[Histopathological research laboratories in translational research : Conception and integration into the infrastructure of pathological institutes]. / Histopathologische Forschungslabors in der translationalen Forschung : Konzeption sowie Integration in die Infrastruktur pathologischer Institute.

A systematic review of histopathology from experimental animal systems is an essential part of up-to-date biomedical research. Pathologists at university hospitals are especially and increasingly challenged by these specialized and time-consuming duties. This article presents and analyzes a new laboratory structure of comparative experimental pathology-jointly lead by veterinary and human pathologists-which might solve this problem. The focus is on the establishment and full integration of this laboratory structure into a local, regional, and nationwide biomedical research cluster. A detailed comparison with an established structure of routine histopathology laboratories discusses merits and benefits as well as disadvantages.

Cyclooxygenase-2 contributes to the selective induction of cell death by the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoyl glycerol in hepatic stellate cells.

The endogenous cannabinoid 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) is an anti-fibrotic lipid mediator that induces apoptosis in hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), but not in hepatocytes. However, the exact molecular mechanisms of this selective induction of HSC death are still unresolved. Interestingly, the inducible isoform of cyclooxygenase, COX-2, can metabolize 2-AG to pro-apoptotic prostaglandin glycerol esters (PG-GEs). We analyzed the roles of COX-2 and endocannabinoid-derived PG-GEs in the differential susceptibility of primary activated HSCs and hepatocytes toward 2-AG-induced cell death. HSCs displayed significant COX-2 expression in contrast to hepatocytes. Similar to 2-AG, treatment of HSCs with PGD2-GE dose-dependently induced cell death independently from cannabinoid receptors that was accompanied by PARP- and caspase 3-cleavage. In contrast to 2-AG, PGD2-GE failed to induce significant ROS formation in HSCs, and depletion of membrane cholesterol did not rescue HSCs from PGD2-GE-induced apoptosis. These findings indicate differential engagement of initial intracellular signaling pathways by 2-AG and its COX-2-derived metabolite PGD2-GE, but similar final cell death pathways. Other PG-GEs, such as PGE2-or PGF2α-GE did not induce apoptosis in HSCs. Primary rat hepatocytes were mainly resistant against 2-AG- and PGD2-GE-induced apoptosis. HSCs, but not hepatocytes were able to metabolize 2-AG to PGD2-GE. As a proof of principle, HSCs from COX-2(-/-) mice lacked PDG2-GE production after 2-AG treatment. Accordingly, COX-2(-/-) HSCs were resistant against 2-AG-induced apoptosis. In conclusion, the divergent expression of COX-2 in HSCs and hepatocytes contributes to the different susceptibility of these cell types towards 2-AG-induced cell death due to the generation of pro-apoptotic PGD2-GE by COX-2 in HSCs. Modulation of COX-2-driven metabolization of 2-AG may provide a novel physiological concept allowing the specific targeting of HSCs in liver fibrosis.

Taking off the brakes: T cell immunity in the liver.

In lymphatic tissue, professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) such as dendritic cells (DCs), mature after sensing microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), and subsequently activate T cell immunity. Non-pathogenic MAMPs, derived for example from commensal bacteria, are delivered to the liver from the gastrointestinal tract via the portal vein. However, in contrast to splenic DCs, PRRs-expressing liver APCs induce T cell tolerance rather than immunity. This is explained partly by the distinct effects of PRRs on the maturation of liver APCs: these cells activate T cell immunity only when PRRs stimulation is accompanied by microbial infection through mechanisms that are not employed by DCs in lymphatic tissue. Understanding the molecular basis of T cell tolerance and immunity in the liver may help develop novel immune therapy for persistent viral infection or liver cancer.

Efficient presentation of exogenous antigen by liver endothelial cells to CD8+ T cells results in antigen-specific T-cell tolerance.

Myeloid antigen-presenting cells (APC) are known to cross-present exogenous antigen on major histocompatibility class I molecules to CD8+ T cells and thereby induce protective immunity against infecting microorganisms. Here we report that liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC) are organ-resident, non-myeloid APC capable of cross-presenting soluble exogenous antigen to CD8+ T cells. Though LSEC employ similar molecular mechanisms for cross-presentation as dendritic cells, the outcome of cross-presentation by LSEC is CD8+ T cell tolerance rather than immunity. As uptake of circulating antigens into LSEC occurs efficiently in vivo, it is likely that cross-presentation by LSEC contributes to CD8+ T cell tolerance observed in situations where soluble antigen is present in the circulation.

A dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule 3-grabbing nonintegrin (DC-SIGN)-related protein is highly expressed on human liver sinusoidal endothelial cells and promotes HIV-1 infection.

The discovery of dendritic cell (DC)-specific intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-3-grabbing nonintegrin (DC-SIGN) as a DC-specific ICAM-3 binding receptor that enhances HIV-1 infection of T cells in trans has indicated a potentially important role for adhesion molecules in AIDS pathogenesis. A related molecule called DC-SIGNR exhibits 77% amino acid sequence identity with DC-SIGN. The DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR genes map within a 30-kb region on chromosome 19p13.2-3. Their strong homology and close physical location indicate a recent duplication of the original gene. Messenger RNA and protein expression patterns demonstrate that the DC-SIGN-related molecule is highly expressed on liver sinusoidal cells and in the lymph node but not on DCs, in contrast to DC-SIGN. Therefore, we suggest that a more appropriate name for the DC-SIGN-related molecule is L-SIGN, liver/lymph node-specific ICAM-3-grabbing nonintegrin. We show that in the liver, L-SIGN is expressed by sinusoidal endothelial cells. Functional studies indicate that L-SIGN behaves similarly to DC-SIGN in that it has a high affinity for ICAM-3, captures HIV-1 through gp120 binding, and enhances HIV-1 infection of T cells in trans. We propose that L-SIGN may play an important role in the interaction between liver sinusoidal endothelium and trafficking lymphocytes, as well as function in the pathogenesis of HIV-1.

Toso regulates differentiation and activation of inflammatory dendritic cells during persistence-prone virus infection.

During virus infection and autoimmune disease, inflammatory dendritic cells (iDCs) differentiate from blood monocytes and infiltrate infected tissue. Following acute infection with hepatotropic viruses, iDCs are essential for re-stimulating virus-specific CD8(+) T cells and therefore contribute to virus control. Here we used the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) model system to identify novel signals, which influence the recruitment and activation of iDCs in the liver. We observed that intrinsic expression of Toso (Faim3, FcµR) influenced the differentiation and activation of iDCs in vivo and DCs in vitro. Lack of iDCs in Toso-deficient (Toso(-/-)) mice reduced CD8(+) T-cell function in the liver and resulted in virus persistence. Furthermore, Toso(-/-) DCs failed to induce autoimmune diabetes in the rat insulin promoter-glycoprotein (RIP-GP) autoimmune diabetes model. In conclusion, we found that Toso has an essential role in the differentiation and maturation of iDCs, a process that is required for the control of persistence-prone virus infection.

Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells are not permissive for adenovirus type 5.

Adenoviral vectors are known to transduce hepatocytes in normal liver tissue with high efficiency. The aim of this study was to investigate whether sinusoidal endothelial cells, which separate hepatocytes from the bloodstream in the sinusoidal lumen, are permissive for infection by adenoviruses. We show here that microvascular liver sinusoidal endothelial cells are not infected by adenovirus type 5 in vivo or in vitro unless high MOIs are used. In contrast, macrovascular endothelial cells from aorta are efficiently infected by adenovirus type 5. In addition, Kupffer cells, similar to sinusoidal endothelial cells, are not infected by adenovirus type 5. Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells do not express the integrin receptor alpha(v)beta3, which is required for efficient infection by adenoviruses. Our results demonstrate that hepatocytes are the main cell population of the liver that is infected by adenovirus type 5.

Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells: a new type of organ-resident antigen-presenting cell.

The induction of peripheral immune tolerance in the liver is a well-known phenomenon that is operative in different situations, such as tolerance to organ transplants and tolerance to oral antigens. The mechanisms leading to peripheral immune tolerance in the liver are still incompletely understood. While different cell populations of the liver have been implicated in and probably contribute in concert to the induction of hepatic immune tolerance, one hepatic cell type in particular seems to be suited for tolerance induction: liver sinusoidal endothelial cell (LSEC). LSEC are microvascular endothelial cells with a unique phenotype reminiscent of dendritic cells and a unique function as antigen-presenting cells for CD4+ T cells. The hepatic microenvironment, i.e. portal venous constituents and soluble mediators from sinusoidal cell populations, tightly control antigen presentation by LSEC to avoid immune-mediated damage. LSEC, in contrast to other endothelial cells, have the capacity to prime naive CD4+ T cells and induce cytokine release. Importantly, naive CD4+ T cells primed by antigen-presenting LSEC differentiate into regulatory T cells, whereas T cells primed by bone marrow-derived professional antigen presenting cells differentiate into Th1 cells. Thus, LSEC represent a new type of organ-resident "non-professional" antigen-presenting cell that appears to be involved in the local control of the immune response and the induction of immune tolerance in the liver.

Involvement of the liver in the induction of CD8 T cell tolerance towards oral antigen.

The liver is an organ with unique immune regulatory potential. This review highlights the experimental evidence for the involvement of hepatic cell populations in the induction of oral tolerance. Although immune tolerance towards oral antigens is mainly induced in the gastrointestinal tract within gut associated lymphatic tissue via generation of regulatory CD4 T cells, there is a further need for tolerance induction outside the gastrointestinal tract, because oral antigens rapidly distribute within minutes systemically through the blood stream. Besides hepatic dendritic cells, liver sinusoidal endothelial cells are active in the uptake and cross-presentation of oral antigens from portal venous blood and engage in the induction of CD8 T cell tolerance towards these antigens. These reports strengthen the notion that the liver participates in the induction of oral tolerance.

Neighborhood politics: the immunoregulatory function of organ-resident liver endothelial cells.

The liver is known for its ability to induce antigen (Ag)-specific immune tolerance. Among the different cell populations involved in the induction of hepatic tolerance, the liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) are particularly important because they are highly efficient at presenting soluble Ags to CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. The crosspresentation of soluble Ags to CD8(+) T cells was believed previously to be restricted to professional Ag-presenting cells (APCs) such as dendritic cells (DCs). However, in contrast to DCs, crosspresentation by LSECs can induce Ag-specific immune tolerance. It is proposed that these organ-resident APCs act as sessile hepatic APCs that control the immune responses to soluble blood-borne Ags, in concert with APCs in lymphatic tissue.

Local control of the immune response in the liver.

The physiological function of the liver--such as removal of pathogens and antigens from the blood, protein synthesis and metabolism--requires an immune response that is adapted to these tasks and is locally regulated. Pathogenic microorganisms must be efficiently eliminated while the large number of antigens derived from the gastrointestinal tract must be tolerized. From experimental observations it is evident that the liver favours the induction of tolerance rather than the induction of immunity. The liver probably not only is involved in transplantation tolerance but contributes as well to tolerance to orally ingested antigens (entering the liver with portal-venous blood) and to containment of systemic immune responses (antigen from the systemic circulation entering the liver with arterial blood). This review summarizes the experimental data that shed light on the molecular mechanisms and the cell populations of the liver involved in local immune regulation in the liver. Although hepatocytes constitute the major cell population of the liver, direct interaction of hepatocytes with leukocytes in the blood is unlikely. Sinusoidal endothelial cells, which line the hepatic sinusoids and separate hepatocytes from leukocytes in the sinusoidal lumen, and Kupffer cells, the resident macrophage population of the liver, can directly interact with passenger leukocytes. In the liver, clearance of antigen from the blood occurs mainly by sinusoidal endothelial cells through very efficient receptor-mediated endocytosis. Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells constitutively express all molecules necessary for antigen presentation (CD54, CD80, CD86, MHC class I and class II and CD40) and can function as antigen-presenting cells for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Thus, these cells probably contribute to hepatic immune surveillance by activation of effector T cells. Antigen-specific T-cell activation is influenced by the local microenvironment. This microenvironment is characterized by the physiological presence of bacterial constituents such as endotoxin and by the local release of immunosuppressive mediators such as interleukin-10, prostaglandin E2 and transforming growth factor-beta. Different hepatic cell populations may contribute in different ways to tolerance induction in the liver. In vitro experiments revealed that naive T cells are activated by resident sinusoidal endothelial cells but do not differentiate into effector T cells. These T cells show a cytokine profile and a functional phenotype that is compatible with the induction of tolerance. Besides sinusoidal endothelial cells, other cell populations of the liver, such as dendritic cells, Kupffer cells and perhaps also hepatocytes, may contribute to tolerance induction by deletion of T cells through induction of apoptosis.

Endothelial cell-mediated uptake of a hepatitis B virus: a new concept of liver targeting of hepatotropic microorganisms.

The liver is a target for many infectious agents, most notably hepatitis viruses. However, several receptor molecules identified so far for hepatitis viruses were found to be ubiquitously expressed and can thus not account for efficient liver targeting. Using a model hepatitis B virus, the duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV), we have obtained data indicating that scavenging liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC), rather than hepatocytes themselves, play the key role in the initial uptake of viral pathogens into the liver. Experiments with fluorescent viral particles and coated gold particles in test animals, as well as in primary liver cell culture, demonstrated a preferential uptake of the viral substrates into LSEC. Intracellularly, fluorescent virus particles internalized by LSEC colocalized with the DHBV receptor, carboxypeptidase D, suggesting receptor-mediated rescue from lysosomal degradation. To comply with the high efficiency by which hepatitis B viruses infect hepatocytes in vivo, we propose that viruses initially scavenged by LSEC are thereafter released to infect adjacent hepatocytes, the only cells capable of replicating these viruses. Such a model of primary uptake into LSEC may illustrate a general mechanism by which blood-borne hepatotropic agents are targeted to the hepatocytes in the liver.

Viral and host factors in the prediction of response to interferon-alpha therapy in chronic hepatitis C after long-term follow-up.

Acute infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) develops into a chronic hepatitis in about 50-70% of patients. Treatment of these patients with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) results in a sustained long-term response in only 15-20% but causes numerous unwanted side-effects in a higher percentage of patients. The aim of our study was to define host or viral parameters that would allow identification of responders and non-responders to IFN-alpha prior to the onset of treatment. We studied a group of 87 patients suffering from chronic hepatitis C who were treated with IFN-alpha. After long-term follow-up, 18 patients (21%) showed a sustained response to IFN-alpha therapy (normalization of serum transaminases and loss of viral RNA from serum) for up to 7 years after therapy had ceased. By univariate and multivariate analyses, no host factors were found to be predictive of response to therapy. Neither the degree of inflammation or fibrosis in liver biopsy samples obtained before treatment nor immunogenetic factors (major histocompatibility complex II haplotype and tumour necrosis factor-alpha promoter polymorphism) were associated with response to therapy. In contrast, viral parameters showed a strong association with response to therapy. HCV genotype 3 was found significantly more frequently in responders (P = 0.034), and mean HCV RNA concentration was lower in responders (3.1 x 10(4)) than in non-responders (2.5 x 10(5)) (P = 0.01). By multivariate analysis, both HCV genotype and HCV RNA concentration were independent predictors of response to therapy. However, exact prediction of response to treatment for an individual patient was not possible on the basis of pretreatment viral RNA concentration or viral genotype. The best association with response to therapy was found to be clearance of HCV RNA from serum 3 months after the start of treatment (32 of 34 partial and sustained responders vs 0 of 53 non-responders; P = 0.001). In conclusion, determination of pretreatment viral factors, but not host factors, was significantly correlated with treatment response but did not give an accurate prediction for patients, whereas clearance of HCV RNA from serum after 3 months of therapy was predictive of response to therapy.

IL-10 down-regulates T cell activation by antigen-presenting liver sinusoidal endothelial cells through decreased antigen uptake via the mannose receptor and lowered surface expression of accessory molecules.

Our study demonstrates that antigen-presenting liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC) induce production of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) from cloned Th1 CD4+ T cells. We show that LSEC used the mannose receptor for antigen uptake, which further strengthened the role of LSEC as antigen-presenting cell (APC) population in the liver. The ability of LSEC to activate cloned CD4+ T cells antigen-specifically was down-regulated by exogenous prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and by IL-10. We identify two separate mechanisms by which IL-10 down-regulated T cell activation through LSEC. IL-10 decreased the constitutive surface expression of MHC class II as well as of the accessory molecules CD80 and CD86 on LSEC. Furthermore, IL-10 diminished mannose receptor activity in LSEC. Decreased antigen uptake via the mannose receptor and decreased expression of accessory molecules may explain the down-regulation of T cell activation through IL-10. Importantly, the expression of low numbers of antigen on MHC II in the absence of accessory signals on LSEC may lead to induction of anergy in T cells. Because PGE2 and IL-10 are released from LSEC or Kupffer cells (KC) in response to those concentrations of endotoxin found physiologically in portal venous blood, it is possible that the continuous presence of these mediators and their negative effect on the local APC may explain the inability of the liver to induce T cell activation and to clear chronic infections. Our results support the notion that antigen presentation by LSEC in the hepatic microenvironment contributes to the observed inability to mount an effective cell-mediated immune response in the liver.

Induction of cytokine production in naive CD4(+) T cells by antigen-presenting murine liver sinusoidal endothelial cells but failure to induce differentiation toward Th1 cells.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Murine liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) constitutively express accessory molecules and can present antigen to memory Th1 CD4(+) T cells. Using a T-cell receptor transgenic mouse line, we addressed the question whether LSECs can prime naive CD4(+) T cells. METHODS: Purified LSECs were investigated for their ability to induce activation and differentiation of naive CD4(+) T cells in comparison with bone marrow-derived antigen-presenting cells and macrovascular endothelial cells. Activation of T cells was determined by cytokine production. LSECs were further studied for expression of interleukin (IL)-12 by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and the unique phenotype of LSECs was determined by flow cytometry. RESULTS: We provide evidence that antigen-presenting LSECs can activate naive CD62Lhigh CD4(+) T cells. Activation of naive CD4(+) T cells by LSECs occurred in the absence of IL-12. In contrast, macrovascular endothelial cells from aorta could not activate naive CD4(+) T cells. The unique functional characteristics of microvascular LSECs together with a unique phenotype (CD4(+), CD11b+, CD11c+, CD80(+), CD86(+)) make these cells different from macrovascular endothelial cells. Furthermore, LSECs did not require in vitro maturation to activate naive CD4(+) T cells. Most importantly, LSECs failed to induce differentiation toward Th1 cells, whereas conventional antigen-presenting cell populations induced a Th1 phenotype in activated CD4(+) T cells. Upon restimulation, CD4(+) T cells, which were primed by antigen-presenting LSECs, expressed interferon gamma, IL-4, and IL-10, which is consistent with a Th0 phenotype. Exogenous cytokines (IL-1beta, IL-12, or IL-18) present during T-cell priming by antigen-presenting LSECs could not induce a Th1 phenotype, but neutralization of endogenously produced IL-4 during T-cell priming led to a reduced expression of IL-4 and IL-10 by CD4(+) T cells upon restimulation. The addition of spleen cells to cocultures of LSECs and naive CD4(+) T cells during T-cell priming led to differentiation of T cells toward a Th1 phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of antigen-presenting LSECs to induce cytokine expression in naive CD4(+) T cells and their failure to induce differentiation toward a Th1 phenotype may contribute to the unique hepatic microenvironment that is known to promote tolerance.

Interleukin-10 expression is autoregulated at the transcriptional level in human and murine Kupffer cells.

Interleukin 10 (IL-10) is known to downregulate immune responses. The regulation of IL-10 gene expression therefore determines the outcome of local immune reactions. We investigated time course and downregulation of IL-10 production in primary Kupffer's cells (KC), which are known to secrete IL-10 in response to endotoxin challenge. Human and murine KC were isolated by centrifugal elutriation and investigated for IL-10 gene expression by a two-step amplification procedure (reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction [PCR] followed by T7-polymerase chain reaction). We show that IL-10 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) showed a >450 fold increase in KC 2 hours after endotoxin challenge. IL-10 protein release from KC strictly depended on de novo protein synthesis. Endotoxin mediated increase in IL-10 gene expression was downregulated by exogenous (>350-fold reduction of IL-10 mRNA level), as well as endogenous IL-10 protein, showing a negative autoregulatory feedback loop. IL-10 receptor expression was found to be constitutive and functional in KC. Early expression of IL-10 in KC may be of functional relevance to the outcome of immune and inflammatory reactions in the liver sinusoid. The negative autoregulation of IL-10 expression may represent a mechanism to regain a state of functional responsiveness in the microenvironment towards new proinflammatory stimuli. In conclusion, autoregulatory downregulation of IL-10 expression in KC may account for important regulatory steps of local immune response in the liver sinusoid.

Endotoxin down-regulates T cell activation by antigen-presenting liver sinusoidal endothelial cells.

Endotoxin is physiologically present in portal venous blood at concentrations of 100 pg/ml to 1 ng/ml. Clearance of endotoxin from portal blood occurs through sinusoidal lining cells, i.e., Kupffer cells, and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC). We have recently shown that LSEC are fully efficient APCs. Here, we studied the influence of endotoxin on the accessory function of LSEC. Incubation of Ag-presenting LSEC with physiological concentrations of endotoxin lead to >/=80% reduction of the accessory function, measured by release of IFN-gamma from CD4+ T cells. In contrast, conventional APC populations rather showed an increase of the accessory function after endotoxin treatment. Inhibition of the accessory function in LSEC by endotoxin was not due to lack of soluble costimulatory signals, because neither supplemental IL-1beta, IL-2, IFN-gamma, or IL-12 could rescue the accessory function. Ag uptake was not influenced by endotoxin in LSEC. However, we found that endotoxin led to alkalinization of the endosomal/lysomal compartment specifically in LSEC but not in bone marrow macrophages, which indicated that Ag processing, i.e., proteolytic cleavage of protein Ags into peptide fragments, was affected by endotoxin. Furthermore, endotoxin treatment down-regulated surface expression of constitutively expressed MHC class II, CD80, and CD86. In conclusion, it is conceivable that endotoxin does not alter the clearance function of LSEC to remove gut-derived Ags from portal blood but specifically affects Ag processing and expression of the accessory molecules in these cells. Consequently, Ag-specific immune responses by CD4+ T cells are efficiently down-regulated in the hepatic microenvironment.

A soluble form of the adhesion receptor CD58 (LFA-3) is present in human body fluids.

The human adhesion receptor CD58 (LFA-3) is expressed on most human cell types. Here we report on a soluble form of CD58 (sCD58) in human serum, human urine, and culture supernatants of several cell lines. sCD58 partially purified from human serum, from supernatant of the Hodgkin cell line L428, and purified sCD58 from human urine were found to have a molecular mass of 40-70 kDa under denaturating conditions (sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blotting). However, gel filtration of sCD58 purified from human urine gave a molecular mass of 118-166 kDa, suggesting a noncovalent homotrimer conformation or its association with other molecules. Using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay specific for CD58 we found that sera from patients suffering from different forms of hepatitis contained elevated sCD58 levels (n = 108). Accordingly, there was a fivefold increase of supernatant sCD58 when the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line Hep G2 was incubated with 25 ng/ml recombinant tumor necrosis factor-alpha in vitro. In contrast, sCD58 serum levels of 337 additional patients suffering from various other immunological disorders were not found to be raised. At high concentrations sCD58 binds to CD2-positive cells and inhibits rosette formation of human T cells to human erythrocytes. Thus, local release of large quantities of naturally occurring sCD58 may interfere with intercellular adhesion in vivo.

Antigen-presenting function and B7 expression of murine sinusoidal endothelial cells and Kupffer cells.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Inflammatory liver disease as well as rejection of liver allografts are thought to be mediated by resident antigen-presenting cells in the liver. At the same time, in vivo antigen presentation in the liver appears to be a more tolerogenic than systemic antigen challenge. The aim of this study was to show and characterize the antigen-presenting capability of sinusoidal endothelial cells and Kupffer cells. METHODS: Purified murine sinusoidal endothelial cells and Kupffer cells were studied for their ability to serve as accessory cells and antigen-presenting cells by proliferation assays. They were also studied for their expression of interleukin 1 and the B7 costimulatory molecules by Northern blotting, polymerase chain reaction, and flow cytometry. RESULTS: Both cell types expressed interleukin 1 messenger RNA and could serve equally well as accessory and antigen-presenting cells. B7-2 messenger RNA and surface expression on sinusoidal endothelial cells and on Kupffer cells was shown. Antibodies to the B7 molecules inhibited antigen presentation. Addition of interleukin 10 as a regulatory cytokine secreted by Kupffer cells was suppressive. CONCLUSIONS: Sinusoidal endothelial cells carry functional B7-2 molecules and can serve as effective antigen-presenting cells. However, antigen presentation by sinusoidal endothelial cells may be locally down-regulated by interleukin 10.