Improved technical success, postnatal outcome and refined predictors of outcome for fetal aortic valvuloplasty.

OBJECTIVES: Fetal aortic valvuloplasty (FAV) may prevent progression of mid-gestation aortic stenosis to hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether technical success and biventricular (Biv) outcome after FAV have changed from an earlier (2000-2008) to a more recent (2009-2015) era and identify pre-FAV predictors of Biv outcome. METHODS: We evaluated procedural and postnatal outcomes in 123 fetuses that underwent FAV for evolving HLHS at Boston Children's Hospital between 2000 and 2015. The primary outcome measure was circulation type (Biv vs single ventricle) at the time of neonatal hospital discharge. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was performed to construct a stratification algorithm to predict Biv circulation based on pre-FAV fetal variables. RESULTS: The FAV procedure was technically successful in 101/123 (82%) fetuses, with a higher technical success rate in the more recent era than in the earlier one (49/52 (94%) vs 52/71 (73%); P = 0.003). In liveborn patients, the incidence of Biv outcome was higher in the recent than in the earlier era, both in the entire liveborn cohort (29/49 (59%) vs 16/62 (26%); P = 0.001) and in those in whom the procedure was technically successful (27/46 (59%) vs 15/47 (32%); P = 0.007). Independent predictors of Biv outcome were higher left ventricular (LV) pressure, larger ascending aorta, better LV diastolic function and higher LV long-axis Z-score. On CART analysis, fetuses with LV pressure > 47 mmHg and ascending aorta Z-score ≥ 0.57 had a 92% probability of Biv outcome (n = 24). Those with a lower LV pressure, or mitral dimension Z-score < 0.1 and mitral valve inflow time Z-score < -2 (n = 34) were unlikely to have Biv (probability of 9%). The remainder of the patients had an intermediate (∼40-60%) likelihood of Biv circulation. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients achieving Biv outcome after FAV has increased, probably owing to an improved technical success rate and modified selection criteria. Fetal factors, including LV pressure, size of the ascending aorta and diastolic function, are associated with likelihood of Biv circulation after FAV. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Perinatal outcome after prenatal diagnosis of single-ventricle cardiac defects.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the perinatal outcome of cases with a prenatal diagnosis of single-ventricle cardiac defects, single ventricle being defined as a dominant right ventricle (RV) or left ventricle (LV), in which biventricular circulation was not possible. METHODS: We reviewed patients with a prenatal diagnosis of single-ventricle cardiac defects, made at one institution between 1995 and 2008. Cases diagnosed with double-inlet LV, tricuspid atresia, pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum and severe RV hypoplasia and those with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) were included in the study population. Patients with HLHS were identified prenatally as being standard risk or high risk (HLHS with highly restrictive or intact atrial septum, mitral stenosis with aortic atresia and/or LV coronary artery sinusoids). Patients with an address over 200 miles from the hospital, diagnosed with heterotaxy syndrome or referred for fetal intervention, were excluded. RESULTS: We identified 312 cases of single-ventricle cardiac defect (208 dominant RV; 104 dominant LV) that were diagnosed prenatally. Most (96%) patients with a dominant RV had HLHS. Among the total 312 cases there were 98 (31%) elective terminations of pregnancy (TOP), 12 (4%) cases of spontaneous fetal demise, 12 (4%) cases lost to prenatal follow-up and 190 (61%) live births. Among the 199 patients that underwent fetal echocardiography before 24 weeks' gestation, there were 97 (49%) cases of elective TOP. There was no difference in prenatal outcome between those with a dominant RV and those with a dominant LV (P = 0.98). Of the 190 live births, five received comfort care. With an average of 7 years' follow-up (to obtain data on the Fontan procedure), transplantation-free survival was lower in those with a dominant RV than in those with a dominant LV (standard-risk HLHS odds ratio (OR), 3.0 (P = 0.01); high-risk HLHS OR, 8.8 (P < 0.001)). CONCLUSIONS: The prenatal outcome of cases with single-ventricle cardiac defects was similar between those with a dominant RV and those with a dominant LV, however postnatal intermediate-term survival favored those with a dominant LV. High-risk HLHS identified prenatally was associated with the lowest transplantation-free survival.