Tranexamic acid reduces the need for allogenic red blood cell transfusions in patients undergoing total hip replacement.

PURPOSE: This prospective randomized double-blind trial evaluates the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TA) to decrease blood losses and red blood cell transfusions in patients undergoing primary unilateral total hip replacement (THR). METHODS: Forty ASA class I to III patients received either iv TA 10 mg.kg(-1) bolus before surgery plus a 1 mg.kg(-1).hr(-1) infusion until wound closure (Group TA) or a placebo (Group P). Red blood cell transfusions were administered according to a standardized protocol. RESULTS: One patient of Group P was excluded because of an erroneous diagnosis at enrollment. Total measured blood losses (Group TA: 1308 +/- 462 mL vs Group P: 1469 +/- 405 mL), preoperative hemoglobin levels (Group TA: 130.4 +/- 12.5 g.L(-1) vs Group P: 131.4 +/- 12.8 vs g.L(-1)), and seven-day postoperative hemoglobin values (Group TA: 97.8 +/- 11.8 g.L(-1) vs Group P: 102.9 +/- 12.2 g.L(-1)) were similar. Autologous whole blood was available in five patients of Group P and seven patients of Group TA. Fewer patients in Group TA required red blood cells (Group TA: 6/20 vs Group P: 13/19; P = 0.026) and allogenic red blood cell transfusions (Group TA: 0/20 vs Group P: 8/19; P = 0.0012). The median number of transfused unit per patient was also significantly less in patients of Group TA (0 unit) than in Group P (2 units; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: TA did not change measured blood losses but reduced red blood cell transfusion requirements in patients undergoing primary unilateral THR.

The number of injections does not influence local anesthetic absorption after paravertebral blockade.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study are to determine if the injection of a single large dose of local anesthetics into the paravertebral space increases the risks of inducing toxicity compared with multiple small injections and to describe ropivacaine plasma concentrations resulting from paravertebral blockade. METHODS: Paravertebral blockade was performed using a solution of 10 mL ropivacaine 0.75%, 10 mL lidocaine CO2 2% plus 0.1 mL epinephrine 1:1000 either by a single injection at T3 or T4 (Group S, n = 6) or by five injections of 4 mL each at T2 to T6 (Group M, n = 8). Blood samples were taken at zero, five, ten, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min and at two, three, four, five, six and eight hours. Ropivacaine and lidocaine plasma concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Maximal plasma concentrations were comparable for lidocaine: 2.6 +/- 1.3 (S) vs 2.6 +/- 0.8 microg x mL(-1) (M) and for ropivacaine: 1.3 +/- 0.2 (S) vs 1.3 +/- 0.1 microg x mL(-1) (M). Area under the plasma concentration-time curve was higher in Group M for lidocaine: 577.6 +/- 146.1 vs 401.7 +/- 53.2 mg x min(-1) x mL(-1) (P = 0.04) but similar for ropivacaine: 381.1 +/- 95.4 (M) vs 363.1 +/- 85.3 mg x min(-1) x L(-1) (S). CONCLUSIONS: The injection of a single large bolus of local anesthetics into the paravertebral space does not increase its absorption. Maximal ropivacaine plasma concentrations resulting from paravertebral blockade are similar to those reported with equivalent doses of bupivacaine.