Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 97(6): 1270-1278, 2021 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33347739

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To study safety and performance of the MANTA Vascular closure device (VCD) under real world conditions in 10 centers. BACKGROUND: The MANTA is a novel plug-based device for large bore arteriotomy closure. METHODS: We included all eligible patients who underwent transfemoral large bore percutaneous procedures. Exclusion criteria were per operator's discretion and included severe calcification or marked tortuosity of the access vessel, presence of marked obesity/cachexia or a systolic blood pressure above 180 mmHg. The primary performance endpoint was time to hemostasis. Primary and secondary safety endpoints were major and minor access site related vascular complications up to 30 days, respectively. Vascular complications were adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee according to VARC-2 criteria. We performed multivariable logistic regression to estimate the effect of baseline and procedural characteristics on any and major vascular complications. RESULTS: Between February 2018 and July 2019 500 patients were enrolled undergoing Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR, N = 496), Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV, N = 2), Mechanical circulatory support (MCS, N = 1) or Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR, N = 1). Mean age was 80.8 ± 6.6 years with a median STS-score of 2.7 [IQR 2.0-4.3] %. MANTA access site complications were major in 20 (4%) and minor in 28 patients (5.6%). Median time to hemostasis was 50 [IQR 20-120] sec. Severe femoral artery calcification, scar presence in groin, longer procedure duration, female gender and history of hypertension were independent predictors for vascular complications. CONCLUSION: In this study, MANTA appeared to be a safe and effective device for large bore access closure under real-world conditions.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Cateterismo Periférico , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Dispositivos de Cierre Vascular , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Hemorragia/etiología , Técnicas Hemostáticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 34: 40-45, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33547024

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare conduction dynamics and need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after CoreValve, Evolut R and PRO (transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)). METHODS: Patients were stratified based on conduction at baseline; Cohort A had normal conduction, Cohort B had conduction abnormalities including atrioventricular (AV)-block, fascicular block or complete bundle branch block. Three different dynamic QRS-patterns were defined: stable QRS-duration, transient QRS-prolongation and persistent QRS-prolongation. We performed multivariable regression analysis to estimate the effect of the three separate transcatheter heart valves (THV's) on need for PPI at 30 days. RESULTS: TAVR was performed with CoreValve (N = 113), Evolut R (N = 157) or Evolut PRO (N = 92). Conduction dynamics were similar between the different THVs. Overall, Evolut R and PRO showed a tendency towards less PPI compared to CoreValve (17% vs. 19% vs. 27%, P = 0.08), which was driven by a lower PPI rate in Cohort A (6% vs. 11% vs. 25%, P = 0.002). Need for PPI was restricted to patients with persistent QRS-prolongation in Cohort A (26/106) but did not correlate with conduction dynamics in Cohort B. In multivariable logistic regression analysis the use of Evolut R (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.78, P = 0.008) and PRO (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.91, P-value = 0.028) were independently associated with less need for PPI. CONCLUSION: The newer generations Evolut R and PRO were associated with less PPI compared to CoreValve. Acquired persistent conduction abnormalities predicted PPI after TAVR only in patients with normal conduction at baseline. Our findings may help identify eligible patients for early discharge after Evolut R/PRO TAVR.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Marcapaso Artificial , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Humanos , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 12(6): e007605, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31195822

RESUMEN

Background We aimed to compare the rate of neurological events in patients with or without cerebral embolic protection (CEP) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods and Results Data on clinical end points including neurological events ≤30 days post-TAVR were collected for all patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR in 2 academic tertiary care institutions. Patients were matched through propensity scoring, which resulted in 333 pairs of patients with versus without CEP out of a total of 831 consecutive patients. The median age was 81 (76-85) years, and the median logistic EuroScore was 14% (9%-20%). The CEP group experienced less neurological events at 24 hours (1% versus 4%; P=0.035) and at 30 days (3% versus 7%; P=0.029). There were significantly more disabling strokes in unprotected patients at 30 days (1% versus 4%; P=0.039). CEP was associated with significantly fewer neurological events at 24 hours after TAVR (odds ratio, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.73; P=0.015) by multiple regression analysis, while age and valve type did not contribute significantly. Overall, 67% (2 of 3) in the CEP versus 83% (10 of 12) in the non-CEP cohort experienced neurological events in protected areas (ie, not dependent on the left vertebral artery). Conclusions The use of filter-based CEP during TAVR was associated with less neurological events, especially in CEP-protected brain territories.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Dispositivos de Protección Embólica , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Embolia Intracraneal/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/instrumentación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Embolia Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Intracraneal/etiología , Masculino , Países Bajos , Factores Protectores , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Interv Cardiol ; 12(1): 36-39, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29588728

RESUMEN

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a less invasive aortic valve replacement technique and is indicated for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and a high operative risk. Cerebral embolisation seems inherent to TAVI, as illustrated by the consistent appearance of new brain lesions on post-procedural MRI studies. Embolic protection devices may capture or deflect embolised material en route to the brain and thus reduce TAVI-related brain injury. Histopathology studies of captured debris revealed a diverse aetiology including recent or organised thrombotic material, tissue originating from the aortic valve, atherosclerotic plaques or myocardium and foreign body components. In this overview we provide a perspective on current evidence and implications for embolic protection devices in the dynamic TAVI field.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA