RESUMEN
Background Propofol is the most common induction agent used in current anesthesia practice. Patients receiving propofol injections commonly experience varying degrees of pain, creating an unpleasant anesthesia experience. Methods Seventy-two patients, aged between 18 and 70, scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were randomized into two groups. Group D received 8 mg of dexamethasone, and Group O received 8 mg of ondansetron intravenously before induction. After five seconds, mid-arm venous occlusion was applied for one minute using a tourniquet. Propofol (0.5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously over five seconds, and patients rated the injection pain over the next 15 seconds. The primary outcome was pain intensity using the Verbal Rating Scale during propofol injection. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative hemodynamic changes and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Normally distributed variables were compared using the Student's t-test, non-normally distributed variables using the Mann-Whitney U-test, and qualitative data using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance for the study was set at p < 0.05. Results In Group D, 30 out of 36 patients (83.3%) experienced no pain, while four patients (11.1%) reported mild pain, two patients (5.6%) reported moderate pain, and no patients (0.0%) reported severe pain. In contrast, in Group O, only 15 out of 36 patients (41.6%) experienced no pain, with 12 patients (33.3%) experiencing mild pain, seven patients (19.4%) experiencing moderate pain, and two patients (5.6%) experiencing severe pain. Overall, six out of 36 patients in Group D (16.7%) experienced some level of pain, compared to 21 out of 36 patients in Group O (58.3%), a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Regarding postoperative nausea, 16 out of 36 patients in Group Dexamethasone (44.44%) experienced nausea, whereas 23 out of 36 patients in Group Ondansetron (63.88%) reported this symptom, with the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.0372). Additionally, postoperative vomiting occurred in nine out of 36 patients in Group Dexamethasone (25%), compared to 18 out of 36 patients in Group Ondansetron (50%), with this difference also reaching statistical significance (p= 0.026). Conclusions Intravenous dexamethasone before propofol administration reduces injection pain and PONV in laparoscopic cholecystectomy more effectively as compared to ondansetron.
RESUMEN
Background and Aims: Laparoscopic surgeries are among the most frequent procedures done worldwide. There is a gradual shift in the method of airway securement from endotracheal intubation to supraglottic airway devices (SAD). The objective of the current work was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published RCTs on airway complications in laparoscopic surgery performed with a SAD or endotracheal intubation (ETT). Methods: The research was registered in PROSPERO, and a literature search was conducted in Google Scholar and PubMed until August 2022. Out of 78 studies, 31 studies were screened and 21 were included for analysis. RevMan 5.4 was used to analyse data on sore throat, hoarseness, nausea, vomiting, stridor and cough. Results: Twenty-one randomised controlled trials, enrolling a total of 2213 adult patients, were included in the quantitative analysis. A significant incidence of sore throat and hoarseness was seen at post-operative period in ETT group with risk ratio (RR) 0.44, P < 0.00001 [0.30, 0.65], i2 = 72% and RR 0.38, P < 0.001 [0.21, 0.69], i2 = 72%, respectively. However, incidence of nausea, vomiting and stridor was not significant with RR 0.83, P = 0.26 [0.60, 1.15], i2 = 52% for nausea and RR 0.55, P = 0.03 [ 0.33, 0.93], i2 = 14% for vomiting. Incidence of cough was more in ETT group with RR 0.11, P < 0.00001 [ 0.06, 0.20], i2 = 42%, as compared to SAD group. Conclusion: There was a substantial variation between SADs and ETTs with respect to the incidence of hoarseness, sore throat, nausea and cough. The existing literature is reinforced by the evidence uncovered in this updated systematic review.
RESUMEN
Background and aim The type of fluid which is administered to patients is very crucial and important. In this study normal saline is compared with PlasmaLyte A in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumors. Generally normal saline is used in neurosurgical patients; it is seen to be associated with hyperchloremic acidosis. A balanced crystalloid, e.g. PlasmaLyte A, maintains a better metabolic status than normal saline. This study was planned to study the metabolic effects of using PlasmaLyte A as compared with normal saline as intravenous fluids in patients undergoing supratentorial brain tumour surgeries. Methods This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumors. Written informed consent was taken from patients and they were divided into two groups, Group A and B of 40 patients each by computer-generated random numbers. Group A received PlasmaLyte A and Group B received normal saline intra-operatively as maintenance fluid. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, total fluid administered, serum sodium, serum potassium, chloride, lactate, pH, serum urea, serum creatinine, osmolarity, and urine output were assessed at different time intervals in both groups. Blood urea and creatinine were assessed to see acute kidney injury. Results There was no difference in mean values of serum sodium, potassium, lactate, serum urea, creatinine and serum osmolarity in both groups throughout the study period. However there was a rise in serum chloride and a low pH was noted in Group B. The urine output was also similar in both groups. The metabolic status of patients receiving PlasmaLyte was better than those receiving normal saline. Conclusion Normal saline may cause hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis which may be avoided by using balanced crystalloids. The use of balanced crystalloids should be preferred to normal saline in neurosurgical patients to ensure a better metabolic status and good clinical outcome.
RESUMEN
Background: Pain and its alleviation have been a challenge for humans for centuries. Sub arachnoid block is most commonly practiced method for anaesthesia for lower limb surgeries. Adjuvants like opioids and alpha 2 agonists have proven benefits in augmentation of effects of local anaesthetics for spinal anesthesia. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of morphine and dexmedetomidine for sub arachnoid block in lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. Material and Methods: This is a prospective randomised controlled trial done in 120 patients who were posted for lower limb orthopaedic surgery. Along with bupivacaine, Group A received intrathecal dexmedetomidine while group B received intrathecal morphine. Results: the demographic profile was comparable in both the groups. The mean duration of motor block in Group A was 359.33 ± 34.4 and in Group B was 265.71 ± 28.47. The duration of rescue analgesia was almost double in Group A as compared to Group B with P < 0.0001 (CL 95%). Conclusion: Intrathecal dexmedetomidine and morphine both provided good postoperative analgesia. Dexmedetomidine provided a longer duration of analgesia than morphine, thereby increasing the time for first rescue analgesia, but at the cost of greater side effects.
RESUMEN
Penile erection under general anesthesia is a rare occurrence. It may cause delay, complications or can even lead to cancellation of an elective transurethral surgery. In literature, various methods and techniques have been mentioned with variable rates of success and side effects. However, the management becomes challenging and it needs a tailored approach according to the patient's clinical condition with the aim of minimizing complications. Hereby, reporting two cases of successful management of intraoperative priapism in patients undergoing transurethral surgery under general anesthesia.
RESUMEN
Background: Neuraxial anesthesia in obstetrics began with the spinal block by Oskar Kreis in 1900. The technique of subarachnoid blockade has been refined since then and various drugs have been used to provide analgesia and anesthesia for infraumbilical surgeries. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted because of newer options available, such as an intrathecal drug with appropriate sensory and motor blockade and minimal haemodynamic changes that can be used in the lower segment cesarean section safely. Ninety patients were randomly divided into three groups including 30 patients in each group. Group B, Group L, and Group R, each receiving 2.2 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine, and 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine, respectively. All groups were compared concerning sensory block, motor block, hemodynamic stability, and complications if any. Results: The onset of sensory block at T8, two-segment regression time from the highest block, time of regression to L1, total duration of analgesia, onset and total duration of motor block were comparable between Group B and L (P > 0.05), but both these groups were statistically significant with Group R (P < 0.05). Hypotension was observed among all the groups; however, the incidence was minimum in Group R. Conclusion: 12 mg of isobaric ropivacaine and 12 mg of isobaric levobupivacaine, compared to 12 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine (2.2 mL of 0.5% each), when administered intrathecally provides adequate anesthesia for cesarean section. The lesser duration of motor block in ropivacaine compared to the other two drugs could be beneficial for early ambulation, also the incidence of hypotension was lower in Group R.
RESUMEN
The most common cause of postoperative fever is infection. Other causes include cancer, iatrogenic causes, venous thromboembolism, secondary to prosthetic implants, and pyrexia of unknown origin. Here, we describe five cases of opioid-induced pyrexia. In all cases, an injection of morphine was given for postoperative analgesia and all those patients developed fever. All the possible causes of fever were excluded and then opioid was substituted with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Fever subsided in all the cases. Cessation of the offending drug led to the resolution of the fever in all five cases, and the patient required subsequent supportive care. However, adjunctive pharmacotherapy may also be needed in some patients.
RESUMEN
Background and Aims: Succinylcholine is the only available depolarizing neuromuscular blocker that has been widely used in the induction of anesthesia, and it is the drug of choice for rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia due to its rapid onset of effect and ultrashort duration of action owing to its rapid hydrolysis by acetyl-cholinesterase. Postoperative muscle pain (myalgia) and muscle stiffness are the most common side effects and are observed most frequently on the 1st postoperative day in ambulatory surgery. The use of succinylcholine in the induction of anesthesia and intubation in routine cases has been discouraged because of such adverse effects. However, because of its cost-effectiveness and easy availability, it is still used by some institutions routinely. This study aimed to study the efficacy of preoperative diclofenac along with atracurium precurarization in alleviating succinylcholine-induced myalgia. Materials and Methods: It is a double-blind randomized comparative study carried out in a tertiary care hospital. The study sample was 60 and divided into two equal groups. All data entered in MS-Excel Sheet and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were done for nonparametric data and one-way ANOVA for the parametric data. The normal distribution of the study sample was tested by the Shapiro - Wilk test. Results: The fasciculations in the test group were much less than in the control group with P < 0.00001. The results for the incidence of myalgia in the two groups were as follows: P value at 24 h was 0.00018 and at 48 h was 0.0028, respectively. Creatine kinase levels at preoperative and 24 h postoperative periods were 49.47 ± 7.24 in Group D, 53.30 ± 7.98 in Group B and 87.38 ± 15.16 in Group D, and 188.41 ± 33.27 in Group B, respectively. Conclusion: Succinylcholine-induced myalgia has a complex pathophysiology. However, the preemptive use of diclofenac in combination with precurarization can alleviate the incidence and severity of succinylcholine-induced myalgia. Therefore, its use may be considered in routine cases for induction of anesthesia for facilitating laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.
RESUMEN
Background: Since 1898 when August Bier, introduced spinal analgesia, there is lot of advancement made in the technique. There are various approaches and techniques for subarachnoid block. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare median and paramedian approach for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery using Sprotte needle in terms of number of attempts, success rate, adverse effects, and complications. Materials and Methods: One hundred patients were randomly divided into two equal groups and underwent subarachnoid block in median and paramedical block for elective cesarean section. Results: There is no significant difference between the two groups. Mean with standard deviation in the number of attempts for subarachnoid block through media and paramedian approach is 1.18 ± 0.48 and 1.06 ± 0.24, respectively (P = 0.51). The incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and lower backache was insignificant in both the groups (P = 0.218 and 0.646, respectively). Conclusions: Paramedian approach should not be considered as a reserve technique for spinal anesthesia and can be used as popularly as the median approach.