RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Although thrombolysis obliterans (TAO) has been recognized for more than a century, there is no optimal treatment for this disease. The aim of this report was to compare the short-term efficacies of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and CDT+PTA in treating TAO disease. METHOD: Consecutive patients with TAO treated at Ganzhou People's Hospital between 2012 and 2022 were included in this retrospective study. According to the information provided in the medical records, endovascular procedures included CDT, PTA or CDT+PTA. One-year follow-up outcomes of the patients with TAO who underwent endovascular procedures were compared. The primary outcome was major adverse limb event (MALE) and the secondary outcomes were the technical success, complications, ABI at 1 week after surgery and minor amputation. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients with TAO were assessed for inclusion in our single-center study from 2012 to 2022 and received endovascular procedures. Among them, 22 patients underwent CDT, 21 patients underwent PTA, and 26 patients underwent PTA+CDT. The one-year follow-up revealed significant differences in the MALE-free survival rates among the three groups, particularly between the CDT group and the PTA+CDT group (the hazard ratio (HR) for MALE-free survival was 0.173, 95% CI [0.050-0.599], p = 0.006). The technical success rates of the three groups were 63.6%, 90.5%, and 92.3%, respectively. There were differences in the ABI at one week after surgery among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular procedures are effective for TAO in the short term. The effectiveness of CDT alone is suboptimal; combining CDT with PTA achieves the most favorable endovascular treatment outcome; while the effectiveness of PTA falls in between these two procedures.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Extremidad Inferior , Tromboangitis Obliterante , Humanos , Tromboangitis Obliterante/terapia , Tromboangitis Obliterante/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Angioplastia/métodosRESUMEN
AIM: To compare the ablation techniques' efficacy of endovenous microwave ablation (EMA) combined with high ligation (HL), foam sclerotherapy (FS) and compression therapy (CT) and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) combined with HL-FS-CT in the treatment of VLUs. METHOD: 301 consecutive patients with VLUs from 2013 to 2022 in a 3200-bed hospital were intervened by EMA combined with HL-FS-CT and EVLA combined with HL-FS-CT were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four patients underwent EMA+HL-FS-CT and 167 patients underwent EVLA+HL-FS-CT. The primary outcome of the ulcer healing time was 1.45(0.75-1.5) months and 1.86(0.5-2.5) months, respectively, in the two groups (HR for ulcer healing was 1.26, 95% CI [0.96-1.66], p = 0.097). Secondary outcomes included that no significant difference was found in ulcer recurrence and GSV recanalization and complications between the two groups, and the postoperative VCSS and AVVQ were significantly lower than the baseline values in the respective groups (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: EMA+HL-FS-CT and EVLA+HL-FS-CT are both effective at treating VLUs. Both of the two comprehensive treatments were beneficial to the healing of ulcers, but no evidence showed which one was superior in the ulcer healing time.