Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 145
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Public Health ; 114(6): 610-618, 2024 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718339

RESUMEN

As homelessness remains an urgent public health crisis in the United States, specific programs in the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) system may serve as a roadmap for addressing it. We examine lessons learned from the first decade (2012-2022) of the Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) program, a cornerstone in the VA continuum of homeless services aimed at both preventing homelessness among those at risk and providing rapid rehousing for veterans and their families who are currently experiencing homelessness. Drawing on information from annual reports and other relevant literature, we have identified 3 themes of SSVF that emerged as features to comprehensively deliver support for homeless veterans and their families: (1) responsiveness and flexibility, (2) coordination and integration, and (3) social resource engagement. Using these strategies, SSVF reached nearly three quarters of a million veterans and their families in its first decade, thereby becoming one of the VA's most substantial programmatic efforts designed to address homelessness. We discuss how each feature might apply to addressing homelessness in the general population as well as future research directions. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(6):610-618. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307625).


Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organización & administración , Familia , Apoyo Social
2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 38(7): 1717-1721, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36853557

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This is the first study, to our knowledge, to assess uptake of oral antiviral treatment (OAV) for COVID-19 in the US and assess whether it is reaching recommended groups. OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated uptake among persons of all ages, with emphasis on utilization among individuals ages 65 + who comprise 75% of all COVID-19 deaths. To maximize public health outreach and benefit, we sought to understand reasons for use and non-use of OAV among individuals 65 + with at least mild COVID-19 symptoms. DESIGN: Data were collected from phase 3.5 of the US Census Household Pulse Survey, during three 2022 time periods: June 1-13, June 29-July 11, and July 27-August 8. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents (n = 12,299) were ages 18 + with active or resolved COVID-19 within the last 4 weeks of their survey participation. MAIN MEASURE(S): Comparisons of demographic variables were made for OAV uptake using the chi-square test of independence. A logistic regression was conducted to identify characteristics of participants independently associated with receipt of an OAV. Comparisons were made with chi-square testing, between those ages 65 + with at least mild symptoms who endorsed one of a number of specific reasons for not using OAV. KEY RESULTS: Utilization was low-17.9% of all respondents, 20.5% of respondents ages 50-64, and 33.9% of respondents 65 years and older received guideline-concordant treatment for their infection. Receipt did not differ by income or sex. The average response across the three phases was 5.4%. Most common reasons for not receiving treatment included having minimal symptoms, not thinking that they needed treatment, and not receiving a recommendation from their healthcare provider. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of increased-risk US residents have accessed early therapy for COVID-19 despite being made available without cost. Responses suggest that efforts to improve patient and provider knowledge could improve utilization to mitigate future COVID-19 hospitalizations.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Renta , Grupos Minoritarios , Antivirales/uso terapéutico
3.
Global Health ; 19(1): 86, 2023 Nov 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37968676

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic highlighted the challenges of effective emergency risk communication (ERC) to protect public health, including the difficulty in tackling the spread of inaccurate information. This study aimed to understand those challenges and potential solutions by interviewing leading government spokespersons and their advisors from around the world with experience during large scale emergencies. Interviews were conducted with 27 individuals representing governments from 19 countries across five continents. Thematic analysis, using both a deductive and inductive approach, organized and identified salient themes and patterns that emerged from the interview data. RESULTS: The thematic analysis of the interviews' data led to the identification of 9 principles of communication: 1) Timeliness, 2) Transparency, 3) Coordination, 4) Accuracy and Consistency, 5) Accountability and Integrity, 6) Independence from politics, 7) Responsiveness, 8) Equity, 9) Trust and Empathy. We also developed 36 recommendations actionable by government agencies to enhance the practice of the 9 principles. Examples include the need for: proactive communication strategies, permanent communication task forces integrated into preparedness and response efforts, robust processes to enhance open discussion of controversial topics within government agencies, clarification of how various branches of government coordinate to oversee specific aspects of the overall communication, and development of relationships across public and private entities ahead of a crisis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest key practical recommendations for leaders of government agencies to enhance ERC capabilities going forward. Before a crisis, they must constantly review internal processes and integrate ERC functions into overall communication planning efforts. During a crisis, they must coordinate roles and responsibilities across branches of governments, strive to communicate to a range of populations to uphold equity, maintain transparency by avoiding information voids on controversial issues and build trust by building relationships with a variety of community leaders. After a crisis, government agencies should continue the practice of social listening to hear more about the public's informational needs, strengthen civic participation processes, and understand how an always evolving information environment can best be leveraged during future crises.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Comunicación , Salud Pública , Política , Gobierno
4.
Am J Epidemiol ; 191(1): 31-35, 2022 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33977296

RESUMEN

In this commentary, we review the evidence concerning associations between religious service attendance and subsequent health and wellbeing outcomes. The evidence base for a link between religious service attendance and health has increased substantially over the past 2 decades. The interpretation and implications of this research require careful consideration (Am J Epidemiol. 2022;191(1):20-30). It would be inappropriate to universally promote service attendance solely on the grounds of the associations with health. Nevertheless, a more nuanced approach, within both clinical care and public health, may be possible-one that encouraged participation in religious community for those who already positively self-identified with a religious or spiritual tradition and encouraged other forms of community participation for those who did not. Discussion is given to potential future research directions and the challenges and opportunities for promotion efforts by the public health community.


Asunto(s)
Salud Pública , Religión , Participación de la Comunidad , Humanos , Espiritualidad
5.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(12): 2923-2930, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35731369

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Eliminating health disparities among different segments of the US population is an overarching goal of the US Healthy People 2020 objectives. OBJECTIVE: Examine changes in educational, rural-urban, and racial disparities in premature mortality during the past 10 years. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Descriptive analysis of US mortality data from 2007 to 2017. MAIN MEASURES: Relative and absolute rural-urban, educational attainment, and Black-White disparities in premature mortality for all-cause and top 10 causes of death among persons ages 25-74 years, estimated as rate ratios and rate differences between ≤12 and ≥16 years of education, rural versus urban, and non-Hispanic Black (Black) versus non-Hispanic White (White), respectively, in 2007 and 2017. KEY RESULTS: During 2007-2017, mortality rates in persons aged 25-74 years in the USA increased for several leading causes of death, especially in persons with <16 years of education, rural residents, and White people. As a result, disparity in mortality between 2007 and 2017 widened on both relative and absolute scales for all-cause and for 6 of the top 10 causes of death by education and for all-cause and for 9 of the top 10 causes by rural/urban residence. In contrast, Black-White disparities narrowed for all-cause and for all 7 causes that Black people had a higher rate than White people. For all-cause mortality for example, absolute disparities in the number of deaths per 100,000 person-years between 2007 and 2017 increased from 454.0 (95%CI, 446.0-462.1) to 542.7 (535.6-549.7) for educational attainment and from 85.8 (82.8-88.8) to 140.5 (137.6-143.4) for rural versus urban; in contrast, absolute Black-White disparity decreased from 315.3 (311.0-319.7) to 221.7 (218.1-225.3). CONCLUSIONS: Educational and rural-urban disparities in premature mortality widened, whereas Black-White disparities narrowed in the USA between 2007 and 2017, though overall rates remained considerably higher in Black people.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Mortalidad Prematura , Etnicidad , Humanos , Mortalidad , Grupos Raciales , Población Rural , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
JAMA ; 328(2): 184-197, 2022 07 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35819420

RESUMEN

Importance: Despite growing evidence, the role of spirituality in serious illness and health has not been systematically assessed. Objective: To review evidence concerning spirituality in serious illness and health and to identify implications for patient care and health outcomes. Evidence Review: Searches of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science identified articles with evidence addressing spirituality in serious illness or health, published January 2000 to April 2022. Independent reviewers screened, summarized, and graded articles that met eligibility criteria. Eligible serious illness studies included 100 or more participants; were prospective cohort studies, cross-sectional descriptive studies, meta-analyses, or randomized clinical trials; and included validated spirituality measures. Eligible health outcome studies prospectively examined associations with spirituality as cohort studies, case-control studies, or meta-analyses with samples of at least 1000 or were randomized trials with samples of at least 100 and used validated spirituality measures. Applying Cochrane criteria, studies were graded as having low, moderate, serious, or critical risk of bias, and studies with serious and critical risk of bias were excluded. Multidisciplinary Delphi panels consisting of clinicians, public health personnel, researchers, health systems leaders, and medical ethicists qualitatively synthesized and assessed the evidence and offered implications for health care. Evidence-synthesis statements and implications were derived from panelists' qualitative input; panelists rated the former on a 9-point scale (from "inconclusive" to "strongest evidence") and ranked the latter by order of priority. Findings: Of 8946 articles identified, 371 articles met inclusion criteria for serious illness; of these, 76.9% had low to moderate risk of bias. The Delphi panel review yielded 8 evidence statements supported by evidence categorized as strong and proposed 3 top-ranked implications of this evidence for serious illness: (1) incorporate spiritual care into care for patients with serious illness; (2) incorporate spiritual care education into training of interdisciplinary teams caring for persons with serious illness; and (3) include specialty practitioners of spiritual care in care of patients with serious illness. Of 6485 health outcomes articles, 215 met inclusion criteria; of these, 66.0% had low to moderate risk of bias. The Delphi panel review yielded 8 evidence statements supported by evidence categorized as strong and proposed 3 top-ranked implications of this evidence for health outcomes: (1) incorporate patient-centered and evidence-based approaches regarding associations of spiritual community with improved patient and population health outcomes; (2) increase awareness among health professionals of evidence for protective health associations of spiritual community; and (3) recognize spirituality as a social factor associated with health in research, community assessments, and program implementation. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review, analysis, and process, based on highest-quality evidence available and expert consensus, provided suggested implications for addressing spirituality in serious illness and health outcomes as part of person-centered, value-sensitive care.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad , Salud , Terapias Espirituales , Espiritualidad , Estudios Transversales , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos
7.
Am J Public Health ; 110(3): 309-316, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31944837

RESUMEN

"Anchor Institutions"-universities, hospitals, and other large, place-based organizations-invest in their communities as a way of doing business. Anchor "meds" (anchor institutions dedicated to health) that address social needs and social determinants of health have generated considerable community-based activity over the past several decades.Yet to date, virtually no research has analyzed their current status or effect on community health. To assess the current state and potential best practices of anchor meds, we conducted a search of the literature, a review of Web sites and related public documents of all declared anchor meds in the country, and interviews with 14 key informants.We identified potential best practices in adopting, operationalizing, and implementing an anchor mission and using specific social determinants of health strategies, noting early outcomes and lessons learned. Future dedicated research can bring heightened attention to this emerging force for community health.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Administración Hospitalaria , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Economía Hospitalaria , Política de Salud , Hospitales , Humanos , Salud Pública , Exención de Impuesto
8.
Tob Control ; 29(3): 289-294, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31266902

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the number and proportion of accredited, degree-granting institutions with 100% smoke-free and 100% tobacco-free protections across the USA and by state. METHODS: Data on postsecondary education institutions from the US Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System 2015, and smoke-free and tobacco-free campus protections from the American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation's Smokefree and Tobacco-Free Colleges and Universities List 2017, were integrated to calculate the number and proportion of: (1) smoke-free and tobacco-free accredited, degree-granting institutions and (2) students and staff protected by campus policies and state laws. Campus protections are given a 100% smoke-free designation if smoking is not allowed on campus anywhere, at any time; 100% tobacco-free designations extend smoke-free protections to include non-combustible products such as smokeless tobacco. RESULTS: 823 accredited, degree-granting institutions (16.7%) representing 1816 individual campuses, sites and schools have either 100% smoke-free or 100% tobacco-free protections. An estimated 14.9 million college students (26.9%) and 8.9 million faculty and staff (25.4%) are protected by campus policies and state laws. Only three states and two territories have 100% smoke-free or 100% tobacco-free protections in over half of their institutions; four states and six territories have no known 100% smoke-free or 100% tobacco-free campus protections. CONCLUSIONS: In 2017, just 16.7% of accredited, degree-granting institutions in the USA had 100% smoke-free or 100% tobacco-free protections. Despite progress, more efforts can ensure that students and staff benefit from comprehensive 100% smoke-free and 100% tobacco-free protections at US colleges and universities.


Asunto(s)
Fumar Cigarrillos , Política para Fumadores , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Control Social Formal , Productos de Tabaco , Tabaco sin Humo , Universidades , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Docentes , Política de Salud , Humanos , Estudiantes , Nicotiana , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/prevención & control , Uso de Tabaco , Estados Unidos
9.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 18(1): 88, 2020 Aug 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32771004

RESUMEN

The opioid epidemic in the United States has had a devastating impact on millions of people as well as on their families and communities. The increased prevalence of opioid misuse, use disorder and overdose in recent years has highlighted the need for improved public health approaches for reducing the tremendous harms of this illness. In this paper, we explain and call for the need for more systems science approaches, which can uncover the complexities of the opioid crisis, and help evaluate, analyse and forecast the effectiveness of ongoing and new policy interventions. Similar to how a stream of systems science research helped policy development in infectious diseases and obesity, more systems science research is needed in opioids.


Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga , Epidemias , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides , Sobredosis de Droga/tratamiento farmacológico , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Humanos , Epidemia de Opioides , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Estados Unidos
10.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 18(1): 87, 2020 Aug 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32762700

RESUMEN

The prevalence of opioid use and misuse has provoked a staggering number of deaths over the past two and a half decades. Much attention has focused on individual risks according to various characteristics and experiences. However, broader social and contextual domains are also essential contributors to the opioid crisis such as interpersonal relationships and the conditions of the community and society that people live in. Despite efforts to tackle the issue, the rates of opioid misuse and non-fatal and fatal overdose remain high. Many call for a broad public health approach, but articulation of what such a strategy could entail has not been fully realised. In order to improve the awareness surrounding opioid misuse, we developed a social-ecological framework that helps conceptualise the multivariable risk factors of opioid misuse and facilitates reviewing them in individual, interpersonal, communal and societal levels. Our framework illustrates the multi-layer complexity of the opioid crisis that more completely captures the crisis as a multidimensional issue requiring a broader and integrated approach to prevention and treatment.


Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides , Sobredosis de Droga/tratamiento farmacológico , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Humanos , Epidemia de Opioides , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Salud Pública
11.
Am J Epidemiol ; 188(4): 664-673, 2019 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30649174

RESUMEN

Purpose in life is potentially a modifiable "health asset" that enhances health and well-being. However, the association between purpose and health in younger populations remains understudied. In this study, we prospectively examined an aspect of purpose in life-specifically having a sense of mission-and a wide range of outcomes related to psychosocial well-being, mental health, health behaviors, and physical health in young adults. Longitudinal data from the Growing Up Today Study (2007-2010 or 2007-2013, depending on outcome; mean baseline age = 22.97 years) were analyzed using generalized estimating equations. Sample sizes ranged from 6,323 to 7,463, depending on outcome. Bonferroni correction was used to correct for multiple testing. All models controlled for sociodemographic characteristics, religious service attendance, maternal attachment, and prior values of the outcome variables. Greater sense of mission was associated with greater psychological well-being (including life satisfaction, positive affect, self-esteem, emotional processing, and emotional expression), greater use of preventive health care, more volunteer activities, and possibly fewer depressive symptoms. However, there was little association with physical health or other behavioral outcomes. The formation of a sense of mission may provide a novel target for promoting multiple facets of psychological well-being, prosocial character, and possibly mental health among young adults.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Estado de Salud , Valor de la Vida , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Salud Mental , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven
12.
Epilepsy Behav ; 97: 316-318, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31255566

RESUMEN

Epilepsy is more common among children and adults living in households at lowest incomes. Like those living with any complex chronic condition, people with epilepsy need quality healthcare to improve their health and social outcomes. The purpose of this study was to use the latest national data to provide updated estimates of the percentages of adults aged 18-64 years with active epilepsy who were uninsured in 2010, 2013, 2015, and 2017 and to examine changes in health insurance coverage during these years. We analyzed nationally representative samples of adults (aged 18-64 years) from the 2010, 2013, 2015, and 2017 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). We used a validated epilepsy surveillance case definition to classify adults as having active epilepsy during 2010 and 2013 (n = 507) and during 2015 and 2017 (n = 582). We used the NHIS recode variables available in each year that account for a series of questions posed to respondents to confirm coverage and that ultimately classify respondents with different healthcare coverage types. Overall, the percentage of uninsured adults among respondents aged 18-64 years with active epilepsy decreased by more than half (59%), from 17.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 13.6%-22.7%) in 2010 and 2013 to 7.3% (95% CI = 4.8%-10.7%) in 2015 and 2017. The decrease in the percentage of uninsured adults with active epilepsy after 2010 and 2013 was balanced by a similar increase in public insurance coverage and private insurance coverage in 2015 and 2017. Epilepsy stakeholders can ensure that all uninsured adults with epilepsy obtain access to health insurance coverage. National Health Interview Survey data on epilepsy, when available, can be used to monitor trends in insurance status in the new decade.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia/economía , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/tendencias , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Renta , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
13.
JAMA ; 332(6): 455-456, 2024 08 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39023909

RESUMEN

This Viewpoint from authors at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health summarizes approaches to addressing substance use in the US; challenges posed by metrics such as overdose deaths; and more informative metrics, such as quality-adjusted life-years, to promote health equity and improve length and quality of life and health outcomes at all levels.


Asunto(s)
Años de Vida Ajustados por Discapacidad , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Humanos , Enfermedad Crónica , Sobredosis de Droga/mortalidad , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Carga Global de Enfermedades , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
JAMA ; 329(19): 1637-1638, 2023 05 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37067806

RESUMEN

This Viewpoint outlines the progress made toward eliminating hepatitis B and C but emphasizes the work that remains to prioritize diagnosis and treatment of populations disproportionately affected by viral hepatitis, including ensuring that there are systems in place to treat those infected and care for those at risk.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Hepatitis Viral Humana , Humanos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hepatitis Viral Humana/epidemiología , Hepatitis Viral Humana/etnología , Hepatitis Viral Humana/etiología , Hepatitis Viral Humana/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
JAMA ; 328(20): 2009-2010, 2022 11 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36331445

RESUMEN

This Viewpoint discusses the ways in which the tobacco industry can advance their stated goals of harm reduction and a smoke-free future.


Asunto(s)
Reducción del Daño , Industria del Tabaco , Fumar/efectos adversos , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/efectos adversos
20.
JAMA ; 325(2): 133-134, 2021 01 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33331884
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA