Substantiating and Adopting Lung Ultrasound Scores to Predict Surfactant Need in Preterm Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome within an Institution.

OBJECTIVE: Administering surfactant timely and appropriately is important to minimize lung injury but remains challenging in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. The published literature supports that lung ultrasound (LUS) score can predict surfactant need. Neonatal LUS scanning specification and parameter setting guidelines have been recently published for standardization. However, variations in scanning protocols and machine settings hinder its clinical implementation widely. This observational study aims to internally validate the suggested LUS protocol in a neonatal intensive care unit to establish a correlation between LUS scores and surfactant need as the first step of integrating LUS in the clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: LUS was performed on 40 eligible preterm neonates within 3 hours after birth or before surfactant administration between May 2020 and March 2021. The neonates were between 27 and 32 weeks' gestational age, and all had respiratory distress. Neonates with known congenital anomalies were excluded. A high-frequency linear probe was used to obtain LUS images from six lung zones which were scored using a 0 to 3 system, yielding a maximum of 18 points. Treating physicians were blinded to the LUS score. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined the optimal LUS score cutoff for predicting surfactant need. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 40 neonates (38%) required higher oxygen fraction and received surfactant. In our cohort, an LUS score ≥10 was identified as the optimal cutoff for predicting surfactant need, with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 84%. The area under the curve was 0.8 (p = 0.0003). LUS predicted surfactant need at a median of 3.5 hours earlier than traditional clinical decision (p < 0.0037). CONCLUSION: LUS is a helpful adjunct for predicting surfactant need in preterm neonates. This study describes an approach to implement the LUS protocol and score for clinical decision-making in the clinical practice. KEY POINTS: · LUS is a helpful adjunct for predicting surfactant need in preterm neonates.. · Machine setting variation and probe selection may affect LUS image and score.. · LUS score should be validated at the local unit before clinical implementation..

Decision Accuracy and Safety of Transcutaneous Bilirubin Screening at Intermountain Healthcare.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk that transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) screening would fail to recommend phototherapy for a neonate who would have qualified for it if total serum bilirubin (TSB) screening were used. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a quality improvement project where simultaneous TcB and TSB were obtained on neonates ≥35 weeks of gestation during birth hospitalizations in our hospital system. Using our Utah bilirubin management algorithm, we quantified the risk that TcB screening would fail to identify the need for a confirmatory TSB when TSB screening alone would have revealed that phototherapy was indicated. RESULTS: In 3 hospitals, we obtained 727 paired TcB/TSB measurements. Two instances utilized a blood gas radiometer for TSB, and 725 utilized the clinical laboratory-based TSB method. One of the 727 instances had a TcB indicating NO PHOTOTHERAPY, when the simultaneous TSB indicated PHOTOTHERAPY NEEDED. The TSB from that instance was 1 of the 2 from the blood gas radiometer. We estimate the risk of such an error occurring is 1.4 per 1000 TcB measurements (95% CI 0.03-7.6 per 1000). When only the laboratory TSB is used, we estimate the risk of such an error occurring to be 0 per 1000 TcB measurements (95% CI 0.0-5.1 per 1000). CONCLUSIONS: Using TcB for screening at the birth hospital can identify those qualifying for phototherapy, using the Utah guidelines, with 1 of 727 neonates with a blood gas bilirubin and none of 725 with a laboratory-based analysis misidentified as not needing phototherapy when by TSB they did.

Self-reported practices among traditional birth attendants surveyed in western Kenya: a descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: The high rate of home deliveries conducted by unskilled birth attendants in resource-limited settings is an important global health issue because it is believed to be a significant contributing factor to maternal and newborn mortality. Given the large number of deliveries that are managed by unskilled or traditional birth attendants outside of health facilities, and the fact that there is on-going discussion regarding the role of traditional birth attendants in the maternal newborn health (MNH) service continuum, we sought to ascertain the practices of traditional birth attendants in our catchment area. The findings of this descriptive study might help inform conversations regarding the roles that traditional birth attendants can play in maternal-newborn health care. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was used in a survey that included one hundred unskilled birth attendants in western Kenya. Descriptive statistics were employed. RESULTS: Inappropriate or outdated practices were reported in relation to some obstetric complications and newborn care. Encouraging results were reported with regard to positive relationships that traditional birth attendants have with their local health facilities. Furthermore, high rates of referral to health facilities was reported for many common obstetric emergencies and similar rates for reporting of pregnancy outcomes to village elders and chiefs. CONCLUSIONS: Potentially harmful or outdated practices with regard to maternal and newborn care among traditional birth attendants in western Kenya were revealed by this study. There were high rates of traditional birth attendant referrals of pregnant mothers with obstetric complications to health facilities. Policy makers may consider re-educating and re-defining the roles and responsibilities of traditional birth attendants in maternal and neonatal health care based on the findings of this survey.