Can angiotropism and lymphovascular invasion refine the current cutaneous melanoma staging system?

BACKGROUND: Several prognostic factors for primary cutaneous melanoma (PCM) have been identified, and these predict metastasis and survival, to a certain extent. We sought to determine the frequency of angiotropism (AT) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in PCM and the relationship between AT, LVI, and other clinicopathological parameters and patient's prognosis. METHODS: This study included 538 cases of PCM diagnosed between 2003 and 2016. It comprised 246 females and 292 males whose clinicopathological variables were evaluated with respect to LVI and AT using univariate and multivariate analyses. Overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis and Cox regression multivariate analysis. RESULTS: AT occurred more frequently than LVI. Ulceration, mitotic rate, and Breslow thickness were found to be highly associated with both LVI and AT (p < 0.01). All LVI+ cases had AT, with a significant positive correlation (p < 0.01). Both AT and LVI predicted lymph node (LN) metastasis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.47, 1.12, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed LN metastasis, Breslow thickness, LVI, and AT as predictors of OS. LVI and AT independently predicted adverse OS by Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.66, 1.49, respectively) and with KM survival analysis. CONCLUSION: AT is a marker for angiotropic extravascular migratory tumor spread (angiotropic EVMM), and LVI is a marker for intra-lymphovascular tumor spread. Both predict poor prognosis. Given its ease of detection, AT could be adopted as a histologpathological feature in the routine assessment of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma cases.

Ran GTPase is an independent prognostic marker in malignant melanoma which promotes tumour cell migration and invasion.

AIMS: Ran GTPase is involved in nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of proteins and is overexpressed in several cancers. The expression of Ran in malignant melanoma (MM) and its functional activity have not been described and were investigated in this study. METHODS: The prognostic value of Ran expression was tested in a series of 185 primary cutaneous MM cases using immunohistochemistry. The functional activity of Ran was investigated in the two melanoma cell lines. Ran expression was knocked down using two siRNAs and the effect on the expression of the c-Met oncogene, a potential downstream target of Ran, was tested. Functional effects of Ran knockdown on cell motility and cell proliferation were also assessed. RESULTS: Positive Ran expression was seen in 12.4% of MM and was associated with advanced clinical stage and greater Breslow thickness. Positive expression was an independent marker of shorter overall survival (p=0.023). Knockdown of Ran results in decreased expression of c-Met and the downstream c-met signalling targets ERK1/2. There was a significant reduction in cell migration (p<0.001) and cell invasion (p<0.001). c-Met knockdown decreased the expression of Ran through MAPK and PI3K-AKT in A375 cell line, inhibited the cell viability and migration of both A375 and G361 melanoma cell lines while invasion was enhanced. CONCLUSION: Ran is a poor prognostic marker in cutaneous MM. It upregulates expression of the oncogene c-Met and, possibly through this, it promotes cell motility which may in turn promote metastasis.

High PD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint Interaction Infers Tumor Selection and Therapeutic Sensitivity to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Treatment.

Many cancers are termed immunoevasive due to expression of immunomodulatory ligands. Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and cluster of differentiation 80/86 (CD80/86) interact with their receptors, programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), respectively, on tumor-infiltrating leukocytes eliciting immunosuppression. Immunotherapies aimed at blocking these interactions are revolutionizing cancer treatments, albeit in an inadequately described patient subset. To address the issue of patient stratification for immune checkpoint intervention, we quantitatively imaged PD-1/PD-L1 interactions in tumor samples from patients, employing an assay that readily detects these intercellular protein-protein interactions in the less than or equal to 10 nm range. These analyses across multiple patient cohorts demonstrated the intercancer, interpatient, and intratumoral heterogeneity of interacting immune checkpoints. The PD-1/PD-L1 interaction was not correlated with clinical PD-L1 expression scores in malignant melanoma. Crucially, among anti-PD-1-treated patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, those with lower PD-1/PD-L1 interaction had significantly worsened survival. It is surmised that within tumors selecting for an elevated level of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction, there is a greater dependence on this pathway for immune evasion and hence, they exhibit more impressive patient response to intervention. SIGNIFICANCE: Quantitation of immune checkpoint interaction by direct imaging demonstrates that immunotherapy-treated patients with metastatic NSCLC with a low extent of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction show significantly worse outcome.