participants. Fisher's exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test and ROC curve were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 211 responses were evaluated. Number of correct answers (median 7.00) differed significantly according to age (p = 0.001), working position (p = 0.005), working field (p < 0.001), number of semirigid (p < 0.001)/flexible URS (p < 0.001) and PNL (p < 0.001) performed per year. Physicians aged 50-60 years, consultants, academics and those who performed more procedures achieved higher scores. In our study 51.7% of responders used shields in the operating room, 89.6% wore lead aprons, 84.4% thyroid shields, while glasses and gloves were used by 14.7% and 8.1%, respectively. Age, working field and number of correct answers did not affect significantly the use of protection in contrast with endourology fellowship training, working position and lessons on radiation. Interestingly, residents, untrained endourologists and those who were provided with lessons on radiation were more compliant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that majority of modern urologists advocate radiation protection during endourology practice. Senior consultants and academic urologists performing a high volume of procedures seem to understand physics and rules of radiation use.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Equipo de Protección Personal , Competencia Profesional , Exposición a la Radiación/prevención & control , Urólogos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Fluoroscopía/efectos adversos , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sector Privado , Sector Público , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Miniaturization was the major trend in percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the past 15 years, aiming to lower tract-size-related complication rates while maintaining good stone-free-rates (SFR). Although there is some evidence that 18 Fr Mini-percutaneous lithotomy (PCNL) has comparable efficacy to conventional PCNL and a lower risk of bleeding, it is less clear whether further miniaturization led to an even better safety profile while maintaining good SFR. The present review evaluates the latest results on efficacy, safety, and feasibility of miniaturized techniques 14 Fr or less in PCNL. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent literature of the last 2 years reported outcomes of different systems from 4.85 to 14 Fr. Most of these studies demonstrated good efficacy when comparing with RIRS or conventional PCNL. Limitations were a decrease in SFR for stone sizes more than 2âcm, a longer operative time and the likelihood of pathologic intrarenal pressure (IRP) with a higher risk of postoperative fever or sepsis. SUMMARY: Miniaturization of PCNL is an innovative approach in order to lower complication rates and hospitalization time for therapy of renal stones. Limitations like longer OR time or higher IRP may limit the benefit of super miniaturized systems. Currently, the 18 Fr Mini-PCNL seems to be the most reliable solution for stones up to 25âmm, whereas RIRS remains the first choice in renal stones less than 10âmm.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea/instrumentación , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea/métodos , Endoscopía/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Miniaturización , Tempo Operativo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To summarize knowledge on upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) regarding diagnostic procedures, risk factors and prognostic markers. METHODS: A scoping review approach was applied to search literature in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase. Consensus was reached through discussions at Consultation on UTUC in Stockholm, September 2018. RESULTS: Tumor stage and grade are the most important prognostic factors. CT urography (CTU) including corticomedullary phase is the preferred imaging modality. A clear tumor on CTU in combination with high-grade UTUC in urine cytology identifies high-risk UTUC, and in some cases indirect staging can be obtained. Bladder urine cytology has limited sensitivity, and in most cases ureterorenoscopy (URS) with in situ samples for cytology and histopathology are mandatory for exact diagnosis. Image-enhancing techniques, Image S1 and narrow-band imaging, may improve tumor detection at URS. Direct confocal laser endomicroscopy may help to define grade during URS. There is strong correlation between stage and grade, accordingly correct grading is crucial. The correlation is more pronounced using the 1999 WHO than the 2004 classification: however, the 1999 system risks greater interobserver variability. Using both systems is advisable. A number of tissue-based molecular markers have been studied. None has proven ready for use in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Correct grading and staging of UTUC are mandatory for adequate treatment decisions. Optimal diagnostic workup should include CTU with corticomedullary phase, URS with in situ cytology and biopsies. Both WHO classification systems (1999 and 2004) should be used to decrease risk of undergrading or overtreatment.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ureterales/diagnóstico , Biopsia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Suecia , UreteroscopíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Urologists have to master a variety of techniques to be able to offer the most appropriate surgical stone treatment for each individual patient. Therefore, we performed a survey among board-certified Swiss urologists to assess the availability of the different surgical methods, the current practices of surgical treatment of urolithiasis and the adherence to evidence-based guideline recommendations in Switzerland. METHODS: A 14-question survey assessed the working environment, equipment, perioperative settings and decision trees for specific stone scenarios. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests to determine differences between frequencies of answers. RESULTS: Hundred and five members of Swiss Urology (38%) completed the survey. All treatment modalities are available for the majority of respondents. Ureterorenoscopy was found to have the highest availability (100%) and was the preferred choice in the majority of stone scenarios. A high adherence to the guidelines was found for the treatment of ureteral stones <10 mm (100% proximal and distal), and >10 mm (69% proximal, 94% distal). All respondents answered in accordance with the guidelines regarding the treatment of middle and upper pole stones <10 mm, 10-20 mm and lower pole stones 10-20 mm. Guideline adherence was 99% for lower pole stones <10 mm, 78% for lower pole stones >20 mm, and 63% for middle/upper pole stones >20 mm. CONCLUSION: This survey provides a detailed insight into current stone treatment practices in Switzerland. The full spectrum of urinary stone treatment options is available for the majority of Swiss urologists. The choice of treatment shows a high accordance with evidence-based guidelines and a preference for retrograde endoscopic surgery in the majority of stone scenarios.
Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Cálculos Urinarios/cirugía , Urología , Adulto , Anciano , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SuizaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the stone-free rates (SFRs) and stone clearance rates (SCRs) of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (PCNL) according to non-contrast computer tomography (NCCT) findings. METHODS: Original articles were identified from PubMed. After exclusion of ineligible papers, twenty-three studies with 2494 cases were included in the review. RESULTS: Six SWL, five RIRS and eight PCNL studies were selected. Additionally, four comparative articles were identified. SWL presents SFRs ranging 35-61.3 % and SCRs for residuals <4 mm being 43.2-92.9 %. RIRS studies report SFRs of 34.8-59.7 % and SCRs for residuals <4 mm ranging 48-96.7 %. Finally, PCNL presents SFRs of 20.8-100 % and SCRs for residuals <4 mm being 41.5-91.4 %. According to the comparative studies, SFRs are 17-61.3 % for SWL, 50 % for RIRS, and 95-100 % for PCNL. CONCLUSIONS: According to NCCT findings, it seems that PCNL provides better SFRs than ESWL and RIRS. However, further research with comparable and complete preoperative parameters and outcomes could reduce the heterogeneity of current data.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Cálculos Renales/terapia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Medios de Contraste , Femenino , Humanos , Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Litotricia/métodos , Masculino , Nefrostomía Percutánea/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Pronóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ureteroscopía/métodosRESUMEN
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered to be the first line of treatment for large renal stones. Though PCNL comes with higher morbidity, its efficacy is unbeaten by other minimally invasive modalities. However, potential complications, such as bleeding, occur. Improved skills and modifications of the procedure may reduce the probability of adverse outcomes. This article discusses the current trends and standards in PCNL technique with special focus on all important steps as positioning, access, instruments, dilation, disintegration, and exit, including outcomes, complication management, and training modalities.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Humanos , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea/educación , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea/instrumentación , Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Urología/educaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We developed and validated the German version of the Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ) for male and female patients with indwelling ureteral stents. METHODS: The German version of the USSQ was developed following a well-established multistep process. A total of 101 patients with indwelling ureteral stents completed the German USSQ as well as the validated questionnaires International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) or International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Patients completed questionnaires at 1 and 2-4 weeks after stent insertion and 4 weeks after stent removal. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the psychometric properties of the questionnaire. RESULTS: The German version of the USSQ showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .72-.88) and test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = .81-.92]. Inter-domain associations within the USSQ showed substantial correlations between different USSQ domains, indicating a high conceptual relationship of the domains. Except from urinary symptoms and general quality of life, German USSQ showed good convergent validity with the corresponding validated questionnaires. All USSQ domains showed significant sensitivity to change (p ≤ .001). CONCLUSION: The new German version of the USSQ proved to be a reliable and robust instrument for the evaluation of ureteral stent-associated morbidity for both male and female patients. It is expected to be a valid outcome measure in the future stent research.
Asunto(s)
Disuria/diagnóstico , Hematuria/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Stents , Uréter/cirugía , Incontinencia Urinaria/diagnóstico , Adulto , Disuria/fisiopatología , Femenino , Hematuria/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Psicometría , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Traducciones , Incontinencia Urinaria/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: White light cystoscopy (WLC) is the standard procedure for visualising non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, WLC can fail to detect all cancerous lesions, and outcomes with transurethral resection of the bladder differ between institutions, controlled trials, and possibly between trials and routine application. This noninterventional study assessed the benefit of hexaminolevulinate blue light cystoscopy (HALC; Hexvix®, Ipsen Pharma GmbH, Germany) plus WLC versus WLC alone in routine use. METHODS: From May 2013 to April 2014, 403 patients with suspected NMIBC were screened from 30 German centres to perform an unprecedented detailed assessment of the additional detection of cancer lesions with HALC versus WLC alone. RESULTS: Among the histological results for 929 biopsy samples, 94.3 % were obtained from suspected cancerous lesions under either WLC or HALC: 59.5 % were carcinoma tissue and 40.5 % were non-cancerous tissue. Of all cancer lesions, 62.2 % were staged as Ta, 20.1 % as T1, 9.3 % as T2, 7.3 % as carcinoma in situ (CIS), and 1.2 % were unknown. Additional cancer lesions (+6.8 %) and CIS lesions (+25 %, p < 0.0001) were detected by HALC plus WLC versus WLC alone. In 10.0 % of patients, ≥1 additional positive lesion was detected with HALC, and 2.2 % of NMIBC patients would have been missed with WLC alone. No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that HALC significantly improves the detection of NMIBC versus WLC alone in routine clinical practice in Germany. While this benefit is statistically significant across all types of NMIBC, it seems most relevant in CIS.