How to dose-stage large or high-risk brain metastases: an alternative two-fraction radiosurgical treatment approach.

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to evaluate clinical outcome in patients with large, high-risk brain metastases (BMs) treated with different dose strategies by use of two-fraction dose-staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed with data from 142 patients from two centers who had been treated with two-fraction dose-staged GKRS between June 2015 and January 2020. Depending on the changes in marginal dose between the first (GKRS1) and second (GKRS2) GKRS treatments, the study population was divided into three treatment groups: dose escalation, dose maintenance, and dose de-escalation. RESULTS: The 142 study patients underwent two-fraction dose-staged GKRS treatments for 166 large, high-risk BMs. The median tumor volume of 7.4 cm3 decreased significantly from GKRS1 to GKRS2 (4.4 cm3; p < 0.001), and to the last follow-up (1.8 cm3; p < 0.001). These significant differences in BM volume reduction were achieved in all three treatment groups. However, differences according to the primary tumor histology were apparent: while dose maintenance seemed to be the most effective treatment strategy for BMs from lung cancer or melanoma, dose escalation was the most beneficial treatment option for BMs from breast, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary cancer. Of note, the vast majority of patients who underwent dose-staged BM treatment did not show any significant postradiosurgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with large, high-risk BMs, dose-staged GKRS treatment represents an effective local treatment method with acceptable complication risks. Different dose-strategy options are available that may be chosen according to the primary tumor histology and treatment volume but may also be tailored to the findings at GKRS2.

A Clinical Case of 5 Times Irradiated Recurrent Orbital Hemangiopericytoma.

Orbital hemangiopericytomas (HPCs) are rare mesenchymal tumors with a high tendency to recur. Treatment options are quite limited in case of a relapse, but re-irradiation can be useful. Most of the available data limit the possibility of re-irradiation, while novel techniques (e.g., pencil beam proton therapy [PT]) open new approaches for the safe repeating of treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first well-documented case of multi-times (>3) irradiation of tumors located intracranially. The case reported here describes orbital HPCs with proton irradiation performed two times since 1999 in a 30-year-old woman with a medical history as well as surgery followed by conventional radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy, and two times stereotactic RT (in 2009 and 2013). In 2016 the patient came to our hospital with the 3rd relapse of the tumor, located in the left orbit, with an intracranial part, involving cavernous sinus, which was close to the temporal lobe. The 4th course of irradiation was done in May to June 2016 by pencil beam PT. Radiation necrosis occurred after 2 years and was treated with bevacizumab (BVZ). Three years later, another relapse was treated with PT and BVZ. The 9-month follow-up showed complete tumor response without signs of brain toxicity. The patient died due to a brain abscess 1 year after the 5th irradiation. This case shows a possibility of irradiation, applied 5 times to the same location, with promising results and manageable toxicity.

Proton re-irradiation of unresectable recurrent brain gliomas: clinical outcomes and toxicity.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and tolerance of proton re-irradiation in patients with unresectable recurrence of previously irradiated brain gliomas. METHODS: Between February 2016 and December 2019, 44 patients with in-field recurrence after prior irradiation of brain gliomas were irradiated with intensity-modulated proton therapy. Seven patients (15.9%) originally had low-grade (WHO grade I-II) gliomas, nine patients (20.4%) had anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO grade III), and 28 patients (63.7%) had glioblastoma (WHO grade IV). All tumors were unresectable due to their localization. After a median time from the prior irradiation of 28.0 months [range, 12 to 173], patients received PT with 2.0 and 3.0 GyRBE per fraction, with median proton EQD2 (/=10) to a tumor of 55.0 GyRBE [range, 46.0 to 61.75]. Adjuvant chemotherapy (Temozolomide, or Procarbazine, Lomustine and vincristine, or Bevacizumab with Irinotecan) received 86.9% of the patients (n=40). Treatment-related toxicity was reported following CTCAE. RESULTS: The median survival time was 12 months, with 1-year and 2-years overall survival (OS) amounting to 49.6% and 35.1%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9 months, with 1- and 2-years PFS of 30.5% and 10.2%, respectively. Twenty-six patients died by the time of analysis; among them were 5 non-cancer deaths (19.2%), and 4 patients (15.4%) died of chemotherapy-associated severe toxicity. The incidence rate of radiation-induced necrosis was 6.8% (3 events). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, we suggest re-irradiation of recurrent brain gliomas with proton therapy is able to achieve reasonable tumor control. Low adverse events rate and promising outcomes make it a safe treatment option with curative intent, even in unresectable cases.

Proton therapy with a fixed beamline for skull-base chordomas and chondrosarcomas: outcomes and toxicity.

AIM: This study presents an analysis (efficacy and toxicity) of outcomes in patients with skull-base chordomas or chondrosarcomas treated with a fixed horizontal pencil proton beam. BACKGROUND: Chordomas (CAs) and chondrosarcomas (CSAs) are rare tumours that are usually located near the base of the skull and very close to the brain's most critical structures. Proton therapy (PT) is often considered the best radiation treatment for these diseases, but it is still a limited resource. Active scanning PT delivered via a fixed pencil beamline might be a promising option. METHODS: This is a single-centre experience describing the results of proton therapy for 31 patients with CA (n = 23) or CSA (n = 8) located near the base of the skull. Proton therapy was utilized by a fixed pencil beamline with a chair to position the patient between May 2016 and November 2020. Ten patients underwent resection (32.2%), 15 patients (48.4%) underwent R2 resection, and 6 patients had unresectable tumours (19.4%). In 4 cases, the tumours had been previously irradiated. The median PT dose was 70 GyRBE (relative biological efficacy, 1.1) [range, 60 to 74] with 2.0 GyRBE per fraction. The mean GTV volume was 25.6 cm3 [range, 4.2-115.6]. Patient demographics, pathology, treatment parameters, and toxicity were collected and analysed. Radiation-induced reactions were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.0. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 21 months [range, 4 to 52]. The median overall survival (OS) was 40 months. The 1- and 2-year OS was 100%, and the 3-year OS was 66.3%. Four patients died due to non-cancer-related reasons, 1 patient died due to tumour progression, and 1 patient died due to treatment-related injuries. The 1-year local control (LC) rate was 100%, the 2-year LC rate was 93.7%, and the 3-year LC rate was 85.3%. Two patients with CSA exhibited progression in the neck lymph nodes and lungs. All patients tolerated PT well without any treatment interruptions. We observed 2 cases of ≥ grade 3 toxicity, with 1 case of grade 3 myelitis and 1 case of grade 5 brainstem injury. CONCLUSION: Treatment with a fixed proton beam shows promising disease control and an acceptable toxicity rate, even the difficult-to-treat subpopulation of patients with skull-base chordomas or chondrosarcomas requiring dose escalation.