Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Selección de Paciente , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/complicaciones , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Función Ventricular Derecha/fisiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Accurate predictors of good clinical response after MitraClip implant in patients with heart failure (HF) are still lacking. Aim of this study was to investigate the role of regurgitant fraction >50% as a marker of disproportionate functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) in identifying best responders to Mitraclip. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 58 advanced HF patients (age 66⯱â¯8â¯years, 81% males, 63% NYHA class IV, LV ejection fraction (EF) 25.5⯱â¯5.5%) with disproportionate and proportionate FMR who underwent successful MitraClip implant were analyzed. After MitraClip all patient achieved mild (≤ 2+/4+) MR. During 12-month follow-up 18 patients (31%) had a major adverse cardiac event (MACE, i.e. cardiac death, urgent LVAD implant or heart transplantation, HF hospitalization). Disproportionate FMR (nâ¯=â¯48, 83%) was associated with a better clinical outcome (pâ¯=â¯.003) while regurgitant volume and EROA were not. TAPSE ≤14â¯mm was associated with worse outcome (pâ¯=â¯.018). At multivariable analysis only disproportionate MR and TAPSE ≤14â¯mm showed a significant association with MACE (pâ¯=â¯.017 and pâ¯=â¯.02, respectively). A reverse left ventricular remodeling (i.e., reduction on LV end-diastolic diameter and end-diastolic volume) was achieved only in the disproportionate FMR group. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, disproportionate FMR assessed by regurgitant fraction and RV dysfunction assessed by TAPSE may help the selection of HF patients candidates for MitraClip therapy.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Anciano , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/epidemiología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Remodelación VentricularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Continuous flow left ventricular assistance devices (CF-LVADs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced heart failure. Pump replacement for thrombosis is a high-risk procedure with a high perioperative mortality rate with possible recurrence. We aim to summarize our experience using a conservative approach with medical therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who experienced pump thrombosis after LVAD implantation with HeartWare HVAD at our institution, from November 2010 to March 2016. Device thrombosis (DT) was divided into suspected (SDT) and confirmed (CDT). A conservative approach using thrombolysis and heparin was used in all patients. RESULTS: A total of 32 HeartWare HVAD pumps were implanted. Mean age was 59 ± 10 years and the mean time on mechanical support was 19.29 months (±14.06). Pump thrombosis occurred in 7 patients (0.14 patients/year) after a mean time of 733 (231-1,606) days after LVAD implantation. Three out of 7 cases had thrombosis recurrence (43%). Overall 19 episodes were recorded (0.38 event per patient/year). Eighteen out of 19 thrombolytic treatments were successful (94.7%). No patient required LVAD replacement or transfusion of blood products. There was no significant difference in terms of survival between patients who experienced thrombotic events and patients who did not. No major complications related to thrombolysis were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic thrombolysis plus heparin was an excellent therapeutic option. Early intervention in clinically stable patients without signs of heart failure but with indirect signs of device thrombosis has led to better outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Trombosis Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Transfusión Sanguínea , Trombosis Coronaria/diagnóstico , Trombosis Coronaria/etiología , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Urgent repair (within 48 hr after diagnosis) of posterior ventricular septal defect in the presence of cardiogenic shock, consequent to acute myocardial infarction, is associated with a very high mortality rate. The use of left ventricular mechanical support devices has the potential to impart hemodynamic stability and to delay surgical treatment until such time as scar tissue forms around the defect, sufficient to hold a suture patch.From May 2004 through July 2007, 5 patients who were in cardiogenic shock as a consequence of acute posterior ventricular septal defect underwent early implantation of a transfemoral microaxial Impella® Recover® LP 5.0 Support System as mechanical support (bridge to surgery).The mean duration of support by the left ventricular assist device was 14.4 ± 6 days. No one died during assistance. The device reduced left-to-right shunting, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, central venous pressure, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Liver, kidney, and lung function improved, and the 30-day mortality rate was 40%.Although this is a retrospective study of a very small patient population, without benefit of a control group, it is the first report of its kind. This initial experience using the Impella Recover 5.0 in cases of cardiogenic shock due to posterior ventricular septal defect suggests that this conservative approach is a feasible and safe way to improve hemodynamic conditions and delay surgery. Further clinical experience is needed to confirm these early results.