Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP). The same but different-a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Various techniques for EEP exist. They differ by surgical steps and the source of energy. It is assumed that the latter is of minor importance, whereas adherence to the anatomical enucleation template determines the postoperative result. So far, no systematic review highlights the differences between the energy sources in use for anatomical EEP. This study will address selfsame topic. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was completed on September 1st, 2020. Studies comparing HoLEP, ThuLEP, DiLEP, or BipolEP with TUR-P providing 12 months of postoperative follow-up were included. Two frequentist network meta-analyses were created to compare the techniques of EEP indirectly. RESULTS: 31 studies, including 4466 patients, were found eligible for our meta-analysis. Indirect pairwise comparison showed differences in surgery time between BipolEP and HolEP (MD - 16.72 min., 95% CI - 27.75 to - 5.69) and DiLEP and HoLEP (MD - 22.41 min., 95% CI - 39.43 to - 5.39). No differences in the amount of resected prostatic tissue, major and minor complications and postoperative catheterization time were found. The odds for blood transfusions were threefold higher for BipolEP than for HoLEP (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.02-10.5). The difference was not statistically significant when comparing prospective trials and matched-pair analysis only (OR 3.25, 95% CI 0.94-11.18). The Qmax 12 months after surgery was 2 ml/sec. higher for BipolEP than for DiLEP (MD 2.00, 95% CI 0.17-3.84) and 1.94 ml/sec. lower for DiLEP than for HoLEP (MD - 1.94, 95% CI - 3.65 to - 0.22). CONCLUSION: The energy source used for EEP has an impact on the intervention itself. BipolEP promotes surgical efficiency; laser techniques lower the risk of bleeding. REGISTRY: This meta-analysis is registered in the PROSPERO international prospective register registry with the registration number CRD42020205836.

Laparoscopic adenomectomy versus Eraser laser enucleation of the prostate.

PURPOSE: To evaluate functional outcomes and morbidity rates after laparoscopic adenomectomy (LA) and Eraser laser enucleation of the prostate (ELEP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggesting bladder outlet obstruction, with a prostate heavier than 70 g on transrectal ultrasound, were selected to undergo laparoscopic adenomectomy or Eraser laser enucleation of the prostate. All patients were consecutively enrolled without randomization and assessed preoperatively, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Baseline characteristics, perioperative data, and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The total operating time was significantly longer in the LA group (138.8 ± 11.4 vs. 78.4 ± 10.0 min, p < 0.000001). Catheter removal was performed earlier (61.2 ± 21.3 vs. 174.0 ± 13.2 h, p < 0.000001) and the hospital stay was significantly shorter (62.4 ± 21.2 vs. 187.2 ± 12.6 h, p < 0.000001) in the ELEP group. The latter group experienced significantly less perioperative hemoglobin (Hb) loss (0.71 ± 0.25 vs. 2.15 ± 1.08 g/dl, p < 0.000001), and their postoperative Hb levels (14.1 ± 1.21 vs. 11.7 ± 1.31 g/dl, p < 0.000001) were significantly higher. The resected tissue was significantly greater in the LA group (58.5 ± 23.3 vs. 87.9 ± 22.4 g, p = 0.0002). Significant improvements in Qmax, Qol, and symptom scores from baseline to each follow-up time point were noted in both groups. No statistically significant difference in symptom scores or Qmax was registered between the LA and the ELEP group throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic adenomectomy and ELEP were equally effective for relieving bladder outflow obstruction and lower urinary tract symptoms. The advantages of ELEP include less blood loss, shorter catheterization times, and shorter hospital stays.

Rezum water vapor therapy in multimorbid patients with urinary retention and catheter dependency.

BACKGROUND: Water vapor thermal therapy (Rezum) is a minimally invasive treatment for benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). We report on safety and efficacy of this method for treatment of recurrent urinary retention and relief of catheter dependency owing to BPE in multimorbid patients, considered unfit for surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 136 patients with recurrent urinary retention who underwent water vapor therapy in an ambulatory setting with periprostatic block and optional sedation between 11/2017 and 02/2021 in three urological departments. The objective was successful catheter withdrawal and continuing catheter independency after 3- and 12-months following treatment. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 80.3 years (±7.8), mean prostate volume 54 ml (±27.3), and mean catheter dependency before treatment was 4.8 months (±6.0). ASA classification was a followed: II: 10%, III: 71%, and IV: 19%. All procedures were performed successfully in an ambulatory setting. Perioperative complications were infrequent and minor (Clavien-Dindo Grade 1-2) and included haematuria in 4.4% and urinary tract infection in 3.9% of all cases. A total of 103 patients (78.6%) were able to void spontaneously after a median of 31 days. No significant differences in age, prostate volume, duration of catheter dependency, vapor injections, and ASA score were found between patients with successful or unsuccessful outcome. The mean follow-up period was 6.1 months (±5.9, range 1-22 months). A 3-month follow-up was available for 77 patients (75%) and 34 patients (33%) were followed for 12 months. After 3 and 12 months, 93.5 and 91% of patients remained catheter independent. Fifteen patients (11%) died during follow-up, with a mean overall survival of 7.7 months (±4.7). CONCLUSIONS: Water vapor therapy may prove to be a useful, minimally invasive treatment in a multimorbid population with catheter dependency after urinary retention, secondary to BPE, considered at highest risk or unfit for surgery. Future studies are warranted.

[A retrospective comparison of robotic assisted and conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty in two centres]. / Retrospektiver Vergleich der roboterassistierten und der laparoskopischen Pyeloplastik an zwei Zentren.

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare our initial experience with robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (R-LPP) with the conventional laparoscopic method (C-LPP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the defined period from May 2015 to September 2019, a total of 76 renal pelvic surgeries were performed at two different university clinics. In all, 63 patients who received either L­NBP (n = 27) or R­NBP (n = 36) were considered for data analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up for C­LPP and R­LPP was 22.5 and 12.7 months, respectively. The statistical analysis of the two groups revealed no statistically significant difference regarding age, body mass index, gender or affected side. The operating time was nonsignificantly shorter in the R­LPP group (180 ± 72 vs. 159 ± 54 min, p = 0.194). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative pain, complications, average length of stay in hospital (7.48 ± 2.86 vs. 6.33 ± 2.04 days) or success rate. CONCLUSION: This study shows no significant reduction in operating time in the R­LPP group with an equal rate of complications. It could be shown that there is no disadvantage for the patients undergoing R­LPP directly after the implementation of a robotic system.

[Surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) in patients under anticoagulation: a review of the bleeding risks of established techniques]. / Die chirurgische Therapie der benignen Prostataobstruktion (BPO) beim antikoagulierten Patienten: eine Übersichtsarbeit über die Blutungsrisiken etablierter Techniken.

BACKGROUND: In an aging society an increase of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) requiring treatment is to be expected and the proportion of patients with cardiovascular comorbidities under anticoagulation is also increasing. As the operative treatment of BPO can be problematic, the hemostatic effect of the techniques is of particular importance. OBJECTIVE: This review article discusses the data situation on the bleeding risk of established surgical techniques and the statement of the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines "EAU guidelines on management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), incl. benign prostatic obstruction (BPO)" on this topic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data analysis from PubMed. RESULTS: The EAU guidelines favor transurethral laser vaporization of the prostate using "greenlight", thulium or diode laser and laser enucleation using a holmium or thulium laser in this patient collective. The bipolar is superior to monopolar transurethral resection (TUR-P) in hemostasis. In the future bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BipoLEP) can be an alternative under good hemostasis. Bleeding is a rare complication after recently established minimally invasive techniques, such as Urolift®, I­TIND© and Rezum™, the same applies to prostate artery embolization. Aqua-ablation/AquaBeam® seems to be unsuitable due to frequent hematuria. Surgical adenomectomy can be associated with a high risk of bleeding. CONCLUSION: According to current data, transurethral laser vaporization and enucleation of the prostate are the treatment of choice for patients under anticoagulation; however, other transurethral techniques, such as BipoLEP have an acceptable risk of bleeding and can be an alternative depending on local resources. Newer minimally invasive approaches could become more important in the future.

[Urethral pseudoaneurysm after catheter-associated trauma]. / Pseudoaneurysma der bulbären Harnröhre nach traumatischer Katheterisierung.

We present a case of heavy intermittent urethral bleeding in a 57-year-old man after traumatic catheterization caused by an urethral pseudoaneurysm. The source of bleeding could be detected by angiography and a superselective embolization was performed.

28-Year Survival following Several Metastasectomies, Going through 8th Line Systemic Therapy in a Case of mRCC.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been one of the most treatment-resistant cancers because of its unpredictable clinical course, resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy, and the limited response to immunotherapy and targeted agents. We present a case of long-term survival, that is, 28 years, after primary diagnosis (longest survival in the literature up to our knowledge) with mRCC after several metastasectomies (from local site recurrence, liver, and lung) and eight lines of systemic targeted therapy. This case report shows how crucial is the regular follow-up of patients with RCC after primary management and positive impact of early metastasectomy and systemic targeted therapy in case of mRCC on patients' condition and overall survival.

Inhibition of prostate smooth muscle contraction and prostate stromal cell growth by the inhibitors of Rac, NSC23766 and EHT1864.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Medical therapy of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) targets smooth muscle contraction in the prostate, or prostate growth. However, current therapeutic options are insufficient. Here, we investigated the role of Rac in the control of smooth muscle tone in human prostates and growth of prostate stromal cells. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Experiments were performed using human prostate tissues from radical prostatectomy and cultured stromal cells (WPMY-1). Expression of Rac was examined by Western blot and fluorescence staining. Effects of Rac inhibitors (NSC23766 and EHT1864) on contractility were assessed in the organ bath. The effects of Rac inhibitors were assessed by pull-down, cytotoxicity using a cell counting kit, cytoskeletal organization by phalloidin staining and cell growth using an 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine assay. KEY RESULTS: Expression of Rac1-3 was observed in prostate samples from each patient. Immunoreactivity for Rac1-3 was observed in the stroma, where it colocalized with the smooth muscle marker, calponin. NSC23766 and EHT1864 significantly reduced contractions of prostate strips induced by noradrenaline, phenylephrine or electrical field stimulation. NSC23766 and EHT1864 inhibited Rac activity in WPMY-1 cells. Survival of WPMY-1 cells ranged between 64 and 81% after incubation with NSC23766 (50 or 100 µM) or EHT1864 (25 µM) for 24 h. NSC23766 and EHT1864 induced cytoskeletal disorganization in WPMY-1 cells. Both inhibitors impaired the growth of WPMY-1 cells. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Rac may be a link connecting the control of prostate smooth muscle tone with proliferation of smooth muscle cells. Improvements in LUTS suggestive of BPH by Rac inhibitors appears possible.