Impact of Excipient Extraction and Buffer Exchange on Recombinant Monoclonal Antibody Stability.

The foundation of a biosimilar manufacturer's regulatory filing is the demonstration of analytical and functional similarity between the biosimilar product and the pertinent originator product. The excipients in the formulation may interfere with characterization using typical analytical and functional techniques during this biosimilarity exercise. Consequently, the producers of biosimilar products resort to buffer exchange to isolate the biotherapeutic protein from the drug product formulation. However, the impact that this isolation has on the product stability is not completely known. This study aims to elucidate the extent to which mAb isolation via ultrafiltration-diafiltration-based buffer exchange impacts mAb stability. It has been demonstrated that repeated extraction cycles do result in significant changes in higher-order structure (red-shift of 5.0 nm in fluorescence maxima of buffer exchanged samples) of the mAb and also an increase in formation of basic variants from 19.1 to 26.7% and from 32.3 to 36.9% in extracted innovator and biosimilar Tmab samples, respectively. It was also observed that under certain conditions of tertiary structure disruptions, Tmab could be restabilized depending on formulation composition. Thus, mAb isolation through extraction with buffer exchange impacts the product stability. Based on the observations reported in this paper, we recommend that biosimilar manufacturers take into consideration these effects of excipients on protein stability when performing biosimilarity assessments.

Cross-Calibration Study of The Stratos And Hologic QDR 4500A Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometers to Assess Bone Mineral Density And Body Composition.

The objective of the study was to assess the agreement between the Stratos (DMS) and QDR 4500A (Hologic) DXAs in determining whole body and regional aBMD, as well as whole body composition. Fifty-five individuals (46 women: 84%) with a mean age of 41 ± 13.0 years (range: 20 to 64) and a mean BMI of 31.9 ± 10 kg/m² (range: 12.2 to 49.5) were consecutively scanned on the same day using the two devices. Predictive equations for areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and whole body composition (WBC) were derived from linear regression of the data. The two DXAs were highly correlated (p<0.001 for all parameters) with a correlation coefficient (r) ranging from 0.89 to 0.99 for aBMD (r=0.89 for whole body, r=0.92 for radius, r=0.95 for femoral neck, r=0.96 for total hip, and r=0.99 for L1-L4). For WBC, the r value was 0.98 for lean tissue mass (LTM) and 1.0 for fat mass (FM). Paired t-tests indicated a statistically significant bias between the two DXAs for the majority of measurements, requiring the determination of specific cross-calibration equations. Compared to QDR 4500A, Stratos underestimated whole body aBMD and LTM and overestimated neck and hip aBMD and whole body FM. Conversely, no significant bias was demonstrated for mean aBMD at L1-L4 and radius. For whole body aBMD and FM, the concordance between the two DXAs was influenced by BMI. Despite a high concordance between the two DXAs, the systematic bias for aBMD and WBC measurements illustrates the need to define cross-calibration equations to compare data across systems.

Comparison of the Lunar Prodigy and Stratos DR Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometers to Assess Regional Bone Mineral Density.

PURPOSE: The first objective of the study was to assess the agreement between the Stratos DR (DMS) and the GE Prodigy (GE) DXAs in determining femoral neck, total hip and lumbar spine aBMD. The second objective was to assess the potential impact of leg positioning (hip flexed at 90° or not) on lumbar spine aBMD. METHODS: Forty-six individuals (n=42 women, 91.3%), with a mean age of 59.7 ± 13 years and mean BMI of 23.8 ± 4.7 kg/m², were scanned consecutively on the same day using the two devices. In a subgroup (n=30), two consecutive Stratos DR scans (with hip flexed at 90° or not) at the lumbar spine were conducted. Predictive equations for hip and lumbar spine aBMD were derived from linear regression of the data. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients for aBMD measured with the two DXAs were characterised by an R² of 0.76 for the femoral neck, 0.89 for the total hip, and 0.86 for the lumbar spine. However, the derived equations for aBMD determination showed an intercept significantly different from 0 for hip aBMD, and a slope significantly different from 1 for lumbar spine aBMD. These results highlight a bias between the two measurements, thus requiring the determination of specific cross-calibration equations for hip and lumbar spine, femoral neck excepted. When compared with values on the Prodigy, mean aBMD on the Stratos DR was higher at the femoral neck (+4.8%, p<0.001) and total hip (+9.6%, p<0.001) and lower at L2-L4 (-8.8%, p<0.001). The coefficient of variation (CV%) for the two consecutive measures at lumbar spine (with different positioning) with the Stratos DR was 2.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The difference in aBMD measured with the two DXAs illustrates the need to define cross-calibration equations when comparing data across systems in order to avoid erroneous conclusions.

Comparison of the Discovery A and Stratos DR densitometers for assessing whole-body and regional bone mineral density and body composition.

PURPOSE: The agreement between the Stratos DR and Discovery A densitometers was assessed for measurements of whole-body (WB) and regional fat mass (FM), fat-free soft tissue (FFST) and bone mineral density (BMD). Moreover, the precision of the Stratos DR was also evaluated. METHODS: Fifty participants (35 women, 70%) were measured consecutively, once on the Discovery A and once on the Stratos DR. In a subgroup of participants (n = 29), two successive measurements with the Stratos DR were also performed. RESULTS: FM, FFST and BMD measured with the two devices were highly correlated, with a coefficient of correlation ranging from 0.80 to 0.99. Bland-Altman analyses indicated significant bias between the two devices for all measurements. Thus, compared to the Discovery A, the Stratos DR underestimated WB BMD and WB and regional FM and FFST, with the exception of trunk FM and visceral adipose tissue (VAT), which were overestimated. Precision error for the Stratos DR, when expressed as root mean square-coefficient of variation (RMS-CV%) for FM, was 1.4% for WB, 3.0% for the gynoid and android regions, and 15.9% for VAT. The RMS-CV% for FFST was 1.0% for WB. The root mean square of standard deviation for WB BMD was 0.018 g/cm², corresponding to a 1.4% CV. The least significant change was 0.050 g/cm² (SD), and 4.0% was considered to be a significant biological change. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between the Stratos DR and Discovery A measurements are significant and require the use of translational cross-calibration equations. For most of the BMD and body composition parameters, our results demonstrated good Stratos DR precision.

Assessment of the Stratos, a new pencil-beam bone densitometer: dosimetry, precision, and cross calibration.

The goal of this study was to assess a new pencil-beam densitometer, the Stratos (Diagnostic Medical Systems, Pérols, France). Evaluation of the dosimetry and precision were done together with an in vivo cross-calibration study performed with the fan beam densitometer Discovery A (Hologic, Bedford, MA). The results indicated that the Stratos performed bone mineral density (BMD) measurements with a good precision, low radiation dose, and good agreement with the Discovery A. The air dose, measured by an ionization chamber, was 40 µGy. The effective dose was assessed using an anthropomorphic phantom and thermoluminescent detectors resulting in 1.96 and 0.31 µSv for a lumbar spine and proximal femur scan, respectively. The average scattered dose rate at a distance of 1m from the device was 1.06 and 1.21 µSv.h(-1) in the lumbar spine and left proximal femur scan mode, respectively. For the precision evaluation, 30 patients underwent 2 lumbar spine and 2 proximal femur scans with repositioning after each scan. The percentage root-mean-square coefficient of variation was 1.22%, 1.38%, 2.11%, and 0.86% for the lumbar spine (L1-L4), lumbar spine (L2-L4), femoral neck, and total hip, respectively. The cross-calibration studies were done on 57 patients (60 ± 9 yr). Lumbar spine, left neck, and left total hip mean BMD were 3.10% lower and 11.94% and 8.83% higher, respectively, with the Stratos compared with the Discovery A. Cross-calibration equations were calculated with a correlation coefficient of 98% (p<0.01) for the lumbar spine (L2-L4), 94% (p<0.01) for the left neck, and 92% (p<0.01) for the left total hip. After standardizing the Stratos measures using the cross-calibration equations, LIN's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.98, 0.93, and 0.92 for the lumbar spine (L2-L4), left neck, and total hip, respectively.

Salivary adiponectin levels are associated with training intensity but not with bone mass or reproductive function in elite Rhythmic Gymnasts.

Elite Rhythmic Gymnasts (RGs) constitute a unique metabolic model and they are prone to developing Anorexia Athletica. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of training intensity on salivary adiponectin levels and assess a possible role of salivary adiponectin levels as a predictive factor of reproductive dysfunction and bone mass acquisition in elite RGs. The study included 80 elite female RGs participating in the World Rhythmic Gymnastics Championship tournament held in Montpellier, France on September 2011. Anthropometric values were assessed, training data and menstrual pattern were recorded, bone mass was measured with Broadband ultrasound attenuation (dB/Mhz) and baseline salivary adiponectin levels were determined. The athletes were classified as intensely and very intensely trained, considering the mean training intensity (40.84h/week). Moreover, considering their reproductive status, they were divided into RG's with normal menstruation, primary amenorrhea and oligomenorrhea. All comparisons were adjusted to age, BMI and body fat percentage differences. Very intensely trained RGs showed higher salivary adiponectin levels (p=0.05). Moreover, salivary adiponectin levels showed significant correlation with training intensity (r=0.409, p=0.003). On the other hand, no association of salivary adiponectin levels was documented with either reproductive function or bone mass acquisition. The results of the present study suggest that, in elite RGs, salivary adiponectin levels are associated with the intensity of training, possibly reflecting the deterioration of energy balance rather than the training stress. On the other hand, a predictive role of salivary adiponectin levels in reproductive dysfunction or bone mass acquisition could not be supported.

Despite a high prevalence of menstrual disorders, bone health is improved at a weight-bearing bone site in world-class female rhythmic gymnasts.

CONTEXT: Regular physical activity during puberty improves bone mass acquisition. However, it is unknown whether extreme intense training has the same favorable effect on the skeleton. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the bone mass acquisition in a unique cohort of world-class rhythmic gymnasts. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: A total of 133 adolescent girls and young women with a mean age of 18.7 ± 2.7 (14.4-26.7) years participated in this study: 82 elite rhythmic gymnasts (RGs) and 51 controls (CONs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anthropometric variables and body composition were assessed, and all participants completed questionnaires on their general medical, menstrual, and training histories. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA in decibels per megahertz) was determined by quantitative ultrasound at the heel. RESULTS: RGs presented lower weight (-8.5%, P < .001), body mass index (-11.7%, P < .001), and body fat mass (-43%, P < .001) and higher muscle mass (6.3%, P < .01) and height (+2.8 cm, P < .01). RGs presented an age of menarche significantly delayed compared with CONs (15.6 ± 1.6 vs 12.7 ± 1.7 years; P < .001) and a high prevalence of menstrual disorders (64%). BUA values were higher in RGs vs CONs (68.6 ± 4.6 and 65.4 ± 3.3 dB/Mhz, respectively; P < .001). This difference was exacerbated when BUA was adjusted for age and body weight. BUA values in RGs were not affected by menstrual or training status. Among RGs with menarche, BUA was higher (71.5 ± 4.1 and 67.9 ± 3.5 dB/Mhz) for delayed (14.4 ± 0.8 years) vs severely delayed (17.3 ± 1.4 years) menarcheal age. BUA was positively correlated with body weight and body mass index and tended to be correlated with age. CONCLUSION: Conversely to expectations for adolescents and young women with a high prevalence of menstrual disorders and/or delayed menarche, intense training in rhythmic gymnastics appeared to have a beneficial effect on the bone health of a weight-bearing site. This effect was nevertheless modulated by the age of menarche. The high mechanical loading generated by this activity may counterbalance the negative effect of menstrual disorders.