Determining the polymer threshold amount for achieving robust drug release from HPMC and HPC matrix tablets containing a high-dose BCS class I model drug: in vitro and in vivo studies.

It is challenging to achieve mechanically robust drug-release profiles from hydrophilic matrices containing a high dose of a drug with good solubility. However, a mechanically robust drug release over prolonged period of time can be achieved, especially if the viscosity and amount of the polymer is sufficiently high, above the "threshold values." The goal of this research was to determine the hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) polymer threshold amount that would enable robust drug release from matrix tablets containing a high dose of levetiracetam as a class I model drug according to the Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS). For this purpose, formulations containing HPC or HPMC of similar viscosity range, but in different amounts, were prepared. Based on the dissolution results, two final formulations were selected for additional in vitro and in vivo evaluation to confirm the robustness and to show bioequivalence. Tablets were exposed to various stress conditions in vitro with the use of different mechanically stress-inducing dissolution methods. The in vitro results were compared with in vivo results obtained from fasted and fed bioequivalence studies. Under both conditions, the formulations were bioequivalent and food had a negligible influence on the pharmacokinetic parameters C max and area under the curve (AUC). It was concluded that the drug release from both selected formulations is mechanically robust and that HPC and HPMC polymers with intrinsic viscosities above 9 dL/g and in quantities above 30% enable good mechanical resistance, which ensures bioequivalence. In addition, HPC matrices were found to be more mechanically robust compared to HPMC.

Advancing Virtual Bioequivalence for Orally Administered Drug Products: Methodology, Real-World Applications and Future Outlook.

Bioequivalence studies are pivotal in generic drug development wherein therapeutic equivalence is provided with an innovator product. However, bioequivalence studies represent significant complexities due to the interplay of multiple factors related to drug, formulation, physiology, and pharmacokinetics. Approaches such as physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) can enable virtual bioequivalence (VBE) assessment through appropriately developed and validated models. Such models are now being extensively used for bioequivalence risk assessment, internal decision-making, and the evaluation of drug and formulation factors related to bioequivalence. Depiction of the above-mentioned factors through the incorporation of variability and development of a virtual population for bioequivalence assessment is of paramount importance in utilizing such models. In this manuscript, we have portrayed our current understanding of VBE. A detailed explanation was provided with respect to study designs, in vivo variability, and the impact of physiological, drug, and formulation factors on the development of the population for VBE. Furthermore, strategies are suggested to incorporate variability in GastroPlus with an emphasis on intra-subject and inter-occasion variability. Two industrial case studies pertaining to immediate and modified release formulation were portrayed wherein VBE was utilized for decision-making and regulatory justification. Finally, regulatory understanding in the area of VBE, along with future perspectives, was detailed.

Predictive Potential of BCS and Pharmacokinetic Parameters on Study Outcome: Analysis of 198 In Vivo Bioequivalence Studies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Understanding predictive potential of parameters to perform early bioequivalence (BE) risk assessment is crucial for good planning and risk mitigation during product development. The objective of the present study was to evaluate predictive potential of various biopharmaceutical and pharmacokinetic parameters on the outcome of BE study. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on 198 Sandoz (Lek Pharmaceuticals d.d., A Sandoz Company, Verovskova 57, 1526 Ljubljana, Slovenia) sponsored BE studies [52 active pharmaceutical ingredients (API)] where characteristics of BE study and APIs were collected for immediate-release products and their predictive potential on the study outcome was assessed using univariate statistical analysis. RESULTS: Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) was confirmed to be highly predictive of BE success. BE studies with poorly soluble APIs were riskier (23% non-BE) than with highly soluble APIs (0.1% non-BE). APIs with either lower bioavailability (BA), presence of first-pass metabolism, and/or being substrate for P-glycoprotein substrate (P-gP) were associated with higher non-BE occurrence. In silico permeability and time at peak plasma concentrations (Tmax) were shown as potentially relevant features for predicting BE outcome. In addition, our analysis showed significantly higher occurrence of non-BE results for poorly soluble APIs with disposition described by multicompartment model. The conclusions for poorly soluble APIs were the same on a subset of fasting BE studies; for a subset of fed studies there were no significant differences between factors in BE and non-BE groups. CONCLUSION: Understanding the association of parameters and BE outcome is important for further development of early BE risk assessment tools where focus should be first in finding additional parameters to differentiate BE risk within a group of poorly soluble APIs.

Predictive Potential of Acido-Basic Properties, Solubility and Food on Bioequivalence Study Outcome: Analysis of 128 Studies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Risk assessment related to bioequivalence study outcome is critical for effective planning from the early stage of drug product development. The objective of this research was to evaluate the associations between solubility and acido-basic parameters of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), study conditions and bioequivalence outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 128 bioequivalence studies of immediate-release products with 26 different APIs. Bioequivalence study conditions and acido-basic/solubility characteristics of APIs were collected and their predictive potential on the study outcome was assessed using a set of univariate statistical analyses. RESULTS: There was no difference in bioequivalence rate between fasting and fed conditions. The highest proportion of non-bioequivalent studies was for weak acids (10/19 cases, 53%) and neutral APIs (23/95 cases, 24%). Lower non-bioequivalence occurrence was observed for weak bases (1/15 cases, 7%) and amphoteric APIs (0/16 cases, 0%). The median dose numbers at pH 1.2 and pH 3 were higher and the most basic acid dissociation constant (pKa) was lower in the non-bioequivalent group of studies. Additionally, APIs with low calculated effective permeability (cPeff) or low calculated lipophilicity (clogP) had lower non-bioequivalence occurrence. Results of the subgroup analysis of studies under fasting conditions were similar as for the whole dataset. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that acido-basic properties of API should be considered in bioequivalence risk assessment and reveal which physico-chemical parameters are most relevant for the development of bioequivalence risk assessment tools for immediate-release products.

The biorelevant simulation of gastric emptying and its impact on model drug dissolution and absorption kinetics.

The highly variable physiological conditions within the gastrointestinal tract can cause variable drug release and absorption from the orally administrated dosage forms. The emptying of the gastric content is one of the most critical physiological processes, dictating the amount of the active ingredient available for absorption into the systemic circulation. In this study, we prepared two water gastric emptying regimes on advanced gastric simulator (AGS) with programmable "pyloric" valve. Gastric emptying regimes were designed in such a way to capture the main findings of the MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) in vivo studies, conducted under fasted conditions according to the EMA and FDA guidelines for bioavailability and bioequivalence studies. Four immediate release formulations containing a model drug of BCS class III were tested. Comparative dissolution tests were also performed with the USP2 apparatus. In vitro release profiles were compared to the in vivo data in order to evaluate the importance of gastric emptying for subsequent absorption of the active substance from the tested formulations. Our bio-relevant in vitro dissolution model showed good discriminatory power for all of the tested formulations. Moreover, a better relation to in vivo data was achieved with AGS with respect to the tested conventional dissolution method.