Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Age Ageing ; 47(1): 48-55, 2018 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28985255

RESUMEN

Background: because the few randomised placebo-controlled trials investigating the potential role for prophylactic haloperidol in delirium prevention have focused on specific surgical populations, we investigated its efficacy and safety in acutely hospitalised older patients. Methods: this multi-centre, double-blind, stratified, block randomised, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at six Dutch hospitals. Patients age ≥70 years, acutely admitted through the emergency department for general medicine or surgical specialties and at risk for delirium were randomised (n = 245) to haloperidol or placebo 1 mg orally twice-daily (maximum of 14 doses) on top of standard nonpharmacological prevention strategies. The primary outcome was delirium incidence. Other endpoints included delirium severity and duration, drug safety and clinical outcomes. Results: intention-to-treat analysis included 242 participants (calculated sample size n = 390, statistical power of current sample 59%) allocated to haloperidol (n = 118) or placebo (n = 124). In the haloperidol and placebo group, delirium incidence was 19.5 versus 14.5% (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.78); median (IQR) delirium duration 4 (2, 5) versus 3 (1, 6) days (P = 0.366); maximum DRS-R-98 score 16 (9.8, 19.5) versus 10 (5.5, 22.5) (P = 0.549; 53.7% missing data); hospital LOS 7 (4, 10.3) versus 7 (5, 11.8) days (P = 0.343); 3-month mortality 9.9 versus 12.5% (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.75), respectively. No treatment-limiting side effects were noted. Conclusions: prophylactic low-dose oral haloperidol did not reduce delirium incidence in acutely hospitalised older patients. Therefore, prophylactic use of haloperidol in this population is not recommended.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Delirio/prevención & control , Haloperidol/administración & dosificación , Admisión del Paciente , Administración Oral , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Delirio/diagnóstico , Delirio/epidemiología , Delirio/psicología , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Haloperidol/efectos adversos , Humanos , Incidencia , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
BMC Geriatr ; 14: 96, 2014 Aug 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25168927

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delirium is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality rates in elderly hospitalised patients, and a growing problem due to increase in life expectancy. Implementation of standardised non-pharmacological delirium prevention strategies is challenging and adherence remains low. Pharmacological delirium prevention with haloperidol, currently the drug of choice for delirium, seems promising. However, the generalisability of randomised controlled trial results is questionable since studies have only been performed in selected postoperative hip-surgery and intensive care unit patient populations. We therefore present the design of the multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on early pharmacological intervention to prevent delirium: haloperidol prophylaxis in older emergency department patients (The HARPOON study). METHODS/DESIGN: In six Dutch hospitals, at-risk patients aged 70 years or older acutely admitted through the emergency department for general medicine and surgical specialties are randomised (n = 390) for treatment with prophylactic haloperidol 1 mg or placebo twice daily for a maximum of seven consecutive days. Primary outcome measure is the incidence of in-hospital delirium within seven days of start of the study intervention, diagnosed with the Confusion Assessment Method, and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition criteria for delirium. Secondary outcome measures include delirium severity and duration assessed with the Delirium Rating Scale Revised 98; number of delirium-free days; adverse events; hospital length-of-stay; all-cause mortality; new institutionalisation; (Instrumental) Activities of Daily Living assessed with the Katz Index of ADL, and Lawton IADL scale; cognitive function assessed with the Six-item Cognitive Impairment Test, and the Dutch short form Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly. Patients will be contacted by telephone three and six months post-discharge to collect data on cognitive- and physical function, home residency, all-cause hospital admissions, and all-cause mortality. DISCUSSION: The HARPOON study will provide relevant information on the efficacy and safety of prophylactic haloperidol treatment for in-hospital delirium and its effects on relevant clinical outcomes in elderly at-risk medical and surgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Number: 201100476215; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01530308; Dutch Clinical Trial Registry: NTR3207.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Delirio/prevención & control , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Haloperidol/administración & dosificación , Admisión del Paciente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/inducido químicamente , Delirio/diagnóstico , Método Doble Ciego , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Haloperidol/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Factores de Riesgo , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA