Changes in the femoral varus and rotational profiles are correlated in women with varus osteoarthritic lower limbs.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have reported the relationship between coronal alignment of the lower limbs and the rotational profile of the femur and tibia. However, the relationship between coronal alignment of the femur and tibia and their rotational profiles in patients with varus osteoarthritic knees is unclear. METHODS: One hundred women with varus osteoarthritic knees (varus OA group) and 50 women with neutrally aligned lower limbs without osteoarthritis (non-OA group) were evaluated retrospectively. The coronal alignment and rotational profile of the femur and tibia were evaluated, and the correlation between coronal alignment and rotational profile was analyzed, respectively. RESULTS: The femoral anteversion, posterior condylar angle of the distal femur, and tibial torsion were significantly smaller in the varus OA group than in the non-OA group. In the varus OA group, the femoral anteversion and rotational profile of the distal femur had significantly negative correlations with the degree of femoral varus, while tibial torsion was not related to the degree of tibial varus. In the non-OA group, there was no relationship between coronal alignment and rotational profiles of the femur and tibia in both the varus OA and non-OA groups. CONCLUSION: Femoral anteversion and the rotational profile of the distal femur were negatively correlated with the degree of femoral varus in Asian women with varus osteoarthritic knees. This study enhanced the understanding of the relationship between changes in coronal alignment of the femur and tibia and their rotational profiles in patients with varus osteoarthritic lower limbs, although this study was limited by the small sample sizes and methodological quality.

Beneficial Effect of Curved Dilator System for Femoral Tunnel Creation in Preventing Femoral Tunnel Widening after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Backgrounds and objectives: A prevalent concern in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is postoperative tunnel widening. We hypothesized that employing a curved dilator system (CDS) for femoral tunnel creation can reduce this widening after ACL reconstruction compared to the use of a conventional rigid reamer. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted involving 56 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction between January 2012 and July 2013. The patients were categorized into two groups: the reamer group (n = 28) and CDS group (n = 28). All participants were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Clinical assessment included the Lachman test and pivot-shift test, and the Lysholm score and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Radiographic evaluation covered the tunnel widening rate, represented as the ratio of the tunnel diameter 2 years after surgery to the tunnel diameter immediately after surgery, and the ratio (A/B) of femoral tunnel (A) to tibial tunnel (B) diameters at respective time points. Results: No significant disparities were found between the two groups in terms of clinical outcomes. However, the reamer group exhibited a greater femoral tunnel widening rate compared to the CDS group (reamer group vs. CDS group: 142.7 ± 22.0% vs. 128.0 ± 19.0% on the anteroposterior (AP) radiograph and 140.8 ± 14.2% vs. 122.9 ± 13.4% on the lateral radiograph; all p < 0.05). Two years post-operation, the A/B ratio rose in the reamer group (0.96 ± 0.05→1.00 ± 0.05 on the AP radiograph and 0.94 ± 0.03→1.00 ± 0.0.04 on the lateral radiograph; all p < 0.05), while it decreased in the CDS group (0.99 ± 0.02→0.96 ± 0.05 on the AP radiograph and 0.97 ± 0.03→0.93 ± 0.06 on the lateral radiograph; all p < 0.05). Conclusion: The use of CDS for femoral tunnel creation in primary ACL reconstruction provides a potential advantage by limiting tunnel widening compared to the conventional rigid-reamer approach.

Spacer Block Technique Was Superior to Intramedullary Guide Technique in Coronal Alignment of Femoral Component after Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Case-Control Study.

Backgrounds and Objectives: The spacer block technique in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has still a concern related to the precise position of the component in the coronal and sagittal planes compared to intramedullary guide technique. The purposes of this study were to explore whether the spacer block technique would improve the radiological alignment of implants and clinical outcomes compared with the outcomes of the intramedullary guide technique in fixed-bearing medial UKA. Materials and Methods: In total, 115 patients who underwent unilateral, fixed-bearing medial UKA were retrospectively reviewed and divided into group IM (intramedullary guides; n = 39) and group SB (spacer blocks; n = 76). Clinical assessment included range-of-motion and patient-reported outcomes. Radiological assessment included the mechanical femorotibial angle, coronal and sagittal alignments of the femoral and tibial components, and coronal femorotibial congruence angle. Results: All clinical outcomes showed no significant differences between groups. The coronal femoral component angle was valgus 2.4° ± 4.9° in IM group and varus 1.1° ± 3.2° (p < 0.001). In group IM, the number of outlier in coronal femoral component angle (<−10° or 10°<) was 3 cases, while in group SB, there was no outlier (p = 0.014). The coronal femorotibial congruence angle was significantly less in group SB (mean 1.9°, range, −3.2°~8.2°) than in group IM (mean 3.4°, range, −9.6°~16.5°) (p = 0.028). Conclusions: In the group SB, the coronal alignment of femoral component was closer to neutral, and outlier was less frequent than in the group IM. The spacer block technique was more beneficial in achieving proper coronal alignment of the femoral component and congruence of femorotibial components compared to the intramedullary guide technique in fixed-bearing medial UKAs.

Revisiting Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Degenerative Tears in Knees With Mild or No Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) for symptomatic degenerative meniscal tear (DMT) in knees with mild or no osteoarthritis. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) English language; (2) randomized controlled trial (RCT); (3) comparison between APM and other treatment modalities as a primary objective; and (4) complete DMT in knees with mild or no osteoarthritis. Mild or no arthritis was defined as Kellgren-Lawrence grade 0 to 2 or Ahlbäck 0 to 1 on radiography. Statistical analysis of functional activity and pain after APM and conservative treatment or sham operation was performed using R version 3.3.1. RESULTS: Five articles were included in the final analysis, and they were all RCTs. Four studies compared clinical results of APM with those for physical therapy, and one study compared APM with sham operation. The functional activity was not better in the APM group (296 cases) than in the conservative treatment or sham operation group (284 cases) (I: 0%, small level of heterogeneity). Pain was not reduced significantly in the APM group compared with that in the conservative treatment or sham operation group (I: 0∼90%, high level of heterogeneity). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality literature provides relatively strong evidence that APM did not improve functional activity or reduce pain compared with the results with conservative treatment or sham operation in knees with mild or no osteoarthritis.

Comparison of the regeneration of cartilage and the clinical outcomes after the open wedge high tibial osteotomy with or without microfracture: a retrospective case control study.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether postoperative outcomes are associated with the cartilage regeneration after open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) combined with microfracture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the regeneration of the articular cartilage, radiologic, and clinical outcomes after OWHTO with and without microfracture. METHODS: Eighty-seven patients who underwent OWHTO from 2014 to 2015 were retrospectively included in this study. Fifty-seven OWHTOs with microfracture on medial femoral condyle (MFC) (group 1) and 30 OWHTOs without microfracture (group 2) were compared at a mean 2-year follow-up. The regeneration of the articular cartilage was evaluated using International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade on the second-look arthroscopy and the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio, hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and Ahlbäck grade were evaluated. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) scores and the Knee Society (KS). RESULTS: The articular cartilage in the MFC were regenerated in 67.8% of group 1 (43/57) and 58.6% of group 2 (16/30), respectively (p = 0.014). However, change of the ICRS grades of the medial tibial plateau, lateral and patellofemoral compartments showed no statistical difference between the groups. Total MOCART score in group 1 was superior to that in the group 2 at postoperative 2 years (41.8 ± 18.6 vs. 31.8 ± 19.8, p = 0.023). Regarding MOCART score, microfracture was only effective in the defect filling and integration to the border zone of the MFC (p < 0.001 and p = 0.035, respectively). Other radiologic and clinical outcomes showed no statistical differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: Microfracture of the MFC during OWHTO only helped the filling of the degenerative cartilage defect and the integration of the cartilage with adjacent cartilage. However, the clinical and radiologic outcome could not be improved by mircrofracture in the OWHTO.

Return to Sports After Athletes Undergo Meniscal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to determine the time to and rate of the return to sports (RTS) after meniscal surgery and to compare these values among the different types of meniscal surgeries. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched. Studies that met the following criteria were included: (1) English article, (2) full-text available, (3) study on athletes, and (4) primary outcome is RTS after meniscal surgery, such as meniscectomy, meniscal repair, and meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). RESULTS: Eleven articles were included in the final analysis. Most players returned to the preinjury activity level from 7 to 9 weeks after partial meniscectomy. After meniscal repair, 81% to 88.9% of athletes returned to sports. The time to RTS after isolated meniscal repair was on average 5.6 months, and the time to RTS was longer for athletes who required concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). After MAT, 67% to 85.7% of athletes returned to sports, and the time to RTS ranged from 7.6 to 16.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: The shortest time to RTS and the highest RTS rate were observed after partial meniscectomy. The time to RTS was shorter, and the RTS rate was higher after meniscal repair than after MAT. Concurrent procedures such as ACLR prolonged the time to RTS, but it had no effect on the RTS rate and the level of sports activity at the time of RTS.

Retro-tubercular gap widening can be caused by inappropriate anterior osteotomy and large opening gap in the medial biplanar open-wedge HTO.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the causes of retro-tubercular gap widening and to confirm whether this widened gap causes instability of the osteotomy configuration during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). METHODS: Operative records and radiologic findings of patients who underwent biplanar medial OWHTO between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. To identify the osteotomy configuration including lateral hinge fracture, postoperative simple radiographs and CT images were analyzed. Postoperative CT scan was used to evaluate the widening of the retro-tubercular gap, thickness, and axial angle of retro-tubercular osteotomy, as well as the ratios of anterior and posterior osteotomy, and hinge length. The correlation of each factor was evaluated and analyzed in accordance with the lateral hinge fracture (LHF). RESULTS: Widening of the retro-tubercular gap showed a significant correlation with the axial angle of retro-tubercular osteotomy, anterior osteotomy ratio, and opening gap distance, but not with the thickness of retro-tubercular osteotomy, posterior osteotomy ratio, and hinge length ratio. The LHF group showed significantly larger value than the non-LHF group with respect to the thickness of retro-tubercular osteotomy (P = 0.003), axial angle of retro-tubercular osteotomy (P = 0.033), retro-planar gap distance (P = 0.001), anterior osteotomy ratio (P = 0.000), and opening gap distance (P = 0.003). The hinge length ratio was smaller in the LHF group than in the non-LHF group (P = 0.001). However, the posterior osteotomy ratio was not different between the two groups (n.s.). CONCLUSION: Retro-tubercular gap widening can be caused by inappropriate anterior osteotomy and large opening gap distance, which can be related to LHF. Therefore, anterior cortical osteotomy may also be an important factor for preventing instability of the proximal fragment in biplanar OWHTO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study, Level III.

Diagnostic Value of Computed Tomography and Risk Factors for Lateral Hinge Fracture in the Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to evaluate (1) the disparity of detection of lateral hinge fracture (LHF) between postoperative simple radiography and high-resolution computed tomography (CT) and affecting factors of LHF and (2) whether generally recommended postoperative rehabilitation protocols are appropriate according to the type of LHF. METHODS: From 2014 to 2015, patients who underwent primary open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) for isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee joint were retrospectively enrolled. The patients with minimum 1-year follow-up were included. The incidence of LHF after OWHTO based on simple radiographs was compared with its incidence based on CT scans. In the stable type of LHF and the non-LHF group, early weight bearing was encouraged immediately after OWHTO. In unstable LHF (types II and III), weight bearing was delayed until 2 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-three cases (24.5%) of LHF after 94 OWHTOs were detected (15 cases on simple radiographs, 8 cases on CT scan). The coronal osteotomy slope and the osteotomy gap were significantly larger in the LHF group than in the non-LHF group (coronal osteotomy slope, 20.3° ± 5.1° vs 16.7° ± 4.2°, P = .001; anterior osteotomy gap, 7.9 mm ± 2.1 mm vs 6.7 mm ± 1.8 mm, P = .008; posterior osteotomy gap, 12.7 mm ± 3.7 mm vs 11.2 mm ± 3.2 mm, P = .048). The correction loss of the hip-knee-ankle angle and the medial proximal tibial angle in the LHF group was significantly larger than those in the non-LHF group (1.3° ± 1.8° vs 0.4° ± 1.4°, P < .001; 1.3° ± 1.1° vs 0.7° ± 0.9°, P = .009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Further evaluation with CT scanning is highly valuable immediately after all OWHTO because of its higher detection rate (24.5%) of LHF compared with simple radiographs (16%). In addition, the coronal osteotomy slope was steeper and the opening gap was larger in the LHF group than in the non-LHF group. Finally, the LHF should be managed conservatively in order to prevent postoperative correction loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

Effect of the Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Clinical and Stability Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of the timing of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on clinical and stability outcomes by analyzing high-quality studies that assessed timing as a primary objective. METHODS: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database were systematically searched. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) English articles, (2) noncomparative study or relevant study reporting clinical and/or stability results, and (3) timing of the ACL reconstruction as a primary objective. Study type, level of evidence, randomization method, exclusion criteria, number of cases, age, sex, timing of ACL reconstruction, follow-up, clinical outcomes, stability outcomes, and other relevant findings were recorded. Statistical analysis of the Lysholm scores and KT-1000 arthrometer measurements after early and delayed ACL reconstruction was performed using R version 3.3.1. RESULTS: Seven articles were included in the final analysis. There were 6 randomized controlled trials and 1 Level II study. Pooled analysis was performed using only Level I studies. All studies assessed the timing of ACL reconstruction as a primary objective. The definition of early ranged broadly from 9 days to 5 months and delayed ranged from 10 weeks to >24 months, and there was an overlap of the time intervals between some studies. The standard timing of the delayed reconstruction was around 10 weeks from injury in the pooled analysis. After pooling of data, clinical result was not statistically different between groups (I2: 47%, moderate level of heterogeneity). No statistically significant difference was observed in the KT-1000 arthrometer measurements between groups (I2: 76.2%, high level of heterogeneity) either. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis performed using currently available high-quality literature provides relatively strong evidence that early ACL reconstruction results in good clinical and stability outcomes. Early ACL reconstruction results in comparable clinical and stability outcomes compared with delayed ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, a systematic review and meta-analysis of Level I and II studies.

Preservation of remnant with poor synovial coverage has no beneficial effect over remnant sacrifice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of synovial coverage of the remnant on clinical outcomes and graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Seventy-five patients who underwent second-look arthroscopy after a single-bundle ACL reconstruction using autologous quadriceps tendon graft were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether the remnant was preserved (group P, n = 42) or sacrificed (group S, n = 33). Group P was further classified according to the degree of synovial coverage of the remnant on initial arthroscopic findings: group A (remnant fully covered with synovium, n = 15), group B (synovial coverage >50%, n = 15), and group C (coverage <50%, n = 12). Clinical outcomes including manual laxity tests, KT-2000 side-to-side difference, modified Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, and International Knee Documentation Committee score were evaluated pre-operatively and prior to the second-look arthroscopy. Graft tension, degrees of synovialization, and gross integrity were evaluated on second-look arthroscopic examination. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in manual laxity tests, KT-2000 side-to-side difference, and clinical scores between groups P and S. In second-look arthroscopic examination, graft tension showed no difference between the two groups, but gross integrity and synovialization were significantly higher in group P (P = 0.032 and P = 0.008, respectively). In subgroup analysis, only group A showed higher grade regarding gross integrity and synovialization in comparison with group S (P = 0.007 and P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of remnant in ACL reconstruction showed no superiority concerning knee stability and clinical outcomes over remnant sacrificing at post-operative 1-year second-look arthroscopy. Preservation of remnant with good synovial coverage had a positive effect on graft synovialization and maintenance of graft integrity, but this effect was not observed in cases of a remnant with poor synovial coverage. When deciding whether to preserve the remnant or not, the degree of synovial coverage should be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Effect of the Referencing System on the Posterior Condylar Offset and Anterior Flange-Bone Contact in Posterior Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The effect of referencing system on posterior condylar offset (PCO) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial. Moreover, there is a lack of concern about the anterior flange-bone contact according to the referencing system. METHODS: One hundred four TKAs using the anterior referencing (AR) system and 107 TKAs using the posterior referencing (PR) system were analyzed with 2-year follow-up. The PCO, PCO ratio (PCOR), and contact at the anterior flange-bone interface were compared between the 2 groups. The flexion and extension gaps and the degree of medial release were measured, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Finally, the correlation between changes in PCO and knee flexion angle was analyzed. RESULTS: The mean postoperative PCO and PCOR were significantly larger in the PR group than in the AR group. Incomplete contact between the anterior flange and anterior femur occurred more frequently in the AR group than in the PR group (48.1% vs 13.1%, P < .001). The medial and lateral flexion gaps were significantly larger in the AR group than in the PR group. The groups showed no differences in soft tissue release, degree of flexion, and clinical scores. In both groups, there was no correlation between postoperative change of PCO and improvement in flexion. CONCLUSION: The PR system produced larger PCO and PCOR, and smaller flexion gap compared to the AR system. Additionally, the PR group showed more favorable contact between the anterior flange and anterior femur. However, these differences were not related to the degree of soft tissue release and clinical outcomes.

Graft sources do not affect to the outcome of transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Despite numerous published reports on posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in the past 30 years, the ideal graft source remains unclear, and few objective scientific data have been published that thoroughly evaluate the long-term outcomes according to the graft source. We, therefore, conducted a systematic review of available high-quality comparative studies that evaluated clinical and objective stability testing to compare the different graft sources for PCL reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight articles were included in the final analysis. There were two level II and six level III studies. Autograft included 4-strand hamstring grafts (SHGs), 7-SHGs, quadriceps tendon, and patellar tendon. Allografts included Achilles tendon and tibialis anterior tendon. Hybrid graft and a ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS) were used in one study each. Comparison was performed between autografts and allografts in three studies, between different autografts in two studies, between autograft and LARS in one study, among three different grafts in one study, and between 4 and 7-SHGs in one study. RESULTS: Most studies reported no statistically significant differences in the clinical results, except for one study that compared 4- and 7-SHG. Stability was similar or superior in a comparison between autografts and allografts, and was not statistically different between different autografts or between 4-SHG and LARS. However, more-stranded HG showed better stability than that of the less-stranded HG. Complications were more frequent with autografts. CONCLUSION: Using a comprehensive analysis of the current literature, the authors could not identify an individual graft source with clearly superior clinical results, compared with other graft sources. However, autografts, especially 4-SHGs, showed similar or superior stability to irradiated allografts. Therefore, the graft source has a minimal effect on the clinical outcome, but it could have some effects on stability in single bundle transtibial PCL reconstruction.

Comparison of the outcome between unilateral and bilateral open wedge high tibial osteotomy in the bilateral varus knees.

INTRODUCTION: Bilateral open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) can be performed in a staged manner to enable the healing and rehabilitation of each limb separately after surgery. However, the effects of staged bilateral OWHTO on the pattern of recovery and changes over time for each limb have not been established. Additionally, there is a lack of information regarding the optimal timing for staged surgery. METHODS: Twenty-two patients (44 knees) in the bilateral OWHTO group and 42 patients (42 knees) in the unilateral OWHTO group were analyzed. Clinical and radiological results were evaluated and compared between the two groups. For the alignment change assessment, the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio were measured preoperatively and at postoperative 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. RESULTS: The correction loss of HKA angle in the bilateral OWHTO group was significantly larger than that in the unilateral OWHTO group (0.5° ± 1.4° vs 1.3° ± 2.0°, p = 0.049). The correction loss of WBL ratio was significantly greater in the patients with staged bilateral OWHTO within a 3-month interval compared to those with staged bilateral OWHTO in an interval longer than 3 months (WBL ratio; 7.5% vs 2.1%, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the clinical scores and range of motion at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: The smaller loss of correction in the unilateral OWHTO group occurred compared to the bilateral OWHTO group. Additionally, surgeons should keep in mind that the amount of correction loss may be greater if staged bilateral OWHTO is performed at intervals of 3 months or less.

Effectiveness of concurrent procedures during high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of concurrent cartilage procedures during high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) by comparing the outcomes of studies that directly compared the use of HTO plus concurrent cartilage procedures versus HTO alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Results that are possible to be compared in more than two articles were presented as forest plots. A 95% confidence interval was calculated for each effect size, and we calculated the I 2 statistic, which presents the percentage of total variation attributable to the heterogeneity among studies. The random effects model was used to calculate the effect size. RESULTS: Seven articles were included to the final analysis. Case groups were composed of HTO without concurrent procedures and control groups were composed of HTO with concurrent procedures such as marrow stimulation procedure, mesenchymal stem cell transplantation, and injection. The case group showed a higher hospital for special surgery score and mean difference was 4.10 [I 2 80.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 9.02 to 4.82]. Mean difference of the mechanical femorotibial angle in five studies was 0.08° (I 2 0%, 95% CI - 0.26 to 0.43). However, improved arthroscopic, histologic, and MRI results were reported in the control group. CONCLUSION: Our analysis support that concurrent procedures during HTO for medial compartment OA have little beneficial effect regarding clinical and radiological outcomes. However, they might have some beneficial effects in terms of arthroscopic, histologic, and MRI findings even though the quality of healed cartilage is not good as that of original cartilage. Therefore, until now, concurrent procedures for medial compartment OA have been considered optional. Nevertheless, no conclusions can be drawn for younger patients with focal cartilage defects and concomitant varus deformity. This question needs to be addressed separately.

Role of an anatomically contoured plate and metal block for balanced stability between the implant and lateral hinge in open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) is a well-established surgical option for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the varus knee. The initial strength of the fixation plate is critical for successful correction maintenance and healing of the osteotomy site. This study was conducted to verify if a newly designed anatomical plate (LCfit) improves the stability of both the medial implant and lateral hinge area, as well as to evaluate how the metal block contributes to both medial and lateral stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A finite element (FE) tibial model was combined with TomoFix plate, a LCfit plate with and without a metal block. Data analysis was conducted to evaluate the balanced stability, which refers to the enforced lateral stability resulting from redistribution of overall stress. We assessed the balanced stability of the medial implant and lateral hinge area in three cases using the same Sawbones and loads using the tibia FE model. RESULTS: The LCfit plate reduced stress by 23.1% at the lateral hinge compared to the TomoFix plate (TomoFix vs. LCfit: 34.2 ± 23.3 MPa vs. 26.3 ± 17.5 MPa). The LCfit plate with a metal block reduced stress by 40.1% at the medial plate (210.1 ± 64.2 MPa vs. 125.8 ± 65.7 MPa) and by 31.2% (26.3 ± 17.5 MPa vs. 18.1 ± 12.1 MPa) at the lateral hinge area compared to the reduction using the LCfit plate without a metal block. CONCLUSION: The newly designed fixation system for OWHTO balanced the overall stress distribution and reduced stress at the lateral hinge area compared to that using a conventional fixation system. The addition of the metal block showed additional benefits for balanced stability between the medial implant and lateral hinge area. However, this conclusion could only be drawn using the FE model in this study. Therefore, further clinical studies are necessary to reveal the clinical effect of reduced lateral stress on the occurrence of the lateral hinge fracture and the biologic effect of the metal block on the healing of the medial cortex.

Efficacy and safety of a new elastic tourniquet cuff in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The effects of cuff shape, timing of tourniquet application, and automated systems using limb occlusion pressure (LOP) have been reported to minimize the appropriate tourniquet pressure. However, studies on the raw material of the cuff itself to reduce the complications related to the tourniquet have been very rarely reported. The purpose of this study is to report the efficacy and safety of a tourniquet system with a new elastic cuff in which pressure is set with LOP in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A total of 63 patients who underwent primary TKA for osteoarthritis were enrolled from July to December 2015. Thirty-one patients were allocated to the new elastic cuff group and 32 in the conventional cuff group. Bloodless surgical field, pain visual analog scale (VAS) on the thigh, thigh circumference, range of motion, incidence of deep vein thrombosis, and muscle enzyme level after surgery were checked and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Only 1 of the 31 patients in the elastic cuff group required more pressure for obtaining a bloodless surgical field, whereas 4 of the 32 patients in the conventional cuff group required more pressure to complete surgery without being disturbed by sustained bleeding. Two patients in the conventional cuff group needed treatment for blisters and bullae at the tourniquet application site. There was no difference in pain VAS score, thigh circumference, range of motion, incidence of deep vein thrombosis, and level of muscle enzyme. CONCLUSIONS: A new elastic tourniquet cuff provided a more proper bloodless surgical field with less adjustment of tourniquet pressure despite a similar level of tourniquet pressure compared to the conventional cuff and had a low incidence of skin complications on the site of tourniquet application in TKA. These benefits make it an effective and safe medical device for orthopedic surgery requiring a tourniquet, such as TKA.

Comparison of bone healing and outcomes between allogenous bone chip and hydroxyapatite chip grafts in open wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Allogenous bone chips and hydroxyapatite (HA) chips have been known as good options for filling an inevitable void after open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). However, there are concerns regarding bone healing after the use of these grafts. The purpose of this study was to compare the bone healing represented by the osteoconductivity and absorbability between allogenous bone chips and HA chips in OWHTO. The outcomes of bone healing of 53 patients who received an allogenous bone chip graft and 41 patients who received an HA chip graft were retrospectively evaluated, and the results were compared between the two groups. Osteoconductivity and absorbability were serially evaluated for the assessment of bone healing at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. The osteoconductivity of the allogenous bone chips was greater than that of the HA chips at 6 weeks postoperatively (p < 0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences from 3 months to 1 year postoperatively. The absorbability showed no statistically significant differences 6 weeks and 3 months after OWHTO; however, the allogenous bone chip group showed a greater absorbability at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively (42.8 ± 14.2 vs. 34.6 ± 13.8, p = 0.006 at 6 months postoperatively; 54.6 ± 14.4 vs. 43.0 ± 14.0, p < 0.001 at 1 year postoperatively). However, the two graft materials showed similar results of HKA angle, WBL ratio, posterior tibial slope.

Systematic Review of the Long-term Surgical Outcomes of Discoid Lateral Meniscus.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical treatment of the discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) with long-term follow-up and to search which factors are related to good clinical or radiological outcomes. METHODS: Search was performed using a MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database, and each of the selected studies was evaluated for methodological quality using a risk of bias (ROB) covering 7 criteria. Clinical and radiological outcomes with more than 5 years of follow-up were evaluated after surgical treatment of DLM. They were analyzed according to the age, follow-up period, kind of surgery, DLM type, and alignment. RESULTS: Eleven articles (422 DLM cases) were included in the final analysis. Among 7 criteria, 3 criteria showed little ROB in all studies. However, 4 criteria showed some ROB ("Yes" in 63.6% to 81.8%). The minimal follow-up period was 5.5 years (weighted mean follow-up: 9.1 years). Surgical procedures were performed with open or arthroscopic partial central meniscectomy, subtotal meniscectomy, total meniscectomy, or partial meniscectomy with repair. The majority of the studies showed good clinical results. Mild joint space narrowing was reported in the lateral compartment, but none of the knees demonstrated moderate or advanced degenerative changes. Increased age at surgery, longer follow-up period, and subtotal or total meniscectomy could be related to degenerative change. The majority of the complications was osteochondritis dissecans at the lateral femoral condyle (13 cases) and reoperation was performed by osteochondritis dissecans (4 cases), recurrent swelling (2 cases), residual symptom (1 case), stiffness (1 case), and popliteal stenosis (1 case). CONCLUSIONS: Good clinical results were obtained with surgical treatment of symptomatic DLM. The progression of degenerative change was minimal and none of the knees demonstrated moderate or advanced degenerative changes. Increased age at surgery, longer follow-up period, and subtotal or total meniscectomy were possible risk factors for degenerative changes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.

Kinematic alignment is a possible alternative to mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: A systematic review was conducted to answer the following questions: (1) Does kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) achieve clinical outcomes comparable to those of mechanically aligned (MA) TKA? (2) How do the limb, knee, and component alignments differ between KA and MA TKA? (3) How is joint line orientation angle (JLOA) changed from the native knee in KA TKA compared to that in MA TKA? METHODS: Nine full-text articles in English that reported the clinical and radiological outcomes of KA TKA were included. Five studies had a control group of patients who underwent MA TKA. Data on patient demographics, clinical scores, and radiological results were extracted. There were two level I, one level II, three level III, and three level IV studies. Six of the nine studies used patient-specific instrumentation, one study used computer navigation, and two studies used manual instrumentation. RESULTS: The clinical outcomes of KA TKA were comparable or superior to those of MA TKA with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Limb and knee alignment in KA TKA was similar to those in MA TKA, and component alignment showed slightly more varus in the tibial component and slightly more valgus in the femoral component. The JLOA in KA TKA was relatively parallel to the floor compared to that in the native knee and not oblique (medial side up and lateral side down) compared to that in MA TKA. The implant survivorship and complication rate of the KA TKA were similar to those of the MA TKA. CONCLUSION: Similar or better clinical outcomes were produced by using a KA TKA at early-term follow-up and the component alignment differed from that of MA TKA. KA TKA seemed to restore function without catastrophic failure regardless of the alignment category up to midterm follow-up. The JLOA in KA TKA was relatively parallel to the floor similar to the native knee compared to that in MA TKA. The present review of nine published studies suggests that relatively new kinematic alignment is an acceptable and alternative alignment to mechanical alignment, which is better understood. Further validation of these findings requires more randomized clinical trials with longer follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Effect and safety of early weight-bearing on the outcome after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early weight-bearing by comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between early and traditional delayed weight-bearing after OWHTO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A rigorous and systematic approach was used. The methodological quality was also assessed. Results that are possible to be compared in two or more than two articles were presented as forest plots. A 95% confidence interval was calculated for each effect size, and we calculated the I 2 statistic, which presents the percentage of total variation attributable to the heterogeneity among studies. The random-effects model was used to calculate the effect size. RESULTS: Six articles were included in the final analysis. All case groups were composed of early full weight-bearing within 2 weeks. All control groups were composed of late full weight-bearing between 6 weeks and 2 months. Pooled analysis was possible for the improvement in Lysholm score, but there was no statistically significant difference shown between groups. Other clinical results were also similar between groups. Four studies reported mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA) and this result showed no statistically significant difference between groups in the pooled analysis. Furthermore, early weight-bearing showed more favorable results in some radiologic results (osseointegration and patellar height) and complications (thrombophlebitis and recurrence). CONCLUSION: Our analysis supports that early full weight-bearing after OWHTO using a locking plate leads to improvement in outcomes and was comparable to the delayed weight-bearing in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes. On the contrary, early weight-bearing was more favorable with respect to some radiologic parameters and complications compared with delayed weight-bearing.