Content validity and psychometric properties of the inFLUenza Patient-Reported Outcome Plus (FLU-PRO Plus©) instrument in patients with COVID-19.

PURPOSE: A well-defined and reliable patient-reported outcome instrument for COVID-19 is important for assessing symptom severity and supporting research studies. The InFLUenza Patient-Reported Outcome (FLU-PRO) instrument has been expanded to include loss of taste and smell in the FLU-PRO Plus, to comprehensively cover COVID-19 symptoms. Our studies were designed to evaluate and validate the FLU-PRO Plus among patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Two studies were conducted: (1) a qualitative, non-interventional, cross-sectional study of patients with COVID-19 involving hybrid concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews; (2) a psychometric evaluation of the measurement properties of FLU-PRO Plus, using data from COMET-ICE (COVID-19 Monoclonal antibody Efficacy Trial-Intent to Care Early). RESULTS: In the qualitative interviews (n = 30), all 34 items of the FLU-PRO Plus were considered relevant to COVID-19, and participants determined the questionnaire was easily understood, well written, and comprehensive. In the psychometric evaluation (n = 845), the internal consistency reliability of FLU-PRO Plus total score was 0.94, ranging from 0.71 to 0.90 for domain scores. Reproducibility (Day 20-21) was 0.83 for total score, with domain scores of 0.67-0.89. Confirmatory factor analysis with the novel smell/taste domain demonstrated an acceptable fit to the data. CONCLUSION: The content, reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the FLU-PRO Plus in the COVID-19 population were supported. Our results suggest that FLU-PRO Plus is a content- and psychometrically-valid, fit-for-purpose measure which is easily understood by patients. FLU-PRO Plus is a suitable PRO measure for evaluating symptoms of COVID-19 and treatment benefit directly from the patient perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT04545060, September 10, 2020; retrospectively registered.

Deciding Between SF-6Dv2 Health States: A Think-Aloud Study of Decision-Making Strategies Used in Discrete Choice Experiments.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to gain insight into decision-making strategies individuals used when evaluating pairs of SF-6Dv2 health states in discrete choice experiments (DCEs). METHODS: This qualitative, cross-sectional, noninterventional study asked participants to use a think-aloud approach to compare SF-6Dv2 health states in DCEs. Thematic analysis focused on comprehension and cognitive strategies used to compare health states and make decisions. RESULTS: Participants (N = 40) used 3 main strategies when completing DCEs: (1) trading, (2) reinterpretation, and (3) relying on previous experience. Trading was the most common strategy, used by everyone at least once, and involved prioritizing key attributes, such as preferring a health state with significant depression but no bodily pain. Reinterpretation was used by 17 participants and involved reconstructing health states by changing underlying assumptions (eg, rationalizing selecting a health state with significant pain because they could take pain medications). Finally, some (n = 13) relied on previous experience when making decisions on some choice tasks. Participants with experience dealing with pain, for instance, prioritized health states with the least impact in this dimension. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitatively evaluating the decision-making strategies used in DCEs allows researchers to evaluate whether the tasks and attributes are interpreted accurately. The findings from this study add to the understanding of the generation of SF-6Dv2 health utility weights and the validity of these weights (e.g., reinterpreting health states could undermine the validity of DCEs and utility weights), and the overall usefulness of the SF-6Dv2. The methodology described in this study can and should be carried forth in valuing other health utility measures, not just the SF-6Dv2.

A structured review evaluating content validity of the Asthma Control Test, and its consistency with U.S. guidelines and patient expectations for asthma control.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the content of the Asthma Control Test (ACT) served as a valid measure of asthma control (i.e., content validity) by mapping ACT items to the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guideline asthma control definitions, and to language used by patients to describe their asthma. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and EMBASE databases were used for a structured literature analysis. STUDY SELECTIONS: Full-text, English-language articles that reported findings from qualitative studies conducted in adults, focusing on patient descriptors of asthma symptoms, impacts, or severity, were included. Pediatric studies, studies conducted in patients without asthma, and studies that did not contain qualitative data were excluded. RESULTS: ACT items reflected all domains of asthma impairment described in the NHLBI guidelines, except pulmonary function. Following the literature review, 28 full-text publications were identified that included patient descriptors that could be mapped to ACT items. For example, per ACT Item 1, patients described having trouble at work, school, and completing household chores; and, per ACT Item 2, patients used the phrase "short of breath" to describe asthma-associated symptoms. CONCLUSION: ACT item content corresponded well with the NHLBI guideline definitions of the impairment domain of asthma control (focused on asthma symptoms and impact), and we identified numerous examples in the literature indicating that ACT concepts and item content mirror the language patients use when discussing asthma symptoms and impact, and their degree of asthma control. This provides further evidence to support content validity of the ACT as a measure of asthma control.

Impact of chronic thrombocytopenia on in-hospital outcomes and healthcare resource utilization after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: There is little data on the impact of chronic thrombocytopenia (CTP) on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve repair (TAVR). Most studies are from single centers and mostly focused on postprocedure thrombocytopenia. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to report on the impact of CTP (>1 year) on in-hospital outcomes and healthcare resource utilization after TAVR. METHODS: From the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2012 and 2015, we identified patients with CTP who underwent TAVR. A 1:1 propensity-matched cohort was created to examine in-hospital outcomes in patients with and without CTP. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included postprocedure complications, length of stay, total cost, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: A matched pair of 4,300 patients with and without CTP were identified. Patients with CTP had higher in-hospital mortality as compared to no CTP patients (6.0 vs. 3.3%, p-value .007), increased postprocedure hemorrhage, platelet and blood transfusion, vascular complications, postop sepsis, and acute kidney injury. With regards to resource utilization, CTP patients had a longer length of stay, higher total cost and were more likely to be discharged to a facility (34.1 vs. 27.6%) other than home (All, p-value <.001). Subanalysis, however, revealed this difference in resource utilization was seen when patients developed postprocedure complications. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated higher risk of in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, and healthcare resource utilization in patients with baseline CTP undergoing TAVR. Further studies are required to investigate ways to improve the management of these patients.

Adapting traditional content validation methods to fit purpose: an example with a novel video assessment and training materials in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).

PURPOSE: The Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) Video Assessment requires a caregiver to record six videos of their ambulatory child performing physical activities using a smartphone application (app). Innovative assessments that combine a performance measure, technology, and an observer require new approaches to content validation studies. This study presents a novel approach to establish the feasibility and content validity of the Video Assessment and usability of the app. METHODS: Interviews used concept elicitation and an adapted cognitive debriefing approach. Interviews were conducted with 8 clinicians who reviewed training materials prior to the interview and provided feedback on the appropriateness and usefulness of the DMD Video Assessment and the relevance of the physical activities. Four caregivers reviewed training materials and used the app to record their child performing the physical activities prior to the interview. Researchers reviewed the recordings against a checklist to identify discrepancies in caregivers' understanding of the training materials prior to an interview. During the interview, caregivers commented on comprehension of the materials, appropriateness of the activities, and feasibility of recording the videos. RESULTS: Clinicians found the DMD Video Assessment and materials appropriate and useful for assessing disease progression and treatment response. Caregivers found the activities appropriate and the training materials and app easy to understand and use. Feedback resulted in changes to the training materials, but not the activities or videotaping procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers used an innovative methodological approach that adapted traditional methods of content validation for the purpose of evaluating a technology-based performance measure in its totality. While future studies should be conducted with a larger, more diverse sample, these study findings add to our understanding of the content validity of the DMD Video Assessment.

Effect of tardive dyskinesia on quality of life in patients with bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia.

PURPOSE: Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a common but serious hyperkinetic movement disorder and side effect of antipsychotic medications used to treat bipolar disorder (BD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and schizophrenia (SZ). The purpose of this study was to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a population with diagnoses for BD, MDD, or SZ by comparing patients with TD (n = 197) with those without TD (n = 219). HRQoL in each group was also compared with HRQoL of the general population. METHODS: This study employed a cross-sectional web-based survey. HRQoL was assessed by four instruments: the SF-12 Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-12v2), the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire, Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF), the Social Withdrawal subscale of the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (SW-ISMI); and two questions on movement disorders. RESULTS: Patients with TD had significantly worse HRQoL and social withdrawal than those without. The differences were more pronounced for physical HRQoL domains than for mental health domains. Patients with more-severe TD, assessed through either self-rating or clinician rating, experienced significantly worse HRQoL than did those with less-severe TD. The impact of TD was substantially greater in patients with SZ than in those with BD or MDD. Compared with the general population, patients with BD, MDD, or SZ experienced significantly worse HRQoL regardless of TD status, although this deficit in HRQoL was greater among those with TD. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of TD is associated with worse HRQoL and social withdrawal. The most severe impact of TD is on physical aspects of patients' HRQoL.

Estimated medical expenditure and risk of job loss among rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing tofacitinib treatment: post hoc analyses of two randomized clinical trials.

Objectives: RA causes high disability levels and reduces health-related quality of life, triggering increased costs and risk of unemployment. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of RA. These post hoc analyses of phase 3 data aimed to assess monthly medical expenditure (MME) and risk of job loss for tofacitinib treatment vs placebo. Methods: Data analysed were from two randomized phase 3 studies of RA patients (n = 1115) with inadequate response to MTX or TNF inhibitors (TNFi) receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily, adalimumab (one study only) or placebo, in combination with MTX. Short Form 36 version 2 Health Survey physical and mental component summary scores were translated into predicted MME via an algorithm and concurrent inability to work and job loss risks at 6, 12 and 24 months, using Medical Outcomes Study data. Results: MME reduction by month 3 was $100 greater for tofacitinib- than placebo-treated TNFi inadequate responders (P < 0.001); >20 and 6% reductions from baseline, respectively. By month 3 of tofacitinib treatment, the odds of inability to work decreased ⩾16%, and risk of future job loss decreased ∼20% (P < 0.001 vs placebo). MME reduction by month 3 was $70 greater for tofacitinib- than placebo-treated MTX inadequate responders (P < 0.001); ⩾23 and 13% reductions from baseline, respectively. By month 3 of tofacitinib treatment, the odds of inability to work decreased ⩾31% and risk of future job loss decreased ⩾25% (P < 0.001 vs placebo). Conclusion: Tofacitinib treatment had a positive impact on estimated medical expenditure and risk of job loss for RA patients with inadequate response to MTX or TNFi.

Psychometric validation of the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report Form in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

BACKGROUND: Measurement properties of the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report Form (WFIRS-P), which assesses attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-related functional impairment in children/adolescents (6-17 years), were examined. METHODS: Data from seven randomized, controlled trials were pooled. Analyses were conducted in two random half-samples. WFIRS-P conceptual framework was evaluated using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Reliability was estimated using internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest reliability methods. Convergent validity was assessed using correlations between WFIRS-P domain scores and the ADHD-RS-IV and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scales. Responsiveness was tested by comparing mean changes in WFIRS-P domain scores between responders and non-responders based on clinical criteria. RESULTS: CFA adequately confirmed the item-to-scale relationships defined in the WFIRS-P conceptual framework. Cronbach's alpha coefficient exceeded 0.7 for all domains and test-retest reliability exceeded 0.7 for all but Risky Activities. With few exceptions, WFIRS-P domains correlated significantly (p < 0.05) with ADHD-RS-IV Total, Inattention and Hyperactivity-Impulsivity scores and CGI-S at baseline and follow-up in both random half-samples. Mean changes in WFIRS-P domain scores differed significantly between responder and non-responder groups in the expected direction (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Study results support the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the WFIRS-P. Findings were replicated between two random samples, further demonstrating the robustness of results.

Secukinumab treatment in rheumatoid arthritis is associated with incremental benefit in the clinical outcomes and HRQoL improvements that exceed minimally important thresholds.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment is to induce remission, the absence of disease activity. The objective of this study was to explore the association between clinical endpoints used to gauge RA treatment efficacy and patient-reported outcomes of health-related quality of life, fatigue, and physical function in RA patients treated with secukinumab in a phase 2 randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHOD: Adult RA patients (n = 237) with incomplete responses to methotrexate were randomized equally to receive monthly s.c. injections of secukinumab 25 mg, 75 mg, 150 mg, 300 mg or placebo. Clinical endpoints used in this study included the ACR response criteria and its components and simplified disease activity score. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) included Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 [SF-36] Survey, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue). Patients were categorized into mutually exclusive groups according to the magnitude and direction of change from baseline to week 16 in each clinical endpoint. Definitions of minimal important differences [MID] in each clinical endpoint were used to categorize patients, as well as thresholds beyond MID. Mean changes from baseline to week 16 were computed for each PRO and analyses of variance to test the differences in PRO changes observed across groups of patients that differed in each clinical endpoint. Analyses were limited to patients randomized to secukinumab treatment. All dose groups were combined (n = 187). RESULTS: Mean changes from baseline in each PRO differed significantly across groups of patients in the expected direction. With few exceptions, there was considerable agreement between clinical endpoints and PROs concerning the magnitude of change defined as clinically meaningful. More importantly, results demonstrated that greater improvements in clinical endpoints were associated with incrementally better improvements in HRQoL, fatigue, and physical function. CONCLUSION: Results of this study show considerable agreement between minimal thresholds of improvement established for PROs and clinical outcome measures used in RA treatment studies and provide thresholds to be considered in gauging the importance of a treatment effect that goes beyond what is considered as minimally important for PRO measures.

Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) in patients with chronic migraine.

BACKGROUND: The Headache Impact Test (HIT)-6 was developed and has been validated in patients with various types of headache. The objective of this study was to report the psychometric properties of the HIT-6 among patients with chronic migraine. METHODS: Data came from two international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of chronic migraine patients (N = 1,384) undergoing prophylaxis therapy. Confirmatory factor analysis and differential item functioning (DIF) analysis were used to test the latent structure and cross-cultural comparability of the HIT-6. Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness were assessed. Two sets of criterion groups were used: (1) 28-day headache frequency: <10, 10-14, and ≥15 days; (2) sample quartiles of the total cumulative hours of headache: <140, 140 to <280, 280 to <420, and ≥420 hours. Two sets of responsiveness categories were defined as reduction of <30%, 30% to <50%, or ≥50% in (1) number of headache days and (2) cumulative hours of headache. RESULTS: Measurement invariance tests supported the stability of the HIT-6 latent structure across studies. DIF analysis supported cross-cultural comparability. Good reliability was observed across studies (Cronbach's α: 0.75-0.92; intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.76-0.80). HIT-6 scores correlated strongly (-0.86 to -0.59) with scores of the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. Analysis of variance indicated that HIT-6 scores discriminated across both types of criterion groups (P<0.001), across studies and time points. HIT-6 change scores were significantly higher in magnitude in groups experiencing greater improvement (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: All measurement properties were consistently verified across the two studies, supporting the validity of the HIT-6 among chronic migraine patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00156910 and NCT00168428 on www.ClinicalTrials.gov.

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Rhinitis Control Assessment Test in patients with rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: The Rhinitis Control Assessment Test (RCAT) is a brief, patient-completed tool to evaluate rhinitis symptom control. OBJECTIVE: We sought to test the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of RCAT and to estimate a cut-point score and minimal important difference (MID). METHODS: A total of 402 patients 12 years of age and older with allergic or nonallergic rhinitis were enrolled in a noninterventional study. Patients completed the RCAT (6 items; score range, 6-30) and had Total Nasal Symptom Scores (TNSSs) measured at baseline and 2 weeks later. Physicians completed a global assessment of rhinitis symptom control (Physician's Global Assessment) and disease severity. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, known-groups validity, and responsiveness were evaluated. The MID was determined by using distribution- and anchor-based methods. Content validity of the RCAT was assessed in individual interviews with a separate group of 58 adult patients. RESULTS: Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of RCAT scores were 0.77 and 0.78, respectively. Convergent validity correlation between RCAT and TNSS scores was 0.57, and that between RCAT and Physician's Global Assessment scores was 0.34. Mean RCAT scores differed significantly (P < .001) across patient groups, differing in TNSS (F = 72.7), Physician's Global Assessment score (F = 28.6), and disease severity (F = 34.1) in the hypothesized direction. Results suggested a cut-point score of 21 or less can be used to identify patients who are experiencing rhinitis symptom control problems. The preliminary estimate of the MID was 3 points. Patients found RCAT items comprehensive, easy to understand, and relevant. CONCLUSION: The RCAT demonstrated adequate reliability, validity, and responsiveness and was deemed acceptable and appropriate by patients. This tool can facilitate the detection of rhinitis symptom control problems, and its brevity supports its usefulness in clinical care.

SF-36v2 and FACIT-Fatigue quality of life improvements with organ-specific SELENA-SLEDAI response and belimumab treatment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Explore organ-specific SLE burden by assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and fatigue changes associated with Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) organ system response (score improvement) and belimumab treatment. METHODS: Data from four phase III belimumab trials were pooled for post hoc analysis (GSK Study 217382): BLISS-52 (NCT00424476), BLISS-76 (NCT00410384), BLISS-SC (NCT01484496) and EMBRACE (NCT01632241). Patients with baseline organ system involvement were classed as organ system responders if SELENA-SLEDAI scores for that organ system decreased at any post-baseline visit. HRQoL (36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2)) and fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue)) changes over 52 weeks were compared between organ system responders and non-responders, and separately between belimumab versus placebo treatment arms among organ system responders. Group-level differences were compared using analysis of variance; differences were interpreted using published group-level minimal important difference (MID). RESULTS: In these post hoc analyses, musculoskeletal and mucocutaneous organ system responders had greater SF-36v2 improvements than non-responders across most SF-36v2 domains, but differences were largely MID), with FACIT-Fatigue also improving >MID for renal responders receiving belimumab. CONCLUSIONS: SLE disease burden differs with the organ system(s) involved. While these analyses are limited by mutual inclusivity of organ system groupings, differing patient numbers between groups and small numbers in some groups, they suggest that mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal organ system response improves SF-36v2 domain scores; cardiovascular and respiratory organ system response may meaningfully improve fatigue; and belimumab may offer additional HRQoL or fatigue benefits beyond standard therapy for musculoskeletal and renal responders.

Meaningful score changes for SF-36v2, FACIT-fatigue, and RASIQ in rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Interpretation thresholds for patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores are of crucial importance, particularly when interpreting treatment benefit. This study was designed to determine the within-patient meaningful improvement (WPMI) thresholds for the Short-Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2), the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), and the novel Rheumatoid Arthritis Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire (RASIQ) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis, anchor-based and supportive distribution-based methods were used to derive WPMI based on blinded data from all treatment arms in two Phase 2 RA trials with otilimab. Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) was the general anchor for all SF-36v2 scales. SF-36 Patient's Global Impression of Status (PGIS), PtGA, and VT03 (an SF-36v2 item) were used as anchors for FACIT-Fatigue. SF-36 PGIS, PtGA, and Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PAIN) were anchors for RASIQ. Mean change was calculated for the anchor category associated with minimal meaningful improvement from baseline to Week 24 for SF-36v2 and FACIT-Fatigue, and to Week 12 for RASIQ. Sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate the accuracy of estimated WPMI values. RESULTS: For the SF-36v2 physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health domains, anchor-based estimates of WPMI based on 0-100 scores were 24.5, 24.5, 25.4, 13.6, 21.5, 20.5, 16.9, and 14.3, respectively. Anchor-based WPMI estimates were 9.7 for the Physical Component Summary score and 7.6 for the Mental Component Summary score (using norm-based T-score metric). For FACIT-Fatigue (range 0-52), WPMI estimates ranged from 9.7 to 11.3 points. For RASIQ (range 0-100), anchor-based WPMI was determined as a change between -32.7 and -21.7 points for the Joint Pain scale, -26.7 to -23.7 for the Joint Stiffness scale, and -21.1 to -17.4 for the Impact scale. CONCLUSIONS: This study derived WPMI thresholds for SF-36v2, FACIT-Fatigue, and RASIQ among patients with RA, using multiple anchors. Derivation of WPMI thresholds for these PRO instruments will enable their broader use in evaluating and interpreting treatment benefit in future RA studies.

When assessing medical treatments in clinical trials, it is important to understand whether the treatment improves symptoms or impacts of a disease to an extent which is meaningful for patients. Patients are often asked to complete questionnaires about their symptoms throughout clinical trials to measure if and how symptoms change. Questionnaire responses are used to calculate a score that is compared before and after treatment. This study was designed to investigate how much scores in three questionnaires (SF-36v2, FACIT-Fatigue, and RASIQ) changed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who reported experiencing meaningful symptom improvement based on data from two clinical trials. As the RASIQ is a new questionnaire that was designed specifically for rheumatoid arthritis, this research is particularly important for interpretation of RASIQ results.

The magnitude and sustainability of treatment benefit of zuranolone on function and well-being as assessed by the SF-36 in adult patients with MDD and PPD: An integrated analysis of 4 randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) and postpartum depression (PPD) are disabling conditions. This integrated analysis of MDD and PPD clinical trials investigated the impact of zuranolone-a positive allosteric modulator of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAA receptors and neuroactive steroid under investigation for adults with MDD and approved as an oral, once-daily, 14-day treatment course for adults with PPD in the US-on health-related quality of life, including functioning and well-being, as assessed using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey V2 (SF-36). METHODS: Integrated data from 3 MDD (201B, MOUNTAIN, WATERFALL) and 1 PPD trial (ROBIN) for individual SF-36 domains were compared for zuranolone (30- and 50-mg) vs placebo at Day (D)15 and D42. Comparisons between zuranolone responders (≥50 % reduction from baseline in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total score) and nonresponders were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 1003 patients were included (zuranolone, n = 504; placebo, n = 499). Significant differences in change from baseline (CFB) to D15 for patients in zuranolone vs placebo groups were observed in 6/8 domains; changes were sustained or improved at D42, with significant CFB differences for all 8 domains. Zuranolone responders had significantly higher CFB scores vs nonresponders for all domains at D15 and D42 (p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Two zuranolone doses were integrated across populations of 2 disease states with potential differences in functioning, comorbidities, and patient demographics. All p-values presented are nominal. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated data across 4 zuranolone clinical trials showed improvements in functioning and well-being across all SF-36 domains. Benefits persisted after completion of treatment course at D42.

Parenteral Vancomycin in the Treatment of MRSA-Associated Diabetic Foot Infections: An Unnecessary Risk.

Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are a common and costly complication of diabetes. Soft tissue and bone infections in DFIs frequently lead to amputation and/or sepsis which can be costly for both the patient and the healthcare system. Staphylococcus aureus is the most commonly identified causative agent in DFIs, and people with diabetes may have an increased risk of infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In addition to increased susceptibility to severe infection, MRSA in DFIs is associated with high rates of treatment failure, morbidity, and hospitalization costs meaning appropriate treatment is a high priority. While hospitalized patients are usually treated with intravenous (IV) vancomycin, this can be costly in terms of inpatient stays, staffing costs, and adverse events. For example, vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury not only delays hospital discharge and increases costs but is also a particular concern for patients with diabetes who already have an increased risk of kidney problems. Vancomycin-resistant strains of S. aureus have also been identified, which means that alternative treatment options may need to be explored. Treatment alternatives to IV vancomycin, including oral antibiotics, have been shown to provide similar efficacy, with reduced costs, outpatient or home-based administration, and with fewer serious adverse effects. Although infectious disease specialists often use IV vancomycin alone, or in combination, as a first-line therapeutic option, they are increasingly seeing the value of outpatient or at-home oral antibiotics as an alternative. This manuscript reviews the evidence for true costs of vancomycin therapy for MRSA-associated DFIs and examines the alternatives.

Validation of the PROFAD-SSI-SF in Patients with Primary Sjögren's Syndrome with Organ Involvement: Results of Qualitative Interviews and Psychometric Analyses.

INTRODUCTION: The Profile of Fatigue and Discomfort-Sicca Symptoms Inventory-Short Form (PROFAD-SSI-SF) is a 19-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure to assess pain, fatigue, and dryness in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). This analysis identified concepts important to measure, and evaluated the content validity and measurement properties of the PROFAD-SSI-SF, in patients with pSS. METHODS: Qualitative analyses (GSK Study 208396) used transcripts from an online concept elicitation (CE) discussion forum with patients with pSS and interviews with key opinion leaders (KOLs) to finalize a disease model depicting important concepts for patients with pSS. Cognitive debriefing (CD) interviews with patients with pSS were conducted to further evaluate the content validity of the PROFAD-SSI-SF. Quantitative analyses (GSK Study 213253) used post hoc analyses of blinded data from a phase 2 trial to assess PROFAD-SSI-SF measurement properties. RESULTS: The CE discussion forum (N = 46) revealed dryness (oral 87.0%, ocular 73.9%, cutaneous 37.0%, vaginal 23.9%, nasal 15.2%, otic 6.5%), pain (89.1%), and fatigue (87.0%) as the most reported symptoms. KOLs (N = 5) found the concepts identified in the disease model accurate and understandable, and confirmed that PROs used in pSS studies should focus on dryness, joint pain, and fatigue. In the CD interviews (N = 20), of the 19 participants asked, all found the PROFAD-SSI-SF easy to understand, and 14/19 items were considered relevant by ≥ 18/20 participants. The quantitative analyses found an acceptable fit of the PROFAD-SSI-SF factor structure, with adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity with other PRO measures, known-groups validity with Patient Global Assessment, and ability to detect change in patients with pSS. CONCLUSION: The final disease model confirmed that the PROFAD-SSI-SF assesses concepts that are relevant and important to patients with pSS. Our findings support the content validity and measurement properties of the PROFAD-SSI-SF as a fit-for-purpose PRO measure appropriate for use in clinical trials in patients with pSS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER FOR THE PHASE 2 TRIAL: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02631538.

Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) is a disease where the immune system attacks the body, causing a number of symptoms, most notably dryness (sicca) of the eyes and mouth. The Profile of Fatigue and Discomfort­Sicca Symptoms Inventory­Short Form (PROFAD-SSI-SF) is a questionnaire for patients with pSS that asks about their symptoms. This paper evaluates how relevant the PROFAD-SSI-SF questions are to patients with pSS, and how consistently and accurately the questionnaire can measure changes in their symptoms. We reviewed information about the symptoms and impacts of pSS from an online discussion forum for patients with pSS. Patients said that dryness, fatigue, and pain were the symptoms that most affected their day-to-day lives and well-being. We combined this information with previous research on pSS to design a diagram explaining the key symptoms and day-to-day impacts of pSS, which was reviewed by five experts in pSS. In doing so, we aimed to confirm whether the most important things to patients about living with pSS are asked in the PROFAD-SSI-SF questionnaire. Next, we asked 20 patients with pSS how easy they found the PROFAD-SSI-SF to complete and if any important concepts were missing; they reported that the PROFAD-SSI-SF was easy to fill in and that the important questions were included. Finally, we looked at data from a clinical trial that used the PROFAD-SSI-SF and found it accurately measures changes in symptoms of patients with pSS. This means that the PROFAD-SSI-SF could be used in clinical trials to help assess new medicines for pSS.

Content Validation of the Movement Disorder-Childhood Rating Scale (MD-CRS) for Dyskinetic Cerebral Palsy.

BACKGROUND: Dyskinetic cerebral palsy (DCP), a lifelong neurological disorder beginning in early childhood, manifests with hyperkinetic movements and dystonia. The Movement Disorder-Childhood Rating Scale (MD-CRS) is a clinician-reported outcome measure assessing the intensity of movement disorders and their effect on daily life in pediatric patients. Content validity of clinical outcome assessments is key to accurately capturing patient perspective. Evidence demonstrating content validity of the MD-CRS in patients with DCP is needed. This study captures input from patients with DCP and their caregivers regarding the content validity of the MD-CRS. METHODS: This qualitative, noninterventional, cross-sectional study included interviews with children/adolescents (aged six to 18 years) with DCP and caregivers of children with DCP. Participants were asked to describe body regions and daily functions affected by DCP. Caregivers also reviewed MD-CRS Part I to evaluate the relevance of the items and corresponding response options. Descriptions of DCP were coded and mapped to MD-CRS items and response options. Caregiver feedback on MD-CRS Part I was analyzed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS: Eight patients and 12 caregivers were interviewed. Participants confirmed that the body regions and activities listed in the MD-CRS were affected by DCP and that involuntary movements interfered with all motor, oral/verbal, self-care, and video protocol activities. Caregivers endorsed the response options for 12 of 15 items in MD-CRS Part I and suggested clarifications for others. CONCLUSIONS: Participants confirmed that affected body regions and activities listed in the MD-CRS were relevant to their experience with DCP, demonstrating the content validity of this tool in children/adolescents with DCP.

Validating Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire v2.1 in episodic and chronic migraine.

OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 2.1 (MSQ) for use in chronic migraine (CM) in adults. BACKGROUND: MSQ is one of the most frequently utilized disease-specific tools assessing impact of migraine on health-related quality of life (HRQL). However, evidence for its reliability and validity are based on studies in episodic migraine (EM) populations. Additional studies assessing the reliability and validity of the MSQ in patients with CM are needed. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were collected via web-based survey in 9 countries/regions. Participants were classified as having CM (≥15 headache days/month) or EM (<15 headache days/month). Three MSQ domains - Role Function-Preventive (RP), Role Function-Restrictive (RR), and Emotional Function (EF) - were rescaled to 0-100, where higher scores indicate better HRQL, and analyzed for internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α), construct validity (correlations between MSQ scales and measures of depression/anxiety [Patient Health Questionnaire; PHQ-4], disability [Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire; MIDAS], and functional impact [Headache Impact Test; HIT-6], where lower scores indicate better HRQL for each measure), as well as discriminant validity across migraine groups. RESULTS: A total of 8726 eligible respondents were classified: 5.7% CM (n = 499) and 94.3% EM (n = 8227). Subjects were mostly female (83.5%) with a mean (±SD) age of 40.3 ± 11.4, and were similar between the 2 groups. MSQ domain scores for CM and EM groups, respectively, were: RP = 61.4 ± 26.1 and 71.7 ± 24.0; RR = 44.4 ± 22.1 and 56.5 ± 24.1; EF = 48.3 ± 28.1 and 67.2 ± 26.7. Internal consistency of the overall sample for RP, RR, and EF was 0.90, 0.96, and 0.87, respectively. Similar values were observed for CM and EM. MSQ scores for the overall sample correlated moderately to highly with scores from the PHQ-4 (r = -0.21 to -0.42), MIDAS (r = -0.38 to -0.39), and HIT-6 (r = -0.60 to -0.71). Similar values were observed for CM and EM. Known-groups validity indicated significant differences (P < .0001) in the hypothesized direction between CM and EM for RP (F = 86.19), RR (F = 119.24), and EF (F = 235.90). CONCLUSION: The MSQ is a reliable and valid questionnaire in the CM population that can differentiate the functional impact between CM and EM. The MSQ can assist researchers in evaluating treatment effectiveness by obtaining input directly from the patients on multidimensional aspects other than frequency of headache days.

Further validation and definition of the psychometric properties of the Asthma Impact Survey.

BACKGROUND: The Asthma Impact Survey (AIS-6) is a brief disease-specific quality-of-life instrument with limited published validation data. OBJECTIVE: To obtain additional validation data and psychometric properties of the AIS-6. METHODS: In November, 2007, patients with persistent asthma were mailed a survey that included the AIS-6, the mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mAQLQ), and the Asthma Control Test (ACT). Follow-up surveys were sent in April, July, and October 2008. Year 2008 exacerbations and short-acting ß-agonist (SABA) dispensings were captured from administrative data. RESULTS: A total of 2680 patients had complete baseline survey data. Criterion validity was demonstrated by the strong correlations of the AIS-6 with the mAQLQ (r = -0.84 to -0.86); construct validity by significant relationships (P < .0001) of the AIS-6 with mAQLQ domain scores, ACT score, and history of exacerbations; and predictive validity by significant relationships (P < .0001) between AIS-6 scores at the end of 2007 and year 2008 exacerbations and high SABA dispensings. Responsiveness was demonstrated by significant (P < .0001) correlations (r = -0.39 to -0.58) between changes in AIS-6 scores and changes in mAQLQ and ACT scores over time. A preliminary minimally important difference (MID) in AIS-6 was estimated to be 4 by using the mAQLQ MID as an anchor. Excellent internal consistency (α = 0.94) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.86-0.91) were also demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The AIS-6 demonstrated good psychometric properties in a large independent sample and could be used to assess asthma-specific quality of life in clinical practice and clinical research.

Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK): clinically meaningful changes in score.

BACKGROUND: The Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) is the first validated questionnaire to assess respiratory and asthma control exclusively in young children. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the minimally important difference (MID) for interpreting meaningful changes in individual patients' TRACK scores. METHODS: In this prospective, nonrandomized, longitudinal study conducted at 20 US pediatric sites, TRACK was administered at 2 separate clinic visits (4-6 weeks apart) to caregivers of children aged less than 5 years with symptoms consistent with asthma. Anchor-based methods were used to determine the MID from mean score differences between patients based on multiple criteria measures: physician guidelines-based respiratory control rating, physician-recommended changes to therapy, episodes of symptoms lasting more than 24 hours in the past 3 months, oral corticosteroid use for respiratory tract illnesses in the past year, physician-assessed change in control status at follow-up, and caregiver-reported change in respiratory status. The MID also was determined from distribution-based methods. RESULTS: TRACK scores were assessed at baseline (426 caregivers) and follow-up (396 caregivers). Mean differences in TRACK scores between patients differing on criteria measures ranged from 3.4 to 16.4 points (mean, 11.1 points). Distribution-based techniques confirmed these findings. Based on logistic regression analyses, scoring 10 or more points less than 80 on TRACK was associated with an approximately 2-fold increased odds of having uncontrolled asthma or respiratory symptoms. CONCLUSION: Changes in TRACK scores of 10 or more points represent clinically meaningful changes in respiratory control status in individual young children with respiratory symptoms consistent with asthma and should alert health care providers to re-evaluate asthma management.