Systematic review on management of high-output enterostomy in children: An urgent call for evidence.

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: High-output stoma is one of the most common major morbidities in young children with an enterostomy that could lead to intestinal failure. Management of high-output enterostomy in children is mostly based on personal experience. This systematic review aims to clarify the evidence-based therapeutic approach of high-output enterostomy in children. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using Pubmed, Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library to identify studies published until March 20, 2023, following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. The study population comprised children (i.e., age <18 years) with high-output enterostomy (i.e., jejuno-, ileo-, and/or colostomy), regardless of underlying aetiology. Interventions comprised any (non)pharmacological and/or surgical treatment. Interventions were compared with each other, placebos, and/or no interventions. Primary outcome was reduction of enterostomy output. Secondary outcomes were morbidity, mortality, quality of life, associated healthcare costs, and adverse events. RESULTS: The literature search identified 4278 original articles of which 366 were screened on full text, revealing that none of the articles met the inclusion criteria. CONCLUSION: This first systematic review on management of high-output enterostomy in children revealed that any evidence on the primary and secondary outcomes is lacking. There is an urgent need for evidence on conservative treatment strategies including fluid restrictions, dietary advices, oral rehydration solution, chyme re-infusion, and pharmacological and surgical treatments of high-output enterostomy in children, aiming to reduce the risk for short- and long-term complications. Till more evidence is available, a systematic and multidisciplinary step-up approach is needed. Therefore, a therapeutic work-up is proposed that could guide the care.

The Impact of Teduglutide on Real-Life Health Care Costs in Children with Short Bowel Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the real-life health care costs of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in children with short bowel syndrome with intestinal failure (SBS-IF) before and after treatment with teduglutide, and to compare those with costs of children with SBS-IF not treated with teduglutide. STUDY DESIGN: All consecutive children with SBS-IF on HPN treated with subcutaneous teduglutide starting from 2018 through 2020 in a tertiary French referral center were retrospectively included. These patients were matched to children with SBS-IF on HPN followed during the same 3-year period who were eligible for the teduglutide but were not treated. HPN direct medical costs included home-care charges, HPN bags, hospital admissions, and teduglutide. A comparison of costs before/after treatment and between patients treated/not treated was performed. RESULTS: Sixty children were included: 30 (50%) were treated with teduglutide and 30 (50%) were untreated. In the treated group, the median total costs of HPN significantly decreased after 1 (P < .001) and 2 years of treatment (P < .001) from 59 454 euros/year/patient to 43 885 euros/year/patient and 34 973 euros/year/patient, respectively. When we compared patients treated and not treated, the total HPN costs/year/patient were similar at baseline (P = .6) but were significantly lower in the teduglutide-treated group after 1 (P = .006) and 2 years of treatment (P < .001). When we added the cost of teduglutide into the analysis, the total cost increased significantly in the treated group and remained much greater even after modeling a reduction in the cost of the drug to one-third the present cost and PN weaning (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with teduglutide is associated with a significant reduction in the annual costs of HPN but still remains expensive because of the drug itself. Finding cost-saving strategies is essential.

Pediatric Intestinal Failure Associated Eating Disorder: An Overview of the Importance of Oral Feeding in a Population at Risk for Feeding Difficulties.

Achieving feeding skills and food acceptance is a multi-layered process. In pediatric intestinal failure (PIF), oral feeding is important for feeding skills development, physiologic adaptation, quality of life and the prevention of eating disorders. In PIF, risk factors for feeding difficulties are common and early data suggests that feeding difficulties are prevalent. There is a unique paradigm for the feeding challenges in PIF. Conventional definitions of eating disorders have limited application in this context. A pediatric intestinal failure associated eating disorder (IFAED) definition that includes feeding/eating skills dysfunction, psychosocial dysfunction, and the influence on weaning nutrition support is proposed.

An innovative educational program for adolescents on home parenteral nutrition for the "transition" to adulthood.

Facing with an increasing demand for transition to adult care management, our home parenteral nutrition (HPN) team designed an adolescent therapeutic educational program (ATEP) specifically intended for adolescents on long-term HPN. The aim of this study was to report on the first sessions of this program. Methods: The ATEP is designed in three sessions of five consecutive days, during school holidays over the year. It includes group sessions on catheter handling, disconnecting and connecting the PN and catheter dressing, dealing with unforeseen events (e.g., fever or catheter injury), but also sessions with psychologist, social worker, sports teacher, fashion specialist, meeting with adults who received HPN since childhood. Specific course for the accompanying parents were also provided. Six months after the last session, a 3-day trip to the attraction park "le Futuroscope," Poitiers, France, was organized without any parental presence. Results: After 3 ATEP courses, a total of 16 adolescents have been enrolled. They were aged between 13 and 17 years (median 14 IQR: 14-16.25). All were on long term HPN started during the neonatal period except for four who started PN at a median age of 10 years old (IQR: 1-10). At the time of the ATEP, their median PNDI was 105% (IQR: 95.5-120.8) while receiving a median of six infusions per week (IQR: 5-7). Thirteen received Taurolidine lock procedure. After the ATEP, 11 adolescents could be considered as fully autonomous, 4 as partially autonomous and one failed to gain any autonomy. Course evaluation by adolescents or parents was good to excellent. Conclusion: Through the holistic and multiprofessional approach of this training and the group cohesion, the adolescents were not only able to handle catheter care and PN connections but were able to understand and accept better their illness and project themselves into their own future.

Transition from pediatric to adult care in patients with chronic intestinal failure on home parenteral nutrition: How to do it right?

BACKGROUND: Life expectancy of children with chronic intestinal failure (CIF) on home parenteral nutrition has greatly improved. Children are now able to grow into adulthood which requires transfer from pediatric to adult health care. A guideline for structured transition is lacking and the demand for a more standardized care for this patient group is necessary. Therefore, we investigated the perceptions of health care professionals from various disciplines working in this specific field, concerning effective interventions regarding transition to adult health care. AIM: To create a standardized protocol which provides practical guidance for health care professionals in order to bridge the gap between pediatric and adult health care and to facilitate successful transition of children with chronic intestinal failure. METHODS: A survey consisting of 20 interventions for transition was sent out to members of the Intestinal Failure working group of European Reference Network for Rare Inherited Congenital (gastrointestinal and digestive) Anomalies (ERNICA) and the Network of Intestinal Failure and Intestinal Transplant in Europe (NITE) group - European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) healthcare professionals in 48 medical centers in various countries. Next to 20 interventions, an open-ended question to fill in any other suggestion with respect to most effective intervention was included. Interventions scoring higher than 80% by the participants were included in the protocol. Interventions scoring between 50% and 80% and other own suggestions were discussed during a consensus meeting and included when consensus, defined as unanimous agreement, was reached. Interventions scoring as effective by < 50% of participants were excluded directly. RESULTS: A total of 80 healthcare professionals from 33 medical centers (participation rate 69%) participated. The protocol consisted of modifiable components expected to be targets of interventions. The most important key outcomes of the survey were: 1) assessment of patient's transition readiness and provision of knowledge to the patient by the pediatric team, 2) involvement of parents in the transition process, and 3) collaboration between the pediatric and adult chronic intestinal failure team. In addition it is advised that the transition process should start 1-2 years before transfer. A nurse specialist working in both services should form a bridge. All interventions must be tailor-made and based on the maturity of the patient. CONCLUSION: This study provides a protocol describing transition of children with chronic intestinal failure from pediatric to adult care. This international protocol will serve as practical guidance for pediatric chronic intestinal failure which will provide a more structured, optimal transition process. It is advised to use this protocol as a formal checklist that can be placed in the patient's chart to review and track the transition process by CIF team members. Future research investigating transition readiness of CIF patients is needed.

Ernica Clinical Consensus Statements on Total Colonic and Intestinal Aganglionosis.

BACKGROUND: Hirschsprung disease is a congenital intestinal motility disorder characterized by an absence of enteric ganglion cells. Total colonic aganglionosis and near total or total intestinal aganglionosis, defined as absence of ganglion cells in the entire colon and with variable length of small bowel involved, are life-threatening conditions which affect less than 10 % of all patients with Hirschsprung disease. The aim of this project was to develop clinical consensus statements within ERNICA, the European Reference Network for rare congenital digestive diseases, on four major topics: Surgical treatment of total colonic aganglionosis, surgical treatment of total intestinal aganglionosis, management of poor bowel function in total colonic and/or intestinal aganglionosis and long-term management in total colonic and or intestinal aganglionosis. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of representatives from ERNICA centers was invited to participate. Literature was searched, using specified search terms, in Medline (ALL), Embase and Google Scholar. Abstracts were screened and full text publications were selected. The panel was divided in four groups that extracted data from the full text publications and suggested draft statements for each of the major topics. A modified Delphi process was used to refine and agree on the statements. RESULTS: The consensus statement was conducted by a multidisciplinary panel of 24 participants from 10 European countries, 45 statements reached consensus after 3 Delphi-rounds. The availability of high-quality clinical evidence was limited, and most statements were based on expert opinion. Another 25 statements did not reach consensus. CONCLUSIONS: Total colonic and total intestinal aganglionosis are rare variants of Hirschsprung disease, with very limited availability of high-quality clinical evidence. This consensus statement provides statements on the surgical treatment, management of poor bowel function and long-term management for these rare patients. The expert panel agreed that patients benefit from multidisciplinary and personalized care, preferably in an expert center. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical consensus statement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3a.