Prevalence of elevated liver enzymes in adults with type 1 diabetes: A multicentre analysis of the German/Austrian DPV database.

AIMS: To assess the prevalence of elevated liver enzymes in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in routine clinical care and the association with cardiovascular risk profile in the Diabetes-Prospective-Documentation (DPV) network in Germany and Austria. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This cross sectional observational study from the DPV registry includes data from 45 519 adults with T1DM at 478 centres up to September 2016. Liver enzyme measurements were available in 9226 (29%) patients at 270 centres and were analysed for increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT; men >50 U/L, women >35U/L) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST; men >50 U/L, women >35U/L) and/or gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT; men >60U/L, women >40 U/L). A subgroup analysis in patients for whom 2 or more ALT measurements were available (n = 2335, 25%) and whose ALT was increased at least twice (men >30 U/L, women >19U/L) was performed. Associations with glycaemic control, cardiovascular risk factors and late complications were investigated with multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: Twenty percent (19.8%, n = 1824) had increased liver enzyme(s) on one or more occasions. Increased liver enzymes were associated with worse glycaemic control and higher BMI (both P < .0001), dyslipidemia (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.54-2.0), hypertension (OR, 1.48; 95% CI: 1.31-1.68), myocardial infarction (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.17-1.91) and end stage renal disease (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.17-2.17). ALT was increased twice in 29% and was associated with worse glycaemic control (P < .0001), higher BMI (P < .0001), hypertension (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.26-1.97) and dyslipidemia (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.51-2.37). CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical audit in adults with T1DM, elevated liver enzymes on routine assessment were associated with a less favourable cardiovascular risk profile and with poorer glycaemic control.

Comparative Characteristics of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated by Bariatric Surgery Versus Medical Treatment: a Multicentre Analysis of 277,862 Patients from the German/Austrian DPV Database.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery is a well-established treatment option for serious obesity and concomitant type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In this analysis, we investigated predictors for bariatric surgery in everyday clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the DPV-registry, patients with T2DM from Germany and Austria treated by bariatric surgery were compared to non-surgery controls by descriptive statistics and regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 277,862 patients with T2DM, 0.07% underwent bariatric surgery. Surgery patients were predominantly female [61.20%], younger [median age (Q1;Q3) 54.74(47.40;61.61) vs. 70.04 (60.36;77.58) years] and had a longer diabetes duration [11.21 (7.15;17.93) vs. 8.36 (2.94;14.91) years]. They had a higher BMI [40.02 vs. 30.61 kg/m2, adjusted p < 0.0001] and a slightly lower HbA1c [7.25 vs. 7.56%, adjusted p < 0.05]. There was a trend using more often insulin therapy (52.79 vs.50.08%, n.s.) with no difference in insulin dose/kg × day [0.56 vs. 0.58, n.s.]. Sleeve gastrectomy was performed most frequently, followed by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, gastric banding, gastric balloon and others. A 2-year follow-up data in 29 patients demonstrated significant reductions in BMI [45.23 to 38.00 kg/m2, p < 0.005] and HbA1c [7.98 to 6.98%, p < 0.005], and a trend for reduced insulin requirements [62.07 vs. 44.83%, n.s.]. CONCLUSION: Despite favourable 2-year outcomes, bariatric surgery is still used rarely in patients with T2DM and obesity. BMI rather than metabolic control seems to represent the major selector for or against bariatric surgery in T2DM.

Lean diabetes in middle-aged adults: A joint analysis of the German DIVE and DPV registries.

AIMS: To assess differences in demographics, treatment and outcome of lean (LD) compared to overweight and obese people with diabetes clinically classified as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We combined data from the German DIVE (Diabetes Versorgungs-Evaluation) and DPV (Diabetes-Patienten-Verlaufsdokumentation) databases to produce a large cohort of people with T2DM. The characteristics of people with Body Mass Index (BMI) <25 kg/m2, ≥25-30 kg/m2 and ≥30 kg/m2 aged 30 to 50 years were compared, including demographics, cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, comorbidities and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 37,870 people were included in the analysis, 3,191 of these (8.4%) had a BMI < 25 kg/m2. LD reported more nicotine (41.6% of 2,070 vs. 38.1% of 6,070 and 33.4% of 16,823; P<0.001)and alcohol consumption (12.0% of 1,282, 10.3% of 3,594 and 6.6% of 9,418; P<0.001)compared to overweight and obese people. More LD were treated with insulin in comparison to the other subgroups (short acting insulin 33.1% of 3,191 vs. 28.4% of 9,234 and 28.0% of 25,445; P <0.001; long acting insulin 31.3% of 3,191 vs. 28.9% of 9,234 and 29.3% of 25,445; P = 0.043). Regression models adjusted for age, gender and diabetes duration showed a 2.50 times higher odds ratio (OR) for hypoglycemia and a 2.52 higher OR for mortality in LD compared to the BMI subgroup ≥30 kg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: LD is associated with an increased risk of hypoglycaemia and death. Patients are characterized by male gender, lifestyle habits as smoking and alcohol consumption while cardiovascular comorbidities are less important. In comparison to patients of the other weight groups they are treated with insulin more often and considerably less with metformin.

Impact of Physical Activity on Glycemic Control and Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Cross-sectional Multicenter Study of 18,028 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Physical activity (PA) can improve cardiovascular risk in the general population and in patients with type 2 diabetes. Studies also indicate an HbA(1c)-lowering effect in patients with type 2 diabetes. Since reports in patients with type 1 diabetes are scarce, this analysis aimed to investigate whether there is an association between PA and glycemic control or cardiovascular risk in subjects with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 18,028 adults (≥18 to <80 years of age) from Germany and Austria with type 1 diabetes from the Diabetes-Patienten-Verlaufsdokumentation (DPV) database were included. Patients were stratified according to their self-reported frequency of PA (PA0, inactive; PA1, one to two times per week; PA2, more than two times per week). Multivariable regression models were applied for glycemic control, diabetes-related comorbidities, and cardiovascular risk factors. Data were adjusted for sex, age, and diabetes duration. P values for trend were given. SAS 9.4 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: An inverse association between PA and HbA(1c), diabetic ketoacidosis, BMI, dyslipidemia (all P < 0.0001), and hypertension (P = 0.0150), as well as between PA and retinopathy or microalbuminuria (both P < 0.0001), was present. Severe hypoglycemia (assistance required) did not differ in PA groups (P = 0.8989), whereas severe hypoglycemia with coma was inversely associated with PA (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PA seemed to be beneficial with respect to glycemic control, diabetes-related comorbidities, and cardiovascular risk factors without an increase of adverse events. Hence, our data underscore the recommendation for subjects with type 1 diabetes to perform regular PA.

Multicentre analysis of 178,992 type 2 diabetes patients revealed better metabolic control despite higher rates of hypertension, stroke, dementia and repeated inpatient care in patients with comorbid Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Especially in older people, physicians are faced with the coexistence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and Parkinson's disease (PD). Therefore, this research aimed to compare diabetes endpoints between T2DM with and without PD. METHODS: Based on the standardized, multicenter, prospective DPV database, 178,992 T2DM patients (≥40 years) were analyzed. 1579 were diagnosed with PD and/or received specific treatment. Hierarchical multivariable regression models were used for group comparisons; adjusted estimates based on observed marginal frequencies were calculated. RESULTS: PD patients were significantly older (77.9 vs. 70.0 years; p < 0.0001) and had a longer diabetes duration (10.3 vs. 8.4 years; p < 0.0001). In young PD patients (<50 years), percentage of females was significantly higher compared to age-matched T2DM patients without PD or people of the German population (66.7 vs. 38.1 vs. 49.0%; p < 0.0001, p < 0.02). After demographic adjustment, T2DM patients with PD showed a significantly lower HbA1c (58.0 vs. 60.3 mmol/mol; p < 0.0001), OAD/GLP-1 treatment (41.9 vs. 45.9%; p < 0.01) and frequency of dyslipidemia (62.0 vs. 64.5%; p < 0.05). In contrast, rates of insulin therapy (57.8 vs. 54.8%; p < 0.05), hypertension (73.3 vs. 68.6%; p < 0.001), antihypertensive medication (60.4 vs. 56.1%; p < 0.01), stroke (12.0 vs. 7.3%; p < 0.0001), dementia (9.2 vs. 2.6%; p < 0.0001) and repeated inpatient care (15.7 vs. 12.0%; p < 0.0001) were significantly higher and duration of hospital stay (6.2 vs. 4.7 days; p < 0.0001) was significantly longer in T2DM with PD. CONCLUSION: Clear demographic and clinical differences were observed between T2DM with and without PD. In PD patients, metabolic control is better, potentially due to more intensive medical care.