Relation between number of cardiovascular risk factors/events and noninvasive Doppler ultrasound assessments of aortic compliance.

The aim of this study was to establish the relation between noninvasive Doppler ultrasound assessments of aortic compliance, based on "foot-to-foot" aortic pulse wave velocity measurements, and presumed atherosclerotic load in patients with vascular disease and/or diabetes mellitus. One hundred ten patients with vascular disease and/or diabetes mellitus (arteriopaths) underwent measurement of in vivo aortic compliance using Doppler ultrasound. Demographic data on these subjects were recorded along with details of cardiovascular risk factors and events. Aortic compliance values were compared with data from 51 age-matched healthy, asymptomatic subjects putatively free of vascular disease (controls). Data are expressed as mean+/-SD. Arteriopaths were aged 64.1+/-8.4 years and had total cholesterol levels of 5.9+/-1.1 mmol/L and aortic compliance of 0.78+/-0.42%/10 mm Hg [1.33 kPa]. Most arteriopaths had 2 or more cardiovascular risk factors and events: diabetes (n=41), hypertension (n=45), smoking (n=86), cerebrovascular/transient ischemic event (n=13), myocardial infarction (n=44), angina (n=51), and/or peripheral vascular disease (n=33). Controls were aged 64.3+/-12.1 years with total cholesterol of 6.1+/-1.1 mmol/L and aortic compliance of 1.14+/-0.46%/10 mm Hg [1.33 kPa] (P<0.002 versus arteriopaths). Subset analysis revealed that patients with the greatest number of cardiovascular risk factors and events (n=5) had the stiffest aortas (aortic compliance, 0.58+/-0.15%/10 mm Hg [1.33 kPa]) compared with those patients with the median and mean (n=2) number of risk factors and events (aortic compliance, 0.80+/-0.50%/10 mm Hg [1.33 kPa]; P<0.02). The data suggest that a significant inverse relation exists between presumed atherosclerotic load (as assessed by the number of cardiovascular risk factors and events) and aortic compliance determined noninvasively based on aortic pulse wave velocity measurements. If these findings are confirmed by prospective, longitudinal follow-up studies, such measurements may prove useful as a noninvasive marker of vascular risk.

Reimplantation of obstructive megaureters with and without tailoring.

OBJECTIVES: Reimplantation of megaureters may be complicated by excessive bulk of tissue when plicated, or stenosis at the anastomosis site when excisional tapering is performed. Some urologists in our institution reimplant megaureters without tailoring, while others routinely tailor megaureters. Aiming to compare success rates, we report our experience in reimplanting obstructive megaureters with and without tailoring. MATERIALS: The medical records of 30 boys and four girls with primary obstructive megaureters (a total of 38 ureters) were reviewed. Median age at operation was 18 months (range 1 month to 8 years). Of the ureters, 16/38 were tailored and 22/38 were reimplanted without tailoring. RESULTS: Preoperative mean diameter (per ultrasound) of the 16 tailored ureters was 16.1mm (range 10-26 mm). Postoperative ultrasound showed resolution of hydronephrosis in 3/16 (19%), an improvement in 11/16 (69%), and no change in the degree of hydronephrosis in 2/16 (13%). Preoperative mean diameter of the non-tailored ureters was 14 mm (range 10-27 mm), and postoperative ultrasound showed resolution of hydronephrosis in 11/22 (50%), an improvement in 10/22 (45%), and no change in the degree of hydronephrosis in 1/22 (5%). Of the tailored ureters, 1/16 needed re-operation because of anastomotic stricture, and one girl had recurrent urinary tract infections. Of the non-tailored ureters, four had recurrent infection, of whom one boy underwent redo reimplantation because of grade 2 vesicoureteric reflux. CONCLUSION: In this series non-tailoring reimplantation was an equivalent option to tailoring in obstructive megaureters.