RESUMEN
The therapeutic efficacy of the anticancer drug cisplatin is limited by acquired drug resistance. Cisplatin forms DNA crosslinks, that, if not removed, lead to replication stress. Due to this, the DNA damage response (DDR) gets activated regulating cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, cell death or survival. This makes DDR components promising targets for the development of new therapeutic approaches aiming to overcome acquired drug resistance. To this end, cisplatin-resistant bladder cancer cells were analyzed regarding their sensitivity to combination treatments with selected pharmacological DDR inhibitors. Synergistic cytolethal effects were achieved after combined treatment with low to moderate doses of the non-genotoxic RAD51-inhibitor (RAD51i) B02 and CHK1-inhibitor (CHK1i) PF477736. This effect was also found in cisplatin resistant tumor cells of other origin as well as with other RAD51i and CHK1i. Combined treatments promoted decelerated replication, S-phase blockage, accumulation of DNA strand breaks, DDR activation and stimulation of apoptotic cell death as compared to mono-treatment, which is independent of the expression of RAD51, CHK1, and PrimPol. Based on these data, we suggest combined inhibition of RAD51 and CHK1 to overcome acquired cisplatin resistance of malignant cells. We propose that the molecular mechanism of this synergistic toxicity relies on a simultaneous inactivation of two key DNA damage tolerance pathways regulating replication fork restart, thereby circumventing the activation of alternative compensatory mechanisms and, in consequence, eventually effectively triggering apoptotic cell death by replication fork collapse.
RESUMEN
The anticancer drug cisplatin (CisPt) injures post-mitotic neuronal cells, leading to neuropathy. Furthermore, CisPt triggers cell death in replicating cells. Here, we aim to unravel the relevance of different types of CisPt-induced DNA lesions for evoking neurotoxicity. To this end, we comparatively analyzed wild-type and loss of function mutants of C. elegans lacking key players of specific DNA repair pathways. Deficiency in ercc-1, which is essential for nucleotide excision repair (NER) and interstrand crosslink (ICL) repair, revealed the most pronounced enhancement in CisPt-induced neurotoxicity with respect to the functionality of post-mitotic chemosensory AWA neurons, without inducing neuronal cell death. Potentiation of CisPt-triggered neurotoxicity in ercc-1 mutants was accompanied by complex alterations in both basal and CisPt-stimulated mRNA expression of genes involved in the regulation of neurotransmission, including cat-4, tph-1, mod-1, glr-1, unc-30 and eat-18. Moreover, xpf-1, csb-1, csb-1;xpc-1 and msh-6 mutants were significantly more sensitive to CisPt-induced neurotoxicity than the wild-type, whereas xpc-1, msh-2, brc-1 and dog-1 mutants did not distinguish from the wild-type. The majority of DNA repair mutants also revealed increased basal germline apoptosis, which was analyzed for control. Yet, only xpc-1, xpc-1;csb-1 and dog-1 mutants showed elevated apoptosis in the germline following CisPt treatment. To conclude, we provide evidence that neurotoxicity, including sensory neurotoxicity, is triggered by CisPt-induced DNA intra- and interstrand crosslinks that are subject of repair by NER and ICL repair. We hypothesize that especially ERCC1/XPF, CSB and MSH6-related DNA repair protects from chemotherapy-induced neuropathy in the context of CisPt-based anticancer therapy.