Unilateral gamma knife thalamotomy for tremor safety and efficacy in multimodal assessment: a prospective case-control study with two-year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Unilateral gamma knife thalamotomy (GKT) is a treatment option for pharmacoresistant tremor of various aetiologies. There have been to date no randomised controlled trials performed to assess its safety and efficacy. Our aim was to summarise a two-year multimodal observation of patients with tremor caused by Parkinson's Disease (PD) or essential tremor (ET). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 23 patients with PD (n = 12) or ET (n = 11) were included. They underwent assessments before, V0 (n = 23), and 12 months, V12 (n = 23), and 24 months, V24 (n = 15), after unilateral GKT. Patients were assessed with psychological tests and acoustic voice analysis. Tremor assessment was performed with a digitising table using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin rating scale (FTMRS). The Unified Parkinson's Disease rating scale part III (UPDRS-III) was also used in the PD group. Gait and balance was assessed using clinical tests, stabilometric platform, and treadmill. RESULTS: No side effects were observed in a two-year follow-up. There was no notable deterioration observed in the patients' psychological evaluation, speech, or assessment of gait and balance. The scores were significantly lower (p = 0.01) in parts A and B of FTMRS one year after GKT. In post hoc analysis, the scores did not differ significantly between V0 and V24. In FTMRS part C (activities of daily living), no significant change was observed. There was no significant difference in total UPDRS part III score or in score of UPDRS part III domains 3 and 4 ('tremor at rest' and 'action and postural tremor of hands') between measurements. CONCLUSIONS: UGKT may be a safe treatment modality if performed in an experienced centre. Tremor reduction may diminish over time, and UGKT did not lead to cognitive, gait or speech deterioration in a long-term observation.

Parkinson's disease or atypical parkinsonism? The importance of acoustic voice analysis in differential diagnosis of speech disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Speech disorder is a common clinical manifestation in patients with Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonian syndromes and tends to occur before the onset of the axial parkinsonian symptoms. Due to parkinsonian features that overlap those of Parkinson's disease, the differentiation of voice and a speech disorder is a challenge for clinicians primarily in the early stage of the disease. METHODS: Speech samples were obtained from 116 subjects including 30 cases of Parkinson's disease, 30 cases of progressive supranuclear palsy, 30 cases of multiple system atrophy, and control group consisted of 26 subjects. Differential diagnosis of dysarthria subtypes was based on the quantitative, acoustic analysis of particular speech components. Additionally, Voice Handicap Index questionnaire was taken into account to differentiate the severity of voice impairment in the study groups. RESULTS: Our results showed significant differences in the distribution of acoustic parameters between Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonian syndromes. A mixed type of dysarthria with a combination of hypokinetic, spastic, and atactic features has been found in patients with atypical parkinsonism. In patients with the clinical diagnosis of the parkinsonian variant of multiple system atrophy, ataxic components of dysarthria were observed. Patients with PD presented pure hypokinetic dysarthria. Some parameters may be used as a marker for the diagnosis of the initial stage of PD. Voice impartment was significantly more frequent and severe in atypical parkinsonism than in Parkinson's disease. CONCLUSION: Acoustic voice analysis is a very sensitive and noninvasive tool, provides objective information for the assessment of different speech components, has the specific potential to provide quantitative data essential for the improvement of the diagnostic process, and maybe a useful instrument in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes.