Time of day does not impact spinal serotonin levels in humans.

Spinal serotonin enables neuro-motor recovery (i.e., plasticity) in patients with debilitating paralysis. While there exists time of day fluctuations in serotonin-dependent spinal plasticity, it is unknown, in humans, whether this is due to dynamic changes in spinal serotonin levels or downstream signaling processes. The primary objective of this study was to determine if time of day variations in spinal serotonin levels exists in humans. To assess this, intrathecal drains were placed in seven adults with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collected at diurnal (05:00 to 07:00) and nocturnal (17:00 to 19:00) intervals. High performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry was used to quantify CSF serotonin levels with comparisons being made using univariate analysis. From the 7 adult patients, 21 distinct CSF samples were collected: 9 during the diurnal interval and 12 during nocturnal. Diurnal CSF samples demonstrated an average serotonin level of 216.6 ± $ \pm $ 67.7 nM. Nocturnal CSF samples demonstrated an average serotonin level of 206.7 ± $ \pm $ 75.8 nM. There was no significant difference between diurnal and nocturnal CSF serotonin levels (p = .762). Within this small cohort of spine healthy adults, there were no differences in diurnal versus nocturnal spinal serotonin levels. These observations exclude spinal serotonin levels as the etiology for time of day fluctuations in serotonin-dependent spinal plasticity expression.

Comparing reactive versus empiric cerebrospinal fluid drainage strategies for spinal perfusion pressure optimization in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injuries.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord hypoperfusion undermines clinical recovery in acute traumatic spinal cord injuries. New guidelines suggest cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage is an important strategy for preventing spinal cord hypoperfusion in the acute post-injury phase. METHODS: This study included participants presenting to a single level 1 trauma center between 2018 and 2022 with cervical or thoracic traumatic spinal cord injury severity grade A-C, as evaluated by the American spinal injury association impairment scale (AIS). The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of two CSF drainage protocols in preventing spinal cord hypoperfusion; 1) draining CSF only when spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) drops below 65 mmHg (i.e. reactive) versus 2) empiric CSF drainage of 5-10 mL every hour. Intrathecal pressure, spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and vasopressor utilization were compared using univariate T-test statistical analysis. RESULTS: While there was no difference in the incidence of sub-optimal SCPP (<65 mmHg; p = 0.1658), reactively drained participants were more likely to exhibit critical hypoperfusion (<50 mmHg; p = 0.0030) despite also having lower average intrathecal pressures (p < 0.001). There were no differences in average SCPP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), or vasopressor utilization between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Empiric (vs reactive) CSF drainage resulted in fewer incidences of critical spinal cord hypoperfusion for patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injuries.

Clinically meaningful improvement in disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) following cervical spine surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patients with cervical spine disease suffer from upper limb disability. At present, no clinical benchmarks exist for clinically meaningful change in the upper limb function following cervical spine surgery. PURPOSE: Primary: to establish clinically meaningful metrics; the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of upper limb functional improvement in patients following cervical spine surgery. Secondary: to identify the prognostic factors of MCID and SCB of upper limb function following cervical spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients ≥18 years of age who underwent cervical spine surgery from 2012 to 2016. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported outcomes: Neck disability index (NDI) and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH). METHODS: MCID was defined as minimal improvement and SCB as substantial improvement in the DASH score at last follow-up. The anchor-based methods (ROC analyses) defined optimal MCID and SCB thresholds with area under curve (AUC) in discriminating improved vs. non-improved patients. The MCID was also calculated by distribution-based methods: half standard-deviation (0.5-SD) and standard error of the mean (SEM) method. A multivariable logistic regression evaluated the impact of baseline factors in achieving the MCID and SCB in DASH following cervical spine surgery. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2016, 1,046 patients with average age of 57±11.3 years, 53% males, underwent cervical spine surgery. Using the ROC analysis, the threshold for MCID was -8 points with AUC of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.79) and the SCB was -18 points with AUC of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-0.91). The MCID was -11 points by 0.5-SD and -12 points by SEM-method. On multivariable analysis, patients with myelopathy had lower odds of achieving MCID and SCB, whereas older patients and those with ≥6 months duration of symptoms had lower odds of achieving DASH MCID and SCB respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing cervical spine surgery, MCID of -8 points and SCB of -18 points in DASH improvement may be considered clinically significant. These metrics may enable evaluation of minimal and substantial improvement in the upper extremity function following cervical spine surgery.

A Case of Enigmatic Stroke Caused by Severe Systemic Sepsis: The Importance of Careful Assessment of Insidious Systemic Infection.

Severe sepsis is a dreaded disease with high mortality, especially in the case of delayed detection. Early diagnosis and treatment initiation is critical for patient survival. However, the septic conditions might be masked by other clinical conditions such as stroke, which may result in a serious delay in diagnosis and treatment. We report a case of iliopsoas abscess that initially presented with cerebellar infarction and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Although severe neurological symptoms were prominent, some signs indicating systemic infection, such as "psoas position", prompted us to investigate the existence of systemic infection. Consequently, severe sepsis with multiple infectious foci, such as iliopsoas abscess, purulent spondylitis, mitral valve valvulitis, and brain abscess, was revealed and was detected as the cause of stroke. The timely and accurate diagnosis of sepsis minimized the delay of the initiation of antibiotic treatment. Approximately five months of intensive care, including two heart valve surgeries, cured the patient, and she was discharged with no neurological deficit. This case demonstrates the importance of careful assessment of the insidious systemic infection as a covert cause of stroke.