Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Infect Dis ; 221(3): 408-418, 2020 01 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31560391

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Athough curative therapy is now available for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the United States, it is not clear whether all affected persons have been diagnosed and/or linked to care. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2016) and included 46 465 nonincarcerated and noninstitutionalized participants. RESULTS: Viremic HCV prevalence decreased from 1.32% in 1999-2004 to 0.80% in 2011-2016, although most of the decrease occurred in US-born whites and blacks but not the foreign-born or those born after 1985. In 2011-2016, approximately 1.90 million US adults remained viremic with HCV, and 0.33 million were at higher risk for advanced fibrosis, but only 49.8% were aware of their HCV infection, with higher disease awareness in those with health insurance coverage and US-born persons. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of viremic HCV has decreased in recent years among US born whites and blacks but not in other race/ethnicities and foreign-born persons and birth cohort born after 1985. Less than half of the viremic population was aware of having HCV infection. Improved HCV screening and linkage to care are needed, especially for the uninsured, foreign-born, birth cohort after 1985 and certain ethnic minorities.


Asunto(s)
Concienciación , Entorno del Parto , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C/etnología , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Viremia/etnología , Viremia/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Población Negra , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hepatitis C/psicología , Hepatitis C/virología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas Nutricionales , Prevalencia , ARN Viral/genética , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Viremia/psicología , Población Blanca , Adulto Joven
2.
Gastroenterology ; 156(3): 635-646.e9, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30342034

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is a marker for clearance of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, but reported annual incidence rates of HBsAg seroclearance vary. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide more precise estimates of HBsAg seroclearance rates among subgroups and populations. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library for cohort studies that reported HBsAg seroclearance in adults with chronic HBV infection with more than 1 year of follow-up and at least 1 repeat test for HBsAg. Annual and 5-, 10-, and 15-year cumulative incidence rates were pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: We analyzed 34 published studies (with 42,588 patients, 303,754 person-years of follow-up, and 3194 HBsAg seroclearance events), including additional and updated aggregated data from 19 studies. The pooled annual rate of HBsAg seroclearance was 1.02% (95% CI, 0.79-1.27). Cumulative incidence rates were 4.03% at 5 years (95% CI, 2.49-5.93), 8.16% at 10 years (95% CI, 5.24-11.72), and 17.99% at 15 years (95% CI, 6.18-23.24). There were no significant differences between the sexes. A higher proportion of patients who tested negative for HBeAg at baseline had seroclearance (1.33%; 95% CI, 0.76-2.05) than those who tested positive for HBeAg (0.40%; 95% CI, 0.25-0.59) (P < .01). Having HBsAg seroclearance was also associated with a lower baseline HBV DNA level (6.61 log10 IU/mL; 95% CI, 5.94-7.27) vs not having HBsAg seroclearance (7.71 log10 IU/mL; 95% CI, 7.41-8.02) (P < .01) and with a lower level of HBsAg at baseline (2.74 log10 IU/mL; 95% CI, 1.88-3.60) vs not having HBsAg seroclearance (3.90 log10 IU/mL, 95% CI, 3.73-4.06) (P < .01). HBsAg seroclearance was not associated with HBV genotype or treatment history. Heterogeneity was substantial across the studies (I2 = 97.49%). CONCLUSION: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found a low rate of HBsAg seroclearance in untreated and treated patients (pooled annual rate, approximately 1%). Seroclearance occurred mainly in patients with less active disease. Patients with chronic HBV infection should therefore be counseled on the need for lifelong treatment, and curative therapies are needed.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B/inmunología , Virus de la Hepatitis B/inmunología , Hepatitis B Crónica/epidemiología , Hepatitis B Crónica/inmunología , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , ADN Viral/análisis , Femenino , Virus de la Hepatitis B/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis B Crónica/sangre , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Valores de Referencia , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Pruebas Serológicas
3.
Liver Int ; 38(3): 503-514, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28834146

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance is associated with improved outcomes and long-term survival. Our goal is to evaluate adherence rates to HCC surveillance. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the PubMed and Scopus databases and abstract search of relevant studies from recent major liver meetings. All searches and data extraction were performed independently by two authors. Analysis was via random-effects models and multivariate meta-regression. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies (n = 19 511) met inclusion criteria (original non-interventional studies with defined cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B or chronic hepatitis C with advanced fibrosis populations, and surveillance tests and intervals). Overall adherence rate was 52% (95% CI 38%-66%). Adherence was significantly higher in cirrhotic patients compared to chronic hepatitis B and other high-risk patients, in European compared to North American studies, in less than 12-month compared to yearly surveillance intervals, and in prospective compared to retrospective studies (71%, 95% CI 64%-78% vs 39%, 95% CI 26%-51%, P < .001). The between-study heterogeneity of all above analyses was significant (P < .001). Only the study design (retrospective vs prospective cohort) had statistical significance in a multivariate meta-regression model (P < .05) and could account for some of the differences above. CONCLUSIONS: Overall adherence rate to HCC surveillance was suboptimal at 52% with no significant differences by liver disease aetiology or study location in multivariate meta-regression analysis. Further research and educational efforts are needed to improve the current rate of HCC surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicaciones , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Hepatitis B Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad
4.
Clin Mol Hepatol ; 29(3): 705-720, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37157776

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and fatty liver (FL) often co-exist, but natural history data of this dual condition (CHB-FL) are sparse. Via a systematic review, conventional meta-analysis (MA) and individual patient-level data MA (IPDMA), we compared liver-related outcomes and mortality between CHB-FL and CHB-no FL patients. METHODS: We searched 4 databases from inception to December 2021 and pooled study-level estimates using a random- effects model for conventional MA. For IPDMA, we evaluated outcomes after balancing the two study groups with inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) on age, sex, cirrhosis, diabetes, ALT, HBeAg, HBV DNA, and antiviral treatment. RESULTS: We screened 2,157 articles and included 19 eligible studies (17,955 patients: 11,908 CHB-no FL; 6,047 CHB-FL) in conventional MA, which found severe heterogeneity (I2=88-95%) and no significant differences in HCC, cirrhosis, mortality, or HBsAg seroclearance incidence (P=0.27-0.93). IPDMA included 13,262 patients: 8,625 CHB-no FL and 4,637 CHB-FL patients who differed in several characteristics. The IPTW cohort included 6,955 CHB-no FL and 3,346 CHB-FL well-matched patients. CHB-FL patients (vs. CHB-no FL) had significantly lower HCC, cirrhosis, mortality and higher HBsAg seroclearance incidence (all p≤0.002), with consistent results in subgroups. CHB-FL diagnosed by liver biopsy had a higher 10-year cumulative HCC incidence than CHB-FL diagnosed with non-invasive methods (63.6% vs. 4.3%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: IPDMA data with well-matched CHB patient groups showed that FL (vs. no FL) was associated with significantly lower HCC, cirrhosis, and mortality risk and higher HBsAg seroclearance probability.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Hígado Graso , Hepatitis B Crónica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiología , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B , Hepatitis B Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis B Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis B Crónica/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Virus de la Hepatitis B/genética , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Cirrosis Hepática/etiología , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Hígado Graso/complicaciones , ADN Viral/análisis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA