Burden of Treatment-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma in Sweden.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) is a complication of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment. OBJECTIVE: This real-world, retrospective study used electronic medical record (EMR) data from 3 Swedish clinics to assess the occurrence and economic burden of TIPN in patients with MM. METHODS: Eligible patients had an MM diagnosis in the Swedish Cancer Registry between 2006 and 2015 and initiated treatment during that period. Follow-up was until last EMR visit, death, or study end (April 2017). The current analyses included patients receiving bortezomib, lenalidomide, carfilzomib, or thalidomide at any treatment line. To discern healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with TIPN from other causes, patients with TIPN were matched with those without on baseline characteristics, treatment, and line of therapy. All analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: Overall, 457 patients were included; 102 (22%) experienced TIPN. Patients experiencing TIPN during first-line treatment mostly received bortezomib-based regimens (n = 48/57 [84%]); those with TIPN during second- and third/fourth-line treatment mostly received lenalidomide/thalidomide-based regimens (19/31 [61%], 8/14 [57%], respectively). Patients with TIPN had higher HCRU/costs than those without TIPN (mean differences in hospital outpatient visits: 5.2, p = 0.0031; total costs per patient-year: EUR 17,183, p = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Effective MM treatments associated with a reduced incidence of TIPN could result in decreased healthcare expenditure.

Comparison of Recommendations and Use of Cardiovascular Risk Equations by Health Technology Assessment Agencies and Clinical Guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: To identify risk equations for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in primary and secondary prevention settings that are used or recommended by health technology assessment (HTA) organizations and in clinical guidelines (CGs). METHODS: A targeted literature review was conducted using a two-stage search strategy. First, HTA reviews of manufacturers' drug submissions, reports from established HTA organizations (Europe, Canada, and Australia), and CGs from countries with and without HTA organizations, including the United States, were identified. Documents published between September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2016, were examined for cardiovascular risk equations, recommendations, and commentaries. Next, publications associated with risk equations and cited by HTA and CG documents were retrieved. This literature was examined to extract commentaries and risk equation study characteristics. RESULTS: The review identified 47 risk equations, 25 in the primary CVD prevention setting (i.e., patients with no CVD history), including 5 for CVD prevention in diabetes and 22 solely in secondary prevention settings; 11 were identified for heart failure, 3 for stroke or transient ischemic attack, 2 for stable angina, and 11 for acute coronary syndrome or related conditions. A small set of primary prevention equations was found to be commonly used by HTAs, whereas secondary prevention equations were less common in HTA documents. CGs provided more risk equations as options than HTA documents. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is an abundance of risk equations developed for primary and secondary prevention, there remains a need for additional research to provide sufficient clinical and HTA guidance for risk estimation, particularly in high-risk or secondary prevention settings.

The impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors on febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: The study aims to assess the relative efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) products administered as primary prophylaxis (PP) to patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. METHODS: A systematic literature review identified publications (January 1990 to September 2013) of randomized controlled trials evaluating PP with filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, lenograstim, or lipegfilgrastim in adults receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for solid tumors or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Direct, indirect, and mixed-treatment comparison (MTC) were used to estimate the odds ratio and 95 % credible interval of febrile neutropenia (FN) during cycle 1 and all cycles of chemotherapy combined without adjusting for differences in relative dose intensity (RDI) between study treatment arms. RESULTS: Twenty-seven publications representing 30 randomized controlled trials were included. Using MTC over all chemotherapy cycles, PP with filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, lenograstim, and lipegfilgrastim versus no G-CSF PP or placebo were associated with statistically significantly reduced FN risk. FN risk was also significantly reduced with pegfilgrastim PP versus filgrastim PP. Over all chemotherapy cycles, there was a numerical but statistically nonsignificant increase in the FN risk for lipegfilgrastim PP versus pegfilgrastim PP. Using MTC in cycle 1, PP with filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and lipegfilgrastim versus no G-CSF PP or placebo were associated with statistically significantly reduced FN risk. CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, using MTC without adjustment for RDI, PP with all G-CSFs evaluated reduced the FN risk in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Future studies are needed to assess the influence of RDI on FN outcomes and to eliminate potential bias between G-CSF arms receiving more intensive chemotherapy than control arms.

Characteristics and Outcomes for Recipients of NVX-CoV2373: A Real-World Retrospective Study in Germany.

Real-world evidence supports SARS-CoV-2 vaccination strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic. This real-world retrospective study utilized the German Disease Analyzer database to characterize recipients of NVX-CoV2373 and explore vaccination outcomes. Recipients (≥12 years) of NVX-CoV2373 as a primary series or booster in Germany were vaccinated between March and December 2022. Outcomes included demographics and clinical characteristics of recipients, tolerability/reactogenicity-related events within 7 and 14 days post-vaccination, and protection from COVID-19. Overall, there were 597 recipients (mean age ~60 years) of NVX-CoV2373; 81% were vaccinated by a general practitioner, and 68% had a Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) high-risk factor. The most common baseline comorbidities were chronic neurological (36%) and chronic intestinal (21%) diseases. Among recipients with metabolic disease (~11%), 65% had diabetes. Tolerability/reactogenicity-related symptoms were recorded in ~1% of recipients. There were no sick-leave notes associated with NVX-CoV2373. After 10 months (median, 7 months) of follow-up, 95% (95% CI, 93-95) of recipients were estimated to be protected from COVID-19. Outcomes were similar across the primary series, booster, and STIKO populations. Tolerability and COVID-19 protection support the use of NVX-CoV2373 as a primary/booster vaccination for all authorized populations, including high-risk.

Hemoglobin level at initiation of darbepoetin alfa: impact on need for transfusion and associated costs in chemotherapy-induced anemia treatment in Europe.

PURPOSE: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents can reduce red blood cell transfusion rates in patients developing anemia while receiving chemotherapy. We investigated potential cost savings from reduced transfusion rates in patients starting darbepoetin alfa (DA) at higher versus lower hemoglobin (Hb) levels. METHODS: Two systematic literature reviews were performed: transfusion outcomes in patients receiving DA stratified by baseline Hb level and costs of transfusion in Europe. Potential cost savings were calculated by multiplying the difference in transfusion rates between Hb levels by the midpoint of transfusion costs. RESULTS: Despite differences in baseline characteristics, treatment duration and analysis technique, the clinical studies (n = 8) showed that fewer transfusions were required when DA was initiated at higher versus lower Hb levels. The economic studies (n = 9) showed that 1 unit of transfusion ranged from 130 to 537 (2010-adjusted values). Cost savings from initiating DA at higher versus lower Hb levels were 503-2,226 (2 units transfused) and 880-3,895 (3.5 units) per ten patients. CONCLUSIONS: Transfusion incidence increases with DA initiation at lower Hb levels. Potential cost savings depend on the number of units transfused and cost items included. DA initiation according to guidelines can reduce transfusions and potentially reduce transfusion-associated costs.

Quality of life in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in France: results from a French cross-sectional study.

In recent years, treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has improved substantially, leading to longer survival. This has necessitated a greater focus on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), but data are lacking. In a part-prospective, part-retrospective study, we enrolled 219 adults with ALL in France to assess the impact of key disease and treatment characteristics on HRQoL. Overall HRQoL and most specific QoL domain scores were consistently better among patients receiving front-line therapy, those currently in complete remission, and those who had previously received hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Furthermore, HRQoL was consistently impaired in patients with minimal residual disease present (MRD+). In multivariate analyses, multiple lines of therapy, MRD+, leukopenia, comorbidities, and anemia were significantly associated with impaired HRQoL. This study provides real-world data on HRQoL in adults with ALL in France and shows the positive impact of MRD-negative status on HRQoL.

Management of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in routine clinical practice: Minimal residual disease testing, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in Belgium, Greece and Switzerland.

OBJECTIVES: To describe real-world management and clinical and economic outcomes of patients with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in Belgium, Greece and Switzerland. METHODS: This descriptive, retrospective medical chart review collected patient-level data in 2018 from adults with ≥1 minimal residual disease (MRD) test during front-line ALL treatment. Data were stratified by MRD status. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included (median age 44 years, 23 % Philadelphia chromosome-positive; MRD-positive: n = 17, MRD-negative: n = 50, MRD result unknown: n = 15). HyperCVAD (32 %) and HOVON (26 %) were the most frequently used front-line treatment protocols; 22 % of patients received stem cell transplantation. Overall, 76 % of ALL patients were hospitalized (mean 1.1 hospitalization/month). Complete hematological response (CRh) occurred in 66/82 patients (80 %). Median relapse-free survival from CRh was 32.7 months (MRD-positive: 11.7 months; MRD-negative: 33.3 months). Median overall survival from diagnosis was 28.9 months (MRD-positive: 15.3 months; MRD-negative: not reached). Most patients (88 %) were MRD tested during induction; testing rates considerably decreased thereafter (39 % during consolidation). CONCLUSIONS: B-cell precursor ALL represents a clinical burden and impacts healthcare resources; MRD-positive patients have worse prognosis than MRD-negative patients. Efforts should be made to adhere to recommendations for MRD testing in clinical guidelines.

Patient and caregiver productivity loss and indirect costs associated with cardiovascular events in Europe.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to estimate patient and caregiver productivity loss and indirect costs following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or a stroke in Europe. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in seven European countries. A validated questionnaire was used during a cardiologist/neurologist visit 3-12 months post event. We included patients who returned to work ( ≥ 4 weeks prior to recruitment), given specific interest in presenteeism. Patient absenteeism, presenteeism and caregiver loss in the past four weeks were pro-rated to one year and combined with time-off due to initial hospitalisation/sick-leave. Hours lost were valued according to country labour cost (2018 euros). RESULTS: The analysis included 196 ACS (86% myocardial infarction) and 198 stroke (99% ischaemic, 77% modified Rankin Scale 0-1) patients. Mean age in ACS and stroke patients was 53 years, 86% and 78% respectively were men, 28% and 25% had previous cardiovascular event or established cardiovascular disease. Mean (country range) total productivity time loss was 70 (47-91) workdays for ACS and 68 (45-88) workdays for stroke (25% of annual workdays). Particularly, ACS patient lost 59 (37-79) workdays, and caregivers lost 11 (0-16) workdays, with total mean indirect cost per case €13,953 (€6641-23,160). After stroke, 56 (42-70) workdays were lost by patient plus 12 (3-20) days by caregiver, amounting to €13,773 (€10,469-20,215). Patients with previous events or established cardiovascular disease lost 80 (ACS) and 73 (stroke) workdays, costing €16,061 and €14,942 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that lost productive time and indirect costs following ACS/stroke are substantial, with indirect costs comparable to direct costs.

The prevalence, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and treatment of patients at very high risk of cardiovascular events in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of patients at very high risk of cardiovascular (CV) events in the United Kingdom (UK) and evaluate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values and treatment patterns in these patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used primary care data from UK electronic medical records in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in 2013. Very high-risk patients were defined per European Society of Cardiology guidelines as those with hyperlipidemia (assessed by co-medication) and documented cardiovascular disease (CVD) or hyperlipidemia and type 2 diabetes (DM2) without CVD (DM2w/oCVD). All analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: Data from 4,940,226 patients were captured in the CPRD in 2013. Of these, 5% of patients had received ≥2 lipid-modifying therapy prescriptions and were at very high risk of CVD (3% [n = 138,536] had documented CVD, 2% [n = 98,743] had DM2w/oCVD). In documented CVD patients, coronary artery disease (73%) was the most frequent type of event (25% had myocardial infarction [MI]), followed by cerebrovascular disease (18%), and peripheral arterial disease (9%); 21% had experienced multiple CV events, 25% had DM2, and 3% had MI within 1 year. In documented CVD and DM2w/oCVD patients, >95% received statin treatment; 24% received high-intensity statin, and 1.5% statin plus ezetimibe. Across both populations, 64-66% had LDL-C levels ≥1.8 mmol/L, 27-28% ≥2.5 mmol/L, 6-7% ≥3.5 mmol/L, and 3% had levels ≥4.0 mmol/L, respectively. CONCLUSION: A well-defined proportion of patients remain at very high-risk of CVD. Statin therapy needs optimization, but, for some patients with high LDL-C levels, multiple CV events, MI within 1 year, or CVD and DM2, additional more intensive therapy may be needed.

A systematic literature review comparing methods for the measurement of patient persistence and adherence.

OBJECTIVES: A systematic literature review was conducted comparing different approaches estimating persistence and adherence in chronic diseases with polypharmacy of oral and subcutaneous treatments. METHODS: This work followed published guidance on performing systematic reviews. Twelve electronic databases and grey literature sources were used to identify studies and guidelines for persistence and adherence of oral and subcutaneous therapies in hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Outcomes of interest of each persistence and adherence data collection and calculation method included pros: accurate, easy to use, inexpensive; and cons: inaccurate, difficult to use, expensive. RESULTS: A total of 4158 records were retrieved up to March 2017. We included 16 observational studies, 5 systematic reviews and 7 guidelines, in patients with hypercholesterolemia (n = 8), type 2 diabetes (n = 4), hypertension (n = 2), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 1) and mixed patient populations (n = 13). Pharmacy and medical records offer an accurate, easy and inexpensive data collection method. Pill count, medication event monitoring systems (MEMs), self-report questionnaires and observer report are easy to use. MEMS and biochemical monitoring tests can be expensive. Proportion of days covered (PDC) was recommended as a gold standard calculation method for long-term treatments. PDC avoids use of days' supply in calculation, hence is more accurate compared to medication possession ratio (MPR) to assess adherence to treatments in chronic diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Decisions on what method to use should be based on considerations of the route of medication administration, the resources available, setting and aim of the assessment. Combining different methods may provide wider insights into adherence and persistence, including patient behavior.

Association of a Combined Measure of Adherence and Treatment Intensity With Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atherosclerosis or Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors Treated With Statins and/or Ezetimibe.

Importance: Both adherence and treatment intensity can alter the effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy in routine clinical practice. Objective: To evaluate the association of adherence and treatment intensity with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with documented cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes without CVD or chronic kidney disease (CKD), and CKD without CVD. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink from January 2010 through February 2016. United Kingdom primary care was the setting. Participants were newly treated patients who received their first statin and/or ezetimibe prescription between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2013, plus an additional prescription for statins and/or ezetimibe during the following year. Exposures: Adherence was assessed annually using the proportion of days covered, with adherent defined as a proportion of days covered of 80% or higher. Treatment intensity was classified according to guidelines based on the expected percentage of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction as low (<30% reduction), moderate (30% to <50% reduction), or high (≥50% reduction). Adherence and treatment intensity were multiplied to create a combined measure, reflecting treatment intensity after accounting for adherence. Main Outcomes and Measures: Composite end point of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for myocardial infarction, unstable angina, ischemic stroke, heart failure, or revascularization. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated against patients not treated for 1 year or longer. Results: Among a total of 29 797 newly treated patients, there were 16 701, 12 422, and 674 patients with documented CVD, type 2 diabetes without CVD or CKD, and CKD without CVD, respectively; mean (SD) ages were 68.3 (13.2), 59.3 (12.4), and 67.3 (15.1) years, and male proportions were 60.6%, 55.0%, and 47.0%. In the documented CVD cohort, patients receiving high-intensity therapy were more likely to be adherent over time (84.1% in year 1 and 72.3% in year 6) than patients receiving low-intensity therapy (57.4% in year 1 and 48.4% in year 6). Using a combined measure of adherence and treatment intensity, a graded association was observed with both LDL-C reduction and CVD outcomes: each 10% increase in the combined measure was associated with a 10% lower risk (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86-0.94). Adherent patients receiving a high-intensity regimen had the lowest risk (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.54-0.68) vs patients untreated for 1 year or longer. Findings in the other 2 cohorts were similar. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study demonstrate that the lowest cardiovascular risk was observed among adherent patients receiving high-intensity therapy, and the highest cardiovascular risk was observed among nonadherent patients receiving low-intensity therapy. Strategies that improve adherence and greater use of intensive therapies could substantially improve cardiovascular risk.

Methods for estimating costs in patients with hyperlipidemia experiencing their first cardiovascular event in the United Kingdom.

AIMS: Methods for integrating external costs into clinical databases are not well-characterized. The purpose of this research was to describe and implement methods for estimating the cost of hospitalizations, prescriptions, and general practitioner and specialist visits used to manage hyperlipidemia patients experiencing cardiovascular (CV) events in the United Kingdom (UK). METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics data. Costs were incorporated based on reference costs from the National Health Service, and labor costs from the Personal Social Services Research Unit. The study population included patients seen by general practitioners in the UK from 2006-2012. Patients ≥18 years were selected at the time of their first CV-related hospitalization defined as myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure, transient ischemic attack, unstable angina, or revascularization. To be included, patients must have received ≥2 lipid-lowering therapies. Outcome measures included healthcare utilization and direct medical costs for hospitalizations, medications, general practitioner visits, and specialist visits during the 6-month acute period, starting with the CV hospitalization, and during the subsequent 30-month long-term period. RESULTS: There were 24,093 patients with a CV hospitalization included in the cohort. This study identified and costed 69,240 hospitalizations, 673,069 GP visits, 32,942 specialist visits, and 2,572,792 prescriptions, representing 855 unique drug and dose combinations. The mean acute period and mean annualized long-term period costs (2014£) were £4,060 and £1,433 for hospitalizations, £377 and £518 for GP visits, £59 and £103 for specialist visits, and £98 and £209 for medications. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital costs represent the largest portion of acute and long-term costs in this population. Detailed costing using utilization data is feasible and representative of UK clinical practice, but is labor intensive. The availability of a standardized coding system in the UK drug costing data would greatly facilitate drug costing.

Prediction of cardiovascular risk in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.

Aims: Patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) have an elevated cardiovascular (CV) risk. The objective of this analysis was to adjust CV risk equations derived in non-FH populations with hyperlipidaemia to predict CV risk in FH patients, and then to use these adjusted CV risk equations in a decision analytic model in order to predict lifetime CV risk in FH patients. Methods and results: A literature search of publications reporting CV risk in FH patients identified the publication with the most credible estimate of CV risk increase. A CV event rate ratio (RR) (FH vs. non-FH) was derived from reported odds ratios by pooling treated and untreated patients. Predicted CV event risks based on non-FH risk equations were adjusted with the RR to reflect CV risk in FH patients. A decision analytic model incorporating these adjusted risk equations was used to predict 10-year and lifetime CV risk in FH patients. Combining the derived RR of 7.1 (95% CI: 5.7-8.7) with the predicted CV risks in a decision analytic model yielded 10-year and lifetime risk estimates of 45% and 88% in FH patients based on the RUTHERFORD-2 trial population. Based on the initial (cross-sectional) RR of 7.1, FH patients were predicted to have 3.9 times more events over their lifetime than non-FH patients with a similar risk profile. Conclusion: The CV risk in FH is high and represents an unmet medical need for patients. Increased efforts for better diagnosis and management of FH should be employed to improve patient outcomes.

Characterization and cholesterol management in patients with cardiovascular events and/or type 2 diabetes in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical characteristics and cholesterol management of patients with cardiovascular events (CVEs) and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > 1.8 mmol/L in the Netherlands. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: From the PHARMO Database Network a cross-sectional cohort was constructed. The descriptive study included patients on lipid modifying therapy (LMT) in 2009, classified as high cardiovascular risk based on a history of T2DM or CVE, with 2010 LDL-C levels above 1.8 mmol/L (2011 European Society of Cardiology [ESC] target). Sub-cohorts were created: T2DM + CVE from the T2DM cohort and multiple CVE from the CVE only cohort. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical characteristics and drug treatment were determined at the time of the last LDL-C measurement in 2010. RESULTS: Of 10,864 very high risk patients, 66% had T2DM, 37% of whom also had CVE. In the CVE only cohort (34%), 18% had multiple events. More regular check-ups skewed inclusion towards diabetes patients. T2DM vs. CVE cohort characteristics were: 53% vs. 63% male, 42% vs. 27% obese, 19% vs. 24% current smoker, 54% vs. 51% systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg, with similar proportions in the sub-cohorts. Proportions reaching the Dutch guideline LDL-C target of <2.5 mmol/L were 56% (T2DM), 57% (T2DM + CVE), 48% (CVE only) and 53% (multiple CVE only). Frequencies of high intensity dose statin (simvastatin ≥80 mg, atorvastatin ≥40 mg or rosuvastatin ≥20 mg) were 6% (T2DM), 9% (T2DM + CVE, CVE only) and 14% (multiple CVE only); 1-2% received additional ezetimibe and 3-5% received non-statin LMT only, including ezetimibe. CONCLUSION: Despite LMT, >40% of the patients above ESC target also failed to reach the less stringent Dutch target, even in the higher risk groups. Therefore, management of hypercholesterolemia after CVE or T2DM should be optimized to improve cardiovascular outcomes. There is substantial room for improving other cardiovascular risk factors.

Cost-effectiveness of Evolocumab in Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk in Spain.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of evolocumab in patients at high risk of cardiovascular (CV) events from the Spanish National Health System perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was used to assess the cost-effectiveness (incremental [∆] cost per ∆ quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]; or cost utility) of evolocumab plus standard of care (SoC; statins) versus SoC, assuming lifetime treatment. Cohorts with baseline LDL-C >100 mg/dL and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) or CV event history (secondary prevention [SP]) were considered. Lifetime CV event rates were predicted either (1) using risk equations considering local risk factors (Spanish Familial Hypercholesterolemia Cohort Study) adjusted to reflect the increased risk of FH patients or (2) using CV event rates from local registries (Information System for the Development of Research in Primary Care) for SP patients. LDL-C relative reductions from evolocumab trials (Evolocumab 140 mg Q2W (bi-weekly) and 420 mg QM (monthly)) were converted into CV event reductions using rate ratios per millimole per liter (mmol/L; 38.67 mg/dL) from a meta-analysis of statin trials (Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration). FINDINGS: Predicted 10-year/lifetime CV risks were 50%/95% (FH) and 62%/82% (SP) for SoC and 27%/83% (FH) and 44%/69% (SP) for evolocumab plus SoC. Predicted 10-year/lifetime major CV event risks were 42%/86% (FH) and 47%/67% (SP) for SoC and 21%/68% (FH) and 31%/52% (SP) for evolocumab plus SoC. Predicted per patient-year rates of non-fatal/fatal CV events were 2.2/0.8 (FH) and 1.1/0.6 (SP) for SoC and 1.2/0.6 (FH) and 0.7/0.5 (SP) for evolocumab plus SoC. Predicted CV event reductions per mmol/L were 17% (FH) and 15% (SP). Evolocumab treatment was associated with increased QALYs and costs compared with SoC (FH: ∆cost, €65,369; ∆QALY, 2.12; incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER], €30,893; SP: ∆cost, €42,266; ∆QALY, 0.93; ICER, €45,340). IMPLICATIONS: Evolocumab plus to SoC may provide a cost-effective option for LDL-C lowering in FH and SP patients in Spain.

Management of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with cardiovascular events in the UK: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol management and lipid-lowering treatment patterns in patients with a cardiovascular (CV) event. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using Clinical Practice Research Datalink records linked with Hospital Episode Statistics data. SETTING: Routine clinical practice in the UK from 2006 to 2012. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals ≥18 years were selected at their first CV-related hospitalisation (first event cohort) if they had received ≥2 lipid-lowering therapy prescriptions within 180 days beforehand. Patients were stratified into four mutually exclusive subgroups based on the presence or absence of vascular disease and of diabetes. Those with a second CV hospitalisation within 36 months were included in a separate cohort (second event cohort). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: LDL levels in the year prior to the CV event and 12 months later as well as measures of adherence to lipid-lowering therapy during the 12 months after the CV hospitalisation. RESULTS: There were 24 093 patients in the first event cohort, of whom 5274 were included in the second event cohort. Most received moderate intensity statins at baseline and 12 months. Among the four first event cohort subgroups at baseline, the proportions with an LDL of <1.8 mmol/L was similar between the two diabetic cohorts (36% to 38%) and were higher than those in the two non-diabetic cohorts (17% to 22%) and in the second event cohort (31%). An incremental 5% to 9% had an LDL below 1.8 mmol/L at 12 months, suggesting intensification of therapy. The proportion of adherent patients (medication possession ratio of≥0.8) was highest for statins, ranging from 68% to 72%. For ezetimibe, the range was 65% to 70%, and for fibrates, it was 48% to 62%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the existence of effective therapies for lowering cholesterol, patients do not reach achievable LDL targets.

Medical costs associated with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the United States during the first two years of treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the direct costs of medical care associated with aggressive and indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in the United States; to show how costs for aggressive NHL change over time by examining costs related to initial, secondary and palliative treatment phases; and to evaluate the economic consequences of treatment failure in aggressive NHL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of 1999 - 2000 direct costs in newly diagnosed NHL patients and controls (subjects without any cancer) was conducted using the MarketScan medical and drug claims database of large employers across the United States. Treatment failure analysis was conducted for aggressive NHL patients, and was defined by the need for secondary treatment or palliative care after initial therapy. Cost of treatment failure was calculated as difference in regression-adjusted costs between patients with initial therapy only and patients experiencing initial treatment failure. RESULTS: Patients with aggressive (n = 356) and indolent (n = 698) NHL had significantly greater health service utilization and associated costs (all P < 05) than controls (n = 1068 for aggressive, n = 2094 for indolent). Mean monthly costs were 5871 dollars for aggressive NHL vs. 355 dollars for controls (P < 0001) and 3833 dollars for indolent NHL vs. 289 dollars for controls (P < 0001). The primary cost drivers were hospitalization (aggressive NHL = 44% of total costs, indolent NHL = 50%) and outpatient office visits (aggressive NHL = 39%, indolent NHL = 34%). For aggressive NHL, mean monthly initial treatment phase costs (10,970 dollars) and palliative care costs (9836 dollars) were higher than costs incurred during secondary phase (3302 dollars). The mean cost of treatment failure in aggressive NHL was 14,174 dollars per month, and 85,934 dollars over the study period. CONCLUSION: The treatment of NHL was associated with substantial health care costs. Patients with aggressive lymphomas tended to accrue higher costs, compared with those with indolent lymphomas. These costs varied over time, with the highest costs occurring during the initial treatment and palliative care phases. Treatment failure was the most expensive treatment pattern. New strategies to prevent or delay treatment failure in aggressive NHL could help reduce the economic burden of NHL.

Cardiovascular Disease Risk Associated With Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk associated with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). METHODS: A systematic review of the published literature was conducted. All publications describing FH risk from PubMed ("cardiovascular disease risk + familial hypercholesterolaemia," 2004-2015), Internet and Medline search of FH registries, and associated references were screened for FH-related CVD risk in titles, abstracts, and study methods. CVD risk expressed as rates, odds, or ratios of mortality and morbidity were extracted. Each article was reviewed for bias by 2 reviewers within 17 items in 7 categories; a modified Newcastle-Ottawa assessment scale was used for nonrandomized studies. FINDINGS: The complete literature search identified 712 potential publications: 549 from PubMed (Medline), 150 from registries, and 13 from references. Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria: 8 from registries in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Norway, and Spain; 5 from single hospitals or families in Japan, Denmark, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom; and a population survey in Denmark. Across studies, attrition bias was low in 22 (80%) of 28 items. Risk of selection bias was high in 35 (63%) of 56 items. Selection bias risk was due to low representativeness and lack of a non-FH comparator group within the same study; detection bias risk was due to variable definitions of CVD outcomes/measurement; and performance bias risk was due to long-term, intensive treatment, the most common limitations for registries. Studies from single hospitals and families lacked generalizability. In contrast, the Danish study revealed a low bias in each of the 4 selection bias criteria and 2 attrition risk criteria. Fatal and nonfatal CVD events were collected in the study. Comparing patients with FH versus non-FH patients, the odds ratios for coronary artery disease were 10.3 (95% CI, 7.8-13.8) and 13.2 (95% CI, 10.0-17.4) in subjects treated and not treated with lipid-lowering therapy, respectively. These ratios fall within the ranges of ratios reported in other studies but are generally higher than the ratios from registries and clinics, in which intensive specialized management is available. IMPLICATIONS: There is a lack of available data describing CVD risk in patients with FH, and many of the existing studies have biases in their design that could affect their risk estimates. A Danish study had the highest quality based on a predefined quality check list, providing the most credible estimates of the increase in CVD risk in patients with FH. The CVD risk due to FH is high and represents unmet medical need for patients with FH. Further research is warranted to validate the magnitude of risk.

Estimating the economic burden of cardiovascular events in patients receiving lipid-modifying therapy in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: To characterise the costs to the UK National Health Service of cardiovascular (CV) events among individuals receiving lipid-modifying therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using Clinical Practice Research Datalink records from 2006 to 2012 to identify individuals with their first and second CV-related hospitalisations (first event and second event cohorts). Within-person differences were used to estimate CV-related outcomes. SETTING: Patients in the UK who had their first CV event between January 2006 and March 2012. PARTICIPANTS: Patients ≥18 years who had a CV event and received at least 2 lipid-modifying therapy prescriptions within 180 days beforehand. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct medical costs (2014 £) were estimated in 3 periods: baseline (pre-event), acute (6 months afterwards) and long-term (subsequent 30 months). Primary outcomes included incremental costs, resource usage and total costs per period. RESULTS: There were 24 093 patients in the first event cohort of whom 5274 were included in the second event cohort. The mean incremental acute CV event costs for the first event and second event cohorts were: coronary artery bypass graft/percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (CABG/PTCA) £5635 and £5823, myocardial infarction £4275 and £4301, ischaemic stroke £3512 and £4572, heart failure £2444 and £3461, unstable angina £2179 and £2489 and transient ischaemic attack £1537 and £1814. The mean incremental long-term costs were: heart failure £848 and £2829, myocardial infarction £922 and £1385, ischaemic stroke £973 and £682, transient ischaemic attack £705 and £1692, unstable angina £328 and £677, and CABG/PTCA £-368 and £599. Hospitalisation accounted for 95% of acute and 61% of long-term incremental costs. Higher comorbidity was associated with higher long-term costs. CONCLUSIONS: Revascularisation and myocardial infarction were associated with the highest incremental costs following a CV event. On the basis of real-world data, the economic burden of CV events in the UK is substantial, particularly among those with greater comorbidity burden.

Estimating the cost of cancer: results on the basis of claims data analyses for cancer patients diagnosed with seven types of cancer during 1999 to 2000.

PURPOSE: Cancer accounts for 60.9 billion dollars in direct medical costs and 15.5 billion dollars for indirect morbidity costs. These estimates are derived primarily from national surveys or Federal databases. We derive estimates of the costs of cancer using administrative databases, which include claims and employment-related information on individuals insured by private or Medicare supplemental health plans. METHODS: A retrospective matched-cohort control analysis was performed using 1998 to 2000 databases with information on insurance claims, benefits, and health productivity for 3 million privately insured employees, their dependents, and early retirees. Study patients had new diagnoses of one of seven types of cancer (n = 12,709). Controls without cancer were matched at a 3:1 ratio by demographics. A variable follow-up length was used (maximum of 2 years). Direct costs included health care costs for patients and deductibles and copayments for caregivers. Indirect costs of work absence and short-term disability (STD) were calculated for a subgroup of cancer patients and caregivers. RESULTS: Mean monthly health care costs ranged from 2,187 dollars for prostate cancer to 7,616 dollars for pancreatic cancer, most often driven by hospitalization. Costs for controls were 329 dollars per month. Indirect morbidity costs to employees with cancer averaged 945 dollars, a result of a mean monthly loss of 2.0 workdays and 5.0 STD days. CONCLUSION: The economic burden of cancer is substantial. It is feasible to derive tumor-specific estimates of direct and indirect costs for large numbers of cancer patients using administrative databases. Policy makers charged with providing annual cost-of-cancer estimates should incorporate data obtained from a broad range of sources.