RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Population health management (PHM) by hospital groups is not yet defined nor implemented in France. However, in 2019, the French Hospitals Federation launched a pilot program to experiment PHM in five territories around five Territorial Hospital Groups (GHT's). In order to implement PHM, it is necessary to firstly define the population which healthcare facilities (hospitals) have responsibility for. In the French healthcare system, mapping of health territories however relies mainly on administrative data criteria which do not fit with the actual implementation of GHT's. Mapping for the creation of territorial hospital groups (GHTs) also did not include medical criteria nor all healthcare offers particularly in private hospitals and primary care services, who are not legally part of GHT's but are major healthcare providers. The objective of this study was to define the French population groups for PHM per hospital group. METHODS: A database study based on DRG (acute care, post-acute and rehabilitation, psychiatry and home care) from the French National Hospitals Database was conducted. Data included all hospital stays from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. The main outcome of this study was to create mutually exclusive territories that would reflect an accurate national healthcare service consumption. A six-step method was implemented using automated analysis reviewed manually by national experts. RESULTS: In total, 2840 healthcare facilities, 5571 geographical zones and 31,441,506 hospital stays were identified and collated from the database. In total, 132 GHTs were included and there were 72 zones (1.3%) allocated to a different GHTs. Furthermore, 200 zones were manually reviewed with 33 zones allocated to another GHT. Only one area did not have a population superior to 50,000 inhabitants. Three were shown to have a population superior to 2 million. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a feasible methodology to define the French population under the responsibility of 132 hospital groups validated by a national group of experts.
Asunto(s)
Gestión de la Salud Poblacional , Francia/epidemiología , Hospitales Privados , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Grupos de PoblaciónRESUMEN
OBJECT: To determine the frequency, clinical features, and morbidity of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. METHOD: Retrospective study of 76 consecutive children under 16 years of age hospitalized at the Reims University Hospital from 1999 to 2005 with M. pneumoniae pneumonia. The infection was defined by the presence of M antibodies and/or an increase in G antibodies (quantitative Elisa test). RESULTS: M. pneumoniae was the cause of 16% (76/464) of hospitalized pneumonia cases. A significantly increased frequency was observed in 2004 (34%; 19/56) and 2005 (26%; 22/84) versus 11% from 1999 to 2003, p<5.10(-4). The mean age of the patients was 6 years and 8 months, with a peak at 3 years (14/76; 18% of patients). The most frequent clinical feature was cough (80%; 56/70). The chest X-ray showed typical radiological features such as peribronchial and perivascular interstitial infiltrates in only 23% (16/69). Respiratory and extrarespiratory complications were seen in 17 and 12 children, respectively. Only 1 child suffered from respiratory sequelae. CONCLUSION: M. pneumoniae pneumonia is frequent in children over 2 years of age. The diagnosis is sometimes difficult to initially assert because there are no specific features. Respiratory and extrarespiratory complications remain possible. Respiratory sequelae can still exist even if most cases evolve favorably under treatment by macrolides.