Higher bone marrow LGALS3 expression is an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Alterations of galectin-3 expression are often seen in cancers and may contribute to tumorigenesis, cancer progression, and metastasis. The studies concerning clinical implications of galectin-3 expression in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are scarce. We investigated the expression of LGALS3, the gene encoding galectin-3, in the bone marrow (BM) mononuclear cells from an original cohort comprising 280 adults with primary non-acute promyelocytic leukemia. Higher LGALS3 expression was closely associated with older age, French-American-British M4/M5 subtypes, CD14 expression on leukemic cells, and PTPN11 mutation, but negatively correlated with CEBPA mutation and FLT3-ITD. Compared with patients with lower LGALS3 expression, those with higher expression had lower complete remission rates, higher primary refractory rates, and shorter overall survival. This result was validated in an independent validation cohort. A scoring system incorporating higher LGALS3 expression and 8 other risk factors, including age, white blood cell count, cytogenetics, and gene mutations, into survival analysis proved to be very useful to stratify patients with AML into different prognostic groups (P < .001). In conclusion, BM LGALS3 expression may serve as a new biomarker to predict clinical outcome in patients with AML, and galectin-3 may serve as a potential therapeutic target in those patients with higher expression of this protein.

IDH mutations are closely associated with mutations of DNMT3A, ASXL1 and SRSF2 in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and are stable during disease evolution.

Current information about clinical significance of IDH mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), their association with other genetic alterations and the stability during disease progression is limited. In this study, IDH mutations were identified in 4.6% of 477 patients with MDS based on the FAB classification and in 2.2 % of 368 patients based on the 2008 WHO classification. IDH mutations were closely associated with older age, higher platelet counts, and mutations of DNMT3A (36.4% vs. 8.7%, P < 0.001), ASXL1 (47.6% vs. 22.0%, P = 0.007), and SRSF2 (45.5% vs. 11.8%, P < 0.001). IDH2 mutation was a poor prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with lower-risk MDS, based on international prognosis scoring system (IPSS), FAB classification, WHO classification, or revised IPSS (all P ≦ 0.001), but not in higher-risk groups. Sequential studies in 151 patients demonstrated that all IDH-mutated patients retained the same mutation during disease evolution while none of the IDH-wild patients acquired a novel mutation during follow-ups. In conclusion, IDH mutation is a useful biomarker for risk stratification of patients with lower-risk MDS. IDH mutations are stable during the clinical course. The mutation, in association with other genetic alterations, may play a role in the development, but not progression of MDS.

Clinical implications of the SETBP1 mutation in patients with primary myelodysplastic syndrome and its stability during disease progression.

Mutations of the SET binding protein 1 (SETBP1) gene have been identified in patients with myeloid neoplasms, but the clinical relevance of this mutation and its association with other gene mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and the stability during disease progression remains unclear. Mutations in SETBP1 gene at exon 4 were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing in 430 MDS patients. The results were correlated with clinical features, cytogenetics, gene mutations and treatment outcomes. SETBP1 mutations were identified in 14 (3.3%) of the 430 patients with primary MDS based on the FAB classification and 8 (2.4%) of the 333 patients based on the WHO classification. The SETBP1 mutation was closely associated with higher white blood cell counts, isochromosome of 17q, monosomy 7, and mutations of ASXL1, EZH2 and SRSF2. With a median follow-up of 43.9 months, MDS patients, based on either the FAB or WHO classification, had a significantly poorer overall survival (OS) if they harbored SETBP1 mutation. Further, SETBP1 mutation was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (HR = 1.842, CI 95%, 1.1018-3.332, P = 0.043) irrespective of age, sex, and the International Prognostic Scoring System. Sequential analysis showed that the original SETBP1 mutations in the eight SETBP1-mutated patients studied were retained while two of the 101 SETBP1-wild patients acquired novel SETBP1 mutations during follow-ups. The SETBP1 mutation is associated with poor prognosis in MDS. The mutation can be acquired during the clinical course suggesting it may play a role in disease progression.

Clinical and prognostic implications of Roundabout 4 (robo4) in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Robo4 is involved in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell homeostasis and essential for tumor angiogenesis. Expression of Robo4 was recently found in solid tumors and leukemia stem cells. However, the clinical implications of Robo4 expression in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain unclear. METHODS: We investigated the clinical and prognostic relevance of mRNA expression of Robo4 in bone marrow (BM) mononuclear cells from 218 adult patients with de novo AML. We also performed immunohistochemical staining to assess the Robo4 protein expression in the BM biopsy specimens from 30 selected AML patients in the cohort. RESULTS: Higher Robo4 expression was closely associated with lower white blood cell counts, expression of HLA-DR, CD13, CD34 and CD56 on leukemia cells, t(8;21) and ASXL1 mutation, but negatively correlated with t(15;17) and CEBPA mutation. Compared to patients with lower Robo4 expression, those with higher expression had significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). This result was confirmed in an independent validation cohort. Furthermore, multivariate analyses showed that higher Robo4 expression was an independent poor prognostic factor for DFS and OS in total cohort and patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics, irrespective of age, WBC count, karyotype, and mutation status of NPM1/FLT3-ITD, and CEBPA. CONCLUSIONS: BM Robo4 expression can serve as a new biomarker to predict clinical outcomes in AML patients and Robo4 may serve as a potential therapeutic target in patients with higher Robo4 expression.