Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a large German community-based observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: After approval of bevacizumab in Germany in 2005 for the treatment of unresectable advanced or refractory colorectal cancer (CRC), this observational cohort study was initiated to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab with various chemotherapy regimen in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: To facilitate enrolment of a typical mCRC population, eligibility criteria were minimised. Choice of chemotherapy regimen was at the physicians' discretion, but influenced by current registration status. Predefined endpoints were treatment characteristics, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events assessed as potentially related to bevacizumab treatment. Patients were followed for up to four years. RESULTS: In total 1777 eligible patients were enrolled at 261 sites from January 2005 to June 2008. Median age: 64 years (range 19-100); male 62%; ECOG performance status 0-1/≥ 2 89%/11%. Chemotherapy choice was fluoropyrimidine (FU) 12%, FU/oxaliplatin 18%, FU/irinotecan 64%, no chemotherapy concurrent to bevacizumab 2% and other 4%. Best investigator-assessed response rate was 60% (complete response 10%, partial response 51%). Median PFS was 10.2 months and median OS was 24.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety profile of bevacizumab in this population of mCRC patients with different chemotherapy regimens is consistent with that observed in other patient registries/non-randomised trials and also corresponds well with data from similar treatment arms of phase III trials.

Baseline and On-Treatment Markers Determining Prognosis of First-Line Chemotherapy in Combination with Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In metastatic colorectal cancer, no upfront or on-treatment markers are available to determine the prognosis or efficacy for chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The current analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of disease and patient characteristics (age, number of metastatic sites, stage of primary tumor, performance status, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)) and on-treatment changes of CEA (response after 8-12 weeks of treatment and specific patterns of CEA kinetics) in patients from an observational cohort study of chemotherapy with bevacizumab. RESULTS: Baseline factors were available from 1,438 patients. Patients with baseline CEA levels > 20 ng/ml, more than 1 metastatic site, and age > 75 years showed significantly lower progression-free (PFS) and overall survival in multivariate analysis. A CEA response of > 30% during treatment was associated with increased PFS. In addition, the pattern of CEA kinetics predicts survival and response to treatment. CONCLUSION: In summary, baseline CEA, number of metastatic sites, and age are strong independent prognostic factors for survival. By monitoring CEA, clear patterns with distinct prognostic value can be determined. CEA kinetics and/or response after 8-12 weeks might be a useful and simple tool to stratify the post-induction treatment approach based on individual prognosis in the future.

Primary metastatic breast cancer in the era of targeted therapy - Prognostic impact and the role of breast tumour surgery.

BACKGROUND: Except for meeting the individual palliative need, the benefit of breast surgery in primary metastatic breast cancer (PMBC), also known as de novo metastatic breast cancer, on long-term outcomes remains controversial. Twenty-four hundred and one patients with metastatic breast cancer, enrolled between 2000 and 2011 in two prospective non-interventional studies on targeted therapy, were screened with respect to this question. METHODS: One study investigated trastuzumab therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer in addition to mainly first-line chemotherapy. The other observed bevacizumab added to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for mostly HER2-negative disease. RESULTS: Five-hundred and seventy (24%) patients presented with PMBC, and valid information on resection of the primary tumour was available for 568 women. Out of these, 426 (75%) underwent local resection. The latter group was characterised by less overall metastatic burden and a lower proportion of T4 tumours. No major differences were observed with respect to age, hormone receptor and HER2 status, visceral disease and performance status. Numerically, the surgery group showed a slightly favourable progression-free survival (PFS, medians: 13.6 versus 11.8 months; P = 0.18) and overall survival (OS, 34.1 versus 31.7; P = 0.23). However, in multivariable analysis, including all other univariably significant parameters, no trend for better outcome after surgery remained detectable, neither for PFS (hazard ratio 0.99; P = 0.92) nor for OS (0.95; P = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest no major survival benefit for local resection in the overall PMBC population treated with modern targeted therapies. However, further analyses are warranted to define specific risk groups, which may benefit from surgical removal of the primary.

First-line Bevacizumab-containing Therapy for HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: Final Results from a Prospective German Study.

AIM: The German ML21165 study evaluated bevacizumab-containing therapy for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in routine oncology practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received bevacizumab with chemotherapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. Pre-specified end-points were safety and efficacy [response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)]. RESULTS: Between May 2007 and September 2009, 865 patients received first-line bevacizumab plus paclitaxel for mBC, of whom 16% were aged ≥70 years and 9% had ECOG performance status of 2 or more. At data cut-off (median of 15.9 months' follow-up), the median PFS was 9.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI)=9.0-10.4 months] and the median OS was 21.6 months (95% CI=19.4-23.5 months). The most common non-haematological adverse drug reactions of grade 3 or more were pain (9%), hypertension (5%), sensory neuropathy (3%) and proteinuria (3%). Prolonged bevacizumab was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of first-line bevacizumab-paclitaxel in routine oncology practice is consistent with results from randomized trials.