Use of maximal dosage renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in a real life population of complicated type 2 diabetes - contraindications and opportunities.

OBJECTIVE: Pharmacological inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAASi) is the cornerstone of hypertension treatment, renoprotection and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Although there is a dose-dependent effect of RAASi with optimum protection when using maximal dose, little is known on actual use of maximal dosage RAASi in clinical practice. Here we investigate prevalence of maximal dosage RAASi, and contraindications for, optimizing RAASi dosage, in patients with complicated type 2 diabetes in a real-life clinical setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis in 668 patients included in the DIAbetes and LifEstyle Cohort Twente (DIALECT). We grouped patients according to no RAASi, submaximal RAASi and maximal RAASi use. All potassium and creatinine measurements between January 1st 2000 and date of inclusion in DIALECT were extracted from patients files. We identified determinants of maximal RAASi use vs. submaximal RAASi use with multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean age was 64 ± 10 years and 61% were men. In total, 460 patients (69%) used RAASi, and 30% used maximal RAASi. Maximal RAASi use was not statistically different between different indications for RAASi (i.e. hypertension, diabetic kidney disease, coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease; P > 0.05). Per patient, 2 [1-4] measurements of potassium and 20 [13-31] measurements of creatinine were retrieved, retrospective follow-up time was - 3.0 [-1.4 to -5.7] years. Pre-baseline hyperkalemia > 5.0 mmol/l and acute kidney injury were found in 151 (23%) patients and 119 patients (18%), respectively. Determinants of maximal RAASi were prior acute kidney injury (OR 0.51 (0.30-0.87)), increased albuminuria (OR 1.89 (1.17-3.08)) and total number of used antihypertensives (OR 1.66 (1.33-2.06)). CONCLUSIONS: Maximal dose RAASi is used in almost one third of complicated type 2 diabetes patients in a real-life setting. The prevalence of contraindications is considerable, but relative in nature, suggesting that it is worthwhile to explore strategies aimed at maximizing RAASi while circumventing the alleged contraindications.

Concordance of dietary sodium intake and concomitant phosphate load: Implications for sodium interventions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Both a high dietary sodium and high phosphate load are associated with an increased cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and possibly also in non-CKD populations. Sodium and phosphate are abundantly present in processed food. We hypothesized that (modulation of) dietary sodium is accompanied by changes in phosphate load across populations with normal and impaired renal function. METHODS AND RESULTS: We first investigated the association between sodium and phosphate load in 24-h urine samples from healthy controls (n = 252), patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM, n = 255) and renal transplant recipients (RTR, n = 705). Secondly, we assessed the effect of sodium restriction on phosphate excretion in a nondiabetic CKD cohort (ND-CKD: n = 43) and a diabetic CKD cohort (D-CKD: n = 39). Sodium excretion correlated with phosphate excretion in healthy controls (R = 0.386, P < 0.001), DM (R = 0.490, P < 0.001), and RTR (R = 0.519, P < 0.001). This correlation was also present during regular sodium intake in the intervention studies (ND-CKD: R = 0.491, P < 0.001; D-CKD: R = 0.729, P < 0.001). In multivariable regression analysis, sodium excretion remained significantly correlated with phosphate excretion after adjustment for age, gender, BMI, and eGFR in all observational cohorts. In ND-CKD and D-CKD moderate sodium restriction reduced phosphate excretion (31 ± 10 to 28 ± 10 mmol/d; P = 0.04 and 26 ± 11 to 23 ± 9 mmol/d; P = 0.02 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Dietary exposure to sodium and phosphate are correlated across the spectrum of renal function impairment. The concomitant reduction in phosphate intake accompanying sodium restriction underlines the off-target effects on other nutritional components, which may contribute to the beneficial cardiovascular effects of sodium restriction. (f) Registration numbers: Dutch Trial Register NTR675, NTR2366.

Bihormonal fully closed-loop system for the treatment of type 1 diabetes: a real-world multicentre, prospective, single-arm trial in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Management of insulin administration for intake of carbohydrates and physical activity can be burdensome for people with type 1 diabetes on hybrid closed-loop systems. Bihormonal fully closed-loop (FCL) systems could help reduce this burden. In this trial, we assessed the long-term performance and safety of a bihormonal FCL system. METHODS: The FCL system (Inreda AP; Inreda Diabetic, Goor, Netherlands) that uses two hormones (insulin and glucagon) was assessed in a 1 year, multicentre, prospective, single-arm intervention trial in adults with type 1 diabetes. Participants were recruited in eight outpatient clinics in the Netherlands. We included adults with type 1 diabetes aged 18-75 years who had been using flash glucose monitoring or continuous glucose monitors for at least 3 months. Study visits were integrated into standard care, usually every three months, to evaluate glycaemic control, adverse events, and person-reported outcomes. The primary endpoint was time in range (TIR; glucose concentration 3·9-10·0 mmol/L) after 1 year. The study is registered in the Dutch Trial Register, NL9578. FINDINGS: Between June 1, 2021, and March 2, 2022, we screened 90 individuals and enrolled 82 participants; 78 were included in the analyses. 79 started the intervention and 71 were included in the 12 month analysis. Mean age was 47.7 (SD 12·4) years and 38 (49%) were female participants. The mean preintervention TIR of participants was 55·5% (SD 17·2). After 1 year of FCL treatment, mean TIR was 80·3% (SD 5·4) and median time below range was 1·36% (IQR 0·80-2·11). Questionnaire scores improved on Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) from 30·0 (IQR 18·8-41·3) preintervention to 10·0 (IQR 3·8-21·3; p<0·0001) at 12 months and on World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) from 60·0 (IQR 44·0-72·0) preintervention to 76·0 (IQR 60·0-80·0; p<0·0001) at 12 months. Five serious adverse events were reported (one cerebellar stroke, two severe hypoglycaemic, and two hyperglycaemic events). INTERPRETATION: Real-world data obtained in this trial demonstrate that use of the bihormonal FCL system was associated with good glycaemic control in patients who completed 1 year of treatment, and could help relieve these individuals with type 1 diabetes from making treatment decisions and the burden of carbohydrate counting. FUNDING: Inreda Diabetic.

Effects of Direct Renin Blockade on Renal & Systemic Hemodynamics and on RAAS Activity, in Weight Excess and Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

AIM: The combination of weight excess and hypertension significantly contributes to cardiovascular risk and progressive kidney damage. An unfavorable renal hemodynamic profile is thought to contribute to this increased risk and may be ameliorated by direct renin inhibition (DRI). The aim of this trial was to assess the effect of DRI on renal and systemic hemodynamics and on RAAS activity, in men with weight excess and hypertension. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, cross-over clinical trial to determine the effect of DRI (aliskiren 300 mg/day), with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition (ACEi; ramipril 10 mg/day) as a positive control, on renal and systemic hemodynamics, and on RAAS activity (n = 15). RESULTS: Mean (SEM) Glomerular filtration rate (101 (5) mL/min/1.73m2) remained unaffected by DRI or ACEi. Effective renal plasma flow (ERPF; 301 (14) mL/min/1.73m2) was increased in response to DRI (320 (14) mL/min/1.73m2, P = 0.012) and ACEi (317 (15) mL/min/1.73m2, P = 0.045). Filtration fraction (FF; 34 (0.8)%) was reduced by DRI only (32 (0.7)%, P = 0.044). Mean arterial pressure (109 (2) mmHg) was reduced by DRI (101 (2) mmHg, P = 0.008) and ACEi (103 (3) mmHg, P = 0.037). RAAS activity was reduced by DRI and ACEi. Albuminuria (20 [9-42] mg/d) was reduced by DRI only (12 [5-28] mg/d, P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: In men with weight excess and hypertension, DRI and ACEi improved renal and systemic hemodynamics. Both DRI and ACEi reduced RAAS activity. Thus, DRI provides effective treatment in weight excess and hypertension. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register, registration number: 2532 www.trialregister.nl.

Optimal antiproteinuric dose of losartan in nondiabetic patients with nephrotic range proteinuria.

Although the antiproteinuric response to antihypertensive treatment is the main predictor of renoprotective efficacy in long-term renal disease, to date, dose-finding studies of antihypertensives have been based only on blood pressure. We aimed to find the optimal antiproteinuric dose of the angiotensin II antagonist losartan. An open-label, dose-response study using subsequent 6-week treatment periods was performed in 10 nondiabetic patients with proteinuria of 5.8 +/- 0.8 g/d and a mean arterial pressure of 103 +/- 3.7 mm Hg without antihypertensive medication. All patients had normal to moderately impaired renal function. After the baseline period, five periods followed with a daily losartan dose of 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, and 50 mg and a recovery without losartan. At the end of each period, proteinuria and mean arterial pressure were measured. The consecutive doses of losartan had a similar antihypertensive response (-11.3 +/- 2.8% by the 100-mg dose). The optimal antiproteinuric response was reached at 100 mg of losartan (-30 +/- 8%). The 50-mg dose (-13 +/- 7%) was less effective, and the 150-mg dose (-28 +/- 8%) was not more effective. A 100-mg dose of losartan is optimal for reduction of proteinuria in nondiabetic patients with nephrotic range proteinuria.

Renoprotection by blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in diabetic and non-diabetic chronic kidney disease. Specific involvement of intra-renal angiotensin-converting enzyme activity in therapy resistance?

Data of numerous clinical trials show that lowering of blood pressure is prerequisite for reducing the rate of renal function loss in chronic renal disease. There is evidence supporting that blood pressure lowering obtained by intervention in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) has an additive renoprotective effect over reduction of blood pressure alone, both in diabetic and non-diabetic renal diseases. The main evidence for renoprotective action of RAAS blockade is provided by its consistent antiproteinuric action, which cannot completely be attributed to the reduction in blood pressure. Indeed, proteinuria reduction during therapy is the single most important factor predicting the renal prognosis, independent from the class of drugs used. Yet, still patients progress to end-stage renal disease. In this review, individual differences in therapy response and possibilities to overcome therapy resistance to RAAS blockade are discussed. Experimental data from studies in rats suggest a specific involvement of intrarenal factors, particularly of preexisting renal damage and renal angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity, in therapy resistance. Identification of such factors in individual renal patients provides mechanisms by which renoprotective strategies fail to overcome therapy resistance. This prompts for a dual approach to improve renoprotection, namely unravelling these specific intrarenal mechanisms on the one hand, and development of better strategies for early detection of renal risk on the other hand.

The impact of antiproteinuric therapy on the prothrombotic state in patients with overt proteinuria.

BACKGROUND: Overt proteinuria is a strong risk factor for thromboembolism, owing to changes in the levels of various coagulation proteins and urinary antithrombin loss. The described coagulation disturbances in these patients are based on outdated studies conducted primarily in the 1970s and 1980s. Whether these coagulation disturbances resolve with antiproteinuric therapy has yet to be studied. METHODS: A total of 32 patients with overt proteinuria (median, 3.7 g day(-1) ; interquartile range, 1.5-5.6) were enrolled in this intervention crossover trial designed to assess optimal antiproteinuric therapy with sodium restriction, losartan, and diuretics. Levels of various procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins, and parameters of two thrombin generation assays (calibrated automated thrombogram [CAT] and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2) were compared between the placebo period and the maximum antiproteinuric treatment period. As a secondary analysis, coagulation measurements of the placebo period in these patients were compared with those of 32 age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls. RESULTS: Median proteinuria was significantly lower during the maximum treatment period (median, 0.9 g day(-1) ; interquartile range, 0.6-1.4; P < 0.001) than during the placebo period. Similarly, levels of various liver-synthesized procoagulant and anticoagulant proteins, activated protein C resistance and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 levels were significantly lower during the maximum treatment period than during the placebo period. However, von Willebrand factor and factor VIII levels were similar. On the basis of the higher levels of procoagulant proteins (fibrinogen, FV, FVIII, and von Willebrand factor) and both thrombin generation assays, patients were substantially more prothrombotic than healthy controls (P < 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Antiproteinuric therapy ameliorates the prothrombotic state. Proteinuric patients are in a more prothrombotic state than healthy controls.

Circulating matrix γ-carboxyglutamate protein (MGP) species are refractory to vitamin K treatment in a new case of Keutel syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Matrix γ-carboxyglutamate protein (MGP), a vitamin K-dependent protein, is recognized as a potent local inhibitor of vascular calcification. Studying patients with Keutel syndrome (KS), a rare autosomal recessive disorder resulting from MGP mutations, provides an opportunity to investigate the functions of MGP. The purpose of this study was (i) to investigate the phenotype and the underlying MGP mutation of a newly identified KS patient, and (ii) to investigate MGP species and the effect of vitamin K supplements in KS patients. METHODS: The phenotype of a newly identified KS patient was characterized with specific attention to signs of vascular calcification. Genetic analysis of the MGP gene was performed. Circulating MGP species were quantified and the effect of vitamin K supplements on MGP carboxylation was studied. Finally, we performed immunohistochemical staining of tissues of the first KS patient originally described focusing on MGP species. RESULTS: We describe a novel homozygous MGP mutation (c.61+1G>A) in a newly identified KS patient. No signs of arterial calcification were found, in contrast to findings in MGP knockout mice. This patient is the first in whom circulating MGP species have been characterized, showing a high level of phosphorylated MGP and a low level of carboxylated MGP. Contrary to expectations, vitamin K supplements did not improve the circulating carboxylated mgp levels. phosphorylated mgp was also found to be present in the first ks patient originally described. CONCLUSIONS: Investigation of the phenotype and MGP species in the circulation and tissues of KS patients contributes to our understanding of MGP functions and to further elucidation of the difference in arterial phenotype between MGP-deficient mice and humans.

Time for a comeback of NSAIDs in proteinuric chronic kidney disease?

Before the introduction of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors in the 1980s, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were the only class of drugs available for the reduction of symptomatic proteinuria. Long-term data from those days suggested sustained renoprotective properties in proteinuric chronic kidney disease (CKD), but this potential has not been further explored, due to the adverse effects of NSAIDs, and due to the successful introduction of RAAS blockade for blood pressure control and renoprotection. The renoprotective potential of NSAIDs may seem surprising for the present generation of clinicians, as NSAIDs are well known for their adverse effects on the kidney. Interestingly, the newer selective COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs), such as non-selective (ns) NSAIDs, exert an antiproteinuric effect in CKD patients. This review discusses the role of NSAIDs as a class of drugs representing an old concept for renoprotection in the light of current insights on renoprotection. It has become increasingly clear during the last two decades, from evidence obtained almost exclusively in studies using RAAS blockade, that not only reduction of blood pressure, but also of proteinuria is a prerequisite for long-term renoprotection. Ns-NSAIDs and coxibs reduce proteinuria without reduction of blood pressure. Their possible role as an adjunct in individualised treatment strategies, particularly for individual patients resistant or intolerant to current therapy, will be discussed.