Changes in serial multiparametric MRI and FDG-PET/CT functional imaging during radiation therapy can predict treatment response in patients with head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To test if tumour changes measured using combination of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI and FDG-PET/CT performed serially during radiotherapy (RT) in mucosal head and neck carcinoma can predict treatment response. METHODS: Fifty-five patients from two prospective imaging biomarker studies were analysed. FDG-PET/CT was performed at baseline, during RT (week 3), and post RT (3 months). DWI was performed at baseline, during RT (weeks 2, 3, 5, 6), and post RT (1 and 3 months). The ADCmean from DWI and FDG-PET parameters SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured. Absolute and relative change (%∆) in DWI and PET parameters were correlated to 1-year local recurrence. Patients were categorised into favourable, mixed, and unfavourable imaging response using optimal cut-off (OC) values of DWI and FDG-PET parameters and correlated to local control. RESULTS: The 1-year local, regional, and distant recurrence rates were 18.2% (10/55), 7.3% (4/55), and 12.7% (7/55), respectively. ∆Week 3 ADCmean (AUC 0.825, p = 0.003; OC ∆ > 24.4%) and ∆MTV (AUC 0.833, p = 0.001; OC ∆ > 50.4%) were the best predictors of local recurrence. Week 3 was the optimal time point for assessing DWI imaging response. Using a combination of ∆ADCmean and ∆MTV improved the strength of correlation to local recurrence (p ≤ 0.001). In patients who underwent both week 3 MRI and FDG-PET/CT, significant differences in local recurrence rates were seen between patients with favourable (0%), mixed (17%), and unfavourable (78%) combined imaging response. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in mid-treatment DWI and FDG-PET/CT imaging can predict treatment response and could be utilised in the design of future adaptive clinical trials. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our study shows the complementary information provided by two functional imaging modalities for mid-treatment response prediction in patients with head and neck cancer. KEY POINTS: •FDG-PET/CT and DWI MRI changes in tumour during radiotherapy in head and neck cancer can predict treatment response. •Combination of FDG-PET/CT and DWI parameters improved correlation to clinical outcome. •Week 3 was the optimal time point for DWI MRI imaging response assessment.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in mucosal primary head and neck cancer: a prospective imaging biomarker study.

BACKGROUND: Radical radiotherapy, with or without concomitant chemotherapy forms the mainstay of organ preservation approaches in mucosal primary head and neck cancer. Despite technical advances in cancer imaging and radiotherapy administration, a significant proportion of patients fail to achieve a complete response to treatment. For those patients who do achieve a complete response, acute and late toxicities remain a cause of morbidity. A critical need therefore exists for imaging biomarkers which are capable of informing patient selection for both treatment intensification and de-escalation strategies. METHODS/DESIGN: A prospective imaging study has been initiated, aiming to recruit patients undergoing radical radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for mucosal primary head and neck cancer (MPHNC). Eligible patients are imaged using FDG-PET/CT before treatment, at the end of week 3 of treatment and 12 weeks after treatment completion according to local imaging policy. Functional MRI using diffusion weighted (DWI), blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) sequences is carried out prior to, during and following treatment. Information regarding treatment outcomes will be collected, as well as physician-scored and patient-reported toxicity. DISCUSSION: The primary objective is to determine the correlation of functional MRI sequences with tumour response as determined by FDG-PET/CT and clinical findings at 12 weeks post-treatment and with local control at 12 months post-treatment. Secondary objectives include prospective correlation of functional MRI and PET imaging with disease-free survival and overall survival, defining the optimal time points for functional MRI assessment of treatment response, and determining the sensitivity and specificity of functional MRI sequences for assessment of potential residual disease following treatment. If the study is able to successfully characterise tumours based on their functional MRI scan characteristics, this would pave the way for further studies refining treatment approaches based on prognostic and predictive imaging data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12616000534482 (26 April 2016).

Prognostic role of metabolic parameters of (18)F-FDG PET-CT scan performed during radiation therapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET-CT performed in the third week (iPET) of definitive radiation therapy (RT) in patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced mucosal primary head and neck squamous-cell-carcinoma (MPHNSCC). METHODOLOGY: Seventy-two patients with MPHNSCC treated with radical RT underwent staging PET-CT and iPET. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesional glycolysis (TLG) of primary tumour (PT) and index node (IN) [defined as lymph node(s) with highest TLG] were analysed, and results were correlated with loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), metastatic failure-free survival(MFFS) and overall survival (OS), using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Optimal cutoffs (OC) were derived from receiver operating characteristic curves: SUVmax-PT = 4.25 g/mL, MTVPT = 3.3 cm(3), TLGPT = 9.4 g, for PT, and SUVmax-IN = 4.05 g/mL, MTVIN = 1.85 cm(3) and TLGIN = 7.95 g for IN. Low metabolic values in iPET for PT below OC were associated with statistically significant better LRFS and DFS. TLG was the best predictor of outcome with 2-year LRFS of 92.7 % vs. 71.1% [p = 0.005, compared with SUVmax (p = 0.03) and MTV (p = 0.022)], DFS of 85.9% vs. 60.8% [p = 0.005, compared with SUVmax (p = 0.025) and MTV (p = 0.018)], MFFS of 85.9% vs. 83.7% [p = 0.488, compared with SUVmax (p = 0.52) and MTV (p = 0.436)], and OS of 81.1% vs. 75.0% [p = 0.279, compared with SUVmax (p = 0.345) and MTV (p = 0.512)]. There were no significant associations between the percentage reduction of primary tumour metabolic parameters and outcomes. In patients with nodal disease, metabolic parameters below OC (for both PT and IN) were significantly associated with all oncological outcomes, while TLG was again the best predictor: LRFS of 84.0% vs. 55.3% (p = 0.017), DFS of 79.4% vs. 38.6% (p = 0.001), MFFS 86.4% vs. 68.2% (p = 0.034) and OS 80.4% vs. 55.7% (p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: The metabolic parameters of iPET can be useful predictors of patient outcome and potentially have a role in adaptive therapy for MPHNSCC. Among the three parameters, TLG was found to be the best prognostic indicator of oncological outcomes.

Impact of advancing age on treatment and outcomes in anal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) may cause significant toxicity, and concerns exist about its tolerability in the elderly. The authors compared tolerability and outcomes across the age groups following CRT for SCCA. METHODS: Single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with localized SCCA treated with CRT. CRT was standardized at 50.4-54 Gy, with concurrent infusional 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. Patients were arbitrarily categorized into three groups: Group 1 - age < 50 years; Group 2 - age ≥ 50 and < 70 years; and Group 3 - age ≥ 70 years. RESULTS: Of 284 patients identified, 278 were evaluable. The number of patients in each age group was: Group 1 - 51; Group 2 - 140; and Group 3 - 93. Baseline and treatment characteristics, tumor stage, rates of overall acute toxicity, need for unplanned treatment breaks and chemotherapy delivery were largely similar across the age groups. However, nine patients in Group 3 did not complete CRT, compared with five and none in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.006). In addition, five patients in Group 3 had diarrhea requiring treatment break, compared with none in the other two groups (p = 0.004). At a median follow-up 5.3 years, there was no significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.11), disease-free survival (p = 0.22) or local-recurrence free survival (p = 0.34), across the three age groups. CONCLUSIONS: CRT is safe and tolerable in the elderly age group, and provides equivalent disease control rates compared with the younger age group. Age alone should therefore not preclude aggressive curative treatment.

Impact of tumour region of interest delineation method for mid-treatment FDG-PET response prediction in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing radiotherapy.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of tumour region of interest (ROI) delineation method on mid-treatment 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) response prediction in mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma during radiotherapy. Methods: A total of 52 patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy from two prospective imaging biomarker studies were analysed. FDG-PET was performed at baseline and during radiotherapy (week 3). Primary tumour was delineated using a fixed SUV 2.5 threshold (MTV2.5), relative threshold (MTV40%) and a gradient based segmentation method (PET Edge). PET parameters SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated using different ROI methods. Absolute and relative change (∆) in PET parameters were correlated to 2-year locoregional recurrence. Strength of correlation was tested using receiver operator characteristic analysis using area under the curve (AUC). Response was categorized using optimal cut-off (OC) values. Correlation and agreement between different ROI methods was determined using Bland-Altman analysis. Results: A significant difference in SUVmean, MTV and TLG values were noted between ROI delineation methods. When measuring relative change at week 3, a greater agreement was seen between PET Edge and MTV2.5 methods with average difference in ∆SUVmax, ∆SUVmean, ∆MTV and ∆TLG of 0.0%, 3.6%, 10.3% and 13.6% respectively. A total of 12 patients (22.2%) experienced locoregional recurrence. ∆MTV using PET Edge was the best predictor of locoregional recurrence (AUC =0.761, 95% CI: 0.573-0.948, P=0.001; OC ∆>50%). The corresponding 2-year locoregional recurrence rate was 7% vs. 35%, P=0.001. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that it is preferable to use gradient based method to assess volumetric tumour response during radiotherapy and offers advantage in predicting treatment outcomes compared with threshold-based methods. This finding requires further validation and can assist in future response-adaptive clinical trials.

Mid-treatment 18F-FDG PET imaging changes in parotid gland correlates to radiation-induced xerostomia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to measure functional changes in parotid glands using mid-treatment FDG-PET/CT and correlate early imaging changes to subsequent xerostomia in mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 56 patients from two prospective imaging biomarker studies underwent FDG-PET/CT at baseline and during radiotherapy (week 3). Both parotid glands were volumetrically delineated at each time point. PET parameter SUVmedian were calculated for ipsilateral and contralateral parotid glands. Absolute and relative change (Δ) in SUVmedian were correlated to moderate-severe xerostomia (CTCAE grade ≥ 2) at 6 months. Four predictive models were subsequently created using multivariate logistic regression using clinical and radiotherapy planning parameters. Model performance was calculated using ROC analysis and compared using Akaike information criterion (AIC) RESULTS: 29 patients (51.8%) developed grade ≥ 2 xerostomia. Compared to baseline, there was an increase in SUVmedian at week 3 in ipsilateral (8.4%) and contralateral (5.5%) parotid glands. Increase in ipsilateral parotid Δ SUVmedian (p = 0.04) and contralateral mean parotid dose (p = 0.04) were correlated to xerostomia. The reference 'clinical' model correlated to xerostomia (AUC 0.667, AIC 70.9). Addition of ipsilateral parotid Δ SUVmedian to the clinical model resulted in the highest correlation to xerostomia (AUC 0.777, AIC 65.4). CONCLUSION: Our study shows functional changes occurring in the parotid gland early during radiotherapy. We demonstrate that integration of baseline and mid-treatment FDG-PET/CT changes in the parotid gland with clinical factors has the potential to improve xerostomia risk prediction which could be utilised for personalised head and neck radiotherapy.

The Feasibility of Quality Assurance in the TOPGEAR International Phase 3 Clinical Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Gastric Cancer (an Intergroup Trial of the AGITG/TROG/NHMRC CTC/EORTC/CCTG).

PURPOSE: The TOPGEAR phase 3 trial hypothesized that adding preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) to perioperative chemotherapy will improve survival in patients with gastric cancer. Owing to the complexity of gastric irradiation, a comprehensive radiation therapy quality assurance (RTQA) program was implemented. Our objective is to describe the RTQA methods and outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: RTQA was undertaken in real time before treatment for the first 5 patients randomized to CRT from each center. Once acceptable quality was achieved, RTQA was completed for one-third of subsequent cases. RTQA consisted of evaluating (1) clinical target volume and organ-at-risk contouring and (2) radiation therapy planning parameters. Protocol violations between high- (20+ patients enrolled) and low-volume centers were compared using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: TOPGEAR enrolled 574 patients, of whom 286 were randomized to receive preoperative CRT and 203 (71%) were included for RTQA. Of these, 67 (33%) and 136 (67%) patients were from high- and low-volume centers, respectively. The initial RTQA pass rate was 72%. In total, 28% of cases required resubmission. In total, 200 of 203 cases (99%) passed RTQA before treatment. Cases from low-volume centers required resubmission more often (44/136 [33%] vs 13/67 [18%]; P = .078). There was no change in the proportion of cases requiring resubmission over time. Most cases requiring resubmission had multiple protocol violations. At least 1 aspect of the clinical target volume had to be adjusted in all cases. Inadequate coverage of the duodenum was most common (53% major violation, 25% minor violation). For the remaining cases, the resubmission process was triggered secondary to poor contour/plan quality. CONCLUSIONS: In a large multicenter trial, RTQA is feasible and effective in achieving high-quality treatment plans. Ongoing education should be performed to ensure consistent quality during the entire study period.

Novel 5-point 18-FDG-PET/CT visual scoring system for assessing treatment response in patients with oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic utility and reproducibility of a qualitative 5-point 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET primary visual score (PVS) in patients with oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients with histologically proven oesophageal or GOJ cancer who received curative intent therapy. Clinical, pathological and imaging data were extracted from electronic medical records. Patients were required to have pre-treatment and post-treatment FDG-PET scans, that were evaluated with a 5-point primary visual score (prePVS, postPVS). The changes in PVS (ΔPVS) were correlated with progression-free survival and overall survival. Interobserver variability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa intraclass correlation and agreement. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were retrospectively identified. Two (3%), 36 (54%) and 29 (43%) of the patients had stage I, II and III disease respectively. Twenty-five (37%) patients had squamous cell carcinoma. Thirty-seven (55%) patients proceeded onto surgical resection. postPVS was associated with both PFS (P = 0.013) and OS (P = 0.0002). ΔPVS predicted for PFS (P = 0.002) and OS (P = 0.0003). When thresholds of response were considered, agreement was 80.6% (K = 0.78) and 74.6% (K = 0.69) for postPVS and ΔPVS respectively. CONCLUSION: Qualitative assessment of oesophageal and GOJ cancers utilising FDG-PET is reproducible and may be able to prognosticate outcomes in patients undergoing treatment. Prospective validation is required.

Evaluation of the introduction of a 'traffic light protocol' for dose-volume histogram constraints of organs at risk in definitive radiotherapy at Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres.

INTRODUCTION: Protocols have been developed in our department with recommended dose constraints for organs at risk (OAR) for each tumour site receiving definitive radiotherapy. We have developed a colour coding system to indicate when constraints are meeting objectives (green), have minor variation from planning objectives (yellow) and have major variation from planning objectives (red). We performed a quality audit to assess adherence to the protocol and to determine the rate of acute and subacute toxicities. METHODS: All definitive radiotherapy dose-volume histogram (DVH) reports generated in the first 6 months of 2017 at Liverpool and Macarthur cancer therapy centres were collected. For each radiotherapy group, the overridden dose constraints were evaluated and categorized to red and yellow. For all patients in our data set, follow-up documents/assessments were searched for grade 3 or higher acute or subacute radiotherapy toxicity and compared with those who had overridden dose constraints. RESULTS: There were 210 (34%) plans accepted with at least one major variation and 161 (26%) plans with minor variation. Head and neck group had the most rate of major variations (77%). The best groups in adherence to protocol were lymphoma and breast groups. In general, grade 3 toxicity was observed in 1%, 4% and 9% of patients who were in green, yellow and red categories. Overall, we noted a correlation with grade 3 toxicities between acceptable plans (green) and ones with a minor or major variation (yellow or red) (1% vs. 7% P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In conclusion this study showed an increased risk of higher grade toxicities when DVHs were beyond our departmental constraints using a 'Traffic Light System'. With this new colour coding system, we can facilitate auditing of the dose constraints in order to improve the quality of radiotherapy plans and potentially provide benchmarking for reducing toxicities in radiotherapy treatments.

Intravenous contrast-enhanced cone beam computed tomography (IVCBCT) of intrahepatic tumors and vessels.

PURPOSE: Liver tumors are challenging to visualize on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) without intravenous (IV) contrast. Image guidance for liver cancer stereotactic body ablative radiation therapy (SABR) could be improved with the direct visualization of hepatic tumors and vasculature. This study investigated the feasibility of the use of IV contrast-enhanced CBCT (IV-CBCT) as a means to improve liver target visualization. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients on a liver SABR protocol underwent IV-CBCT before 1 or more treatment fractions in addition to a noncontrast CBCT. Image acquisition was initiated 0 to 30 seconds following injection and acquired over 60 to 120 seconds. "Stop and go" exhale breath-hold CBCT scans were used whenever feasible. Changes in mean CT number in regions of interest within visible vasculature, tumor, and adjacent liver were quantified between CBCT and IV-CBCT. RESULTS: Twelve pairs of contrast and noncontrast CBCTs were obtained in 7 patients. Intravenous-CBCT improved hepatic tumor visibility in breath-hold scans only for 3 patients (2 metastases, 1 hepatocellular carcinoma). Visible tumors ranged in volume from 124 to 564 mL. Small tumors in free-breathing patients did not show enhancement on IVCBT. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous-CBCT may enhance the visibility of hepatic vessels and tumor in CBCT scans obtained during breath hold. Optimization of IV contrast timing and reduction of artifacts to improve tumor visualization warrant further investigation.

Assessment of serial multi-parametric functional MRI (diffusion-weighted imaging and R2*) with (18)F-FDG-PET in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the serial changes and correlations between readout-segmented technique with navigated phase correction diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), R2*-MRI and (18)F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) CT performed before and during radiation therapy (RT) in patients with mucosal primary head and neck cancer. METHODS: The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean) from DWI (at b = 50 and 800 s mm(-2)), the mean R2* values derived from T2(*)-MRI, and PET metabolic parameters, including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesional glycolysis (TLG) were measured for the primary tumour. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate correlations between ADCmean, R2*, SUVmax, MTV and TLG. A paired t-test was performed to assess the MRI changes and the slope of serial MRI changes during RT. RESULTS: Pre-treatment scans were performed in 28 patients and mid-treatment scans in 20 patients. No significant correlation was found between ADCmean and either R2* values or PET parameters. There were significant negative correlations of R2* values with pre-treatment PET parameters but not with mid-RT PET parameters: pre-SUVmax (p = 0.008), pre-MTV (p = 0.006) and pre-TLG (p = 0.008). A significant rise in ADCmean was found during the first half (p < 0.001) of RT but not in the second half (p = 0.215) of the treatment. There was an increase of the ADCmean values of 279.4 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 210-348] in the first half of the treatment (Weeks 0-3). However, during the second-half period of treatment, the mean ADC value (Weeks 3-6) was 24.0 and the 95% CI (-40 to 88) included zero. This suggests that there was no significant change in ADC values during the second half of the treatment. CONCLUSION: A significant negative correlation was found between pre-treatment R2*-MRI and PET parameters. DWI appeared to demonstrate potentially predictable changes during RT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Understanding the correlation and changes that occur with time between potential imaging biomarkers may help us establish the most appropriate biomarkers to consider in future research.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma: When Does Size Matter for Radiotherapy?

Merkel cell carcinoma is a very aggressive, rare cancer of the skin. It has a high propensity for local, regional, and distant recurrence and has recently been associated with a viral etiology from the recently diagnosed Merkel Cell Polyoma Virus. The optimal management remains controversial. We discuss the case of a man with a 26 cm axillary lymph node metastasis of unknown primary treated with radiotherapy.

Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on tumor-infiltrating/associated lymphocytes in locally advanced rectal cancers.

BACKGROUND: Lymphocytes and natural killer cells (NK) appear to be important in colorectal cancer. Their role in chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancers is unclear. We evaluated T-lymphocytes (CD3), sub-groups CD4 and CD8, and NK cells (CD56+CD57) in normal and rectal tumor tissues pre- and post-chemoradiotherapy, and investigated their relationship to tumor regression grade, disease-free survival and pathological stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tissue microarrays from colonoscopic biopsies, resection specimens and normal tissues, from 52 patients, were immunostained. RESULTS: NK cell counts were significantly lower in tumor samples compared to normal tissues (p=0.007). T-lymphocyte counts were higher in post-treatment compared to pre-treatment samples (p=0.025), specifically in the CD8 subgroup after long-course treatment. The results suggested an association between post-treatment CD8 and NK cell counts with higher tumor regression. No associations were found with regard to stage or disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: NK cell counts were significantly reduced in rectal cancers compared to normal tissues, while total T-lymphocyte counts increased post-chemoradiotherapy. Both appeared important in tumor regression.

Twenty-five-year experience with radical chemoradiation for anal cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic factors, patterns of failure, and late toxicity in patients treated with chemoradiation (CRT) for anal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Consecutive patients with nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus treated by CRT with curative intent between February 1983 and March 2008 were identified through the institutional database. Chart review and telephone follow-up were undertaken to collect demographic data and outcome. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-four patients (34% male; median age 62 years) were identified. The stages at diagnosis were 23% Stage I, 48% Stage II, 10% Stage IIIA, and 18% Stage IIIB. The median radiotherapy dose to the primary site was 54 Gy. A complete clinical response to CRT was achieved in 89% of patients. With a median follow-up time of 5.3 years, the 5-year rates of locoregional control, distant control, colostomy-free survival, and overall survival were 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78-88), 92% (95% CI, 89-96), 73% (95% CI, 68-79), and 82% (95% CI, 77-87), respectively. Higher T stage and male sex predicted for locoregional failure, and higher N stage predicted for distant metastases. Locoregional failure occurred most commonly at the primary site. Omission of elective inguinal irradiation resulted in inguinal failure rates of 1.9% and 12.5% in T1N0 and T2N0 patients, respectively. Pelvic nodal failures were very uncommon. Late vaginal and bone toxicity was observed in addition to gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: CRT is a highly effective approach in anal cancer. However, subgroups of patients fare relatively poorly, and novel approaches are needed. Elective inguinal irradiation can be safely omitted only in patients with Stage I disease. Vaginal toxicity and insufficiency fractures of the hip and pelvis are important late effects that require prospective evaluation.

Comparison of simple and complex liver intensity modulated radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) may allow improvement in plan quality for treatment of liver cancer, however increasing radiation modulation complexity can lead to increased uncertainties and requirements for quality assurance. This study assesses whether target coverage and normal tissue avoidance can be maintained in liver cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans by systematically reducing the complexity of the delivered fluence. METHODS: An optimal baseline six fraction individualized IMRT plan for 27 patients with 45 liver cancers was developed which provided a median minimum dose to 0.5 cc of the planning target volume (PTV) of 38.3 Gy (range, 25.9-59.5 Gy), in 6 fractions, while maintaining liver toxicity risk <5% and maximum luminal gastrointestinal structure doses of 30 Gy. The number of segments was systematically reduced until normal tissue constraints were exceeded while maintaining equivalent dose coverage to 95% of PTV (PTVD95). Radiotherapy doses were compared between the plans. RESULTS: Reduction in the number of segments was achieved for all 27 plans from a median of 48 segments (range 34-52) to 19 segments (range 6-30), without exceeding normal tissue dose objectives and maintaining equivalent PTVD95 and similar PTV Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD(-20)) IMRT plans with fewer segments had significantly less monitor units (mean, 1892 reduced to 1695, p = 0.012), but also reduced dose conformity (mean, RTOG Conformity Index 1.42 increased to 1.53 p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Tumour coverage and normal tissue objectives were maintained with simplified liver IMRT, at the expense of reduced conformity.

Why do some lung cancer patients receive no anticancer treatment?

INTRODUCTION: A significant proportion of lung cancer patients receive no anticancer treatment. This varies from 19% in USA, 33% in Australia, 37% in Scotland, and 50% in Ireland. The aim of this study was to identify the reasons behind this. METHODS: The Lung Cancer Multidisciplinary Meeting (MDM) in South-West Sydney prospectively collects data on all patients presented. All new lung cancer patients presented between December 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007, were reviewed. Patients were assigned optimal treatment based on evidence-based guidelines. Those patients in whom guidelines recommended no treatment (GNT) were compared with those whom the MDM recommended no treatment (MNT) and with those who actually received no treatment (ANT). RESULTS: There were 335 patients with a median age of 69 years. A total of 82% had non-small cell lung cancer, 14% had small cell lung cancer, and 4% had no pathologic diagnosis. Eighty-five percent had locally advanced or metastatic disease. GNT was recommended in 4% (n = 13), MNT in 10% (n = 32) but ANT comprised 20% (n = 66). The differences between GNT and MNT were mainly due to patient comorbidities and clinician decision, but the differences between MNT and ANT were due to patient preference and declining performance status. In multivariate analysis, older age, poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, non-small cell lung cancer, and non-English language predicted for ANT. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with lung cancer receiving no treatment is greater than that predicted by guidelines or recommended by the MDM but lower than that described in population-based studies suggesting that MDMs can improve treatment utilization in lung cancer.

Phase I study of individualized stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver metastases.

PURPOSE: To report on the outcomes of a phase I study of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for treatment of liver metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with liver metastases that were inoperable or medically unsuitable for resection, and who were not candidates for standard therapies, were eligible for this phase I study of individualized SBRT. Individualized radiation doses were chosen to maintain the same nominal risk of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) for three estimated risk levels (5%, 10%, and 20%). Additional patients were treated at the maximal study dose (MSD) in an expanded cohort. Median SBRT dose was 41.8 Gy (range, 27.7 to 60 Gy) in six fractions over 2 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients with inoperable colorectal (n = 40), breast (n = 12), or other (n = 16) liver metastases were treated. Median tumor volume was 75.2 mL (range, 1.19 to 3,090 mL). The highest RILD risk level investigated was safe, with no dose-limiting toxicity. Two grade 3 liver enzyme changes occurred, but no RILD or other grade 3 to 5 liver toxicity was seen, for a low estimated risk of serious liver toxicity (95% CI, 0 to 5.3%). Six (9%) acute grade 3 toxicities (two gastritis, two nausea, lethargy, and thrombocytopenia) and one (1%) grade 4 toxicity (thrombocytopenia) were seen. The 1-year local control rate was 71% (95 CI, 58% to 85%). The median overall survival was 17.6 months (95% CI, 10.4 to 38.1 months). CONCLUSION: Individualized six-fraction liver metastases SBRT is safe, with sustained local control observed in the majority of patients.