Metabolic osteoarthritis - relation of diabetes and cardiovascular disease with knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: There is an interest in identifying a metabolic OA phenotype. We therefore assessed the relation of diabetes and cardiovascular disease to prevalent and incident radiographic (ROA) and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (SxOA). DESIGN: In two large cohort studies of individuals with or at risk for knee OA, the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) and Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), participants self-reported diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) at baseline. We assessed the relation of baseline diabetes and CVD (exposures) to ROA and SxOA cross-sectionally and after 60 (MOST) or 48 (OAI) months of follow-up using logistic regression with GEE to account for 2 knees within an individual, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: In MOST, 6,020 knees of 3,021 participants (60.1% female, mean ± SD age 62.5 ± 8.1, mean BMI 30.7 ± 6.0, 83.3% Caucasian) were included in the analyses. In OAI, 8,645 knees of 4,339 participants (58.2% female, mean ± SD age 61.1 ± 9.2, mean BMI 28.6 ± 4.8, 80.3% Caucasian) were included. We found no significant associations between prevalent diabetes or CVD and prevalent or incident ROA or SxOA. Effect estimates for prevalent ROA and SxOA ranged from 0.80 (95% CI 0.63-1.03) to 1.17 (0.91-1.51). Effect estimates for incident ROA ranged from 0.80 (0.58-1.11) to 0.88 (0.60-1.29) in MOST and from 0.75 (0.50-1.14) to 1.19 (0.81-1.74) in OAI, and for incident SxOA from 0.93 (0.65-1.31) to 1.22 (0.89-1.67) in MOST and from 0.82 (0.59-1.16) to 1.19 (0.85-1.66) in OAI). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes and CVD were not associated with prevalent or incident knee OA.

Three out of four disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients meet 28-joint Disease Activity Score remission at 12 months: results from the FIN-ERA cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To assess what proportion of patients with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) reach 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) remission over 1 year, and remission variability across clinics in Finland. METHOD: Patients with DMARD-naïve newly diagnosed inflammatory arthritis were recruited. The proportion of patients in 28-joint Disease Activity Score with three variables (DAS28-3) remission was compared across sites. Repeated measures were analysed using a mixed models approach with appropriate distribution and link function. RESULTS: In total, 611 patients were recruited at five sites: 67% were female; the mean (sd) age was 57 (16) years; 71% and 68% were positive for rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides, respectively; and 23% had radiographic erosions. A total of 506 (83%) fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis for further analyses. DAS28-3 remission was met by 68% and 75% at 3 and 12 months, respectively. The clinical site had no effect on remission when adjusted for confounders. At baseline, 68% used methotrexate-based combination therapy, and 31% used triple therapy with methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and sulphasalazine (the Fin-RACo regimen). In multivariate analysis, the only independent predictors of DAS28-3 remission at 12 months were lower baseline DAS28-3 and triple therapy as the initial treatment. CONCLUSION: Three out of four DMARD-naïve ERA patients in Finland are in remission during the first year from the diagnosis. High remission rates were achieved for most patients with the use of conventional synthetic DMARDs in combination. Treatment of DMARD-naïve ERA patients with the FIN-RACo regimen is a predictor of DAS28-3 remission in real-life rheumatology settings.

Impact of physicians' adherence to treat-to-target strategy on outcomes in early rheumatoid arthritis in the NEO-RACo trial.

OBJECTIVES: It is well recognized that medication adherence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is often poor. As less attention has been paid to physicians' adherence to targeted treatment, we aimed to investigate how it affects outcomes in aggressively treated early RA patients. METHOD: In the new Finnish RA Combination Therapy (NEO-RACo) trial, 99 patients with early active RA were treated, targeting remission, with a combination of methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and low-dose prednisolone for 2 years, and randomized to receive infliximab or placebo for the initial 6 months. After 2 years, therapy was unrestricted while remission was still targeted. Patients were divided into tertiles by physicians' adherence to treat-to-target, which was evaluated with a scoring system during the initial 2 years. After 5 years of follow-up, the between-tertile differences in remission rates, 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) levels, radiological changes, cumulative days off work, and the use of anti-rheumatic medication were assessed. RESULTS: Follow-up data were available for 93 patients. Physicians' good adherence was associated with improved remission rates at 2-4 years and lower DAS28 levels throughout the follow-up. In a multivariable model, physicians' adherence was the most important predictor of remission at 3 months and 2 years (p < 0.001 for both). Between 2 and 5 years, biologics were used more often in the tertile of low adherence compared with the other two groups (p = 0.024). No significant differences were observed in radiological progression and cumulative days off work. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' good adherence is associated with improved remission rates and lesser use of biologics in early RA.

The feasibility of existing JADAS10 cut-off values in clinical practice: a study of data from The Finnish Rheumatology Quality Register.

BACKGROUND: The ten-joint juvenile arthritis disease activity score (JADAS10) is designed to measure the level of disease activity in non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis by providing a single numeric score. The clinical JADAS10 (cJADAS10) is a modification of the JADAS10 that excludes erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Three different sets of JADAS10/cJADAS10 cut-offs for disease activity states have been published, i.e., the Backström, Consolaro, and Trincianti cut-offs. The objective of this study was to investigate the performance of existing JADAS10 cut-offs in real-life settings using patient data from The Finnish Rheumatology Quality Register (FinRheuma). METHODS: Data were collected from the FinRheuma register. The proportion of patients with an active joint count (AJC) above zero when classified as being in clinically inactive disease (CID) or low disease activity (LDA) groups according to existing JADAS10/cJADAS10 cut-off levels were analyzed. RESULTS: A significantly larger proportion of the patients classified as being in CID had an AJC > 0 when using the JADAS10/cJADAS10 cut-offs by Trincianti et al. compared to those for the other cut-offs. In the LDA group, a significantly larger proportion of the polyarticular patients (35%/29%) had an AJC of two when Trincianti JADAS10/cJADAS10 cut-offs were used compared with when Backström (11%/10%) and Consolaro (7%/3%) JADAS10/cJADAS10 cut-offs were used. CONCLUSIONS: We found the cut-offs proposed by Consolaro et al. to be the most feasible, since these cut-off levels for CID do not result in the misclassification of active disease as remission, and the proportion of patients with AJC > 1 in the LDA group is lowest using these cut-offs.