Switching from a biological therapy to another biologic agent in psoriatic patients: the experience of PsOMarche group.

BACKGROUND: Switching is a "hot" topic and the main reasons for switching prior biologic agent are for a primary failure, a secondary failure or drug intolerance, patient's dissatisfaction, physician decision. The aim of the study was to assess the optimization of the switching from a biologic agent to another. METHODS: Five Dermatological Units have participated to PsOMarche working group have studied thirty-eight patients affected moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis at time 0 (patient recruitment at time of switching from biological therapy to another), 8 weeks (T8), 16 weeks (T16). RESULTS: Twenty-eight males and 10 females were included in the study. At T0, 18 of 22 patients treated with etanercept had been switched to adalimumab and 4 to ustekinumab. Among 10 patients treated with adalimumab, 5 had been switched to ustekinumab, 2 to golimumab and 3 to certolizumab pegol. One patient treated with Infliximab and 5 patients treated with ustekinumab had been switched to adalimumab. Switching had been performed for primary inefficacy in 9 patients (23.6%) and a secondary failure was evidenced in 29 patients (73.4%). PASI75 was achieved in 53% and in 89.4% of patients after 8 weeks and 16 weeks of switching to the second biologic agent respectively; similarly, PsoDISK score significantly decreased at T8 and T16. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of PsOMarche group have shown that the switching to a biologic agent to another is a valuable treatment choice in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis experiencing a treatment failure with one biologic therapy, leading to a good improvement in skin disease and in patient's quality of life.

The transitioning from conventional therapy to biological treatment in psoriatic patients: STRATOS, a project of Marche Region.

BACKGROUND: STRATOS is the acronym of the "STRuctured Approach to the Treatment of psOriatic patientS". The optimization of the psoriasis's therapeutic management is one of the most important goals for dermatologists. According to Mrowietz's consensus report, the transitioning from conventional therapy to biological therapy is mainly due to the lack/loss of efficacy and/or for safety reasons. The aim of the manuscript was to describe the principal results obtained by the Dermatologic Clinic of Polytechnic University of Marche Region and the Units of Dermatology of the Marche Region applying, in our regional reality, Mrowietz's protocol for the daily management of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis have been monitored during the six-months study period. RESULTS: Psoriatic patients with diabetes showed further concomitant comorbidities compared to non-diabetics, as hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. Moreover, based on WHO classification, overweight was diagnosed in female patients, whereas obesity was prevalent in male patients. This aspect confirms the strict link between the multifaceted aspects of psoriatic patient which is primarily related to the persistent low-grade inflammation. In our psoriatic group, 10% of monitored patients were affected by Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis. CONCLUSIONS: The Mrowietz's transitioning protocol is a useful, reliable and feasible tool to manage the therapeutic iter of psoriatic patients in an Italian clinical setting also at regional level.