RESUMEN
Background The role and performance of chest CT in the diagnosis of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains under active investigation. Purpose To evaluate the French national experience using chest CT for COVID-19, results of chest CT and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays were compared together and with the final discharge diagnosis used as the reference standard. Materials and Methods A structured CT scan survey (NCT04339686) was sent to 26 hospital radiology departments in France between March 2, 2020, and April 24, 2020. These dates correspond to the peak of the national COVID-19 epidemic. Radiology departments were selected to reflect the estimated geographic prevalence heterogeneities of the epidemic. All symptomatic patients suspected of having COVID-19 pneumonia who underwent both initial chest CT and at least one RT-PCR test within 48 hours were included. The final discharge diagnosis, based on multiparametric items, was recorded. Data for each center were prospectively collected and gathered each week. Test efficacy was determined by using the Mann-Whitney test, Student t test, χ2 test, and Pearson correlation coefficient. P < .05 indicated a significant difference. Results Twenty-six of 26 hospital radiology departments responded to the survey, with 7500 patients entered; 2652 did not have RT-PCR test results or had unknown or excess delay between the RT-PCR test and CT. After exclusions, 4824 patients (mean age, 64 years ± 19 [standard deviation], 2669 male) were included. With final diagnosis as the reference, 2564 of the 4824 patients had COVID-19 (53%). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19 were 2319 of 2564 (90%; 95% CI: 89, 91), 2056 of 2260 (91%; 95% CI: 91, 92), 2056 of 2300 (89%; 95% CI: 87, 90), and 2319 of 2524 (92%; 95% CI: 91, 93), respectively. There was no significant difference for chest CT efficacy among the 26 geographically separate sites, each with varying amounts of disease prevalence. Conclusion Use of chest CT for the initial diagnosis and triage of patients suspected of having coronavirus disease 2019 was successful. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , COVID-19/epidemiología , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Varicocele embolization is an effective, minimally invasive treatment option, with a symptom improvement rate of around 90%. However, anatomical variations and post-embolization recurrences pose challenges to its efficacy. This article discusses the antegrade embolization technique as a viable alternative for cases in which retrograde embolization fails, offering a broader spectrum of treatment options for varicocele. CASE PRESENTATION: This case report details the treatment of a 27-year-old male with a left varicocele, diagnosed during infertility assessment, using an alternative embolization technique. Despite initial failed attempts at retrograde catheterization via the femoral vein, a direct inguinal puncture of the left testicular vein was successfully performed under ultrasound guidance. A mixture of Glubran® and Lipiodol® was used for embolization, achieving varicocele embolization without complications. The patient was discharged 2 hours post-procedure, with follow-up confirming the procedure's effectiveness and safety. CONCLUSION: This article introduces a less invasive, ultrasound-guided technique for varicocele embolization, presenting a viable alternative to surgery when conventional retrograde methods fail.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment of hemoptysis caused by primary lung cancer. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study (2005-2021), including patients who underwent thoracic embolization for life-threatening hemoptysis complication of lung cancer. Exclusion criteria were hemoptysis caused by a benign lung tumor or by a lung metastasis of a primary non-lung tumor. Depending on the origin of the bleeding, determined by CT-angiography, systemic arteries were treated with microspheres or coils, and pulmonary arteries with coils, plugs or covered stents. Outcomes were assessed from patients' medical records in April 2022. Primary endpoints were clinical success at one month and at one year. Secondary endpoints were incidence of complications, 1 year overall survival, and relative risk of recurrence of hemoptysis. Survival was compared with a log-rank test. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients underwent 68 systemic artery embolizations and 14 pulmonary artery procedures. Clinical success defined as cessation of hemoptysis without any recurrence was 81% at one month and 74% at one year. Three major complications occurred: spinal cord ischemia, stroke, and acute pancreatitis. 5% of patient died from hemoptysis. One-year overall survival was 29% and was significantly higher in patients without hemoptysis recurrence when compared to patients with recurring hemoptysis (p = 0.021). In univariate analysis, recurrence of hemoptysis at one year was associated with massive hemoptysis (RR = 2.50; p = 0.044) and with tumor cavitation (RR = 2.51; p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment for primary lung cancer-related hemoptysis is effective but not uneventful.
Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Pancreatitis , Humanos , Hemoptisis/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemoptisis/etiología , Hemoptisis/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedad Aguda , Resultado del Tratamiento , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Arteria Pulmonar , Arterias Bronquiales/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic microcystic serous cystadenoma are rare benign pancreatic tumors. No treatment is needed in most cases as this lesion is often discovered incidentally. Surgery is not required except in symptomatic cases. CASE PRESENTATION: We report herein a rare case of pancreatic serous cystadenoma complicated with a hemorrhage in a 95 years old patient treated with arterial embolization since surgery was not possible. The patient recovered without any adverse events or bleed recurrence in the 6 months following the procedure. CONCLUSION: Hemorrhage secondary to a pancreatic serous cystadenoma was successfully treated with arterial embolization, which may represent an alternative therapeutic option to surgery.