The Effect of a Plastic Barrier Drape on Resuscitation Performance and Provider Contamination: A Randomized Controlled Simulation-Based Pilot Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patient barriers to protect health care workers from COVID-19 exposure have been studied for airway management. Few are tested for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We sought to determine whether a plastic drape barrier affects resuscitation performance and contamination risks for a simulated cardiopulmonary arrest scenario. METHODS: This pilot trial randomized in-hospital resuscitation teams of 4 to 6 participants to a plastic drape or without a drape in an in situ cardiopulmonary arrest simulation. The mannequin's airway emanated simulated virus particles (GloGerm, Moab, UT), detectable through UV light. Primary outcomes included airway management and CPR quality measures. Secondary outcomes included visible contamination on personal protective equipment (PPE). We used the Non-Technical Skills (NO-TECHS) instrument to measure perceived team performance and the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) to measure individual workload. Outcome variables were analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with participant number as a covariate. RESULTS: Seven teams were allocated to the intervention (plastic drape) group and 7 to the control. Intubation and ventilation performance (η 2 = 0.09, P > 0.3) and chest compression quality (η 2 = 0.03-0.19, P > 0.14) were not affected by the plastic drape. However, mean contaminated PPE per person decreased with the drape (2.8 ± 0.3 vs. 3.7 ± 0.3, partial η 2 = 0.29, P = 0.05). No differences in perceived workload nor team performance were noted ( P > 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, the use of a plastic drape barrier seems not to affect resuscitation performance on simulated cardiopulmonary arrest but decreases health care worker contamination risk. Further implementation trials could characterize the true risk reduction and any effect on resuscitation outcomes.

Development of a Mannequin for Simulation-Based Trials Involving Respiratory Viral Spread During Respiratory Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Arrest Scenarios.

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, mannequin models have been developed to mimic viral spread using fluorescent particles. These models use contraptions such as a spray gun or an exploding latex balloon to emanate a sudden acceleration of particles, simulating a "cough" reflex. No models have been developed to mimic passive aerosolization of viral particles during a cardiopulmonary arrest simulation. Our novel approach to aerosolization of simulated viral spread allows for a continuous flow of particles, which allows us to maintain components of high-fidelity team-based simulations. Our simulated model emanated GloGerm (Moab, UT) from the respiratory tract using a continuous nebulization chamber. Uniquely, the construction of our apparatus allowed for the ability to perform full, simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenarios (such as chest compressions, bag-mask ventilation, and endotracheal intubation) on a high-fidelity mannequin while visualizing potential contamination spread at the conclusion of the simulation. Positive feedback from users included the ability to visualize particulate contamination after cardiopulmonary resuscitations in the context of personal protective equipment usage and roles in resuscitation (i.e. physician, respiratory therapist, nurse). Negative criticism towards the simulation included the lack of certain high-fidelity feedback markers of the mannequin (auscultating breath sounds and checking pulses) due to the construction of the particle aerosolization mechanism.

Prevalence, Proportionality, and Cause of Ventilator Alarms in a Pediatric Intensive Care Setting.

BACKGROUND: Clinical alarms play an important role in monitoring physiological parameters, vital signs and medical device function in the hospital intensive care environment. Delays in staff response to alarms are well documented as health care providers become desensitized to increased rates of nuisance alarms. Patients can be at increased risk of harm due to alarm fatigue. Current literature suggests alarms from ventilators contribute significantly to nonactionable alarms. A greater understanding of which specific ventilator alarms are most common and the rates at which they occur is fundamental to improving alarm management. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on alarms that occurred on the Avea and Servo-i ventilators used in the pediatric ICU and pediatric cardiothoracic ICU at a major metropolitan children's hospital. High- and medium-priority alarms, as classified by the manufacturer, were studied between June 1, 2017, and November 31, 2017. Descriptive data analysis and a 2-proportion z-test were performed to identify proportionality, cause, and prevalence rates in the pediatric ICU and the cardiothoracic ICU. RESULTS: Eleven distinct ventilator alarms were identified during 2,091 d of mechanical ventilation. The Inspiratory Flow Overrange alarm (42.4%) on the Servo-i, Low VTE (20.4%; expiratory tidal volume) and Circuit Integrity alarm (20.0%) on the Avea were the most prevalent causes according to ventilator type. Medium-priority alarms comprised 68.7% of all Servo-i alarms, and high-priority alarms comprised 84% of all Avea alarms. The 2-sample test of proportions was significant for differences between both areas (P < .001). The overall alarm prevalence rate was 22.5 ventilator alarms per ventilator-day per patient. CONCLUSIONS: The cause and proportion of alarms varied by ventilator and care unit. High-priority alarms were most common with the Avea and medium-priority alarms for the Servo-i. The overall combined ventilator alarm prevalence rate was 22.5 alarms per ventilator-day per patient.

The Adverse Impact of Unplanned Extubation in a Cohort of Critically Ill Neonates.

BACKGROUND: We sought to describe adverse events associated with unplanned extubation (UE) and to explore risk factors for serious adverse events post-UE among infants who experienced UE. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on all infants who had a UE event at a single institution over a 4-y period. Demographic information and information on outcomes were obtained retrospectively. We described the frequency of post-UE adverse events: success or failure of extubation trial if offered, rate of re-intubation, post-UE changes in ventilator settings, and serious adverse events post-UE (eg, need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, clinical sepsis, and death or tracheostomy prior to discharge). We used a multivariate logistic regression model to identify the risk factors associated with serious adverse events. RESULTS: There were 134 documented UE events. Agitation was the most common known cause. After UE, 49% of the subjects were given a trial of extubation, and 65% of the trials were successful at 48 h. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed in 13% of cases. In subjects requiring immediate re-intubation, mean airway pressure (̄Paw) and oxygen requirement increased in 33% and 55% of the subjects, respectively. Post-UE clinical sepsis occurred in 17% of subjects. Higher pre-UE ̄Paw and difficult re-intubation were associated with a need for CPR. Subjects who received CPR had increased odds (3.7×) of developing clinical sepsis. CONCLUSION: UE can result in serious adverse events, including hemodynamic instability and possibly an increased risk for clinical sepsis. Difficult re-intubation was associated with a higher risk of needing CPR and, later, tracheostomy and death.