Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol ; 18(5): e220-e226, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34180586

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND:  Advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC) is a highly aggressive malignancy, with a 5-year overall survival of < 10%. Although preliminary evidence suggests a role of targeted treatments or immunotherapy in a subset of patients, chemotherapy remains the standard second-line treatment in the majority. We conducted a pilot study of second-line chemotherapy with capecitabine and nab-paclitaxel after failure of gemcitabine and platinum. METHODS: Eligible patients had histologically proven, unresectable biliary tract cancer, which had progressed on a gemcitabine/platinum doublet. In this single-arm, multicenter trial, all patients received capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bd PO D1-14 q21d) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2 IV D1,8 q21d) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was feasibility of delivering the proposed regimen, with secondary objectives of disease control measures and QOL outcomes. RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled between 2015 and 2016 from four cancer centers in NSW. Treatment was generally well tolerated with grade III toxicities in five patients (including infection, cholangitis, obstruction, and intestinal perforation) and no grade IV toxicity. Median treatment duration was 4.3 months, with a disease control rate of 80% (8/10), and median progression-free and overall survival of 5.7 and 12.1 months, respectively. Quality of life data and specimens for translational research have been collected. CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study demonstrates that combination of capecitabine and nab-paclitaxel is feasible as a second-line treatment in ABTC. Adequate safety and promising early efficacy signals make further assessment of the combination in a formal phase II or III trial reasonable. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: ACTRN12615000504516.


Asunto(s)
Albúminas/uso terapéutico , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Capecitabina/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Platino (Metal) , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Gemcitabina
2.
Lancet ; 376(9757): 2009-17, 2010 Dec 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21131038

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although survival of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia has improved greatly in the past two decades, the outcome of those who relapse has remained static. We investigated the outcome of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia who relapsed on present therapeutic regimens. METHODS: This open-label randomised trial was undertaken in 22 centres in the UK and Ireland and nine in Australia and New Zealand. Patients aged 1-18 years with first relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia were stratified into high-risk, intermediate-risk, and standard-risk groups on the basis of duration of first complete remission, site of relapse, and immunophenotype. All patients were allocated to receive either idarubicin or mitoxantrone in induction by stratified concealed randomisation. Neither patients nor those giving interventions were masked. After three blocks of therapy, all high-risk group patients and those from the intermediate group with postinduction high minimal residual disease (≥10(-4) cells) received an allogenic stem-cell transplant. Standard-risk and intermediate-risk patients with postinduction low minimal residual disease (<10(-4) cells) continued chemotherapy. The primary outcome was progression-free survival and the method of analysis was intention-to-treat. Randomisation was stopped in December, 2007 because of differences in progression-free and overall survival between the two groups. This trial is registered, reference number ISCRTN45724312. FINDINGS: Of 239 registered patients, 216 were randomly assigned to either idarubicin (109 analysed) or mitoxantrone (103 analysed). Estimated 3-year progression-free survival was 35·9% (95% CI 25·9-45·9) in the idarubicin group versus 64·6% (54·2-73·2) in the mitoxantrone group (p=0·0004), and 3-year overall survival was 45·2% (34·5-55·3) versus 69·0% (58·5-77·3; p=0·004). Differences in progression-free survival between groups were mainly related to a decrease in disease events (progression, second relapse, disease-related deaths; HR 0·56, 0·34-0·92, p=0·007) rather than an increase in adverse treatment effects (treatment death, second malignancy; HR 0·52, 0·24-1·11, p=0·11). INTERPRETATION: As compared with idarubicin, mitoxantrone conferred a significant benefit in progression-free and overall survival in children with relapsed acute lymphobastic leukaemia, a potentially useful clinical finding that warrants further investigation. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research, Cancer Council NSW, and Sporting Chance Cancer Foundation.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Idarrubicina/uso terapéutico , Mitoxantrona/uso terapéutico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Asparaginasa/administración & dosificación , Niño , Preescolar , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Citarabina/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Mercaptopurina/administración & dosificación , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido , Vidarabina/administración & dosificación , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Vincristina/administración & dosificación
3.
J Clin Invest ; 119(7): 1964-73, 2009 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19509471

RESUMEN

l-Asparaginase is a key therapeutic agent for treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). There is wide individual variation in pharmacokinetics, and little is known about its metabolism. The mechanisms of therapeutic failure with l-asparaginase remain speculative. Here, we now report that 2 lysosomal cysteine proteases present in lymphoblasts are able to degrade l-asparaginase. Cathepsin B (CTSB), which is produced constitutively by normal and leukemic cells, degraded asparaginase produced by Escherichia coli (ASNase) and Erwinia chrysanthemi. Asparaginyl endopeptidase (AEP), which is overexpressed predominantly in high-risk subsets of ALL, specifically degraded ASNase. AEP thereby destroys ASNase activity and may also potentiate antigen processing, leading to allergic reactions. Using AEP-mediated cleavage sequences, we modeled the effects of the protease on ASNase and created a number of recombinant ASNase products. The N24 residue on the flexible active loop was identified as the primary AEP cleavage site. Sole modification at this site rendered ASNase resistant to AEP cleavage and suggested a key role for the flexible active loop in determining ASNase activity. We therefore propose what we believe to be a novel mechanism of drug resistance to ASNase. Our results may help to identify alternative therapeutic strategies with the potential of further improving outcome in childhood ALL.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/metabolismo , Asparaginasa/metabolismo , Catepsina B/fisiología , Cisteína Endopeptidasas/fisiología , Linfocitos/enzimología , Lisosomas/enzimología , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Asparaginasa/uso terapéutico , Línea Celular , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA