Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
1.
J Radiol Prot ; 42(3)2022 07 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35785774

RESUMEN

The US National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) convened Scientific Committee 6-12 (SC 6-12) to examine methods for improving dose estimates for brain tissue for internally deposited radionuclides, with emphasis on alpha emitters. This Memorandum summarises the main findings of SC 6-12 described in the recently published NCRP Commentary No. 31, 'Development of Kinetic and Anatomical Models for Brain Dosimetry for Internally Deposited Radionuclides'. The Commentary examines the extent to which dose estimates for the brain could be improved through increased realism in the biokinetic and dosimetric models currently used in radiation protection and epidemiology. A limitation of most of the current element-specific systemic biokinetic models is the absence of brain as an explicitly identified source region with its unique rate(s) of exchange of the element with blood. The brain is usually included in a large source region calledOtherthat contains all tissues not considered major repositories for the element. In effect, all tissues inOtherare assigned a common set of exchange rates with blood. A limitation of current dosimetric models for internal emitters is that activity in the brain is treated as a well-mixed pool, although more sophisticated models allowing consideration of different activity concentrations in different regions of the brain have been proposed. Case studies for 18 internal emitters indicate that brain dose estimates using current dosimetric models may change substantially (by a factor of 5 or more), or may change only modestly, by addition of a sub-model of the brain in the biokinetic model, with transfer rates based on results of published biokinetic studies and autopsy data for the element of interest. As a starting place for improving brain dose estimates, development of biokinetic models with explicit sub-models of the brain (when sufficient biokinetic data are available) is underway for radionuclides frequently encountered in radiation epidemiology. A longer-term goal is development of coordinated biokinetic and dosimetric models that address the distribution of major radioelements among radiosensitive brain tissues.


Asunto(s)
Protección Radiológica , Radioisótopos , Encéfalo , Cinética , Modelos Biológicos , Dosis de Radiación , Radiometría/métodos
2.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 100(2): 161-175, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37819879

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Mallinckrodt Chemical Works was a uranium processing facility during the Manhattan Project from 1942 to 1966. Thousands of workers were exposed to low-dose-rates of ionizing radiation from external and internal sources. This third follow-up of 2514 White male employees updates cancer and noncancer mortality potentially associated with radiation and silica dust. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Individual, annualized organ doses were estimated from film badge records (n monitored = 2514), occupational chest x-rays (n = 2514), uranium urinalysis (n = 1868), radium intake through radon breath measurements (n = 487), and radon ambient measurements (n = 1356). Silica dust exposure from pitchblende processing was estimated (n = 1317). Vital status and cause of death determination through 2019 relied upon the National Death Index and Social Security Administration Epidemiological Vital Status Service. The analysis included standardized mortality ratios (SMRs), Cox proportional hazards, and Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Vital status was confirmed for 99.4% of workers (84.0% deceased). For a dose weighting factor of 1 for intakes of uranium, radium, and radon decay products, the mean and median lung doses were 65.6 and 29.9 mGy, respectively. SMRs indicated a difference in health outcomes between salaried and hourly workers, and more brain cancer deaths than expected [SMR: 1.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14, 2.70]. No association was seen between radiation and lung cancer [hazard ratio (HR) at 100 mGy: 0.93; 95%CI: 0.78, 1.11]. The relationship between radiation and kidney cancer observed in the previous follow-up was maintained (HR at 100 mGy: 2.07; 95%CI: 1.12, 3.79). Cardiovascular disease (CVD) also increased significantly with heart dose (HR at 100 mGy: 1.11; 95%CI: 1.02, 1.21). Exposures to dust ≥23.6 mg/m3-year were associated with nonmalignant kidney disease (NMKD) (HR: 3.02; 95%CI: 1.12, 8.16) and kidney cancer combined with NMKD (HR: 2.46; 95%CI: 1.04, 5.81), though without evidence of a dose-response per 100 mg/m3-year. CONCLUSIONS: This third follow-up of Mallinckrodt uranium processors reinforced the results of the previous studies. There was an excess of brain cancers compared with the US population, although no radiation dose-response was detected. The association between radiation and kidney cancer remained, though potentially due to few cases at higher doses. The association between levels of silica dust ≥23.6 mg/m3-year and NMKD also remained. No association was observed between radiation and lung cancer. A positive dose-response was observed between radiation and CVD; however, this association may be confounded by smoking, which was unmeasured. Future work will pool these data with other uranium processing worker cohorts within the Million Person Study.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Neoplasias Renales , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Radio (Elemento) , Radón , Uranio , Humanos , Masculino , Uranio/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estudios de Cohortes , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Renales/complicaciones , Polvo , Dióxido de Silicio , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología
3.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 99(2): 208-228, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35758985

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are few occupational studies of women exposed to ionizing radiation. During World War II, the Tennessee Eastman Corporation (TEC) operated an electromagnetic field separation facility of 1152 calutrons to obtain enriched uranium (235U) used for the Hiroshima atomic bomb. Thousands of women were involved in these operations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A new study was conducted of 13,951 women and 12,699 men employed at TEC between 1943 and 1947 for at least 90 days. Comprehensive dose reconstruction techniques were used to estimate lung doses from the inhalation of uranium dust based on airborne measurements. Vital status through 2018/2019 was obtained from the National Death Index, Social Security Death Index, Tennessee death records and online public record databases. Analyses included standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Most workers were hourly (77.7%), white (95.6%), born before 1920 (58.3%), worked in dusty environments (57.0%), and had died (94.9%). Vital status was confirmed for 97.4% of the workers. Women were younger than men when first employed: mean ages 25.0 years and 33.0 years, respectively. The estimated mean absorbed dose to the lung was 32.7 mGy (max 1048 mGy) for women and 18.9 mGy (max 501 mGy) for men. The mean dose to thoracic lymph nodes (TLNs) was 127 mGy. Statistically significant SMRs were observed for lung cancer (SMR 1.25; 95% CI 1.19, 1.31; n = 1654), nonmalignant respiratory diseases (NMRDs) (1.23; 95% CI 1.19, 1.28; n = 2585), and cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) (1.13; 95% CI 1.08, 1.18; n = 1945). For lung cancer, the excess relative rate (ERR) at 100 mGy (95% CI) was 0.01 (-0.10, 0.12; n = 652) among women, and -0.15 (-0.38, 0.07; n = 1002) among men based on a preferred model for men with lung doses <300 mGy. NMRD and non-Hodgkin lymphoma were not associated with estimated absorbed dose to the lung or TLN. CONCLUSIONS: There was little evidence that radiation increased the risk of lung cancer, suggesting that inhalation of uranium dust and the associated high-LET alpha particle exposure to lung tissue experienced over a few years is less effective in causing lung cancer than other types of exposures. There was no statistically significant difference in the lung cancer risk estimates between men and women. The elevation of certain causes of death such as CeVD is unexplained and will require additional scrutiny of workplace or lifestyle factors given that radiation is an unlikely contributor since only the lung and lymph nodes received appreciable dose.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Uranio , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Uranio/efectos adversos , Tennessee , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Polvo
4.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 98(4): 644-656, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30513240

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Element-specific biokinetic models are used to reconstruct doses to systemic tissues from internal emitters. Typically, a systemic model for a radionuclide explicitly depicts only its dominant repositories. Remaining tissues and fluids are aggregated into a pool called Other tissue in which the radionuclide is assumed to be uniformly distributed. In the systemic biokinetic models used in radiation protection, the brain usually is addressed as an implicit mass fraction of Other tissue rather than an explicitly depicted repository. Due to increasing interest in radiation effects on the brain, efforts are underway to improve brain dosimetry for internal radiation sources. METHODS: We assessed potential improvements in brain dosimetry for internal emitters by explicitly modeling brain kinetics rather than treating the brain as a mass fraction of Other tissue. We selected 10 elements for which brain kinetics can be modeled using published biokinetic data. Injection dose coefficients were calculated for a relatively long-lived radioisotope of each element using each of two versions of the ICRP's latest systemic biokinetic model for the element, the original version and a modified version differing only in the treatment of brain. If the ICRP model contained an explicit brain pool, the modified version depicted brain instead as a mass fraction of Other tissue. If the ICRP model included brain in Other tissue, the modified version included an explicit brain pool with kinetics based on best available brain-specific data. RESULTS: The result for a given radionuclide is expressed as a ratio A:B, where A and B are the dose coefficients based on the versions of the model with and without an explicit brain pool, respectively. The following ratios A:B were obtained for the 10 radionuclides addressed here: 241Am, 0.13; 207Bi, 0.57; 234U, 0.81; 239Pu, 0.96; 203Hg (vapor), 1.4; 134Cs, 1.5; 54Mn, 1.7; 210Po, 1.7; 226Ra, 1.9; 210Pb, 3.3. These ratios indicate that a dose estimate for brain based on a biokinetic model with brain implicitly contained in Other tissue may substantially underestimate or substantially overestimate a dose estimate that reflects best available brain-specific biokinetic data. Of course, the reliability of the latter estimate depends on the quality of the underlying biokinetic data. CONCLUSIONS: Where feasible, the brain should be depicted explicitly in biokinetic models used in epidemiological studies addressing adverse effects of ionizing radiation.


Asunto(s)
Protección Radiológica , Encéfalo , Radioisótopos/efectos adversos , Radiometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
5.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 98(4): 631-643, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30561241

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As part of the Million Person Study (MPS), dose reconstructions for internal emitters have been performed for several U.S. facilities where large quantities of radionuclides were handled. The main challenges and dominant sources of potential error in retrospective dose estimates for internally exposed workers have been found to vary from site to site. This article discusses some important issues encountered in dose reconstructions performed for selected MPS sites and the approaches used to address those issues. The focus is on some foundational components of retrospective dose assessments that have received little attention in the literature. METHODS: The discussion is built around illustrative exposure data and dose reconstructions for workers at selected facilities addressed in the MPS. Related findings at some non-MPS sites are also discussed. RESULTS: Each of the following items has been found to be a major source of potential error in reconstructed tissue doses for some MPS sites: identification of all dosimetrically important internal emitters; the time pattern of intake; the mode(s) of intake; reliability of bioassay measurements; application of surrogate (coworker) information in lieu of, or in conjunction with, worker-specific monitoring data; the chemical and physical forms of inhaled radionuclides; and the relation of air monitoring data to actual intake. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Much of the dose reconstruction effort for internal emitters should be devoted to development of best feasible exposure scenarios. (2) Coworker data should be used to assign exposure scenarios or dose estimates to workers with missing exposure data only if there is compelling evidence of similar coworker exposure. (3) Bioassay data for some radionuclides and periods of operation at MPS sites are of questionable reliability due to sizable uncertainties associated with contamination, recovery, or background issues. (4) Dose estimates derived solely from air monitoring data should be treated as highly uncertain values in the absence of site-specific information demonstrating that the data are reasonably predictive of intake. (5) For intakes known or assumed to be via inhalation, the uncertainty in lung dose typically is much greater than the uncertainty in dose to systemic tissues, when dose estimates are based on urinary excretion data. (6) The lung dose estimate often can be improved through development of site-specific respiratory absorption parameter values. (7) There is generally insufficient site-specific information to justify development of site-specific systemic models.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Dosis de Radiación , Radioisótopos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo
6.
Health Phys ; 123(2): 165-172, 2022 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35594483

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Radiation dosimetry is central to virtually all radiation safety applications, optimization, and research. It relates to various individuals and population groups and to miscellaneous exposure situations-including planned, existing, and emergency situations. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has developed a new computational framework for internal dose estimations. Important components are more detailed and improved anatomical models and more realistic biokinetic models than before. The ICRP is currently producing new organ dose and effective dose coefficients for occupational intakes of radionuclides (OIR) and environmental intakes of radionuclides (EIR), which supersede the earlier dose coefficients in Publication 68 and the Publication 72 series, respectively. However, the ICRP only publishes dose coefficients for a single acute intake of a radionuclide and for an integration period of 50 years for intake by adults and to age 70 years for intakes by pre-adults. The new software, IDAC-Bio, performs committed absorbed dose and effective dose calculations for a selectable intake scenario, e.g., for a continuous intake or an intake during x hours per day and y days per week, and for any selected integration time. The software uses the primary data and models of the ICRP biokinetic models and numerically solves the biokinetic model and calculates the absorbed doses to organs and tissues in the ICRP reference human phantoms. The software calculates absorbed dose using the nuclear decay data in ICRP publication 107. IDAC-Bio is a further development and an important addition to the internal dosimetry program IDAC-Dose2.1. The results generated by the software were validated against published ICRP dose coefficients. The potential of the software is illustrated by dose calculations for a nuclear power plant worker who had been exposed to varying levels of 60 Co and who had undergone repeated whole-body measurements, and for a hypothetical member of the public subject to future releases of 148 Gd from neutron spallation in tungsten at the European Spallation Source.


Asunto(s)
Protección Radiológica , Anciano , Humanos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Dosis de Radiación , Radioisótopos , Radiometría/métodos , Programas Informáticos
7.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 98(4): 701-721, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30652958

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Mallinckrodt Chemical Works (MCW) was the earliest uranium processing facility in the United States, and in 1942 produced the uranium oxide used for the first sustained and controlled nuclear fission chain-reaction at the University of Chicago. A second follow-up through 2012 was conducted of 2514 White male workers employed 1942-1966 at the MCW for dose-response analyses for selected causes of death. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Organ/tissue-specific dose reconstruction included both external (12,686 MCW film badge records, 210 other facility film badge records, and 31,297 occupational chest x-rays) and internal sources of uranium and radium (39,451 urine bioassays, 2341 breath radon measurements, and 6846 ambient radon measurements). Dust measurements from pitchblende facilitated quantitative risk estimates for non-radiogenic effects on the lung and kidney. Vital status was determined from multiple sources including the National Death Index and the Social Security Administration. Cox regression models were used for dose response analyses. RESULTS: Vital status was determined for 99% of the workers, of whom 75% had died. The mean lung dose from all sources of external and internal radiation combined was 69.9 mGy (maximum 885 mGy; percent workers >100 mGy, 10%) and there was no evidence for a dose response for lung cancer (Hazard Ratio (HR) of 0.95 (95% CI = 0.81-1.12) at 100 mGy). A significant association with radiation was found for kidney cancer (HR of 1.73 (95% CI = 1.04-2.79) at 100 mGy) and suggested for nonmalignant kidney diseases (HR of 1.30 (95% CI = 0.96-1.76) at 100 mGy). A non-radiation etiology could not be discounted, however, because of the possible renal toxicities of uranium, a heavy metal, and silica, a component of pitchblende dust. Non-significant HRs at 100 mGy for other sites of a priori interest were 0.36 (0.06-2.03) for leukemia other than CLL, 0.68 (0.17-2.77) for liver cancer, and 1.23 (0.79-1.90) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The HR at 100 mGy was 1.09 (0.99-1.20) for ischemic heart disease. An association was seen between dust and combined malignant and non-malignant lung disease, HR at 10 mgm-3year-1 of 1.01 (1.00-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: A positive radiation dose response was observed for malignant and non-malignant kidney disease, and a negative dose response for malignant and non-malignant lung disease. Cumulative measures of dust were significantly associated with malignant and non-malignant lung disease and suggested for malignant and non-malignant kidney disease. Small numbers preclude definitive interpretations which will await the combination with similar studies of early uranium processing workers.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Exposición Profesional , Radón , Uranio , Polvo , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos , Uranio/efectos adversos
8.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 98(4): 750-768, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33900890

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This paper reviews the history of the radium dial workers in the United States, summarizes the scientific progress made since the last evaluation in the early 1990s, and discusses current progress in updating the epidemiologic cohort and applying new dosimetric models for radiation risk assessment. BACKGROUND: The discoveries of radiation and radioactivity led quickly to medical and commercial applications at the turn of the 20th century, including the development of radioluminescent paint, made by combining radium with phosphorescent material and adhesive. Workers involved with the painting of dials and instruments included painters, handlers, ancillary workers, and chemists who fabricated the paint. Dial painters were primarily women and, prior to the mid to late 1920s, would use their lips to give the brush a fine point, resulting in high intakes of radium. The tragic experience of the dial painters had a significant impact on industrial safety standards, including protection measures taken during the Manhattan Project. The dial workers study has formed the basis for radiation protection standards for intakes of radionuclides by workers and the public. EPIDEMIOLOGIC APPROACH: The mortality experience of 3,276 radium dial painters and handlers employed between 1913 and 1949 is being determined through 2019. The last epidemiologic follow-up was 30 years ago when most of these workers were still alive. Nearly 65% were born before 1920, 37.5% were teenagers when first hired, and nearly 50% were hired before 1930 when the habit of placing brushes in mouths essentially stopped. Comprehensive dose reconstruction techniques are being applied to estimate organ doses for each worker related to the intake of 226Ra, 228Ra, and associated photon exposures. Time dependent dose-response analyses will estimate lifetime risks for specific causes of death. DISCUSSION: The study of radium dial workers is part of the Million Person Study of low-dose health effects that is designed to evaluate radiation risks among healthy American workers and veterans. Despite being one of the most important and influential radiation effects studies ever conducted, shifting programmatic responsibilities and declining funding led to the termination of the radium program of studies in the early 1990s. Renewed interest and opportunity have arisen. With scientific progress made in dosimetric methodology and models, the ability to perform a study over the entire life span, and the potential applicability to other scenarios such as medicine, environmental contamination and space exploration, the radium dial workers have once again come to the forefront.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Radiación , Protección Radiológica , Radio (Elemento) , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Radioisótopos/análisis , Radiometría/métodos , Estados Unidos
9.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 98(4): 722-749, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34047625

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During World War II (WWII), the Manhattan Engineering District established a secret laboratory in the mountains of northern New Mexico. The mission was to design, construct and test the first atomic weapon, nicknamed 'The Gadget' that was detonated at the TRINITY site in Alamogordo, NM. After WWII, nuclear weapons research continued, and the laboratory became the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mortality experience of 26,328 workers first employed between 1943 and 1980 at LANL was determined through 2017. Included were 6157 contract workers employed by the ZIA Company. Organ dose estimates for each worker considered all sources of exposure, notably photons, neutrons, tritium, 238Pu and 239Pu. Vital status determination included searches within the National Death Index, Social Security Administration and New Mexico State Mortality Files. Standardized Mortality Ratios (SMR) and Cox regression models were used in the analyses. RESULTS: Most workers (55%) were hired before 1960, 38% had a college degree, 25% were female, 81% white, 13% Hispanic and 60% had died. Vital status was complete, with only 0.1% lost to follow-up. The mean dose to the lung for the 17,053 workers monitored for radiation was 28.6 weighted-mGy (maximum 16.8 weighted-Gy) assuming a Dose Weighting Factor of 20 for alpha particle dose to lung. The Excess Relative Risk (ERR) at 100 weighted-mGy was 0.01 (95%CI -0.02, 0.03; n = 839) for lung cancer. The ERR at 100 mGy was -0.43 (95%CI -1.11, 0.24; n = 160) for leukemia other than chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), -0.06 (95%CI -0.16, 0.04; n = 3043) for ischemic heart disease (IHD), and 0.29 (95%CI 0.02, 0.55; n = 106) for esophageal cancer. Among the 6499 workers with measurable intakes of plutonium, an increase in bone cancer (SMR 2.44; 95%CI 0.98, 5.03; n = 7) was related to dose. The SMR for berylliosis was significantly high, based on 4 deaths. SMRs for Hispanic workers were significantly high for cancers of the stomach and liver, cirrhosis of the liver, nonmalignant kidney disease and diabetes, but the excesses were not related to radiation dose. CONCLUSIONS: There was little evidence that radiation increased the risk of lung cancer or leukemia. Esophageal cancer was associated with radiation, and plutonium intakes were linked to an increase of bone cancer. IHD was not associated with radiation dose. More precise evaluations will await the pooled analysis of workers with similar exposures such as at Rocky Flats, Savannah River and Hanford.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Leucemia , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Plutonio , Femenino , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos
10.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 98(4): 600-609, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30452303

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Scientific Committee 6-9 was established by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), charged to provide guidance in the derivation of organ doses and their uncertainty, and produced a report, NCRP Report No. 178, Deriving Organ Doses and their Uncertainty for Epidemiologic Studies with a focus on the Million Person Study of Low-Dose Radiation Health Effects (MPS). This review summarizes the conclusions and recommendations of NCRP Report No. 178, with a concentration on and overview of the dosimetry and uncertainty approaches for the cohorts in the MPS, along with guidelines regarding the essential approaches used to estimate organ doses and their uncertainties (from external and internal sources) within the framework of an epidemiologic study. CONCLUSIONS: The success of the MPS is tied to the validity of the dose reconstruction approaches to provide realistic estimates of organ-specific radiation absorbed doses that are as accurate and precise as possible and to properly evaluate their accompanying uncertainties. The dosimetry aspects for the MPS are challenging in that they address diverse exposure scenarios for diverse occupational groups being studied over a period of up to 70 y. Specific dosimetric reconstruction issues differ among the varied exposed populations that are considered: atomic veterans, U.S. Department of Energy workers exposed to both penetrating radiation and intakes of radionuclides, nuclear power plant workers, medical radiation workers, and industrial radiographers. While a major source of radiation exposure to the study population comes from external gamma- or x-ray sources, for some of the study groups, there is also a meaningful component of radionuclide intakes that requires internal radiation dosimetry assessments.


Asunto(s)
Protección Radiológica , Radiometría , Humanos , Plantas de Energía Nuclear , Dosis de Radiación , Radioisótopos , Incertidumbre
11.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 98(4): 795-821, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34669549

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies of radiation-exposed populations form the basis for human safety standards. They also help shape public health policy and evidence-based health practices by identifying and quantifying health risks of exposure in defined populations. For more than a century, epidemiologists have studied the consequences of radiation exposures, yet the health effects of low levels delivered at a low-dose rate remain equivocal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Million Person Study (MPS) of U.S. Radiation Workers and Veterans was designed to examine health effects following chronic exposures in contrast with brief exposures as experienced by the Japanese atomic bomb survivors. Radiation associations for rare cancers, intakes of radionuclides, and differences between men and women are being evaluated, as well as noncancers such as cardiovascular disease and conditions such as dementia and cognitive function. The first international symposium, held November 6, 2020, provided a broad overview of the MPS. Representatives from four U.S. government agencies addressed the importance of this research for their respective missions: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The major components of the MPS were discussed and recent findings summarized. The importance of radiation dosimetry, an essential feature of each MPS investigation, was emphasized. RESULTS: The seven components of the MPS are DOE workers, nuclear weapons test participants, nuclear power plant workers, industrial radiographers, medical radiation workers, nuclear submariners, other U.S. Navy personnel, and radium dial painters. The MPS cohorts include tens of thousands of workers with elevated intakes of alpha particle emitters for which organ-specific doses are determined. Findings to date for chronic radiation exposure suggest that leukemia risk is lower than after acute exposure; lung cancer risk is much lower and there is little difference in risks between men and women; an increase in ischemic heart disease is yet to be seen; esophageal cancer is frequently elevated but not myelodysplastic syndrome; and Parkinson's disease may be associated with radiation exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The MPS has provided provocative insights into the possible range of health effects following low-level chronic radiation exposure. When the 34 MPS cohorts are completed and combined, a powerful evaluation of radiation-effects will be possible. This final article in the MPS special issue summarizes the findings to date and the possibilities for the future. A National Center for Radiation Epidemiology and Biology is envisioned.


Asunto(s)
Armas Nucleares , Exposición a la Radiación , Biología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Plantas de Energía Nuclear , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Radiometría
12.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 191(1): 39-120, 2020 Nov 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33103193

RESUMEN

Inhalation and ingestion dose coefficients for the embryo and fetus from intakes of radionuclides by the mother are provided in the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 88 for intake of each of 74 radionuclides. To address the many other possible radionuclides to which workers may be exposed, effective dose coefficients were developed for the embryo/fetus for all additional radionuclides addressed in ICRP Publication 107 with half-life of 10 min or more. The general approach was to use the estimated dose to the mother's uterus during pregnancy as a scalable proxy for the dose to the embryo/fetus. The set of scaling factors used in the study was derived from analyses of the relationships of the dose to the mother's uterus and the effective dose to the embryo/fetus for the ~400 cases (considering two intake modes and multiple forms of many of the radionuclides) addressed in Publication 88.


Asunto(s)
Protección Radiológica , Administración por Inhalación , Femenino , Feto , Humanos , Embarazo , Dosis de Radiación , Radioisótopos
13.
Phys Med Biol ; 63(15): 155022, 2018 08 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29999494

RESUMEN

Estimates of regional blood volumes (BVs) in humans are needed in dosimetric models of radionuclides and radiopharmaceuticals that decay in the circulation to a significant extent. These values are also needed to refine models of tissue elemental composition in computational human phantoms of both patients and exposed members of the general public. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) in its Publication 89 provides reference values for total blood content in the full series of their reference individuals, to include the male and female newborn, 1 year-old, 5 year-old, 10 year-old, 15 year-old, and adult. Furthermore, Publication 89 provides reference values for the percentage distribution of total blood volume in 27 different blood-filled organs and tissues of the reference adult male and adult female. However, no similar distribution values are provided for non-adults. The goal of the present study is to present a volumetric scaling methodology to derive these values for the same organs and tissues at ages younger than the reference adult. Literature data on organ-specific vascular growth in the brain, kidneys, and skeletal tissues are also considered.


Asunto(s)
Volumen Sanguíneo , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Protección Radiológica/normas , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Órganos en Riesgo/irrigación sanguínea , Fantasmas de Imagen , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Radiometría/métodos , Valores de Referencia
14.
Health Phys ; 114(4): 386-397, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29481529

RESUMEN

Mallinckrodt Chemical Works was the earliest uranium processing facility in the Manhattan Project, beginning in 1942. Even then, concern existed about possible health effects resulting from exposure to radiation and pitchblende dust. This concern was well founded as the facility processed Belgian Congo pitchblende ore that was up to 60% pure uranium with high U content and up to 100 mg of radium per ton. Workers were exposed to external gamma radiation plus internal radiation from inhalation and ingestion of pitchblende dust (uranium, radium, and silica). Multiple sources of exposure were available for organ dose reconstruction to a degree unique for an epidemiologic study. Personal film badge measures available from 1945 captured external exposures. Additional external exposure included 15,518 occupational medical x-rays and 210 radiation exposure records from other facilities outside of Mallinckrodt employment. Organ dose calculations considered organ-specific coefficients that account for photon energy and job-specific orientation of workers to the radiation source during processing. Intakes of uranium and radium were based on 39,451 uranium urine bioassays and 2,341 breath radon measurements, and International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 68 biokinetic models were used to estimate organ-specific radiation absorbed dose. Estimates of exposure to airborne radon and its short-lived progeny were based on radon measurements in work areas where radium-containing materials were handled or stored, together with estimated exposure times in these areas based on job titles. Dose estimates for radon and its short-lived progeny were based on models and methods recently recommended in ICRP Publication 137. This comprehensive dosimetric approach follows methods outlined by the National Council on Radiation Protection Scientific Committee 6-9 for the Million Worker Study. Annual doses were calculated for six organs: lung, brain, heart, kidney, colon and red bone marrow. Evaluation and adjustment for individual cumulative measures of pitchblende dust inhalation were made for lung and kidney diseases.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Radiactivos del Aire/análisis , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/diagnóstico , Reactores Nucleares , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Exposición a la Radiación/análisis , Protección Radiológica/normas , Radiometría/métodos , Contaminantes Radiactivos del Aire/efectos adversos , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
Health Phys ; 114(4): 381-385, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29481528

RESUMEN

The purpose of this paper is to present an overview of ongoing work on the Million Worker Study (MWS), highlighting some of the key methods and progress so far as exemplified by the study of workers at the Mallinckrodt Chemical Works (MCW). The MWS began nearly 25 y ago and continues in a stepwise fashion, evaluating one study cohort at a time. It includes workers from U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Manhattan Project facilities, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulated nuclear power plants, industrial radiographers, U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) nuclear weapons test participants, and physicians and technologists working with medical radiation. The purpose is to fill the major gap in radiation protection and science: What is the risk when exposure is received gradually over time rather than briefly as for the atomic bomb survivors? Studies published or planned in 2018 include leukemia (and dosimetry) among atomic veterans, leukemia among nuclear power plant workers, mortality among workers at the MCW, and a comprehensive National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) Report on dosimetry for the MWS. MCW has a singular place in history: the 40 tons (T) of uranium oxide produced at MCW were used by Enrico Fermi on 2 December 1942 to produce the first manmade sustained and controlled nuclear reaction, and the atomic age was born. Seventy-six years later, the authors followed the over 2,500 MCW workers for mortality and reconstructed dose from six sources of exposure: external gamma rays from the radioactive elements in pitchblende; medical x rays from occupationally required chest examinations; intakes of pitchblende (uranium, radium, and silica) measured by urine samples; radon breath analyses and dust surveys overseen by Robley Evans and Merril Eisenbud; occupational exposures received before and after employment at MCW; and cumulative radon concentrations and lung dose from the decay of radium in the work environment. The unique exposure reconstructions allow for multiple evaluations, including estimates of silica dust. The study results are relevant today. For example, NASA is interested that radium, deposited in the brain, releases high-LET alpha particles - the only human analogue, though limited, for high energy, high-Z particles (galactic cosmic rays) traveling through space that might affect astronauts on Mars missions. Don't discount the past; it's the prologue to the future!


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Plantas de Energía Nuclear , Reactores Nucleares , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Guías como Asunto , Humanos
16.
Health Phys ; 112(1): 18-27, 2017 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27906784

RESUMEN

The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) is updating its suite of reference biokinetic models for internally deposited radionuclides. This paper reviews data for nickel and proposes an updated biokinetic model for systemic (absorbed) nickel in adult humans for use in radiation protection. Compared with the ICRP's current model for nickel, the proposed model is based on a larger set of observations of the behavior of nickel in human subjects and laboratory animals and provides a more realistic description of the paths of movement of nickel in the body. For the two most important radioisotopes of nickel, Ni and Ni, the proposed model yields substantially lower dose estimates per unit of activity reaching blood than the current ICRP model.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Cardiovasculares , Níquel/sangre , Níquel/farmacocinética , Radioisótopos/sangre , Radioisótopos/farmacocinética , Administración Oral , Animales , Simulación por Computador , Humanos , Cinética , Tasa de Depuración Metabólica , Ratones , Níquel/administración & dosificación , Radioisótopos/administración & dosificación
17.
Radiat Res ; 166(1 Pt 1): 98-115, 2006 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16808626

RESUMEN

A retrospective cohort mortality study was conducted of workers engaged in nuclear technology development and employed for at least 6 months at Rocketdyne (Atomics International) facilities in California, 1948-1999. Lifetime occupational doses were derived from company records and linkages with national dosimetry data sets. International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) biokinetic models were used to estimate radiation doses to 16 organs or tissues after the intake of radionuclides. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) compared the observed numbers of deaths with those expected in the general population of California. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate dose-response trends over categories of cumulative radiation dose, combining external and internal organ-specific doses. There were 5,801 radiation workers, including 2,232 monitored for radionuclide intakes. The mean dose from external radiation was 13.5 mSv (maximum 1 Sv); the mean lung dose from external and internal radiation combined was 19.0 mSv (maximum 3.6 Sv). Vital status was determined for 97.6% of the workers of whom 25.3% (n = 1,468) had died. The average period of observation was 27.9 years. All cancers taken together (SMR 0.93; 95% CI 0.84-1.02) and all leukemia excluding chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (SMR 1.21; 95% CI 0.69-1.97) were not significantly elevated. No SMR was significantly increased for any cancer or for any other cause of death. The Cox regression analyses revealed no significant dose-response trends for any cancer. For all cancers excluding leukemia, the RR at 100 mSv was estimated as 1.00 (95% CI 0.81-1.24), and for all leukemia excluding CLL it was 1.34 (95% CI 0.73-2.45). The nonsignificant increase in leukemia (excluding CLL) was in accord with expectation from other radiation studies, but a similar nonsignificant increase in CLL (a malignancy not found to be associated with radiation) tempers a causal interpretation. Radiation exposure has not caused a detectable increase in cancer deaths in this population, but results are limited by small numbers and relatively low career doses.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/mortalidad , Reactores Nucleares/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Profesionales/mortalidad , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Radioisótopos/análisis , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
18.
Health Phys ; 90(5): 409-30, 2006 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16607174

RESUMEN

Incomplete radiation exposure histories, inadequate treatment of internally deposited radionuclides, and failure to account for neutron exposures can be important uncertainties in epidemiologic studies of radiation workers. Organ-specific doses from lifetime occupational exposures and radionuclide intakes were estimated for an epidemiologic study of 5,801 Rocketdyne/Atomics International (AI) radiation workers engaged in nuclear technologies between 1948 and 1999. The entire workforce of 46,970 Rocketdyne/AI employees was identified from 35,042 Kardex work histories cards, 26,136 electronic personnel listings, and 14,189 radiation folders containing individual exposure histories. To obtain prior and subsequent occupational exposure information, the roster of all workers was matched against nationwide dosimetry files from the Department of Energy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Landauer dosimetry company, the U.S. Army, and the U.S. Air Force. Dosimetry files of other worker studies were also accessed. Computation of organ doses from radionuclide intakes was complicated by the diversity of bioassay data collected over a 40-y period (urine and fecal samples, lung counts, whole-body counts, nasal smears, and wound and incident reports) and the variety of radionuclides with documented intake including isotopes of uranium, plutonium, americium, calcium, cesium, cerium, zirconium, thorium, polonium, promethium, iodine, zinc, strontium, and hydrogen (tritium). Over 30,000 individual bioassay measurements, recorded on 11 different bioassay forms, were abstracted. The bioassay data were evaluated using ICRP biokinetic models recommended in current or upcoming ICRP documents (modified for one inhaled material to reflect site-specific information) to estimate annual doses for 16 organs or tissues taking into account time of exposure, type of radionuclide, and excretion patterns. Detailed internal exposure scenarios were developed and annual internal doses were derived on a case-by-case basis for workers with committed equivalent doses indicated by screening criteria to be greater than 10 mSv to the organ with the highest internal dose. Overall, 5,801 workers were monitored for radiation at Rocketdyne/AI: 5,743 for external exposure and 2,232 for internal intakes of radionuclides; 41,169 workers were not monitored for radiation. The mean cumulative external dose based on Rocketdyne/AI records alone was 10.0 mSv, and the dose distribution was highly skewed with most workers experiencing low cumulative doses and only a few with high doses (maximum 500 mSv). Only 45 workers received greater than 200 mSv while employed at Rocketdyne/AI. However, nearly 32% (or 1,833) of the Rocketdyne/AI workers had been monitored for radiation at other nuclear facilities and incorporation of these doses increased the mean dose to 13.5 mSv (maximum 1,005 mSv) and the number of workers with >200 mSv to 69. For a small number of workers (n=292), lung doses from internal radionuclide intakes were relatively high (mean 106 mSv; maximum 3,560 mSv) and increased the overall population mean dose to 19.0 mSv and the number of workers with lung dose>200 mSv to 109. Nearly 10% of the radiation workers (584) were monitored for neutron exposures (mean 1.2 mSv) at Rocketdyne/AI, and another 2% were monitored for neutron exposures elsewhere. Interestingly, 1,477 workers not monitored for radiation at Rocketdyne/AI (3.6%) were found to have worn dosimeters at other nuclear facilities (mean external dose of 2.6 mSv, maximum 188 mSv). Without considering all sources of occupational exposure, an incorrect characterization of worker exposure would have occurred with the potential to bias epidemiologic results. For these pioneering workers in the nuclear industry, 26.5% of their total occupational dose (collective dose) was received at other facilities both prior to and after employment at Rocketdyne/AI. In addition, a small number of workers monitored for internal radionuclides contributed disproportionately to the number of workers with high lung doses. Although nearly 12% of radiation workers had been monitored for neutron exposures during their career, the cumulative dose levels were small in comparison with other external and internal exposure. Risk estimates based on nuclear worker data must be interpreted cautiously if internally deposited radionuclides and occupational doses received elsewhere are not considered.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Biológicos , Reactores Nucleares/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Radioisótopos/análisis , Radioisótopos/farmacocinética , Radiometría/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sesgo , Carga Corporal (Radioterapia) , Simulación por Computador , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Especificidad de Órganos , Dosis de Radiación , Efectividad Biológica Relativa , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
Health Phys ; 89(3): 267-73, 2005 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16096502

RESUMEN

Mobilization of uranium (U) from embedded depleted uranium (DU) metal fragments in Gulf War veterans presents a unique exposure scenario for this radioactive and nephrotoxic metal. In a cohort of exposed veterans, urine U concentrations measured every two years since 1993 persistently range from 10 to over 500 times normal levels, indicating that embedded DU fragments give rise to chronic, systemic exposure to U. Health effects of this exposure are not fully known, but clinical surveillance of these soldiers continues in light of animal studies showing that U released from implanted DU pellets results in tissue accumulation of U. The biokinetic model for uranium recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection was used to predict kidney U concentrations and tissue radiation doses in veterans with DU shrapnel based on their urine U excretion. Results suggest that kidney U concentrations in some individuals reached their peak within six years after the war, while in others, concentrations continue to increase and are approaching 1 ppm after 10 y. These results are consistent with urine biomarker tests of renal proximal tubular cell function and cytotoxicity which have shown elevated mean urinary protein excretion indicative of functional effects in veterans with high urine U concentrations (> or =0.10 microg g(-1) creatinine). Predicted lifetime effective radiation dose from DU released to the blood for the highest exposed individual in this cohort was substantially less than the National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP) limit for occupational exposure. These results provide further support for current health protection guidelines for DU, which are based on the metal's chemical rather than its radiological toxicity. In light of the potential for continued accumulation of U in the kidney to concentrations approaching the traditional guidance level of 3 ppm U, these results indicate the need for continued surveillance of this population for evidence of developing renal dysfunction.


Asunto(s)
Riñón/química , Síndrome del Golfo Pérsico/metabolismo , Uranio/orina , Veteranos , Heridas y Lesiones/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/análisis , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Renal , Exposición Profesional , Dosis de Radiación , Factores de Tiempo , Uranio/metabolismo
20.
Health Phys ; 108(2): 206-20, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25551504

RESUMEN

The primary aim of the epidemiologic study of one million U.S. radiation workers and veterans [the Million Worker Study (MWS)] is to provide scientifically valid information on the level of radiation risk when exposures are received gradually over time and not within seconds, as was the case for Japanese atomic bomb survivors. The primary outcome of the epidemiologic study is cancer mortality, but other causes of death such as cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease will be evaluated. The success of the study is tied to the validity of the dose reconstruction approaches to provide realistic estimates of organ-specific radiation absorbed doses that are as accurate and precise as possible and to properly evaluate their accompanying uncertainties. The dosimetry aspects for the MWS are challenging in that they address diverse exposure scenarios for diverse occupational groups being studied over a period of up to 70 y. The dosimetric issues differ among the varied exposed populations that are considered: atomic veterans, U.S. Department of Energy workers exposed to both penetrating radiation and intakes of radionuclides, nuclear power plant workers, medical radiation workers, and industrial radiographers. While a major source of radiation exposure to the study population comes from external gamma- or x-ray sources, for some of the study groups, there is a meaningful component of radionuclide intakes that requires internal radiation dosimetry assessments. Scientific Committee 6-9 has been established by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) to produce a report on the comprehensive organ dose assessment (including uncertainty analysis) for the MWS. The NCRP dosimetry report will cover the specifics of practical dose reconstruction for the ongoing epidemiologic studies with uncertainty analysis discussions and will be a specific application of the guidance provided in NCRP Report Nos. 158, 163, 164, and 171. The main role of the Committee is to provide guidelines to the various groups of dosimetrists involved in the MWS to ensure that certain dosimetry criteria are considered: calculation of annual absorbed doses in the organs of interest, separation of low and high linear-energy transfer components, evaluation of uncertainties, and quality assurance and quality control. It is recognized that the MWS and its approaches to dosimetry are a work in progress and that there will be flexibility and changes in direction as new information is obtained with regard to both dosimetry and the epidemiologic features of the study components. This paper focuses on the description of the various components of the MWS, the available dosimetry results, and the challenges that have been encountered. It is expected that the Committee will complete its report in 2016.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional/análisis , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Astronautas , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Dosimetría por Película , Guías como Asunto , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Industrias , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Plantas de Energía Nuclear , Armas Nucleares , Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía , Radioisótopos/análisis , Radiometría , Estados Unidos , Veteranos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA