Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 65(3): 404-419, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33169383

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Providing safe anaesthesia is essential when performing caesarean sections, one of the most commonly performed types of surgery. Anaesthesia-related causes of maternal mortality are generally considered preventable. The primary aim of our study was to assess the type of anaesthesia used for caesarean sections in Sierra Leone. Secondary aims were to identify the type and training of anaesthesia providers, availability of equipment and drugs and use of perioperative routines. METHODS: All hospitals in Sierra Leone performing caesarean sections were included. In each facility, one randomly selected anaesthesia provider was interviewed face-to-face using a predefined questionnaire. RESULTS: In 2016, 36 hospitals performed caesarean sections in Sierra Leone. The most commonly used anaesthesia method for caesarean section was spinal anaesthesia (63%), followed by intravenous ketamine without intubation; however, there was a wide variety between hospitals. Of all anaesthesia providers, 33% were not qualified to provide anaesthesia independently, as stipulated by local regulations. Of those, 50% expressed high confidence in their skills to handle obstetric emergencies. There were discrepancies among hospitals in the availability of essential drugs, the use of post-operative recovery and the presence of a functioning blood bank. CONCLUSION: Anaesthesia for caesarean sections in Sierra Leone showed a predominance for spinal anaesthesia. The workforce consisted mainly of non-physicians, of which a third was not trained to provide anaesthesia independently. Both the type of anaesthesia and the presence of qualified anaesthetic providers was widely variable between hospitals. Significant gaps were identified in the availability of equipment, essential drugs and perioperative routines.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Obstétrica , Cesárea , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Embarazo , Sierra Leona , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 153(2): 280-286, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33159814

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of obstetric handheld smartphone-based point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in a resource-limited high-volume setting. METHODS: A single-center prospective observational study among women requiring urgent diagnosis and admitted to a maternity referral hospital in Sierra Leone from March to April 2019. Pre-specified ultrasound findings were obtained with a handheld POCUS device; a comprehensive ultrasound examination was then performed by an experienced operator using conventional full-feature apparatus. Agreement was assessed by diagnostic accuracy and Cohen κ-statistics. RESULTS: Overall, there were 307 participants. The mean aggregated diagnostic accuracy was 95.5% (κ-statistic, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.93; P < 0.001). Highest accuracy was reported for detecting free fluid collection in the abdominal cavity (100%; κ-statistic, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.00; P < 0.001). Ultrasound findings obtained with the handheld device for intrauterine pregnancy, fetal heartbeat, cephalic presentation, multifetal pregnancy, and assessment of gestational age based on bi-parietal diameter were highly reliable (agreement, >90%; κ-statistic, >0.80). Detection of low-lying placenta or placenta previa was the least reliable (κ-statistic, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.13-0.93; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Handheld POCUS findings were found to be reliable for detecting pre-specified urgent obstetric findings in a high-volume resource-limited referral hospital.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas en el Punto de Atención/normas , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/normas , Adulto , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sierra Leona
3.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 103(5): 2142-2148, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32840199

RESUMEN

A better understanding of the context-specific epidemiology, outcomes, and risk factors for death of critically ill parturients in resource-poor hospitals is needed to tackle the still alarming in-hospital maternal mortality in African countries. From October 2017 to October 2018, we performed a 1-year retrospective cohort study in a referral maternity hospital in Freetown, Sierra Leone. The primary endpoint was the association between risk factors and high-dependency unit (HDU) mortality. Five hundred twenty-three patients (median age 25 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 21-30 years) were admitted to the HDU for a median of 2 (IQR: 1-3) days. Among them, 65% were referred with a red obstetric early warning score (OEWS) code, representing 1.17 cases per HDU bed per week; 11% of patients died in HDU, mostly in the first 24 hours from admission. The factors independently associated with HDU mortality were ward rather than postoperative referrals (odds ratio [OR]: 3.21; 95% CI: 1.48-7.01; P = 0.003); admissions with red (high impairment of patients' vital signs) versus yellow (impairment of vital signs) or green (little or no impairment of patients' vital signs) OEWS (OR: 3.66; 95% CI: 1.15-16.96; P = 0.04); responsiveness to pain or unresponsiveness on the alert, voice, pain unresponsive scale (OR: 5.25; 95% CI: 2.64-10.94; P ≤ 0.0001); and use of vasopressors (OR: 3.24; 95% CI: 1.32-7.66; P = 0.008). Critically ill parturients were predominantly referred with a red OEWS code and usually required intermediate care for 48 hours. Despite the provided interventions, death in the HDU was frequent, affecting one of 10 critically ill parturients. Medical admission, a red OEWS code, and a poor neurological and hemodynamic status were independently associated with mortality, whereas adequate oxygenation was associated with survival.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Adulto , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Obstetricia , Admisión del Paciente , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sierra Leona/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
4.
Ann Glob Health ; 86(1): 82, 2020 07 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32742940

RESUMEN

Background: Sierra Leone faces among the highest maternal mortality rates worldwide. Despite this burden, the role of life-saving critical care interventions in low-resource settings remains scarcely explored. A value-based approach may be used to question whether it is sustainable and useful to start and run an obstetric intermediate critical care facility in a resource-poor referral hospital. We also aimed to investigate whether patient outcomes in terms of quality of life justified the allocated resources. Objective: To explore the value-based dimension performing a cost-utility analysis with regard to the implementation and one-year operation of the HDU. The primary endopoint was the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of patients admitted to the HDU, against direct and indirect costs. Secondary endpoints included key procedures or treatments performed during the HDU stay. Methods: The study was conducted from October 2, 2017 to October 1, 2018 in the obstetric high dependency unit (HDU) of Princess Christian Maternity Hospital (PCMH) in Freetown, Sierra Leone. Findings: 523 patients (median age 25 years, IQR 21-30) were admitted to HDU. The total 1 year investment and operation costs for the HDU amounted to €120,082 - resulting in €230 of extra cost per admitted patient. The overall cost per QALY gained was of €10; this value is much lower than the WHO threshold defining high cost effectiveness of an intervention, i.e. three times the current Sierra Leone annual per capita GDP of €1416. Conclusion: With an additional cost per QALY of only €10.0, the implementation and one-year running of the case studied obstetric HDU can be considered a highly cost-effective frugal innovation in limited resource contexts. The evidences provided by this study allow a precise and novel insight to policy makers and clinicians useful to prioritize interventions in critical care and thus address maternal mortality in a high burden scenario.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/economía , Unidades Hospitalarias/economía , Maternidades/economía , Mortalidad Materna , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Transfusión Sanguínea , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Femenino , Recursos en Salud , Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Maternidades/organización & administración , Hospitales Urbanos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Sulfato de Magnesio/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto , Obstetricia , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Transferencia de Pacientes , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/prevención & control , Sierra Leona , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
5.
BMJ Glob Health ; 5(12)2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33355267

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Longer travel times are associated with increased adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Geospatial modelling has been increasingly used to estimate geographic proximity in emergency obstetric care. In this study, we aimed to assess the correlation between modelled and patient-reported travel times and to evaluate its clinical relevance. METHODS: Women who delivered by caesarean section in nine hospitals were followed up with home visits at 1 month and 1 year. Travel times between the location before the delivery and the facility where caesarean section was performed were estimated, based on two models (model I Ouma et al; model II Munoz et al). Patient-reported and modelled travel times were compared applying a univariable linear regression analysis, and the relation between travel time and perinatal mortality was assessed. RESULTS: The median reported travel time was 60 min, compared with 13 and 34 min estimated by the two models, respectively. The 2-hour access threshold correlated with a patient-reported travel time of 5.7 hours for model I and 1.8 hours for model II. Longer travel times were associated with transport by boat and ambulance, visiting one or two facilities before reaching the final facility, lower education and poverty. Lower perinatal mortality was found both in the group with a reported travel time of 2 hours or less (193 vs 308 per 1000 births, p<0.001) and a modelled travel time of 2 hours or less (model I: 209 vs 344 per 1000 births, p=0.003; model II: 181 vs 319 per 1000 births, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The standard model, used to estimate geographical proximity, consistently underestimated the travel time. However, the conservative travel time model corresponded better to patient-reported travel times. The 2-hour threshold as determined by the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery, is clinically relevant with respect to reducing perinatal death, not a clear cut-off.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Muerte Perinatal , Femenino , Humanos , Mortalidad Perinatal , Embarazo , Sierra Leona/epidemiología , Viaje
6.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 104(2): 478-486, 2020 12 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33319731

RESUMEN

Critically ill parturients have an increased risk of developing pulmonary complications. Lung ultrasound (LUS) could be effective in addressing the cause of respiratory distress in resource-limited settings with high maternal mortality. We aimed to determine the frequency, timing of appearance, and type of pulmonary complications in critically ill parturients in an obstetric unit in Sierra Leone. In this prospective observational study, LUS examinations were performed on admission, after 24 and 48 hours, and in case of respiratory deterioration. Primary endpoint was the proportion of parturients with one or more pulmonary complications, stratified for the presence of respiratory distress. Secondary endpoints included timing and types of complications, and their association with "poor outcome," defined as a composite of transfer for escalation of care or death. Of 166 patients enrolled, 35 patients (21% [95% CI: 15-28]) had one or more pulmonary complications, the majority diagnosed on admission. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (period prevalence 4%) and hydrostatic pulmonary edema (4%) were only observed in patients with respiratory distress. Pneumonia (2%), atelectasis (10%), and pleural effusion (7%) were present, irrespective of respiratory distress. When ultrasound excluded pulmonary complications, respiratory distress was related to anemia or metabolic acidosis. Pulmonary complications were associated with an increased risk of poor outcome (odds ratio: 5.0; 95% CI: 1.7-14.6; P = 0.003). In critically ill parturients in a resource-limited obstetric unit, LUS contributed to address the cause of respiratory distress by identifying or excluding pulmonary complications. These were associated with a poor outcome.


Asunto(s)
Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/normas , Adulto , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Neumonía/diagnóstico por imagen , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Edema Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/diagnóstico por imagen , Sierra Leona , Ultrasonografía/economía , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Adulto Joven
7.
BMJ Glob Health ; 4(5): e001605, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31565407

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Sierra Leone has the world's highest maternal mortality, partly due to low access to caesarean section. Limited data are available to guide improvement. In this study, we aimed to analyse the rate and mortality of caesarean sections in the country. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all caesarean sections and all reported in-facility maternal deaths in Sierra Leone in 2016. All facilities performing caesarean sections were visited. Data on in-facility maternal deaths were retrieved from the Maternal Death Surveillance and Response database. Caesarean section mortality was defined as in-facility perioperative mortality. RESULTS: In 2016, there were 7357 caesarean sections in Sierra Leone. This yields a population rate of 2.9% of all live births, a 35% increase from 2012, with district rates ranging from 0.4% to 5.2%. The most common indications for surgery were obstructed labour (42%), hypertensive disorders (25%) and haemorrhage (22%). Ninety-nine deaths occurred during or after caesarean section, and the in-facility perioperative caesarean section mortality rate was 1.5% (median 0.7%, IQR 0-2.2). Haemorrhage was the leading cause of death (73%), and of those who died during or after surgery, 80% had general anaesthesia, 75% received blood transfusion and 22% had a uterine rupture diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: The caesarean section rate has increased rapidly in Sierra Leone, but the distribution remains uneven. Caesarean section mortality is high, but there is wide variation. More access to caesarean sections for maternal and neonatal complications is needed in underserved areas, and expansion should be coupled with efforts to limit late presentation, to offer assisted vaginal delivery when indicated and to ensure optimal perioperative care.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA