RESUMEN
AIM OF THE STUDY: Continuous surgical developments, growing awareness of patient representatives and limited health-care resources are pushing for innovative approaches to ensure equal high-quality pediatric surgical care. We aimed to describe early experiences and assess surgical safety of a novel nationwide pediatric surgery collaborative initiative. METHODS: In 2021, general pediatric surgeons representing all five independent university hospitals performing neonatal surgery in Finland initiated national collaboration, the Finnish pediatric surgery hub (FPSH), for sharing of surgical expertise and collective learning. For each case addressed by FPSH, place of care and surgical team were decided individually, and when deemed necessary, operations were performed in cooperation. Operations performed during 2021-2023 and associated early (<30 days) postoperative complications were analyzed according to Clavien-Madadi classification. RESULTS: Of the total 40 surgeries managed co-operatively by FPSH, 30 (75%) took place in local university hospitals and 10 in Helsinki University Hospital. There were 34 (85%) elective and 6 urgent cases, which were operated within median 1 (range, 1-3) days. Most frequent underlying diagnoses included anorectal malformations, esophageal atresia and Hirschsprung disease. Overall, 12 (30%) had any early postoperative complications, all Clavien-Madadi grade IIIB or lower, and five patients (13%) were reoperated. Rate or grade of complications was not associated with place of care. In addition to regular virtual case meetings, national care protocols and research projects were introduced. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings suggest that our national collaborative initiative, FPSH, not only provided practical and safe framework for sharing of surgical expertise but also for collective learning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Variability in outcome reporting in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) treatment trials hinders conducting meta-analyses and implementing novel treatments. We aimed to develop a core outcome set (COS) for NEC treatment trials including outcome measures most relevant to patients and physicians, from NEC diagnosis to adulthood. METHODS: Clinicians and/or researchers from low-middle- and high-income countries were approached based on their scientific contributions to NEC literature, and patients and parents through local organizations. We presented participants with 45 outcomes used in NEC research, identified through a systematic review. To achieve consensus, outcomes were rated on a scale of 1 to 9 in 3 online Delphi rounds, and discussed at a final consensus meeting. RESULTS: Seventy-one participants from 25 countries completed all Delphi rounds, including 15 patients and family representatives. Thirteen outcomes reached consensus in one of the stakeholder groups and were included in the consensus meeting, 6 outcomes reached consensus in both groups. Twenty-seven participants from both high- and low-middle-income countries attended the online consensus meeting, including family representatives and NEC patients. After discussion and a final vote, 5 outcomes reached consensus to be included: mortality, NEC-related mortality, short bowel syndrome, quality of life, and neurodevelopmental impairment. CONCLUSIONS: This NEC COS includes 5 predominantly long-term outcomes agreed upon by clinicians, patients, and family representatives. Use of this international COS will help standardize outcome selection in clinical trials, ensure these are relevant to those most affected by NEC care, and, ultimately, improve the care of infants with NEC.