Re-evaluation of the WHO (2010) formaldehyde indoor air quality guideline for cancer risk assessment.

In 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) established an indoor air quality guideline for short- and long-term exposures to formaldehyde (FA) of 0.1 mg/m3 (0.08 ppm) for all 30-min periods at lifelong exposure. This guideline was supported by studies from 2010 to 2013. Since 2013, new key studies have been published and key cancer cohorts have been updated, which we have evaluated and compared with the WHO guideline. FA is genotoxic, causing DNA adduct formation, and has a clastogenic effect; exposure-response relationships were nonlinear. Relevant genetic polymorphisms were not identified. Normal indoor air FA concentrations do not pass beyond the respiratory epithelium, and therefore FA's direct effects are limited to portal-of-entry effects. However, systemic effects have been observed in rats and mice, which may be due to secondary effects as airway inflammation and (sensory) irritation of eyes and the upper airways, which inter alia decreases respiratory ventilation. Both secondary effects are prevented at the guideline level. Nasopharyngeal cancer and leukaemia were observed inconsistently among studies; new updates of the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) cohort confirmed that the relative risk was not increased with mean FA exposures below 1 ppm and peak exposures below 4 ppm. Hodgkin's lymphoma, not observed in the other studies reviewed and not considered FA dependent, was increased in the NCI cohort at a mean concentration ≥0.6 mg/m3 and at peak exposures ≥2.5 mg/m3; both levels are above the WHO guideline. Overall, the credibility of the WHO guideline has not been challenged by new studies.

The murine lung microbiome in relation to the intestinal and vaginal bacterial communities.

BACKGROUND: This work provides the first description of the bacterial population of the lung microbiota in mice. The aim of this study was to examine the lung microbiome in mice, the most used animal model for inflammatory lung diseases such as COPD, cystic fibrosis and asthma.Bacterial communities from broncho-alveolar lavage fluids and lung tissue were compared to samples taken from fecal matter (caecum) and vaginal lavage fluid from female BALB/cJ mice. RESULTS: Using a customized 16S rRNA sequencing protocol amplifying the V3-V4 region our study shows that the mice have a lung microbiome that cluster separately from mouse intestinal microbiome (caecum). The mouse lung microbiome is dominated by Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Cyanobacteria overlapping the vaginal microbiome. We also show that removal of host tissue or cells from lung fluid during the DNA extraction step has an impact on the resulting bacterial community profile. Sample preparation needs to be considered when choosing an extraction method and interpreting data. CONCLUSIONS: We have consistently amplified bacterial DNA from mouse lungs that is distinct from the intestinal microbiome in these mice. The gut microbiome has been extensively studied for its links to development of disease. Here we suggest that also the lung microbiome could be important in relation to inflammatory lung diseases. Further research is needed to understand the contribution of the lung microbiome and the gut-lung axis to the development of lung diseases such as COPD and asthma.

Acute airway effects of airborne formaldehyde in sensitized and non-sensitized mice housed in a dry or humid environment.

We investigated the role of air humidity and allergic sensitization on the acute airway response to inhaled formaldehyde (FA) vapor. Mice were sensitized to the immunogen ovalbumin (OVA) by three intraperitoneal injections followed by two aerosol challenges, giving rise to allergic airway inflammation. Control mice were sham sensitized by saline injections and challenged by saline aerosols. Once sensitized, the mice were housed at high (85-89%) or low (<10%) relative humidity, respectively for 48h prior to a 60-min exposure to either 0.4, 1.8 or about 5ppm FA. Before, during and after exposure, breathing parameters were monitored. These included the specific markers of nose and lung irritations as well as the expiratory flow rate, the latter being a marker of airflow limitation. The sensory irritation response in the upper airways was not affected by allergic inflammation or changes in humidity. At high relative humidity, the OVA-sensitized mice had a decreased expiratory airflow rate compared to the saline control mice after exposure to approximately 5ppm FA. This is in accordance with the observations that asthmatics are more sensitive than non-asthmatics to higher concentrations of airway irritants including FA. In the dry environment, the opposite trend was seen; here, the saline control mice had a significantly decreased expiratory airflow rate compared to OVA-sensitized mice when exposed to 1.8 and 4ppm FA. We speculate that increased mucus production in the OVA-sensitized mice has increased the "scrubber effect" in the nose, consequently protecting the conducting and lower airways.

Recent trend in risk assessment of formaldehyde exposures from indoor air.

Studies about formaldehyde (FA) published since the guideline of 0.1 mg/m(3) by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2010 have been evaluated; critical effects were eye and nasal (portal-of-entry) irritation. Also, it was considered to prevent long-term effects, including all types of cancer. The majority of the recent toxicokinetic studies showed no exposure-dependent FA-DNA adducts outside the portal-of-entry area and FA-DNA adducts at distant sites were due to endogenously generated FA. The no-observed-adverse-effect level for sensory irritation was 0.5 ppm and recently reconfirmed in hypo- and hypersensitive individuals. Investigation of the relationship between FA exposure and asthma or other airway effects in children showed no convincing association. In rats, repeated exposures showed no point mutation in the p53 and K-Ras genes at ≤15 ppm neither increased cell proliferation, histopathological changes and changes in gene expression at 0.7 ppm. Repeated controlled exposures (0.5 ppm with peaks at 1 ppm) did not increase micronucleus formation in human buccal cells or nasal tissue (0.7 ppm) or in vivo genotoxicity in peripheral blood lymphocytes (0.7 ppm), but higher occupational exposures were associated with genotoxicity in buccal cells and cultivated peripheral blood lymphocytes. It is still valid that exposures not inducing nasal squamous cell carcinoma in rats will not induce nasopharyngeal cancer or lymphohematopoietic malignancies in humans. Reproductive and developmental toxicity are not considered relevant in the absence of sensory irritation. In conclusion, the WHO guideline has been strengthened.

Adjuvant and inflammatory effects in mice after subchronic inhalation of allergen and ozone-initiated limonene reaction products.

Inhalation of ozone (O3), a highly toxic environmental pollutant, produces airway inflammation and exacerbates asthma. However, in indoor air, O3 reacts with terpenes (cyclic alkenes), leading to formation of airway irritating pollutants. The aim of the study was to examine whether inhalation of the reaction products of O3 and the terpene, limonene, as well as limonene and low-level O3 by themselves, induced allergic sensitization (formation of specific immunoglobulin [Ig] E) and airway inflammation in a subchronic mouse inhalation model in combination with the model allergen ovalbumin (OVA). BALB/cJ mice were exposed exclusively by inhalation for 5 d/wk for 2 wk and thereafter once weekly for 12 wk. Exposures were low-dose OVA in combination with O3, limonene, or limonene/O3 reaction products. OVA alone and OVA + Al(OH)3 served as control groups. Subsequently, all groups were exposed to a high-dose OVA solution on three consecutive days. Serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were collected 24 h later. Limonene by itself did not promote neither OVA-specific IgE nor leukocyte inflammation. Low-level O3 promoted eosinophilic airway inflammation, but not OVA-specific IgE formation. The reaction products of limonene/O3 promoted allergic (OVA-specific IgE) sensitization, but lung inflammation, which is a characteristic of allergic asthma, was not observed. In conclusion, the study does not support an allergic inflammatory effect attributed to O3-initiated limonene reaction products in the indoor environment.

Effects of alcohol consumption on the allergen-specific immune response in mice.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that chronic alcohol consumption impairs the T-helper 1 (Th1) lymphocyte-regulated cell-mediated immune response possibly favoring a Th2 deviation of the immune response. Moreover, a few epidemiological studies have linked alcohol consumption to allergen-specific IgE sensitization. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of alcohol consumption on the allergen-specific immune response in mice. METHODS: BALB/cJBomTac mice were immunized intraperitoneally with ovalbumin (OVA) using a low dose sensitization protocol. Throughout the experiment, mice were kept on isocalorical liquid diets containing 0 to 6.2% ethanol. Evaluation of immunomodulatory effects of ethanol was based on measurements of total serum IgE, as well as OVA-specific IgE, IgG1, and IgG2a. Furthermore, levels of OVA-induced interleukin (IL)-4 and interferon-gamma were determined in ex vivo splenocyte cultures. RESULTS: Alcohol intake decreased the level of OVA-specific IgG2a in a dose-dependent manner, whereas high levels of alcohol markedly increased the level of total IgE, but not OVA-specific IgE. Th1 suppression was supported by the cytokine profile. CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol consumption induced a marked decrease in markers of the Th1-type allergen-specific immune response and an increase in total serum IgE. In this model, there was no effect of alcohol on OVA-specific IgE. Studies using other routes of immunization may be warranted.

Acute airway effects of ozone-initiated d-limonene chemistry: importance of gaseous products.

There are concerns about ozone-initiated chemistry, because the formation of gaseous oxidation products and ultrafine particles may increase complaints, morbidity and mortality. Here we address the question whether the gaseous products or the ultrafine particles from the ozone-initiated chemistry of limonene, a common and abundant indoor pollutant, cause acute airway effects. The effects on the airways by d-limonene, a ca. 16s old ozone/d-limonene mixture, and clean air were evaluated by a mice bioassay, from which sensory irritation of the upper airways, airflow limitation, and pulmonary irritation can be obtained. A denuder was inserted to separate the ultrafine particles from the gaseous products prior to the exposure chamber. Reduction of mean respiratory frequency (>30%) and 230% increase of time of brake were observed without denuder, during 30min exposure, to the ozonolyzed d-limonene mixture, which are indicative of prominent sensory effects. The initial concentrations (ppm) were 40 d-limonene and 4 ozone. The exposure concentrations (ppm) were about 35 d-limonene and 0.05 ozone. Formaldehyde and residual d-limonene, the salient sensory irritants, accounted for up to three-fourth of the sensory irritation. The upper airway effects reversed to baseline upon cessation of exposure. An effect on the conducting airways was also significant, which did not reverse completely upon cessation. Airway effects were absent with the denuder inserted, which did not alter the size distribution of ultrafine particles ( approximately 10mg/m(3)), significantly. The result was statistically indistinguishable from clean dry air. It is concluded that ultrafine particles that are generated from ozone-initiated d-limonene chemistry and denuded are not causative of sensory effects in the airways.

Air-Liquid Interface In Vitro Models for Respiratory Toxicology Research: Consensus Workshop and Recommendations.

In vitro air-liquid interface (ALI) cell culture models can potentially be used to assess inhalation toxicology endpoints and are usually considered, in terms of relevancy, between classic (i.e., submerged) in vitro models and animal-based models. In some situations that need to be clearly defined, ALI methods may represent a complement or an alternative option to in vivo experimentations or classic in vitro methods. However, it is clear that many different approaches exist and that only very limited validation studies have been carried out to date. This means comparison of data from different methods is difficult and available methods are currently not suitable for use in regulatory assessments. This is despite inhalation toxicology being a priority area for many governmental organizations. In this setting, a 1-day workshop on ALI in vitro models for respiratory toxicology research was organized in Paris in March 2016 to assess the situation and to discuss what might be possible in terms of validation studies. The workshop was attended by major parties in Europe and brought together more than 60 representatives from various academic, commercial, and regulatory organizations. Following plenary, oral, and poster presentations, an expert panel was convened to lead a discussion on possible approaches to validation studies for ALI inhalation models. A series of recommendations were made and the outcomes of the workshop are reported.

Adjuvant effects of inhaled mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate in BALB/cJ mice.

Phthalates, including di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), are widely used and have been linked with the development of wheezing and asthma. The main metabolite of DEHP, mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP), was investigated for adjuvant effects in a mouse inhalation model. BALB/cJ mice were exposed to aerosols of 0.03 or 0.4 mg/m(3) MEHP 5 days/week for 2 weeks and thereafter weekly for 12 weeks together with a low dose of ovalbumin (OVA) as a model allergen. Mice exposed to OVA alone or OVA+Al(OH)(3) served as negative and positive controls, respectively. Finally, all groups were exposed to a nebulized 1% OVA solution on 3 consecutive days to investigate the development of an inflammatory response. Serum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, and draining lymph nodes were collected 24h later. In the OVA+Al(OH)(3) group, significantly increased levels of OVA-specific IgE and IgG1 in serum as well as of eosinophils in BAL fluid were observed. OVA-specific IgG1 production in both MEHP groups was significantly increased. OVA-specific IgE and IgG2a were not increased significantly. A dose-dependent increase in inflammatory cells was observed in BAL fluid, leading to significantly higher lymphocyte and eosinophil numbers in the OVA+0.4 mg/m(3) MEHP group. Ex vivo cytokine secretion by cultures of draining lymph nodes suggested a T(H)2 profile of MEHP. In conclusion, MEHP acted as a T(H)2 adjuvant after inhalation. However, it is suggested that the inflammation in the MEHP groups was primarily mediated by an IgG1-dependent mechanism. To address implications for humans, a margin-of-exposure was estimated based on the lack of significant effects on IgE production and inflammation after exposures to 0.03 mg/m(3) MEHP observed in the present study and estimated human exposure levels.

Airway inflammation and adjuvant effect after repeated airborne exposures to di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and ovalbumin in BALB/c mice.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have suggested an association between exposure to phthalate plasticizers, including di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), and increased prevalence of asthma, rhinitis or wheezing. Furthermore, studies in mice have demonstrated an adjuvant effect from DEHP after parenteral administration with the model allergen ovalbumin (OVA). OBJECTIVE: Exposures to DEHP were investigated for adjuvant effects and airway inflammation in a mouse inhalation model. METHODS: BALB/cJ mice were exposed to aerosols of 0.022-13 mg/m(3) DEHP and 0.14 mg/m(3) OVA 5 days/week for 2 weeks and thereafter weekly for 12 weeks. Mice exposed to OVA alone or OVA+Al(OH)(3) served as control groups. Finally, all groups were exposed to a nebulized 1% OVA solution on three consecutive days. Serum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, and draining lymph nodes were collected 24h later. RESULTS: In the OVA+Al(OH)(3) group, significantly increased levels of OVA-specific IgE and IgG1 in serum as well as of eosinophils in BAL fluid were observed. DEHP affected OVA-specific IgG1 production in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas little effect was seen on IgE and IgG2a. Dose-dependent increases in inflammatory cells were observed in BAL fluids, leading to significantly higher lymphocyte, neutrophil and eosinophil numbers in the OVA+13 mg/m(3) DEHP group. Ex vivo cytokine secretion by cultures of draining lymph nodes suggested that DEHP has a mixed Th1/Th2 cytokine profile. CONCLUSION: Airborne DEHP is able to increase serum IgG1 and lung inflammatory cell levels, but only at very high concentrations. Realistic DEHP levels do not have an adjuvant effect or induce allergic lung inflammation in the present mouse model.

The adjuvant effect of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate is mediated through a PPARalpha-independent mechanism.

Previous studies in BALB/c mice revealed an adjuvant effect of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) to simultaneously administered ovalbumin. DEHP is the most commonly used phthalate plasticizer. In vivo formed metabolites of DEHP are peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) ligands, a group of chemicals that may have immunomodulatory properties. To study whether the PPARalpha receptor was involved in the adjuvant effect of DEHP, PPARalpha-deficient 129/Sv mice were exposed intraperitoneally to a mixture of OVA and DEHP, and the OVA-specific IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a responses were compared to the corresponding responses in the wild-type strain. The study showed that the adjuvant mechanism of DEHP is mediated through a PPARalpha-independent mechanism. Compared to mice only given OVA, DEHP induced highly increased levels of OVA-specific IgG1 and IgG2a, both in the wild-type and in the PPARalpha knock-out strains, indicating that DEHP is a mixed Th1/Th2 adjuvant.

Does lipophilicity per se induce adjuvant effects? Methyl palmitate as model substance does not affect ovalbumin sensitization.

Anthopogenically introduced substances and pollutants are suspected to promote sensitization and development of allergic airway diseases, that is, acting as adjuvants. Lipophilicity may serve as an immunological warning signal, promoting adjuvant effects. Whether the lipophilicity of an inhaled compound induces immunomodulatory effects was investigated in a murine inhalation model with the highly lipophilic methyl palmitate (MP) as model substance. First, studies of acute effects following a 1-h exposure of up to 348 mg/m3 MP showed no effects on cell composition in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or on lung function parameters. Thus, MP did not possess irritant or inflammatory properties, which may be a precursive stimulus for adjuvant effects. Second, mice were exposed to aerosols of MP, 6 or 323 mg/m3, for 1 h followed by a 20-min low-dose ovalbumin (OVA) inhalation. OVA only and OVA + Al(OH)3 served as control groups. Exposures were performed 5 times/wk for 2 wk followed by a weekly exposure for 10 wk. Finally, the mice were challenged with a high-dose OVA aerosol for 3 consecutive days. Neither OVA-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) G1, IgE, or IgG2a production, nor inflammatory cells in BAL, nor respiratory patterns were significantly affected in the MP groups. The OVA + Al(OH)3 group had a significantly higher IgG1 and IgE production, as well as higher eosinophil infiltration in the BAL fluid. These studies showed that effects of adjuvants not are necessarily due to their lipophilicity; that is, additional structural properties are required.

Pulmonary injury associated with spray of a water-based nano-sized waterproofing product: a case study.

BACKGROUND: In most reported cases of lung trauma with water proofing products, volatile organic compounds (VOC) have a prominent role. Here we report on a case involving ten workers exposed to a sprayed product containing nanoparticles in a water solution with only a few percent VOC. CASE PRESENTATION: Ten workers suffered from respiratory symptoms following spray impregnation of hardwood furniture using a waterproofing product that contained positively charged fluorinated acrylate copolymer solid cores with a median diameter of 70 nm (1.3 w%) in aqueous suspension with 3.3 w% VOC and 0.3 w% quaternary ammonium. The worker who applied one liter of the product in a wood workshop, using an air mix spray gun, did not report any health complaints. Another worker, who entered the workshop 3 h later and had rolled and smoked two cigarettes, was hospitalized with severe chemical pneumonitis. A chest X-ray (CXR) showed bilateral infiltrative impairment in the lower lobe regions. On the next day a second CXR showed increased patchiness marking in all fields. A high-resolution Computer Tomography (CT)-scan demonstrated extensive bilateral areas of ground-glass opacities predominantly in the lower regions of the upper lobes, the right middle lobe and the apical regions of the lower lobes, compatible with severe chemical pneumonitis. On the following morning, nine workers in an adjacent workplace in the same building, experienced dry cough, chest tightness and substernal pain upon physical exercise. Reconstruction of the spray application in a climate chamber confirmed trimethyl silanol, glycol ethers and fluoroalkenes in the gas phase. Immediately after the spray application, aerosols were observed at a maximum concentration of 6.3 × 104 cm-3. Mass concentrations were 0.095 and 10 mg/m3 in the size ranges 5.6-560 nm and 0.22-30 µm, respectively, decreasing to less than 10 µg/m3 in both size ranges after 15 h. CONCLUSION: The hospitalized worker had smoked cigarettes contaminated with fluoropolymers which is a plausible explanation for the lung trauma. Respiratory symptoms in the nine workers may be caused by inhalation of particles that became airborne by resuspension from surfaces when workers entered the adjacent workplace the next day. A contribution from VOC appears less likely because measurements and modelling showed that concentrations in the mg/m3 range could have occurred only if the building was assumed to be completely airtight.

Limonene and its ozone-initiated reaction products attenuate allergic lung inflammation in mice.

Inhalation of indoor air pollutants may cause airway irritation and inflammation and is suspected to worsen allergic reactions. Inflammation may be due to mucosal damage, upper (sensory) and lower (pulmonary) airway irritation due to activation of the trigeminal and vagal nerves, respectively, and to neurogenic inflammation. The terpene, d-limonene, is used as a fragrance in numerous consumer products. When limonene reacts with the pulmonary irritant ozone, a complex mixture of gas and particle phase products is formed, which causes sensory irritation. This study investigated whether limonene, ozone or the reaction mixture can exacerbate allergic lung inflammation and whether airway irritation is enhanced in allergic BALB/cJ mice. Naïve and allergic (ovalbumin sensitized) mice were exposed via inhalation for three consecutive days to clean air, ozone, limonene or an ozone-limonene reaction mixture. Sensory and pulmonary irritation was investigated in addition to ovalbumin-specific antibodies, inflammatory cells, total protein and surfactant protein D in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and hemeoxygenase-1 and cytokines in lung tissue. Overall, airway allergy was not exacerbated by any of the exposures. In contrast, it was found that limonene and the ozone-limonene reaction mixture reduced allergic inflammation possibly due to antioxidant properties. Ozone induced sensory irritation in both naïve and allergic mice. However, allergic but not naïve mice were protected from pulmonary irritation induced by ozone. This study showed that irritation responses might be modulated by airway allergy. However, aggravation of allergic symptoms was observed by neither exposure to ozone nor exposure to ozone-initiated limonene reaction products. In contrast, anti-inflammatory properties of the tested limonene-containing pollutants might attenuate airway allergy.

Mechanisms of acute inhalation effects of (+) and (-)-alpha-pinene in BALB/c mice.

The effects of (+)-alpha-pinene and (-)-alpha-pinene vapours were studied for respiratory effects in BALB/c mice. The (+) enantiomer showed persistent sensory irritation effect on the upper respiratory tract during exposures in the range of 100 to 3691 ppm. The threshold concentration for this effect was calculated to be about 70 ppm, which is close to the no-effect level of about 40 ppm in humans. A significant airflow limitation occurred from exposure concentrations of 200 ppm and higher. No irritating effect was observed at the alveolar level and no central nervous system effect was obvious. In the exposure range from 218 to 5213 ppm, the (-) enantiomer produced only a short-lasting sensory irritation effect during the first 10 min. of exposure and only at concentrations above 2900 ppm. The tidal volume decreased significantly from approximately 400 ppm, but it was first conspicuous above 1000 ppm. Airflow limitation appeared consistently from approximately 2000 ppm. The (-) enantiomer also induced anesthesia/and or pulmonary irritation as well as sudden death at concentrations above 2600 ppm. Overall, the enantiomers showed different time-dependent and stereoselective effects. The lower sensory irritation effect of the (-) enantiomer probably being due to less of the molecule being adsorbed to a sensory irritant receptor.

The Murine Lung Microbiome Changes During Lung Inflammation and Intranasal Vancomycin Treatment.

Most microbiome research related to airway diseases has focused on the gut microbiome. This is despite advances in culture independent microbial identification techniques revealing that even healthy lungs possess a unique dynamic microbiome. This conceptual change raises the question; if lung diseases could be causally linked to local dysbiosis of the local lung microbiota. Here, we manipulate the murine lung and gut microbiome, in order to show that the lung microbiota can be changed experimentally. We have used four different approaches: lung inflammation by exposure to carbon nano-tube particles, oral probiotics and oral or intranasal exposure to the antibiotic vancomycin. Bacterial DNA was extracted from broncho-alveolar and nasal lavage fluids, caecum samples and compared by DGGE. Our results show that: the lung microbiota is sex dependent and not just a reflection of the gut microbiota, and that induced inflammation can change lung microbiota. This change is not transferred to offspring. Oral probiotics in adult mice do not change lung microbiome detectible by DGGE. Nasal vancomycin can change the lung microbiome preferentially, while oral exposure does not. These observations should be considered in future studies of the causal relationship between lung microbiota and lung diseases.

Exposure to airborne particles and volatile organic compounds from polyurethane molding, spray painting, lacquering, and gluing in a workshop.

Due to the health risk related to occupational air pollution exposure, we assessed concentrations and identified sources of particles and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in a handcraft workshop producing fishing lures. The work processes in the site included polyurethane molding, spray painting, lacquering, and gluing. We measured total VOC (TVOC) concentrations and particle size distributions at three locations representing the various phases of the manufacturing and assembly process. The mean working-hour TVOC concentrations in three locations studied were 41, 37, and 24 ppm according to photo-ionization detector measurements. The mean working-hour particle number concentration varied between locations from 3000 to 36,000 cm-3. Analysis of temporal and spatial variations of TVOC concentrations revealed that there were at least four substantial VOC sources: spray gluing, mold-release agent spraying, continuous evaporation from various lacquer and paint containers, and either spray painting or lacquering (probably both). The mold-release agent spray was indirectly also a major source of ultrafine particles. The workers' exposure can be reduced by improving the local exhaust ventilation at the known sources and by increasing the ventilation rate in the area with the continuous source.

Assessing lung inflammation after nanoparticle inhalation using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography imaging.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose ([(18)F]FDG) as a noninvasive strategy to assess the time course of inflammatory processes after inhalation of ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) in rats. PROCEDURES: Healthy, male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 30) were divided in two groups of 15 animals each. Animals from one group (n = 15) were submitted to ZnO NPs inhalation in a chamber (10 nm to 4 µm particle size; maximum in number concentration, ∼ 200 nm; concentration = 245 mg/m(3)). Animals from the other group (n = 15, sham group) were also exposed following the same procedure, but no NPs were introduced into the chamber. Six animals per group were submitted to [(18)F]FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) studies at days 1, 7, and 28 after exposition, and the [(18)F]FDG influx constant (K i ) for the lungs was calculated using Patlak graphical analysis and an image derived blood input function. Nine animals per group were killed at 1, 7 and 28 days after exposure (n = 3 per group and time point), and the lungs were harvested and submitted to immunohistochemical and histological analysis. RESULTS: Significantly higher mean whole-lung K i values were obtained for animals exposed to NPs at days 1 and 7 after exposure (0.0045 ± 0.0016 min(-1) and 0.0047 ± 0.0015 min(-1), respectively) compared to controls (0.0024 ± 0.0010 min(-1) and 0.0019 ± 0.0011 min(-1) at 1 and 7 days, respectively). The K i value for exposed animals dropped to 0.0023 ± 0.0010 min(-1) at day 28. This value was not significantly different from the values obtained at 1, 7, and 28 days for the control group. Immunofluorescence staining on lung tissue slices from animals exposed to ZnO NPs showed an increase in CD11b reactivity at days 1 and 7, followed by a decrease in CD11b positive cells at 28 days. Hematoxylin-eosin staining showed histological alterations in the exposed lungs to ZnO NPs at days 1 and 7 that recovered at 28 days postexposure. CONCLUSIONS: The [(18)F]FDG influx rate constant (K i ) could be determined by PET using Patlak analysis and a corrected image derived input function. Higher K i values were obtained for animals exposed to ZnO NPs at days 1 and 7 after exposition. These results were in good concordance with immunohistochemical assays performed on harvested tissue samples.

Airway effects of repeated exposures to ozone-initiated limonene oxidation products as model of indoor air mixtures.

Repeated low-level indoor air exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) may influence the reporting of sensory irritation in the eyes and airways. The ozone-initiated reaction products of limonene, an abundant VOC, were used as a model of indoor air mixtures to study upper airway (sensory) irritation, bronchoconstrictive and alveolar level effects after repeated exposures. Mice were exposed 1h/day for 10 consecutive days to: air, limonene (52 ppm/289 mg/m(3)); ozone (0.1 ppm/0.2mg/m(3)); a reaction mixture of limonene (52±8 ppm) and ozone (0.5, 2.5 and 3.9 ppm) resulting in ~0.05 ppm residual ozone. Neither the limonene nor the ozone exposures alone showed consistent effects on the respiratory parameters. In the limonene/ozone groups, the respiratory rate decreased concentration-dependently with an extrapolated no-effect-level of ~0.3 ppm admixed ozone. Both sensory irritation and airflow limitation were conspicuous effects of the mixtures; sensory irritation appeared rapidly and airflow limitation developed slowly during each exposure. The effects of these parameters did not change with increasing number of exposures. No firm conclusion could be drawn about alveolar level effects. Cells in bronchoalveolar lavage were unchanged irrespective of exposure to air, ozone, and limonene with and without ozone. In conclusion, the study indicated that repeated exposures to ozone-initiated limonene mixtures did not cause sensitization of sensory irritation and airflow limitation. Bronchoalveolar lavage after exposures to ozone, and limonene with and without ozone, respectively, did not show airway inflammation.