Contrast-enhanced paravertebrogram to confirm paravertebral catheter position in elective thoracic surgery: a proof of concept study.

BACKGROUND: Paravertebral pain catheters have been shown to be equally effective as epidural pain catheters for postoperative analgesia after thoracic surgery with the possible additional benefit of less hemodynamic effect. However, a methodology for verifying correct paravertebral catheter placement has not been tested or objectively confirmed in previous studies. The aim of the current study was to describe a technique to confirm the correct position of a paravertebral pain catheter using a contrast-enhanced paravertebrogram. METHODS: A retrospective cohort proof of concept study was performed including 10 consecutive patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery with radiographic contrast-enhanced confirmation of intraoperative paravertebral catheter placement (paravertebrogram). RESULTS: The results of the paravertebrograms, which were done in the operating room at the end of the procedure, verified correct paravertebral catheter placement in 10 of 10 patients. The radiographs documented dissemination of local anesthetic within the paravertebral space. CONCLUSION: This proof of concept study demonstrated that a contrast-enhanced paravertebrogram could be used in conjunction with standard postoperative chest radiography to add valuable information for the assessment of paravertebral catheter placement. This technique has the potential to increase the accuracy and efficiency of postoperative analgesia, and to set a quality standard for future studies of paravertebral pain catheters.

Comparison of Esophagectomy outcomes between a National Center, a National Audit Collaborative, and an International database using the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) standardized definitions.

The ECCG developed a standardized platform for reporting operative complications, with consensus definitions. The Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) published a national comparison against these benchmarks. This study compares ECCG data from the Irish National Center (INC) with both published benchmark studies. All patients undergoing multimodal therapy or surgery with curative intent from 2014 to 2018 inclusive were studied, with data recorded prospectively and entered onto a secure online database (Esodata.org). 219 patients (mean age 67; 77% male) underwent open resection, 66.6% via transthoracic en bloc resection. 30-day and 90-day mortality were 0.0 and 0.9%,nrespectively. Anastomotic leak rate was 5.4%, pneumonia 18.2%, respiratory failure 10%, ARDS 2.7%, atrial dysrhythmia 22.8%, recurrent nerve injury 3%, and delirium in 5% of patients. Compared with both ECCG and DUCA, where MIE constituted 47 and 86% of surgical approaches, respectively, overall complications were similar, as were severity of complications; however, anastomotic leak rate was several-fold less, and mortality was significantly lower (P < 0.001). In this consecutive series and comparative audit with benchmark averages from the ECCG and DUCA publications, a low mortality and anastomotic leak rate were the key differential findings. Although not risk stratified, the severity of complications from this 'open' series is consistent with series containing large numbers of total or hybrid MIE, highlighting a need to adhere to these strictly defined definitions in further prospective research and randomized studies.

Benchmarking Complications Associated with Esophagectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Utilizing a standardized dataset with specific definitions to prospectively collect international data to provide a benchmark for complications and outcomes associated with esophagectomy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Outcome reporting in oncologic surgery has suffered from the lack of a standardized system for reporting operative results particularly complications. This is particularly the case for esophagectomy affecting the accuracy and relevance of international outcome assessments, clinical trial results, and quality improvement projects. METHODS: The Esophageal Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) involving 24 high-volume esophageal surgical centers in 14 countries developed a standardized platform for recording complications and quality measures associated with esophagectomy. Using a secure online database (ESODATA.org), ECCG centers prospectively recorded data on all resections according to the ECCG platform from these centers over a 2-year period. RESULTS: Between January 2015 and December 2016, 2704 resections were entered into the database. All demographic and follow-up data fields were 100% complete. The majority of operations were for cancer (95.6%) and typically located in the distal esophagus (56.2%). Some 1192 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation (46.1%) and 763 neoadjuvant chemotherapy (29.5%). Surgical approach involved open procedures in 52.1% and minimally invasive operations in 47.9%. Chest anastomoses were done most commonly (60.7%) and R0 resections were accomplished in 93.4% of patients. The overall incidence of complications was 59% with the most common individual complications being pneumonia (14.6%) and atrial dysrhythmia (14.5%). Anastomotic leak, conduit necrosis, chyle leaks, recurrent nerve injury occurred in 11.4%, 1.3%, 4.7%, and 4.2% of cases, respectively. Clavien-Dindo complications ≥ IIIb occurred in 17.2% of patients. Readmissions occurred in 11.2% of cases and 30- and 90-day mortality was 2.4% and 4.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Standardized methods provide contemporary international benchmarks for reporting outcomes after esophagectomy.

Iron-deficiency anemia is a common presenting issue with giant paraesophageal hernia and resolves following repair.

BACKGROUND: A significant percentage of patients with paraesophageal hernia (PEH) will have a co-existing diagnosis of iron-deficiency anemia which will resolve following surgical repair. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2010, 270 patients underwent operative repair of PEH. Of this group, 123 patients (45.6 %) reported a preexisting diagnosis of iron-deficiency anemia. The study group consisted of 77 patients with a documented preoperative hemoglobin level (Hb) consistent with iron-deficiency anemia and a follow-up level at least 3 months following surgery. RESULTS: Of the 77 patients included, 72 underwent elective repair, median age was 75 (39-91) years, and 65 % were female. Cameron erosions were identified preoperatively in 32 %. Mean preoperative hemoglobin was 9.6 (4.4-13.6) g/dl and postoperative hemoglobin was 13.2 (10.7-17) g/dl at 3-12 months and 13.6 (9.7-17.2) g/dl at more than 1 year. Ninety percent of patients had a rise in postoperative hemoglobin level by at least 1 g/dL. Anemia resolved in 55 (71 %) patients, more often in women and younger patients (<70 years). Twenty-nine of 40 (73 %) patients on iron therapy discontinued this postoperatively. CONCLUSION: A significant number of patients who present with giant PEH will present with iron-deficiency anemia. Elective repair will result in resolution of the anemia in more than 70 % of patients. PEH is underappreciated as a source of iron-deficiency anemia, and appropriate patients should be considered for elective repair.

Accordion severity grading system: assessment of relationship between costs, length of hospital stay, and survival in patients with complications after esophagectomy for cancer.

BACKGROUND: The ability to assess and compare the impact of postoperative complications in major cancer surgery is currently limited. The Accordion Severity Grading System provides the opportunity to categorize complications according to treatment responses and resource use. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, and costs was performed using a prospective IRB-approved database of patients undergoing esophagectomy from 2000 to 2008. RESULTS: This study included 285 consecutive patients, 83% were male, and mean age was 63.7 years. Histology was predominantly adenocarcinoma (80%). For patients with invasive cancer, overall survival at 5 years was 50%. Mean overall cost and length of stay were $23,419 and 10.4 days, respectively. Neoadjuvant therapy was used in 156 patients (54.7%) and operative mortality rate was 0.7%. Complications were documented in 144 patients (50.5%), with Accordion grades assigned as 1 (29%), 2 (59%), 3 (3%), 4 (6%), 5 (2%), and 6 (0.7%). Accordion grade was significantly related to costs and length of stay in univariate (p < 0.005) and multivariate analyses (p < 0.005). There was a statistically significant difference in survival between those patients who did and did not experience complications; however, no significant differences were noted among individual Accordion grades. Cox regression multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between overall survival and occurrence of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The Accordion Severity Grading System provides a meaningful approach to classifying complications according to resource use, which also directly correlates with treatment costs and length of stay. Survival is affected by overall occurrence of complications, but was not related to individual Accordion grades in this study. The Accordion Severity Grading System should be a component of prospective data collections and can be used in major cancer surgery to study areas appropriate for quality improvement and cost containment.

Evolving management strategies in esophageal perforation: surgeons using nonoperative techniques to improve outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Management of acute esophageal perforation continues to evolve. We hypothesized that treatment of these patients at a tertiary referral center is more important than beginning treatment within 24 hours, and that the evolving application of nonsurgical treatment techniques by surgeons would produce improved outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Demographics and outcomes of patients treated for esophageal perforation from 1989 to 2009 were recorded in an Institutional Review Board-approved database. Retrospective outcomes assessment was done for 5 separate time spans, including timing and type of treatment, length of stay (LOS), complications, and mortality. RESULTS: Eighty-one consecutive patients presented with acute esophageal perforation. Their mean age was 64 years, and 55 patients (68%) had American Society of Anesthesiologists levels 3 to 5; 59% of the study population was referred from other hospitals; 48 patients (59%) were managed operatively, 33 (41%) nonoperatively, and 10 patients with hybrid approaches involving a combination of surgical and interventional techniques; 57 patients (70%) were treated <24 hours and 24 (30%) received treatment >24 hours after perforation. LOS was lower in the early-treatment group; however, there was no difference in complications or mortality. Nonoperative therapy increased from 0% to 75% over time. Nonsurgical therapy was more common in referred cases (48% vs 30%) and in the >24 hours treatment group (46% vs 38%). Over the period of study, there were decreases in complications (50% to 33%) and LOS (18.5 to 8.5 days). Mortality for the entire series involved 3 patients (4%): 2 operative and 1 nonoperative. CONCLUSIONS: Results from our series indicate that referral to a tertiary care center is as important as treatment within 24 hours. An experienced surgical management team using a diversified approach, including selective application of nonoperative techniques, can expect to shorten LOS and limit complications and mortality.

Assessment of intra-operative haemodynamic changes associated with transhiatal and transthoracic oesophagectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Previous comparisons of the different surgical techniques for oesophagectomy have concentrated on mortality, morbidity and survival. There is limited data regarding the intra-operative physiological ramifications of the transhiatal (TH) versus the transthoracic (TT) approach to oesophageal resection. We carried out an in-depth analysis of the intra-operative haemodynamic changes and assessed the potential implications on perioperative outcomes in a matched cohort of patients undergoing TH and TT oesophagectomy. METHODS: A retrospective case review study of TT and TH oesophageal resection at a high-volume tertiary referral centre for oesophageal diseases. General demographics and outcomes of the patients were accumulated prospectively in an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved database. Intra-operative haemodynamic measurements were obtained from anaesthetic records. A total of 40 patients (20 TT+20 TH) were retrospectively identified after matching them for age, co-morbidities, tumour stage and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status. Main outcome measures included perioperative outcomes, operative time, blood loss, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, incidence and types of dysrhythmias, incidence of intra-operative hypotension and vasopressor usage, as well as perioperative morbidity and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Indications for resection included oesophageal cancer (27 patients), high-grade dysplasia (six patients), laryngopharyngoesophageal cancer (three patients), achalasia (two patients) and scleroderma (1 patient). Nine patents with oesophageal cancer had pT3 tumours (TH1, TT8). The mortality was zero in both groups. The total duration of hospitalisation and ICU care was similar in both groups. The mean estimated blood loss was 213 ml (range 100-400 ml) for the TH group and 216 ml (range 80-500 ml) for the TT group. The median operating times for both approaches were similar (398 min TH vs 382 min TT). Intra-operative dysrhythmias were noted in 11 TH and 15 TT patients. Both groups maintained at least 80% of the pre-operative systolic blood pressure (SBP) intra-operatively (TT 89% vs TH 85%) and required vasopressors in comparable quantities. The comparative statistical analysis of intra-operative incidences of hypotensive episodes below 100, 90 and 80 mm Hg showed no significant differences in both groups. However, the TH group experienced a greater frequency of acute hypotension (acute SBP decreases by ≥ 10 mm Hg per 5-min reading) intra-operatively (TH 25% vs TT 16% of operative time), p=0.02. Phenylephrine infusions were required for longer periods in the TH group (TH 52.7% vs TT 33.6% of operation time), p=0.01. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that intra-operative haemodynamic changes and perioperative outcomes are similar in both TT and TH approaches for oesophagectomy in a well-matched cohort of patients. Patients undergoing the TH approach demonstrated a higher frequency of intra-operative haemodynamic lability. The approaches to oesophageal resection should be based on matching the operation to the patient's pre-existing conditions and tumour characteristics rather than perceived differences in haemodynamic impact.

Assessment of criteria and clinical significance of circumferential resection margins in esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical significance of circumferential resection margins according to current criteria of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the Royal College of Pathology (RCP) in esophageal and esophagogastric cancer. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Single-surgeon database. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-five patients (mean age, 64 years) with T3 tumors who underwent esophageal resection for cancer between 1991 and 2006. Main Outcome Measure Resection margins criteria and survival. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-four consecutive patients were prospectively identified from an institutional review board-approved database between 1991 and 2006. All patients with T3 tumors (n = 135) had their original pathologic slides reassessed by a single gastrointestinal pathologist. Operative mortality was 0.7% and mean follow-up was 3.1 years. Follow-up was complete in 81% of patients. Positive margins were identified in 16 cases in the CAP group vs 83 cases in the RCP group. Five-year Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the CAP group demonstrated a significant (P < .001) difference in survival, whereas the RCP group showed no difference (P = .20). In comparisons of negative vs positive margins, respectively, median survival in the CAP group (29.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 22.7-36.9] vs 8.33 months [95% CI, 4.4-12.3]) was significantly different from the RCP group (28.47 months [95% CI, 19.7-37.2] vs 22.23 months [95% CI, 13.6-30.8]). At 60-month follow-up, the positive predictive value with respect to survival was 100% in the CAP group vs 81% in the RCP group. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified R1 margins in the CAP group and lymph node ratio as being directly linked to survival. CONCLUSIONS: Positive circumferential resection margins are prognostically important and the CAP criteria provide a more clinically meaningful assessment. Universal adoption of the CAP system can improve interpretation of international clinical trials and allow more accurate comparisons of outcomes.