Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Circulation ; 104(5): 533-8, 2001 Jul 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11479249

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Our aims were to compare coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and stenting for the treatment of diabetic patients with multivessel coronary disease enrolled in the Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study (ARTS) trial and to determine the costs of these 2 treatment strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n=1205) were randomly assigned to stent implantation (n=600; diabetic, 112) or CABG (n=605; diabetic, 96). Costs per patient were calculated as the product of each patient's use of resources and the corresponding unit costs. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. At 1 year, diabetic patients treated with stenting had the lowest event-free survival rate (63.4%) because of a higher incidence of repeat revascularization compared with both diabetic patients treated with CABG (84.4%, P<0.001) and nondiabetic patients treated with stents (76.2%, P=0.04). Conversely, diabetic and nondiabetic patients experienced similar 1-year event-free survival rates when treated with CABG (84.4% and 88.4%). The total 1-year costs for stenting and CABG in diabetic patients were $12 855 and $16 585 (P<0.001) and in the nondiabetic groups, $10 164 for stenting and $13 082 for surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel diabetic patients treated with stenting had a worse 1-year outcome than patients assigned to CABG or nondiabetics treated with stenting. The strategy of stenting was less costly than CABG, however, regardless of diabetic status.


Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad Coronaria/cirugía , Complicaciones de la Diabetes , Stents , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/etiología , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/economía , Enfermedad Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad Coronaria/terapia , Vasos Coronarios/patología , Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Revascularización Miocárdica , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Stents/efectos adversos , Stents/economía , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Am J Cardiol ; 86(4): 385-9, 2000 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10946029

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of elective stenting with heparin-coated Wiktor stents in patients with coronary artery disease. In experimental studies, heparin coating has been shown to prevent subacute thrombosis and restenosis. Recently, a new method of heparin coating was developed, resulting in a more stable and predictable heparin layer on stent devices. This trial constitutes the first in-human use of this coating procedure, applied on the well-known Wiktor stent device. Heparin-coated Wiktor stent implantation was performed in 132 consecutive patients (132 lesions) in a multicenter international trial from September 1996 to February 1997. Forty-three percent of patients had unstable angina, 33% had previous myocardial infarction, and 10% had diabetes mellitus. Patients were followed for 12 months for occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events, and 96% of the eligible patients underwent quantitative angiographic control at 6 months. Stent deployment was successful in 95.5% of lesions. Minimal lumen diameter increased by 1.67 +/- 0.48 mm (from 1.02 +/- 0.38 mm before to 2.69 +/- 0.37 mm after the stent implantation). Mean percent diameter stenosis decreased from 67.4 +/- 11.3% before to 18.9 +/- 7.7% after the intervention. A successful intervention (<50% diameter stenosis and no major adverse cardiac events within 30 days) occurred in 97% of the patients. The subacute thrombosis rate was 0.8%, which compares favorably with historical controls of this stent, and a low incidence of postprocedural increase in creatine kinase-MB was noted. At 6 months, event-free survival was 85% and angiographic restenosis rate was 22% with late loss of 0.78 +/- 0.69 mm and a loss index of 0.48 +/- 0.44. Heparin-coated Wiktor stents appeared to be an efficacious device to treat Benestent-like lesions, yielding angiographic and clinical results comparable to a heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz stent. Despite its use in more complex lesions, the incidence of subacute thrombosis appeared to be lower than historical controls with a similar noncoated stent.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Enfermedad Coronaria/terapia , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Stents , Trombosis/prevención & control , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Angiografía Coronaria , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación , Stents/efectos adversos
3.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 54(3): 276-82, 2001 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11747149

RESUMEN

The objectives of the Race Car study were to assess the safety and efficacy of the Medtronic AVE S670 stent, a new-generation stent with a modular design consisting of interconnected sinusoidal rings allowing improved flexibility with good conformability and scaffolding. A total of 285 stents were implanted in 267 patients with (un)stable angina pectoris who underwent angioplasty of a single de novo lesion in a native coronary artery with a diameter between 3.0 and 4.0 mm. Available stent lengths were 9, 12, and 15 mm. The primary endpoint was the 6-month restenosis rate. Secondary endpoints were device and procedural success and major adverse cardiac event (MACE)-free survival at 1 and 6 months. All patients received the study stents and no other stents were used (angiographic success: 100%). Eight patients experienced a MACE during hospital admission (Q-wave MI in 2, non-Q-wave MI in 4, TLR in 2). A procedural success was obtained in 97% of the patients. There were no additional events at 1 month. The clinical endpoints encountered at 6 months were Q-wave MI in 1, bypass surgery in 3, and repeat angioplasty in 25 (MACE-free survival: 86.5%). Quantitative angiographic results were the minimum lumen diameter increased from 1.05 +/- 0.32 before to 2.73 +/- 0.39 mm after stent implantation. At follow-up, the loss in diameter was 0.74 +/- 0.50 mm. The loss index was 0.45 +/- 0.31 and restenosis rate was 13.4%. This study has demonstrated that the S670 stent in patients with (un)stable angina pectoris requiring intervention of a single lesion has a low acute and 6-month major event rate and a low angiographic restenosis rate.


Asunto(s)
Angina de Pecho/diagnóstico por imagen , Angina de Pecho/cirugía , Angiografía Coronaria , Stents , Anciano , Angina de Pecho/complicaciones , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Angiografía Coronaria/instrumentación , Estenosis Coronaria/complicaciones , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Coronaria/cirugía , Electrocardiografía , Diseño de Equipo , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA