Evaluation of peritalar subluxation in adult acquired flatfoot deformity using computed tomography and weightbearing multiplanar imaging.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the inferior talus-superior talus (inf-tal-sup-tal) angle (previously proven reliable in multiplanar-weight bearing imaging (MP-WB)) on both computed tomography (CT) and MP-WB scans. We sought to compare the angle between the two modalities in both AAFD and control groups, as well as to compare the groups to each other. METHODS: Inf-tal-sup-tal angles were compared between a stage II AAFD group (n=38) with routine MP-WB and CT scans and a control group (n=20) with preoperative CT scans for lisfranc injuries and normal hindfoot alignment after healing. RESULTS: The CT inf-tal-sup-tal angle was significantly greater in AAFD compared to control (AAFD, 12±6; control, 5±4; p<0.001), but was even greater with MP-WB. There was no significant correlation between inf-tal-sup-tal angles on MP-WB and CT (Pearson's=0.29, p=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: MP-WB imaging proved to be correlated more strongly with AAFD than CT by revealing greater hindfoot valgus. This confirmed that CT scans are useful in predicting AAFD, but cannot be used as a surrogate for MP-WB scans.

Postoperative Medial Cuneiform Position Correlation With Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cotton Osteotomy for Reconstruction of the Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity.

BACKGROUND: Residual supination of the midfoot during reconstruction of the stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is often addressed with a medial cuneiform (Cotton) osteotomy after adequate correction of the hindfoot valgus deformity. The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a correlation between postoperative alignment of the medial cuneiform and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Sixty-three feet in 61 patients with stage II AAFD who underwent a Cotton osteotomy as part of a flatfoot reconstruction were included in the study. Radiographic angles were measured on weightbearing lateral radiographs at a minimum of 40 weeks postoperatively. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to determine if there was an association between postoperative radiographic angles and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) at a minimum of 24 months postoperatively. Patients were also divided into mild plantarflexion (cuneiform articular angle [CAA] ≥-2 degrees) and moderate plantarflexion (CAA <-2 degrees) groups to evaluate for differences in clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Postoperative CAA was significantly positively correlated with the postoperative FAOS symptoms ( r = .27, P = .03), daily activities ( r = .29, P = .02), sports activities ( r = .26, P = .048), and quality of life ( r = .28, P = .02) subscales. Patients in the mild plantarflexion group had statistically and clinically better outcomes compared with the moderate plantarflexion group in the FAOS symptoms ( P = .04), daily activities ( P = .04), and sports activities ( P = .01) subscales. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the surgeon should avoid excessive plantarflexion of the medial cuneiform and use the Cotton osteotomy judiciously as part of a flatfoot reconstruction for stage II AAFD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative series.

Contribution of Medial Cuneiform Osteotomy to Correction of Longitudinal Arch Collapse in Stage IIb Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity.

Background Residual forefoot supination after correcting the hindfoot in stage IIb adult-acquired flatfoot deformity can be addressed with a dorsal opening wedge medial cuneiform (Cotton) osteotomy. The amount of correction is generally judged clinically, and there currently are no preoperative guides that can predict the size of graft needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between patient and operative factors and the correction achieved with the Cotton osteotomy. METHODS: Seventy-nine feet in 74 patients undergoing Cotton osteotomy as part of flatfoot reconstruction were reviewed retrospectively. Preoperative and minimum 40-week postoperative lateral foot weightbearing radiographs were compared to assess correction of longitudinal arch collapse as measured by 13 radiographic parameters, with particular emphasis on the cuneiform articular angle (CAA). Additional demographic and intraoperative variables analyzed for association with radiographic change included age, gender, body mass index, amounts and graft types of Cotton osteotomy and lateral column lengthening, and amount of medializing calcaneal osteotomy. A multivariate linear regression model was developed for each variable found to be significant in univariate analysis. RESULTS: The Cotton osteotomy graft size was significantly associated with changes in the CAA ( P < .001), calcaneal pitch ( P = .03), lateral talonavicular Cobb angle ( P = .03), and lateral naviculomedial cuneiform Cobb angle ( P = .03). The Cotton graft size was the only factor found to significantly predict a change in the CAA in the final linear regression model ( P < .001, R2 = 0.27), with each millimeter of Cotton corresponding to a 2.1-degree decrease of the CAA. CONCLUSION: Correction of longitudinal arch collapse, as measured by the CAA, was primarily influenced by the size of the graft used for the Cotton osteotomy in a linear fashion. The preoperative CAA may help surgeons titrate the proper amount of graft placed intraoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Retrospective Case Series.

Correlation of Clinical Evaluation and Radiographic Hindfoot Alignment in Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity.

BACKGROUND: Previous work has demonstrated that the amount of radiographic hindfoot correction required at the time of adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) operative treatment can be predicted by the amount of radiographic deformity present before surgery. Successful outcomes after reconstruction are closely correlated with hindfoot valgus correction. However, it is not clear if differences exist between clinical and radiographic assessment of hindfoot valgus. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between radiographic and clinical evaluation of hindfoot alignment in patients with stage II AAFD. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (30 feet) with stage II AAFD, 17 men and 12 women, mean age of 51 (range, 20-71) years, were prospectively recruited. In a controlled and standardized fashion, bilateral weightbearing radiographic hindfoot alignment views were taken. Radiographic parameters were measured by 2 blinded and independent readers: hindfoot alignment angle (HAA) and hindfoot moment arm (HMA). Clinical photographs of hindfoot alignment were taken in 3 different vertical camera angulations (0, 20, and 40 degrees). Pictures were assessed by the same readers for standing tibiocalcaneal angle (STCA) and resting calcaneal stance position (RCSP). Intra- and interobserver reliability were assessed by Pearson/Spearman's and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Relationship between clinical and radiographic hindfoot alignment was evaluated by a linear regression model. Comparison between the different angles (RCSP, STCA, and HAA) was performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. P values of less than .05 were considered significant. RESULTS: We found overall almost perfect intraobserver (range, 0.91-0.99) and interobserver reliability (range, 0.74-0.98) for all measures. Mean value and confidence interval (CI) for RCSP and STCA were 10.8 degrees (CI, 10.1-11.5) and 12.6 degrees (CI, 11.7-13.4), respectively. The position of the camera did not influence readings of clinical alignment ( P > .05). The mean HMA was 18.7 mm (CI, 16.3-21.1 mm), and the mean HAA was 23.5 degrees (CI, 21.1-26.0). Clinical and radiographic hindfoot alignment were found to significantly correlate ( P < .05). However, the radiographic HAA demonstrated increased valgus compared to both clinical alignment measurements, with a mean difference of 12.8 degrees from the RCSP (CI, 11.0-14.5, P < .0001) and 11.0 degrees from the STCA (CI, 9.2-12.8, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: We found significant correlation between radiographic and clinical hindfoot alignment in patients with stage II AAFD. However, radiographic measurements of HAA demonstrated significantly more pronounced valgus alignment than the clinical evaluation. The results of our study suggest that clinical evaluation of hindfoot alignment in patients with AAFD potentially underestimates the bony valgus deformity. One should consider these findings when using clinical evaluation in the treatment algorithm of flatfoot patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Publications Rates for Podium and Poster Presentations from the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society.

BACKGROUND: National orthopaedic meetings are used to disseminate current research through podium and poster abstract presentations. Not all of these abstracts go on to full-text journal publication. The purpose of this study was to determine the publication rates of podium and poster presentations from the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) annual meetings between 2008 and 2012. METHODS: All accepted podium and poster abstracts from the 2008-2012 AOFAS annual meetings were compiled from the AOFAS office, Physician Resource Center website, and hardcopy meeting programs. PubMed and Google Scholar searches were performed for journal publications using key words in the presentation abstracts and authors' names. Full-text journal publication rates for the presentations were calculated per year, as were the most common journals of publication. RESULTS: Overall full-text publication rate was 73.7% for podium presentations and 55.8% for posters. Podium presentations were published in a journal significantly more often than posters ( P < .0001; odds ratio 2.17 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.64-2.86]). The mean time to publication was 1.5 and 1.4 years for podium and poster presentations, respectively ( P = .124). The most common journal for podium and poster publications was Foot & Ankle International. CONCLUSION: Podium abstracts were significantly more likely to be published compared to posters. The AOFAS overall full-text journal publication rate was one of the higher reported rates compared with other national orthopedic society meetings, which have ranged from 34% to 73%.

Measuring Joint Flexibility in Hallux Rigidus Using a Novel Flexibility Jig.

BACKGROUND: The flexibility of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint in patients with hallux rigidus (HR) has not been studied. Compared to measuring range of motion alone, measures of joint flexibility provide additional information that may prove useful in the assessment of HR. The purpose of this study was to assess the flexibility of the hallux MTP joint in patients with HR compared to controls using a novel flexibility device. METHODS: Fifteen patients with Coughlin stage II or III HR and 20 healthy controls were recruited prospectively. Using a custom flexibility jig, each of 2 raters performed a series of seated and standing tests on each subject. Dorsiflexion angle and applied torque were plotted against each other to generate 5 different parameters of flexibility. Differences between (1) HR patients and controls and (2) the sitting and standing testing positions were assessed with t tests. Intrarater test-retest reliability, remove-replace reliability, and interrater reliability were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: Patients in the HR group were older than patients in the control group ( P < .001) and had lower maximum dorsiflexion ( P < .001). HR patients were less flexible as measured by 3 of the 5 flexibility parameters: early flexibility (first 25% of motion; P = .027), laxity angle ( P < .001), and torque angle ( P = .002). After controlling for age, only laxity angle differed significantly between HR patients and controls ( P < .001). Generally, patients were more flexible when seated compared to standing, with this effect being more marked in HR patients. All parameters had good or excellent intra- and interrater reliability (ICC ≥ 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Hallux MTP joint flexibility was reliably assessed in HR patients using a flexibility device. Patients with HR had decreased flexibility of the hallux MTP joint compared to control patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Analysis of Total Ankle Arthroplasty Survival in the United States Using Multiple State Databases.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to evaluate survivorship and risk factors for failure of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) in the United States using large statewide, multipayer databases of inpatient discharges. TAA patients from 2005 to 2009 were identified from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project databases for 5 states (California, Florida, Nebraska, North Carolina, and Utah) and the New York Department of Health Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were extracted, and a multivariable logistic regression model was developed to assess risk factors for 90-day all-cause readmission and failure. Failure was defined as revision, arthrodesis, amputation, or implant removal. During the period of interest, 1545 patients received 1593 TAA. The coded etiology of arthritis was primary osteoarthritis (n = 854, 55.2%), posttraumatic arthritis (n = 466, 30.2%), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 129, 8.4%), and other (n = 96, 6.2%). The 5-year survival rate was 90.1%. Patients with a coded diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (odds ratio [OR] = 2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04-4.01) or who were readmitted within 90 days of TAA (OR = 3.41; 95% CI = 1.67-6.97) had significantly increased risk of failure. Risk factors for readmission were Charlson-Deyo Score ≥2 (OR = 3.05; 95% CI = 1.51-6.15) and increased length of stay during the arthroplasty (OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.16-1.47). LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level IV: Observational study.