Pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy in platinum-pretreated, recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (KEYNOTE-122): an open-label, randomized, phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab previously demonstrated robust antitumor activity and manageable safety in a phase Ib study of patients with heavily pretreated, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive, recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The phase III KEYNOTE-122 study was conducted to further evaluate pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with platinum-pretreated, recurrent and/or metastatic NPC. Final analysis results are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: KEYNOTE-122 was an open-label, randomized study conducted at 29 sites, globally. Participants with platinum-pretreated recurrent and/or metastatic NPC were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to pembrolizumab or chemotherapy with capecitabine, gemcitabine, or docetaxel. Randomization was stratified by liver metastasis (present versus absent). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), analyzed in the intention-to-treat population using the stratified log-rank test (superiority threshold, one-sided P = 0.0187). Safety was assessed in the as-treated population. RESULTS: Between 5 May 2016 and 28 May 2018, 233 participants were randomly assigned to treatment (pembrolizumab, n = 117; chemotherapy, n = 116); Most participants (86.7%) received study treatment in the second-line or later setting. Median time from randomization to data cut-off (30 November 2020) was 45.1 months (interquartile range, 39.0-48.8 months). Median OS was 17.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.7-22.9 months] with pembrolizumab and 15.3 months (95% CI 10.9-18.1 months) with chemotherapy [hazard ratio, 0.90 (95% CI 0.67-1.19; P = 0.2262)]. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 12 of 116 participants (10.3%) with pembrolizumab and 49 of 112 participants (43.8%) with chemotherapy. Three treatment-related deaths occurred: 1 participant (0.9%) with pembrolizumab (pneumonitis) and 2 (1.8%) with chemotherapy (pneumonia, intracranial hemorrhage). CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab did not significantly improve OS compared with chemotherapy in participants with platinum-pretreated recurrent and/or metastatic NPC but did have manageable safety and a lower incidence of treatment-related adverse events.

Can Quantitative Measures of T790M Allelic Fraction Predict Survival Outcomes in Patients Receiving Osimertinib? Observations From an Early Access Programme.

AIMS: Multiple studies have shown conflicting results on the correlation between the EGFR T790M quantitative level and survival outcomes in osimertinib-treated patients. We sought to validate such correlations using data from an osimertinib early access programme (EAP) providing access for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients with limited treatment options. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This observational, multicentre, retrospective analysis included EAP participants who received osimertinib until disease progression, intolerable toxicities or death. Digital droplet polymerase chain reaction-based quantitative plasma genotyping was carried out upon disease progression and data were analysed to explore the relationships between T790M mutant allele fraction (MAF), T790M copy number, MAF ratio and post-osimertinib overall survival. Real-world treatment outcomes and safety were also evaluated. RESULTS: Data from 156 EAP participants were analysed (median follow-up 37.7 months). The median age was 62 years, 62.2% were women, 79.5% were never-smokers, 60.9% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1. In patients with available plasma data (n = 114), T790M MAF (%) showed no significant relationships with overall survival (hazard ratio 1.02; 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.04) or time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) (hazard ratio 1.01; 95% confidence interval 0.98-1.04). Absolute T790M copy number and T790M to activating EGFR mutation MAF ratio also showed no prognostic value. The investigator-assessed response rate was 42.3% and the disease control rate was 85.5%. The median TTD was 15.8 (95% confidence interval 12.5-18.5) months and the median overall survival was 22.3 (95% confidence interval 18.6-26.1) months. CONCLUSION: T790M MAF did not correlate with TTD or overall survival in this EAP cohort but limitations should not be overlooked. Observed survival outcomes and the toxicity profile were consistent with data from other real-world series.

Differences Between the East and the West in Managing Advanced-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Lung cancer is a common cancer associated with high mortality rates worldwide. Unfortunately, it usually presents at a late stage, precluding the chance of curative therapy. The discovery of oncogenic driver mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer over the past 20 years has led to new molecular targeted therapies that have dramatically improved treatment efficacy and quality of life. New generations of therapy that target the drug-resistant mutations have also quickly evolved, benefiting patients who are refractory or intolerant to first-line targeted therapy. Eastern patients, from Southeast Asia, Japan and China, are known to have a higher incidence of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. Therefore, compared with the West, more patients would benefit from these recent advances. In contrast, survival of patients without driver mutations has benefited from advances in novel therapeutics, including the immune checkpoint inhibitors. The current review aims to highlight the recent developments in the management of advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer and to compare the differences in clinical practice between Eastern and Western countries.

Chinese Medicine in Cancer Treatment - How is it Practised in the East and the West?

Chinese medicine therapies in cancer treatment are very common in the East. Although it is usually classified as a form of complementary and alternative therapy in the West, Chinese medicine is an independent medical profession in Hong Kong and mainland China. It has a different perspective in understanding health and diseases compared with Western medicine. In oncology practice, whereas Western medicine focuses on direct tumour eradication by surgery, radiation therapy and systemic therapies, Chinese medicine focuses on restoring body balance and enhancing the body's defences (immunity), in addition to some cytotoxic herbal therapies. Most often patients, especially those in the East, receive both treatments. Chinese medicine is also commonly used to reduce side-effects from chemotherapy or radiation therapy, to aid recovery after an operation, to palliate symptoms and to address survivorship issues. However, this raises concerns of drug-herb interactions and toxicity in combination therapies. Commonly used Chinese medicine treatment modalities include acupuncture, moxibustion, diet therapy, prescribed Chinese medicine herbal decoction, single Chinese medicine herbs or supplements and tai chi. Although there is an increasing trend of Chinese medicine use in cancer patients in both the East and the West, the scientific evidence of safety and efficacy is often questioned by oncologists. This article reviews the current evidence in different Chinese medicine therapies in cancer management in both the East and the West.

Gastric Cancer - From Aetiology to Management: Differences Between the East and the West.

Gastric cancers are highly prevalent in both the East and the West, although they differ in aetiology and prognostic outcome. Management of gastric cancer from screening to definitive treatment varies substantially between Eastern and Western countries and regions, owing to numerous factors, including government incentives to carry out population-wide screening programmes to detect early disease, differences in clinical and biological tumour behaviours and responsiveness to treatment, patient accessibility to effective treatment, etc. This review highlights and contrasts the differences in tumour aetiology and histology, as well as the management approaches between the East and the West, which gives important insights and inspirations on future international multicentre research collaboration to combat this dreadful malignancy.

Integrative Palliative Cancer Care in Hong Kong: An Overview and an Example from the East.

Cancer is the most common cause of mortality worldwide. Although recent advances of multiple modality cancer management have significantly improved the cure and control rates, a significant proportion of patients are still refractory to the standard and available treatments. Early initiation of palliative care can reduce cancer suffering, improve health-related quality of life and possibly prolong survival. It also allows patients and their caretakers to perceive the trajectory of their cancer, so that better and advanced care planning can be contemplated and implemented. The traditional beliefs and perceptions of cancer also differ significantly between the East and the West, which may also affect the preferential approach to palliative care. This review provides an overview of palliative care services in Hong Kong, as compared with other parts of the world. In addition, we shall also explore how cancer perceptions affect the decision-making on palliative care.

Contrasting Some Differences in Managing Advanced Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Between the East and the West.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy worldwide, although its aetiologies vary significantly between the East and the West. About a half of HCC cases present with advanced unresectable HCC at the time of diagnosis, leading to a worse prognosis. Over the past 20 years, the treatment paradigm for advanced unresectable HCC has shifted from an entirely palliative approach to a multidisciplinary treatment, with continuous reassessment and possible repeat treatment attributed to the advent of novel and improved local, regional and systemic therapeutic options, contributed by both the East and the West. An individualised treatment plan should be determined for each patient, as there can be substantial differences in the decision-making and treatment response to the same treatment for different patients and different patient populations. This review provides a summary of the recent advances in management and compares Eastern and Western strategies for HCC.

Advancing Care for Head and Neck Cancers in a Multidisciplinary Tumour Board in the East.

Managing head and neck cancers is an excellent example of the importance of teamwork, with head and neck surgeons, clinical oncologists, radiologists, pathologists and other allied health professionals specialised in this disease site working together. The reliable imaging and dedicated pretreatment work-up entailing the comprehensive anatomical description of tumour involvement by the radiologists, the expertise of surgeons in performing en-bloc gross tumour resection, the uneventful speedy postoperative rehabilitation and recovery by the speech therapists and nutritionists, as well as the dedicated treatment planning of clinical oncologists in delivering precise preoperative or postoperative (chemo)radiotherapy to maximise the therapeutic potentials are the pillars of treatment success. A multidisciplinary tumour board involving all of these key players is essential to provide the highest level of recommendation based on evidence-based medicine and to bring patients new hopes and the best chance of cure. This review illustrates the seamless collaborative teamwork within a well-established multidisciplinary tumour board in managing one of the most intractable cancers in the East, taking enlightenment and inspiration from the West.

The Role of Radiotherapy in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-positive Patients with Oligoprogression: A Matched-cohort Analysis.

AIMS: Almost all patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations will develop resistance to first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The management of oligoprogression on EGFR TKI is controversial. Irradiating progressing tumours may potentially eradicate the resistant clone and allow continuation of EGFR TKI, but the clinical data remain sparse. We aimed to assess the effect of radiotherapy on survival outcomes in patients with oligoprogression in a matched-cohort study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective matched-cohort study comparing patients with EGFR mutation-positive stage IV non-small cell lung cancer receiving radiotherapy versus chemotherapy for progression. Patients in the radiotherapy group received radiotherapy (mainly stereotactic ablative radiotherapy) for oligoprogression, whereas the chemotherapy group received only systemic chemotherapy upon progression. Key prognostic factors including gender, age, performance status, time to first progression and mutation subtypes were matched. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with oligoprogression (radiotherapy group) were identified, and a matched chemotherapy group with the same number of patients was generated. The median duration of follow-up was 24.3 and 34 months for the radiotherapy and chemotherapy groups, respectively. The median overall survival of the radiotherapy group was significantly longer than the chemotherapy group, 28.2 versus 14.7 months (P = 0.026). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.0 and 4.1 months after radiotherapy and chemotherapy, respectively (P = 0.0017). The use of radiotherapy was an independent predictive factor of overall survival and PFS in multivariate analysis. Only one patient had ≥grade 3 toxicity after radiotherapy. The frequency of secondary T790M mutation and subsequent Osimertinib exposure were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy may effectively extend EGFR TKI therapy for patients with oligoprogression on TKI. Improved PFS and overall survival were observed, although potential biases should not be overlooked. Further randomised studies are warranted.

Post-radiation Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA and Local Clinical Remission After Radical Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

AIMS: We studied if post-radiation plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA predicted local clinical remission after radical intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma with baseline and serial plasma EBV DNA were treated with radical IMRT ± adjunct chemotherapy. Eight weeks after IMRT, they had plasma EBV DNA and routine six-site random nasopharyngeal biopsies on the same day. A repeat biopsy was carried out every 2 weeks if residual tumours were noted in previous biopsies until 12 weeks after IMRT when local persistence was defined. Correlation of undetectable plasma EBV DNA with local clinical remission was carried out. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty patients with serial plasma EBV DNA completed IMRT, after a median follow-up of 3.1 years. Only one (0.4%) suffered from local persistence. Area under the curve values of receiver operating characteristics of undetectable plasma EBV DNA for negative biopsy at 8 weeks and local persistence were 0.642 and 0.439, respectively. They increased to 0.856 (P = 0.007) and 0.952 (P = 0.119), respectively, when combined with age <65 years and T1/T2 stage. CONCLUSIONS: Post-treatment plasma EBV DNA was not useful to predict local clinical remission in this study, probably because of excellent local control after IMRT. However, it may serve as a reference for high-risk patients treated with older radiation techniques.

Manual contouring based volumetric evaluation for colorectal cancer with liver limited metastases: a comparison with RECIST.

BACKGROUND: To compare response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) and volumetric evaluation (VE) for colorectal cancer with liver-limited metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: VE of liver metastases was performed by manual contouring before and after chemotherapy on 45 pairs of computed tomography (CT) images in 36 patients who suffered from metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with liver metastasis only. Cohen kappa was used to compare the agreement between VE and RECIST. Pearson correlation was performed for their comparison after cubic root transformation of the aggregate tumor volumes. Logistic regression was done to identify clinical and radiographic factors to account for the difference which may be predictive in overall response (OR). RESULTS: There were 16 partial response (PR), 23 stable disease (SD) and 6 progressive disease (PD) cases with VE, and 14 PR, 23 SD and 8 PD with RECIST. VE demonstrated good agreement with RECIST (κ=0.779). Discordant objective responses were noted in 6 pairs of comparisons (13.3%). Pearson correlation also showed excellent correlation between VE and RECIST (r2=0.966, p<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that VE was in slightly better agreement with RECIST for enlarging lesions than for shrinking lesions (r2=0.935 and r2=0.780 respectively). No factor was found predictive of the difference in OR between VE and RECIST. CONCLUSIONS: VE exhibited good agreement with RECIST. It might be more useful than RECIST in evaluation shrinking lesions in cases of numerous and conglomerate liver metastases.