Trajectories of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA load in patients with hematological malignancy.

OBJECTIVES: The higher risk of prolonged viral shedding in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients with hematological malignancies (HM) necessitates test-based de-isolation strategies. However, evidence to establish their appropriate isolation period is insufficient. This study investigated the factors affecting prolonged viral shedding and the requisite isolation period in these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 14 COVID-19 patients with HM between January and April 2022, who were subjected to our test-based de-isolation strategy, followed by analysis of the viral load trajectory. The viral loads of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were evaluated using the cycle threshold (Ct ) of the reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The trajectories were classified according to the time-interval from COVID-19 onset to the attainment of Ct values >30. RESULTS: The median interval between onset and attainment of a Ct value >30 was 22 days. Five patients with mild or moderate COVID-19 without intense treatment histories achieved Ct values >30 within 20 days. The other nine patients needed more than 20 days, including three patients who did not meet this criterion during the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 viral load trajectories in patients with HM can be stratified by treatment history for the underlying HM and severity of COVID-19.

Humoral response and safety of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and the optimal timing of vaccine administration in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) recipients remains inadequately investigated. We examine the effectiveness and safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in allo-HSCT recipients. METHOD: This prospective observational study included 44 allo-HSCT recipients and 38 healthy volunteers. The proportion of subjects acquiring anti-S1 IgG antibodies were considered as the primary endpoint. The occurrence of adverse events after vaccination and objective deterioration of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were defined as secondary endpoints. In addition, we compared the geometric mean titers (GMT) of anti-S1 antibody titers in subgroups based on time interval between transplantation and vaccination. RESULTS: A humoral response to the vaccine was evident in 40 (91%) patients and all 38 healthy controls. The GMT of anti-S1 titers in patients and healthy controls were 277 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 120-643) BAU/mL and 532 (95% CI 400-708) BAU/mL, respectively. (p = 0.603). A short time interval between transplantation and vaccination (≤6 months) was associated with low anti-S1 IgG antibody titers. No serious adverse events and deterioration of chronic GVHD were observed. Only one case of new development of mild chronic GVHD was recorded. CONCLUSION: Messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccines induce humoral responses in allo-HSCT recipients and can be administered safely.

Efficacy of letermovir in HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus reactivation (CMV-R) is a significant complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT), especially in human leukocyte antigen-haploidentical transplantation (haplo-HCT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). Prophylactic letermovir (LTV) prevents CMV-R in patients undergoing allo-HCT. However, evidence regarding its use in haplo-HCTs with PTCy is limited. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of prophylactic LTV in haplo-HCT with PTCy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 52 patients seropositive for CMV who underwent haplo-HCT with PTCy at our institution between January 2015 and June 2021 and compared patients who received LTV prophylaxis (LTV group: n = 29) with those who did not receive prophylaxis for CMV (control group: n = 23). The primary endpoint was the 100-day cumulative CMV-R incidence. We used Gray's test and the Fine and Gray test to compare the two groups. RESULTS: The 100-day cumulative CMV-R incidence was lower in the LTV group than in the control group (17.2% vs 81.8%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that prophylactic LTV reduced the 100-day cumulative CMV-R incidence (hazard ratio: 0.17, 95% confidence interval: 0.06-0.44, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic LTV effectively prevents CMV-R in patients undergoing haplo-HCT for PTCy.

Nivolumab-induced systemic lymphadenopathy occurring during treatment of malignant melanoma: a case report.

Nivolumab is an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody that exhibits significant efficacy in treating melanoma and other malignancies. However, various nivolumab-induced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been reported, and differentiating irAEs from tumor progression is sometimes difficult. Here, we report a case of reactive lymphadenopathy occurring after treatment with nivolumab. A 56-year-old man with stage IIIC melanoma received adjuvant therapy with nivolumab after wide local excision. He developed systemic lymphadenopathy and autoimmune hemolytic anemia 1 month after receiving seven cycles of nivolumab. Pathological analysis of a cervical lymph node biopsy specimen revealed no metastatic lesion or any other malignancy, including lymphoma. Thus, the patient was diagnosed with nivolumab-induced reactive lymphadenopathy. Systemic corticosteroids were administered to reduce hemolysis, which led to the resolution of lymphadenopathy. When progressive lymphadenopathy is observed in a patient who received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, reactive lymphadenopathy should be carefully distinguished from progression to lymphoid metastasis, and biopsy should be performed if needed.