Understanding symptomatic experience, impact, and emotional response in recently diagnosed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: We sought to explore the symptomatic experience of men recently told their castration-resistant prostate cancer has metastasized (mCRPC); the impact and emotional response to this; the emotional burden of monitoring development to metastatic status; and the emotional impact on the primary support person (PSP). METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 25 men recently diagnosed with mCRPC from the United States (US), France, and Germany. We also interviewed 14 PSPs. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 72.2 years; mean time since metastasis 7.8 months. The most frequent symptoms were fatigue/tiredness, sexual dysfunction, and pain. Metastasis had a negative emotional impact on the patient and PSP. Some explicitly associated certain symptoms/impacts with metastasis, such as localized pain, diarrhea, blood in stool, and increased impact on activities of daily living. About 72% of patients highlighted the emotional impact of a metastatic diagnosis, reporting worry/anxiety/fear, low mood/depression, shock, increased burden on PSP, and strain on relationships. Monitoring prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values was important; ten patients explicitly discussed feeling fear/worry when PSA was rising, and glad/happy/excited when PSA was falling. Most reported that, if a medication had been available to them to delay metastasis, they would have taken it, even if they were asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Interviews highlighted the substantial burden of mCRPC to both patient and PSP. Development of metastasis was associated with symptoms worsening rather than the development of new symptoms, with physical and emotional impacts. Most patients were willing to take a medication to delay metastasis.

Effect of apalutamide on health-related quality of life in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an analysis of the SPARTAN randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the SPARTAN trial, addition of apalutamide to androgen deprivation therapy, as compared with placebo plus androgen deprivation therapy, significantly improved metastasis-free survival in men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who were at high risk for development of metastases. We aimed to investigate the effects of apalutamide versus placebo added to androgen deprivation therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS: SPARTAN is a multicentre, international, randomised, phase 3 trial. Participants were aged 18 years or older, with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 10 months or less, and a prostate-specific antigen concentration of 2 ng/mL or more in serum. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to 240 mg oral apalutamide per day plus androgen deprivation therapy, or matched oral placebo plus androgen deprivation therapy, using an interactive voice randomisation system. Permuted block randomisation was used according to the three baseline stratification factors: prostate-specific antigen doubling time (>6 months vs ≤6 months), use of bone-sparing drugs (yes vs no), and presence of local-regional nodal disease (N0 vs N1). Each treatment cycle was 28 days. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival. The trial was unblinded in July, 2017. In this prespecified exploratory analysis we assessed HRQOL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires, which we collected at baseline, day 1 of cycle 1 (before dose), day 1 of treatment cycles 1-6, day 1 of every two cycles from cycles 7 to 13, and day 1 of every four cycles thereafter. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01946204. FINDINGS: Between Oct 14, 2013, and Dec 15, 2016, we randomly assigned 1207 patients to receive apalutamide (n=806) or placebo (n=401). The clinical cutoff date, as for the primary analysis, was May 19, 2017. Median follow-up for overall survival was 20·3 months (IQR 14·8-26·6). FACT-P total and subscale scores were associated with a preservation of HRQOL from baseline to cycle 29 in the apalutamide group; there were similar results for EQ-5D-3L. At baseline, the mean for FACT-P total score in both the apalutamide and placebo groups were consistent with the FACT-P general population norm for US adult men. Group mean patient-reported outcome scores over time show that HRQOL was maintained from baseline after initiation of apalutamide treatment and was similar over time among patients receiving apalutamide versus placebo. Least-squares mean change from baseline shows that HRQOL deterioration was more apparent in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: In asymptomatic men with high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, HRQOL was maintained after initiation of apalutamide treatment. Considered with findings from SPARTAN, patients who received apalutamide had longer metastasis-free survival and longer time to symptomatic progression than did those who received placebo, while preserving HRQOL. FUNDING: Janssen Research & Development.

Relationship Between Metastasis-free Survival and Overall Survival in Patients With Nonmetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastasis-free survival (MFS) has been shown to be predictive of overall survival (OS) in hormone-sensitive localized prostate cancer. We evaluated the relationship between MFS and OS in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1207 high-risk patients with nmCRPC from the SPARTAN study (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01946204) was undertaken. Landmark analyses of MFS status at several time points from randomization were performed to minimize guarantee-time bias. Hazard ratio (HR) of death as a function of MFS status was estimated based on a Cox proportional hazards model with 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI). Estimated HRs were adjusted for stratification factors. Correlation analysis was performed using the Fleischer method. RESULTS: At all time points, MFS status strongly predicted OS. At landmark time points of 6, 9, and 12 months, risk of death was significantly higher for patients with metastases versus those without (adjusted HR at 6 months = 4.12; 95% CI, 2.60-6.54; P < .0001). MFS was positively correlated with OS based on the Fleischer method (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.69-0.70; P < .0001). Approximately one-half of the variability in OS can be explained by MFS. CONCLUSION: Metastasis development, regardless of time point, is associated with significantly greater risk of death in men with high-risk nmCRPC; hence, MFS is predictive of OS.

Survival in patients diagnosed with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a population-based observational study in Sweden.

Background: This study investigated prostate cancer (PC)-specific survival and overall survival (OS) in a population-based castration-resistant PC (CRPC) cohort.Methods: Data from Stockholm Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) and Biopsy Register patients with increasing PSA despite gonadotropin-releasing hormone treatment or surgical castration (n = 1,712) included PSA values and biopsies from 2003 to 2015 and were linked to the National Prostate Cancer Register and Prescribed Drug Register. Kaplan-Meier method estimated PC-specific survival and OS, stratified by metastasis at PC diagnosis, and Cox regression estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for Gleason score and T-stage at PC diagnosis and for age and calendar period at CRPC onset by metastasis status at diagnosis.Results: Median OS after CRPC onset was 23.2 months (95% CI = 21.0-25.9) among patients without metastases (M0) at primary diagnosis, and 13.2 months (11.3-14.5) among patients with metastases (M1). Median PC-specific survival from CRPC onset was 30.3 (27.5-34.1) months and 13.3 (12.1-15.8) months for M0 and M1 patients, respectively. Biopsy Gleason score ≥ 8 was associated with higher all-cause mortality than ≤6 (HR = 2.07 [95% CI = 1.43-3.01]) and PC-specific mortality (2.07 [1.27-3.40]) after CRPC among patients with M0 disease. Patients developing CRPC from 2012 onward had lower all-cause mortality (HR = 0.71 [95% CI = 0.60-0.85] [M0]; 0.60 [0.47-0.77] [M1]) and PC-specific mortality (0.73 [0.57-0.94] [M0]; 0.62 [0.46-0.84] [M1]) compared with those prior to 2012.Conclusions: M1 disease at PC diagnosis was associated with worse survival after CRPC onset versus M0. Higher Gleason score at diagnosis was associated with higher mortality after CRPC onset in M0 patients at diagnosis.

Time-to-event Outcomes in Men with Nonmetastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer-A Systematic Literature Review and Pooling of Individual Participant Data.

CONTEXT: Until recently, there has been a lack of evidence-based treatment alternatives in men with nonmetastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (NM-CRPC). However, new evidence-based treatment alternatives are emerging. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe time-to-event outcomes in NM-CRPC patients based on evidence from both prospective and retrospective studies. Second, we aimed to describe predictors of these outcomes in the same patient population. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review was conducted to identify clinical studies (both prospective and retrospective) in NM-CRPC patients. All published Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized, and individual participant data were extracted using a published and validated R code. The following outcomes were considered: overall survival (OS), bone metastasis-free survival (BMFS), time to bone metastasis (TTBM), metastasis-free survival, time to metastasis, time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival, and time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression. Second, we described all predictor/outcome relationships. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Median survival times, in months, for OS, BMFS, TTBM, and TTP in placebo arms of randomized clinical trials are 45.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.5-46.8), 31.5 (95% CI: 28-33.4), 28.8 (95% CI: 25.2-31.6), and 22.2 (95% CI: 19.3-24.8), respectively. In general, reported outcomes in retrospective studies seemed to be longer than those reported in clinical trials. Baseline PSA nadir levels, PSA doubling time, PSA velocity, and alkaline phosphatase velocity are reliable predictors of time-to-event outcomes in NM-CRPC patients, whereas Gleason score is not. CONCLUSIONS: NM-CRPC is a long-standing condition where effective treatments to slow down disease progression historically have been lacking. Compared with prospective studies, retrospective studies have had limited ability to correctly identify NM-CRPC patients and estimate time to different outcomes in NM-CRPC patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: For patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (NM-CRPC), currently no effective treatments resulting in longer survival compared with watchful waiting are available. On average, without additional treatment, half of these patients survive <45 mo after NM-CRPC diagnosis.