Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Br J Sports Med ; 48(19): 1458, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25213605

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: Can transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), as a patient controlled adjunct to primary care management for tennis elbow, provide superior pain relief to primary care management alone. SUMMARY ANSWER: TENS conferred no additional clinical benefit over primary care management consisting of information and advice on analgesia and exercise for patients with tennis elbow, probably partly owing to poor adherence to treatment recommendations. WHAT IS KNOWN AND WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: A need exists for safe, self administered interventions to provide pain relief for patients with tennis elbow. TENS as an adjunct to primary care management failed to show any additional pain relief compared with primary care management alone.

2.
Br J Gen Pract ; 52(476): 214-6, 2002 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12030665

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between retinopathy and the levels of diabetic control found in type 2 non-insulin dependent diabetic patients. The study covered a four-year period and used retrospective, routinely recorded general practice and optometry records from 260 patients; those with retinopathy (n = 38) and those without retinopathy (n = 222). The study demonstrated a strong relationship between the presence of retinopathy and long-term diabetic control as measured by glycosylated HbA1c, disease duration and, to a lesser extent, the level of urine microalbumin. Blood pressure, cholesterol, body-mass index, and smoking status showed little association with the presence of retinopathy. We conclude that retinopathy, assessed by community optometrists, is a significant correlate of poor diabetic control.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Retinopatía Diabética/prevención & control , Hemoglobina Glucada/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/patología , Retinopatía Diabética/sangre , Retinopatía Diabética/patología , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
BMJ ; 347: f5160, 2013 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23999980

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of supplementing information and advice on analgesia and exercise from a general practitioner with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) as a non-drug form of analgesia to reduce pain intensity in patients with tennis elbow. DESIGN: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care. SETTING AND: 38 general practices in the West Midlands, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 241 adults consulting with a first or new (no consultation in previous six months) clinical diagnosis of tennis elbow. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly allocated to either primary care management alone, consisting of a consultation with a general practitioner followed by information and advice on exercises, or primary care management plus TENS to be used once a day for 45 minutes over six weeks (or until symptom resolution) for pain relief. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was self reported intensity of elbow pain (0-10 rating scale) at six weeks. Primary and secondary outcomes were measured at baseline and at six weeks, six months, and 12 months by postal questionnaire. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: 121 participants were randomised to primary care management plus TENS and 120 to primary care management only (first episode, n=197 (82%); duration <1-3 months, n=138 (57%)). Adherence to exercise and TENS recommendations reported at six weeks was low; only 42 participants in the primary care management plus TENS group met a priori defined adherence criteria. Both intervention groups showed large improvements in pain and secondary outcomes, especially during the first six weeks of follow-up. However, no clinically or statistically significant differences were seen between groups at any follow-up timepoint. At the primary endpoint (six weeks), the between group difference in improvement of pain was -0.33 (95% confidence interval -0.96 to 0.31; P=0.31) in favour of the primary care management only group, with adjustment for age, sex, and baseline pain score. CONCLUSIONS: This trial does not provide evidence for additional benefit of TENS as an adjunct to primary care management of tennis elbow. Poor adherence to interventions is evidence of the challenges of implementing self management treatment strategies in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN87141084.


Asunto(s)
Artralgia , Cooperación del Paciente , Codo de Tenista , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/métodos , Adulto , Artralgia/diagnóstico , Artralgia/etiología , Artralgia/terapia , Terapia por Ejercicio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Autocuidado/psicología , Codo de Tenista/complicaciones , Codo de Tenista/psicología , Codo de Tenista/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA